Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2020, Vol. 52 Issue (3) : 269-282     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00269
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The underlying mechanism of emotions on co-representation in joint actions
Xiaolei SONG1(),Xiaoqian JIA1,Yuan ZHAO2,Jingjing GUO1
1 School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience, Xi’an 710062, China
2 Students' Affairs Office, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, China
Download: PDF(768 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Joint action is a common phenomenon that involves two or more people cooperating together to achieve a common goal in our daily life. The action representation of co-actors play an important role in joint actions. Self-other integration, as a type of cognitive process, is the foundation of the joint action. Moreover, emotion can influence not only cognitive processes but also social interactions (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). Therefore, it is worthy to investigate whether different types of emotion play an important role in joint action.
Three experiments were conducted in the present study to explore the influences of different dimensional of emotions on joint actions. A total of 48 participants were recruited in Experiment 1a to investigate the change of co-representation ability in joint action under conditions of high level of arousal with high/low level of valence. Joint Simon task was used to measure the ability of co-representation, and PANAS and Affect Grid were used to measure the level of emotional valence and arousal. In Experiment 1b, 48 participants were recruited to further explore the effect of low arousal with different valences on joint actions. In Experiment 2, another 48 participants were recruited to explore the effect of the dimension of motivation on joint actions under the condition of high arousal and high valence.
The results of Experiment 1a showed that high arousal improved Joint Simon effect (JSE) significantly regardless of the valence, which indicated that high arousal played an important role in joint actions. Experiment 1b revealed that high valence played a compensating role under the condition of low arousal. The results of combined analyses of experiment 1a and 1b showed that high arousal could be a key factor in enhancing the ability of co-representation. Experiment 2 found that, only under the condition of low motivation, high arousal with high valence could significantly improve JSE.
In conclusion, these results indicate that (1) high level of emotional arousal is the key factor in improving the ability of co-representation in joint actions regardless of the level of emotional valence; (2) high level of emotional valence played an compensating role under the condition of low level of arousal to maintain the level of co-representation; (3) the high arousal is not the determined factor in the enhancement of the co-representation and moderated by motivation intensity as well; and (4) When completing joint action, emotions adjusts the referential coding of co-actor through regulating range of attention so that influences the ability of co-representation, which further confirming the referential coding account.

Keywords emotional valence      emotional arousal      motivation      joint Simon effect      referential coding account     
:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Xiaolei SONG     E-mail: songxiaolei@snnu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 18 January 2020
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
Xiaolei SONG,Xiaoqian JIA,Yuan ZHAO,Jingjing GUO. The underlying mechanism of emotions on co-representation in joint actions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2020, 52(3): 269-282.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00269     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2020/V52/I3/269
[1] Baron R. A . (1987). Effects of negative ions on interpersonal attraction: Evidence for intensification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(3), 547-553.
[2] Bedwell W. L., Pavlas D., Heyne K., Lazzara E. H., & Salas E . (2012). Toward a taxonomy linking game attributes to learning: An empirical study. Simulation & Gaming, 43(6), 729-760.
[3] Clore G. L., & Huntsinger J. R . (2009). How the object of affect guides its impact. Emotion Review, 1(1), 39-54.
[4] Colzato L. S., de Bruijn E. R. A., & Hommel B . (2012). Up to “me” or up to “us”? The impact of self-construal priming on cognitive self-other integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 341.
[5] Colzato L. S., Zech H., Hommel B., Verdonschot R., van den Wildenberg W. P. M., & Hsieh S . (2012). Loving-kindness brings loving-kindness: The impact of Buddhism on cognitive self-other integration. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 19(4), 541-545.
[6] Corson Y., & Verrier N . (2007). Emotions and false memories: valence or arousal? Psychological Science, 18(3), 208-211.
[7] Cunningham M. R . (1988). What do you do when you’re happy or blue? Mood, expectancies, and behavioral interest. Motivation and Emotion, 12(4), 309-331.
[8] Desimone, R., Duncan J . (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18(1), 193-222.
[9] Dolk T., Hommel B., Colzato L. S., Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2011). How “social” is the social Simon effect? Frontiers in Psychology, 2(84), 84.
[10] Dolk T., Hommel B., Colzato L. S., Schütz-Bosbach S., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2014). The joint Simon effect: A review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(974), 1-10.
[11] Dolk T., Hommel B., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . (2013). The (not so) social Simon effect: A referential coding account. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39(5), 1248-1260.
[12] Dunn J. R., & Schweitzer M. E . (2005). Feeling and believing: The influence of emotion on trust. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(5), 736-748.
[13] Forgas J. P . (1998). On feeling good and getting your way: Mood effects on negotiator cognition and bargaining strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(3), 565-577.
[14] Fredrickson B. L . (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218-226.
[15] Fredrickson B. L . (2003). The value of positive emotions. American Scientist, 91(4), 330-335.
[16] Fredrickson B. L., & Branigan C . (2005). Positive emotions broaden the scope of attention and thought-action repertoires. Cognition and Emotion, 19(3), 313-332.
[17] Gable P. A., & Harmon-Jones E . (2010). The motivational dimensional model of affect: Implications for breadth of attention, memory, and cognitive categorisation. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 322-337.
[18] Gilet A.-L., Jallais C . (2011). Valence, arousal, and word associations. Cognition and Emotion, 25(4), 740-746.
[19] Heyes C . (2014). Submentalizing: I am not really reading your mind. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9(2), 131-143.
[20] Hommel B . (2011). The Simon effect as tool and heuristic. Acta Psychologica, 136(2), 189-202.
[21] Huang L., Yang T. Z., Ji Z. M . (2003). Applicability of the positive and negative affect scale in Chinese. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 17(1), 54-56.
[21] [ 黄丽, 杨廷忠, 季忠民 . (2003). 正性负性情绪量表的中国人群适用性研究. 中国心理卫生杂志, 17(1), 54-56.]
[22] Jefferies L. N., Smilek D., Eich E., & Enns J. T . (2008). Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychological Science, 19(3), 290-295.
[23] Kandel E. R., Schwartz J. H., & Jessell T. M . (2000). Principles of neural science (4th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
[24] Kanske P., & Kotz S. A . (2010). Modulation of early conflict processing: N200 responses to emotional words in a flanker task. Neuropsychologia, 48(12), 3661-3664.
[25] Kuhbandner C., & Zehetleitner M . (2011). Dissociable effects of valence and arousal in adaptive executive control. PLoS One, 6(12), e29287.
[26] Kuhbandner C., Pekrun R., & Maier M. A . (2010). The role of positive and negative affect in the “mirroring” of other persons’ actions. Cognition and Emotion, 24(7), 1182-1190.
[27] Larson M. J., Gray A. C., Clayson P. E., Jones R., & Kirwan B. C . (2013). What are the influences of orthogonally-manipulated valence and arousal on performance monitoring processes? The effects of affective state. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 87(3), 327-339.
[28] Lazar J. N., & Pearlman-Avnion S . (2014). Effect of affect induction method on emotional valence and arousal. Psychology, 5(7), 595-601.
[29] Liepelt R., Klempova B., Dolk T., Colzato L. S., Ragert P., Nitsche M. A., & Hommel B . (2016). The medial frontal cortex mediates self-other discrimination in the joint Simon task: A tDCS study. Journal of Psychophysiology, 30(3), 87-101.
[30] Lyubomirsky S., King L., & Diener E . (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: Does happiness lead to success?. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 803-855.
[31] Ma Q. G., & Shang Q . (2013). Modulation of emotion on Simon effect: An experimental study. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 19(2), 119-125.
[31] [ 马庆国, 尚倩 . (2013). 情绪对西蒙效应的调节作用. 应用心理学, 19(2), 119-125.]
[32] Ma Y. G., Li S. X . (2014). The effect of high: Approach- motivated positive affect on attentional flexibility. Psychological Exploration, 34(6), 517-522.
[32] [ 马元广, 李寿欣 . (2014). 高趋近动机积极情绪对注意灵活性的影响. 心理学探新, 34(6), 517-522.]
[33] Memelink J., & Hommel B . (2013). Intentional weighting: A basic principle in cognitive control . Psychological Research, 77(3), 249-259.
[34] Porcu E., Bolling L., Lappe M., & Liepelt R . (2016). Pointing out mechanisms underlying joint action. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(4), 972-977.
[35] Rowe G., Hirsh J. B., & Anderson A. K . (2007). Positive affect increases the breadth of attentional selection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(1), 383-388.
[36] Russell J. A., Weiss A., & Mendelsohn G. A . (1989). The affect grid: A single-item scale of pleasure and arousal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), 493-502.
[37] Schmitz T. W., de Rosa E., & Anderson A. K . (2009). Opposing influences of affective state valence on visual cortical encoding. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(22), 7199-7207.
[38] Sebanz N., Bekkering H., & Knoblich G . (2006). Joint action: bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(2), 70-76.
[39] Sebanz N., Knoblich G., & Prinz W . (2003). Representing others’ actions: just like one’s own? Cognition, 88(3), B11-B21.
[40] van Steenbergen H., Band G. P. H., Hommel B., Rombouts S. A. R. B., & Nieuwenhuis S . (2014). Hedonic hotspots regulate cingulate-driven adaptation to cognitive demands. Cerebral Cortex, 25(7), 1746-1756.
[41] Vesper C., Abramova E., Bütepage J., Ciardo F., Crossey B., Effenberg A., … Wahn B . (2016). Joint action: Mental representations, shared information and general mechanisms for coordinating with others. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 2039.
[42] Watson D., Clark L. A., & Tellegen A . (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063-1070.
[43] Waugh C. E., & Fredrickson B. L . (2006). Nice to know you: Positive emotions, self-other overlap, and complex understanding in the formation of a new relationship. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1(2), 93-106.
[44] Xu S., Song X. L . (2016). Joint Simon effect: Current research, influencing factors and theories. Advances in Psychological Science, 24(3), 367-378.
[44] [ 徐胜, 宋晓蕾 . (2016). 联合Simon效应:现状、影响因素与理论解释. 心理科学进展, 24(3), 367-378.]
[45] Yamaguchi M., Wall H. J., & Hommel B . (2016). Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task. Psychological Research, 82(2), 385-394.
[46] Zhang G. N., & Zhou R. L . (2013). The effect of low versus high motivational intensity affect on attentional scope. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 11(1), 30-36.
[46] [ 张光楠, 周仁来 . (2013). 情绪对注意范围的影响:动机程度的调节作用. 心理与行为研究, 11(1), 30-36.]
[1] DONG Niannian, WANG Xueli. Where there's a will, there's a way: Intrinsic motivational orientation, idea quality, and idea implementation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 801-810.
[2] LI Hong,YANG Xiaoguang,ZHENG Wenyu,WANG Chao. Emotional regulation goals of young adults with depression inclination: An event-related potential study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 637-647.
[3] XING Cai,MENG Yuqi,LIN Qingqing,QIN Ziyu. Effect of childbearing deadline on women’s wanted fertility[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 428-436.
[4] ZHONG Luojin, RU Taotao, FAN Meng, MO Lei. The effect of cognitive vagueness and motivation on conscious and unconscious self-deception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(12): 1330-1340.
[5] ZHANG Kuo,ZHAO Ying,WANG Jingxin, . Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1207-1219.
[6] HU Yue, WANG Bin, MA Hongyu, LI Gai.  Fate control and problem lottery playing: The perspective of meaning maintenance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
[7] SONG Xiaolei, ZHANG Junting, SHI Jie, YOU Xuqun.  Influence of emotional valence on the spatial simon effect under the vocal response mode[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1031-1040.
[8] GU Honglei, LIU Jun, XIA Tiansheng.  Effect of family socioeconomic status on reading autonomy among elementary school students: The mediating effects of parents' encouragement and reading motivation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1063-1071.
[9] KE Chunchun, NIE Aiqing, ZHANG Ruiqing.  The modulation of recall task on collaborative inhibition and error pruning: The influence of emotional valence and level of processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 733-744.
[10] LIU Fang; DING Jinhong; ZHANG Qin. Positive affect and selective attention: Approach-motivation intensity influences the early and late attention processing stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 794-803.
[11] ZHANG Jian; SONG Yahui; LIU Xiao. Undermining effect exists or not: Relationship between extrinsic and intrinsic motivation in workplace[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 73-83.
[12] ZHU Xiangru; ZHANG Yan; YANG Suyong; WU Haiyan; WANG Lili; GU Ruolei. The Motivational Hierarchy between Self and Mother: Evidence from the Feedback-related Negativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 807-813.
[13] ZHANG Jijia; WANG Xinxia; HE Xiumei. Effects of Agent’s Motivation on Mental Simulation during Sentence Comprehension[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1247-1259.
[14] XIAO Hongrui; HUANG Yifan2; GONG Xianmin; WANG Dahua. Age Alters the Effects of Emotional Valence on False Memory: Using the Simplified Conjoint Recognition Paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 19-28.
[15] XIAO Hongrui;GONG Xianmin;WANG Dahua. Effect of Emotional Valence and Time Interval on the False Memory of Pictures among Older Adults[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 922-930.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech