Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2020, Vol. 52 Issue (3) : 371-385     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00371
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude
RAN Yaxuan1,LIU Jiani1,ZHANG Yishi2(),WEI Haiying3
1 School of Business Administration, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
2 School of Management, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan 430070, China
3 School of Management, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China
Download: PDF(1501 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The use of celebrity endorsements in advertising is quietly pervasive. One brand can be endorsed by either one celebrity or multiple celebrities. Notably, it is more and more common nowadays that a single brand harnesses multiple celebrity endorsers in its advertisement to potentially attract more consumers. Literature on consumer psychology has mainly studied the context of a single celebrity endorsing a single brand, suggesting that source characteristics, such as familiarity, expertise, trustworthiness and attractiveness of the endorser, can affect consumer response and attitudes. A growing of recent studies have investigated the context of a single celebrity endorsing multiple brands, while surprisingly very few studies have examined whether one brand should be endorsed by either one person or multiple people. In the current research, we extend the extent literature by examining how consumer respond to celebrity advertising endorsed by either one person or multiple people.
Consumers can build their relationship with a brand through the celebrity endorsers. In this vein, the number of endorsers (one celebrity versus multiple celebrities) can influence consumer attitudes via their feelings of connecting with the brand. Based on the image transference perspective, the celebrity’s traits could be transferred to the brand’s perceived traits. Thus, when a brand is endorsed by one person (multiple people), this brand is perceived to hold one identity (multiple identities). According to person-positivity bias, we postulate that one endorser (versus multiple endorsers) can enhance consumers’ connected feelings with the brand, then in turn increase consumers’ positive brand attitude. And this effect is only constraint for status-signaling products. Although the main hypothesis seems straightforward, there are constraints on its applicability. If the associations between the number of endorsers and self-brand connection are attenuated, the effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude should be suppressed. That is, when multiple endorsers look like a whole (e.g., a team), the main effect would be reversed, such that multiple endorsers with wholeness characteristics elicit higher brand attitude than one endorser.
One pilot study and four studies were conducted to examine our hypotheses. Pilot study (n = 53) examined that the basic hypothesis of trait transference, such that the brand endorsed by one person (multiple people) would be perceived to hold one identity (multiple identities). Experiment 1 (n = 199) investigated the main effect and the mediating role of self-brand connection. Experiment 2 (n = 245) used a moderation-of-process approach to further validate the mediation of self-brand connection. Experiment 3 (n = 158) examined that the effect is constraint when the product is characterized as status-signaling, while targeting and eliminating possible alternative explanations. Experiment 4 (n = 92) identified the moderating effect of when multiple endorsers look like a whole and provide replication of the main effect. To document a robust effect, we varied the context of advertising and the endorsers across four studies.
Our investigation suggests that consumer facing a brand endorsed by one celebrity have greater brand attitude than those facing a brand endorsed by multiple celebrities. Specifically, compared to multiple endorsers, one endorser can enhance consumers’ feeling of connecting with the brand, which in turn increase brand attitudes. For non-status-signaling products, the relative difference between one endorser and multiple endorsers would be attenuated. At the same time, there are qualifications on these effects. When multiple endorsers are a whole, the superior of one endorser would be reversed. These findings offer novel insights on endorsing, number of people, and self-brand connection, while suggesting that companies must carefully consider the number of celebrities in the wake of considering the appropriate endorsement.

Keywords brand endorsement      number of people      self-brand connection      image transference perspective      person-positivity bias     
ZTFLH:  B849: F713.55  
Corresponding Authors: Yishi ZHANG     E-mail: yszhang@whut.edu.cn
Issue Date: 18 January 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Yaxuan RAN
Jiani LIU
Yishi ZHANG
Haiying WEI
Cite this article:   
Yaxuan RAN,Jiani LIU,Yishi ZHANG, et al. The magic of one person: The effect of the number of endorsers on brand attitude[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 371-385.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00371     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2020/V52/I3/371
品牌 风格专一性 风格多元性 适合某一类人 适合不同的人 代表人格数量
TP Shop (五人) 3.75 (1.25) 5.00 (1.33) 4.13 (1.29) 5.68 (0.94) 4.96 (1.21)
Caring More (两人) 2.83 (1.07) 5.13 (0.92) 4.42 (1.35) 5.02 (1.19) 5.32 (0.95)
J. Estina (单人) 4.66 (1.37) 3.45 (1.31) 5.13 (1.08) 3.79 (1.36) 3.53 (1.23)
TeWise (单人) 5.66 (1.04) 2.75 (1.16) 5.96 (1.00) 3.15 (1.34) 2.47 (1.28)
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
[1] Aron A., Aron E. N., & Smollan D . (1992). Inclusion of other in the self scale and the structure of interpersonal closeness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 596-612.
[2] Barasch A., & Berger J . (2014). Broadcasting and narrowcasting: How audience size affects what people share. Journal of Marketing Research, 51(3), 286-299.
[3] Bartz S., Molchanov A., & Stork P. A . (2013). When a celebrity endorser is disgraced: A twenty-five-year event study. Marketing Letters, 24(2), 131-141.
[4] Chaplin L. N., & John D. R . (2005). The development of self-brand connections in children and adolescents. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(1), 119-129.
[5] Chen A. C.-H., Chang R. Y.-H., Besherat A., & Baack D. W . (2013). Who benefits from multiple brand celebrity endorsements? An experimental investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 30(10), 850-860.
[6] Cheng S. Y. Y., White T. B., & Lan N. C . (2012). The effects of self-brand connections on responses to brand failure: A new look at the consumer-brand relationship. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 280-288.
[7] Choi S. M., & Rifon N. J . (2012). It is a match: The impact of congruence between celebrity image and consumer ideal self on endorsement effectiveness. Psychology & Marketing, 29(9), 639-650.
[8] Critcher C. R., & Dunning D . (2013). Predicting persons’ versus a person’s goodness: Behavioral forecasts diverge for individuals versus populations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 28-44.
[9] Critcher C. R., & Dunning D . (2014). Thinking about others versus another: Three reasons judgments about collectives and individuals differ. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(12), 687-698.
[10] Cunha M., Forehand M. R., & Angle J. W . (2015). Riding coattails: When co-branding helps versus hurts less-known brands. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(5), 1284-1300.
[11] Elberse A., & Verleun J . (2012). The economic value of celebrity endorsements. Journal of Advertising Research, 52(2), 149-165.
[12] Escalas J. E . (2004). Narrative processing: Building consumer connections to brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1-2), 168-179.
[13] Escalas J. E., & Bettman J. R . (2017). Connecting with celebrities: How consumers appropriate celebrity meanings for a sense of belonging. Journal of Advertising, 46(2), 297-308.
[14] Evers E. R. K., Inbar Y., & Zeelenberg M . (2014). Set-fit effects in choice. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 504-509.
[15] Faul F., Erdfelder E., Buchner A., & Lang A.-G . (2009). Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behavior Research Methods, 41(4), 1149-1160.
[16] Galak J., Small D. A., & Stephen A. T . (2011). Micro-finance decision making: A field study of prosocial lending. Journal of Marketing Research, 48(Special Issue), S130-S137.
[17] Gao H. C., Winterich K. P., & Zhang Y. L . (2016). All that glitters is not gold: How others’ status influences the effect of power distance belief on status consumption. Journal of Consumer Reserach, 43(2), 265-281.
[18] Halevy N., Chou E. Y., Cohen T. R., & Livingston R. W . (2011). Status conferral in intergroup social dilemmas: Behavioral antecedents and consequences of prestige and dominance. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 102(2), 351-366.
[19] Hamilton D. L., & Sherman S. J . (1996). Perceiving persons and groups. Psychological Review, 103(2), 336-355.
[20] Handriana T., & Wisandiko W. R . (2017). Consumer attitudes toward advertisement and brand, based on the number of endorsers and product involvement: An experimental study. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 19(3), 289-306.
[21] Hayes A. F., & Preacher K. J . (2014). Statistical mediation analysis with a multicategorical independent variable. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 67(3), 451-470.
[22] Huang M. X., Yao S. Y., & Liu M. H . (2018). Self-enhancing or self-deprecating: How can celebrity endorsement enhance the marketing effectiveness of advertisements in social media. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(8), 907-919.
[22] [ 黄敏学, 姚舜禹, 刘茂红 . (2018). 自强还是自嘲? 名人代言如何提升社会化媒体广告的营销效果. 心理学报, 50(8), 907-919.]
[23] Huber F., Meyer F., Vogel J., Weihrauch A., & Hamprecht J . (2013). Endorser age and stereotypes: Consequences on brand age. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 207-215.
[24] Ilicic J., & Webster C. M . (2013). Celebrity co-branding partners as irrelevant brand information in advertisements. Journal of Business Research, 66(7), 941-947.
[25] Insko C. A., Schopler J., Hoyle R. H., Dardis G. J., & Graetz K. A . (1990). Individual-group discontinuity as a function of fear and greed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(1), 68-79.
[26] Iyengar S., Jackman S., Messing S., Valentino N., Aalberg T., Duch R., .. Kobayashi T . (2013). Do attitudes about immigration predict willingness to admit individual immigrants? A cross-national test of the person-positivity bias. Public Opinion Quarterly, 77(3), 641-665.
[27] Köhler W . (1970). Gestalt psychology: An introduction to new concepts in modern psychology. New York: Liveright Publishing Corporation.
[28] Lafferty B. A., Goldsmith R. E., & Newell S. J . (2002). The dual credibility model: The influence of corporate and endorser credibility on attitudes and purchase intentions. Journal of Marketing Theory & Practice, 10(3), 1-12.
[29] Louie T. A., & Obermiller C . (2002). Consumer response to a firm’s endorser (dis)association decisions. Journal of Advertising, 31(4), 41-52.
[30] Miller F. M., & Allen C. T . (2012). How does celebrity meaning transfer? Investigating the process of meaning transfer with celebrity affiliates and mature brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(3), 443-452.
[31] Mishra H., Mishra A., & Nayakankuppam D . (2006). Money: A bias for the whole. Journal of Consumer Research, 32(4), 541-549.
[32] Newheiser A. K., Sawaoka T., & Dovidio J. F . (2012). Why do we punish groups? High entitativity promotes moral suspicion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(4), 931-936.
[33] Niculescu M., Payne C. R., & Krishnan V . (2013). One-to-one and one-to-many business relationship marketing: Toward a theoretical framework. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 20(2), 51-64.
[34] Otterbring T., Ringler C., Sirianni N. J., & Gustafsson A . (2018). The Abercrombie & Fitch effect: The impact of physical dominance on male customers’ status-signaling consumption. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(1), 69-79.
[35] Packard G., Moore S. G., & McFerran B . (2018). (I'm) happy to help (you): The impact of personal pronoun use in customer-firm interactions. Journal of Marketing Research, 55(4), 541-555.
[36] Park C. W., Eisingerich A. B., & Park J. W . (2013). Attachment-aversion (aa) model of customer-brand relationships. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(2), 229-248.
[37] Park C. W., Jaworski B. J., & Maclnnis D. J . (1986). Strategic brand concept-image management. Journal of Marketing, 50(4), 135-145.
[38] Park C. W., MacInnis D. J., Priester J., Eisingerich A. B., & Iacobucci D . (2010). Brand attachment and brand attitude strength: Conceptual and empirical differentiation of two critical brand equity drivers. Journal of Marketing, 74(6), 1-17.
[39] Petty R. E., Cacioppo J. T., & Schumann D . (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10(2), 135-146.
[40] Preacher K. J., & Hayes A. F . (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40(3), 879-891.
[41] Rice D. H., Kelting K., & Lutz R. J . (2012). Multiple endorsers and multiple endorsements: The influence of message repetition, source congruence and involvement on brand attitudes. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22(2), 249-259.
[42] Saleem F . (2007). Effect of single celebrity and multiple celebrity endorsement on low involvement and high involvement product advertisements. European Journal of Social Sciences, 5, 125-132.
[43] Schopler J., & Insko C. A . (1992). The discontinuity effect in interpersonal and intergroup relations: generality and mediation. European Review of Social Psychology, 3(1), 121-151.
[44] Sears D. O . (1983). The person-positivity bias. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 44(2), 233-250.
[45] Shaddy F., & Fishbach A . (2016). Seller beware: How bundling affects valuation. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(5), 737-751.
[46] Shen H., & Sengupta J . (2018). Word of mouth versus word of mouse: Speaking about a brand connects you to it more than writing does. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(3), 595-614.
[47] Slovic P . (2010). “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide. Social Science Electronic Publishing, 2(April), 79-95.
[48] Small D. A., Loewenstein G., & Slovic P . (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143-153.
[49] Spencer S. J., Zanna M. P., & Fong G. T . (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(6), 845-851.
[50] Steffel M., & Le Boeuf R. A . (2014). Overindividuation in gift giving: Shopping for multiple recipients leads givers to choose unique but less preferred gifts. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1167-1180.
[51] Susskind J., Maurer K., Thakkar V., Hamilton D. L., & Sherman J. W . (1999). Perceiving individuals and groups: Expectancies, dispositional inferences, and causal attributions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(2), 181-191.
[52] Thomas V. L., & Fowler K . (2015). More isn’t always better: Exploring the influence of familiarity when using multiple celebrity endorsers. Journal of Promotion Management, 21(2), 208-223.
[53] Um N. H . (2008). Exploring the effects of single vs. multiple products and multiple celebrity endorsements. Journal of Management and Social Sciences, 4, 104-114.
[54] van der Veen R., & Song H . (2014). Impact of the perceived image of celebrity endorsers on tourists’ intentions to visit. Journal of Travel Research, 53(2), 211-224.
[55] White K., Lin L., Dahl D. W., & Ritchie R. J. B . (2016). When do consumers avoid imperfections? Superficial packaging damage as a contamination cue. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(1), 110-123.
[56] Willis J., & Todorov A . (2010). Making up your mind after a 100ms exposure to a face. Psychological Science, 17(7), 592-598.
[57] Zhou X. Y., Kim S., & Wang L . (2019). Money helps when money feels: Money anthropomorphism increases charitable giving. Journal of Consumer Research, 45(5), 953-972.
[1] DU Wei-Qiang,YU Chun-Ling,ZHAO Ping. The Influence of Different Kinds of Reference Groups on Self-brand Connections[J]. , 2009, 41(02): 156-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech