Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2020, Vol. 52 Issue (2) : 128-138     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2020.00128
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Spatial iconicity of moral concepts: Co-dependence of linguistic and embodied symbols
WANG Hanlin,JIANG Zeliang,FENG Xiaohui,LU Zhongyi()
College of Education, Hebei Normal University, Shijiazhuang 050024, China
Download: PDF(1137 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

Spatial iconicity is described as the perceptual characteristic of a concrete concept. This idea demonstrates that word pairs are processed faster when their positions match certain references in the physical world (e.g. ‘heaven’ is presented above ‘ground’). Embodied cognition theory explains that spatial iconicity involves processing concrete words to activate their embodied symbols automatically (e.g. spatial and colour symbols). This process then simulates the perceptual characteristics of the words’ physical reference. Symbolic theory proposes that spatial iconicity can also be interpreted by linguistic factors (e.g. word order frequency). Word order frequency is higher in the iconic order than in the reverse-iconic order, which facilitates the processing of word pairs. Symbol interdependency hypothesis integrates the two explanations above, claiming that the embodied and linguistic symbols are involved in shaping spatial iconicity. Furthermore, the respective contributions of these symbols depend on the type of stimuli or task. Despite these claims, the mechanism of spatial iconicity remains controversial. Moreover, whether abstract concepts have a similar spatial iconic effect is still unknown.

In Experiment 1, a semantic relationship judgment task was conducted to investigate the effect of embodied symbols on the processing of moral word pairs. Twenty-six participants were chosen randomly to discriminate the antonymous relationship of the moral word pairs in an iconic (e.g. moral-up & immoral-down) or reverse-iconic (e.g. moral-down & immoral-up) arrangement. In Experiment 2, a spatial iconicity judgment task was conducted to investigate the effect of linguistic symbols on the processing of moral word pairs. Twenty-seven participants were chosen to distinguish the iconicity of the moral word pairs, which may belong to an antonym or not. The EEG signals and the reaction times during both experiments were recorded.

The results showed that when Chinese moral antonyms were arranged against their spatial iconicity (e.g. moral-down & immoral-up), the processing of the antonymous relationship induced a larger N400 than the arrangement that was coherent with the spatial iconicity (e.g. moral-up & immoral-down). Furthermore, the judgment of the antonymous relationship was slower for the antonym pairs in a reverse-iconic arrangement than in an iconic arrangement. The results also showed that the Chinese word pairs, which did not have antonyms (e.g. trust - evil), induced a larger N200 and N700 than the antonym pairs (e.g. incorrupt - corrupt) did. Moreover, the reaction time of the iconicity judgment to the word pairs that did not belong to antonyms was slower than that of the antonym pairs. The results of the two experiments revealed that regardless of the task, the embodied and linguistic symbols contributed to spatial iconicity. Nevertheless, the mechanisms of the two symbols were different.

This study explored the spatial iconicity of abstract moral concepts, the roles of the embodied symbols and the linguistic symbols in shaping spatial iconicity. The results showed that (1) abstract moral concepts had a similar spatial iconicity to concrete concepts, which could be achieved by mapping the metaphors. (2) Furthermore, embodied and linguistic symbols were involved in shaping spatial iconicity regardless of the task. (3) When processing moral words, the linguistic symbols were activated to influence the process. The embodied symbols would only be activated and take effect in the middle of the process.

Keywords morality      spatial iconicity      embodied cognition      linguistic symbol      vertical metaphor     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Zhongyi LU     E-mail:
Issue Date: 24 December 2019
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Hanlin WANG
Zeliang JIANG
Xiaohui FENG
Zhongyi LU
Cite this article:   
Hanlin WANG,Zeliang JIANG,Xiaohui FENG, et al. Spatial iconicity of moral concepts: Co-dependence of linguistic and embodied symbols[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 128-138.
URL:     OR
变异源 N200 N400 N700
F p η2p F p η2p F p η2p
呈现方式(A) 0.56 n.s. 5.19 0.032 0.17 2.41 n.s.
电极位置(B) 81.05 < 0.001 0.76 4.23 0.019 0.15 6.96 0.003 0.22
A×B 0.34 n.s. 0.11 n.s. 0.08 n.s.
变异源 N200 N400 N700
F p η2p F p η2p F P η2p
反义程度(A) 5.96 0.022 0.19 1.57 n.s. 11.53 0.002 0.31
电极位置(B) 61.67 < 0.001 0.70 3.36 n.s. 5.95 0.009 0.19
A×B 1.19 n.s. 0.11 n.s. 2.31 n.s.
[1] Barsalou L. W., Santos A., Simmons W. K., & Wilson C. D . (2008). Language and simulation in conceptual processing. In M. de Vega, A. M. Glenberg, & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Symbols, embodiment, and meaning (pp. 245-283). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
[2] Binder J. R., Westbury C. F., Mckiernan K. A., Possing E. T., & Medler D. A . (2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(6), 905-917.
[3] Borghi A. M., Binkofski F., Castelfranchi C., Cimatti F., Scorolli C., & Tummolini L . (2017). The challenge of abstract concepts. Psychological Bulletin, 143(3), 263-292.
[4] Cohen J . (2013). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Routledge.
[5] Dove G . (2009). Beyond perceptual symbols: A call for representational pluralism. Cognition, 110(3), 412-431.
[6] Dove G . (2010). On the need for embodied and dis-embodied cognition. Frontiers in Psychology, 1(6), 242.
[7] Estes Z., Verges M., & Barsalou L. W . (2008). Head up, foot down: Object words orient attention to the objects' typical location. Psychological Science, 19(2), 93-97.
[8] Folstein J. R., & van Petten C . (2008). Influence of cognitive control and mismatch on the N2 component of the ERP: A review. Psychophysiology, 45(1), 152-170.
[9] Gullick M. M., Mitra P., & Coch D . (2013). Imagining the truth and the moon: An electrophysiological study of abstract and concrete word processing. Psychophysiology, 50(5), 431-440.
[10] Hirschfeld G., Zwitserlood P., & Dobel C . (2011). Effects of language comprehension on visual processing - MEG dissociates early perceptual and late N400 effects. Brain and Language, 116(2), 91-96.
[11] Holcomb P. J., Kounios J., Anderson J. E., & West W. C . (1999). Dual-coding, context-availability, and concreteness effects in sentence comprehension: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25(3), 721-742.
[12] Hubbard T. M., Magne C., & Langston W . (2014). Spatial configuration of vertically related word pairs modulates the N400 component. Neuroreport, 25(18), 1424-1428.
[13] Kutas M., & Federmeier K. D . (2011). Thirty years and counting: Finding meaning in the N400 component of the event-related brain potential (ERP). Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 621-647.
[14] Lakens D . (2012). Polarity correspondence in metaphor congruency effects: Structural overlap predicts categorization times for bipolar concepts presented in vertical space. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38(3), 726-736.
[15] Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[16] Lakoff G., & Johnson M . (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
[17] Laszlo S., & Federmeier K. D . (2011). The N400 as a snapshot of interactive processing: Evidence from regression analyses of orthographic neighbor and lexical associate effects. Psychophysiology, 48(2), 176-186.
[18] Louwerse M. M . (2008). Embodied relations are encoded in language. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(4), 838-844.
[19] Louwerse M. M., & Connell L . (2011). A taste of words: Linguistic context and perceptual simulation predict the modality of words. Cognitive Science, 35(2), 381-398.
[20] Louwerse M. M., & Hutchinson S . (2012). Neurological evidence linguistic processes precede perceptual simulation in conceptual processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 385.
[21] Louwerse M. M., & Jeuniaux P . (2010). The linguistic and embodied nature of conceptual processing. Cognition, 114(1), 96-104.
[22] Louwerse M. M., He X. Y., Deng Y. M., Zhao X. R., & Xue Y . (2017). Symbol interdependency in language processing: Interactions between language statistics and perceptual simulation. Journal of South China Normal University (Social Science Edition), (2), 51-60.
[22] [ Louwerse, M. M., 何先友, 邓玉梅, 赵雪汝, 薛颖 . (2017). 语言加工中的符号相互依存: 语言统计和知觉模拟的交互作用. 华南师范大学学报: 社会科学版(2), 51-60.]
[23] Lund K., & Burgess C . (1996). Producing high-dimensional semantic spaces from lexical co-occurrence. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers, 28(2), 203-208.
[24] Malhi S. K., & Buchanan L . (2018). A test of the symbol interdependency hypothesis with both concrete and abstract stimuli. Plos One, 13(3), e0192719.
[25] Markman A. B., & Dietrich E . (2000). Extending the classical view of representation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(12), 470-475.
[26] Meier B. P., Hauser D. J., Robinson M. D., Friesen C. K., & Schjeldahl K . (2007). What's "up" with God? Vertical space as a representation of the divine. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 93(5), 699-710.
[27] Patel S. H., & Azzam P. N . (2005). Characterization of N200 and P300: Selected studies of the event-related potential. International Journal of Medical Sciences, 2(4), 147-154.
[28] Schubert T. W . (2005). Your highness: Vertical positions as perceptual symbols of power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(1), 1-21.
[29] Song Y. Q., & Zhang J. J . (2014). Temporal-spatial metaphor in conceptual representation: Can spatial information be activated when processing the temporal reference which implied in the changing shape of objects? Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46(2), 216-226.
[29] [ 宋宜琪, 张积家 . (2014). 空间隐喻和形状变化对物体内隐时间概念加工的影响. 心理学报, 46(2), 216-226.]
[30] Stefanucci J. K., & Storbeck J . (2009). Don't look down: Emotional arousal elevates height perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(1), 131-145.
[31] Tse C. S., Kurby C. A., & Du F . (2010). Perceptual simulations and linguistic representations have differential effects on speeded relatedness judgements and recognition memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(5), 928-941.
[32] Wang J., Conder J. A., Blitzer D. N., & Shinkareva S. V . (2010). Neural representation of abstract and concrete concepts: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Human Brain Mapping, 31(10), 1459-1468.
[33] Wang, R. M, Mo, L., Wang R. M., Mo L., Li L., Wang S. P., & Wu J . (2005). Perceptual symbol representation and propositional symbol representation in language comprehension. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 37(2), 143-150.
[33] [ 王瑞明, 莫雷, 李利, 王穗苹, 吴俊 . (2005). 言语理解中的知觉符号表征与命题符号表征. 心理学报, 37(2), 143-150.]
[34] Wang X. X., Jiang S., & Zhang J. J . (2018). Effect of the spatial linguistic symbol on the container metaphor of seniority rules. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50(09), 953-964.
[34] [ 汪新筱, 江珊, 张积家 . (2018). 空间语言标记影响亲属关系的容器隐喻. 心理学报, 50(09), 953-964.]
[35] West W. C., & Holcomb P. J . (2000). Imaginal, semantic, and surface-level processing of concrete and abstract words: An electrophysiological investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 1024-1037.
[36] Zwaan R. A., & Yaxley R. H . (2003). Spatial iconicity affects semantic relatedness judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(4), 954-958.
[1] SU Jiajia, YE Haosheng. [J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 386-398.
[2] YE Haosheng,ZENG Hong,YANG Wendeng. Enactive cognition: Theoretical rationale and practical approach[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1270-1280.
[3] LI Xiao-dan,DING Dao-qun,YE Hao-sheng. The influence of embodied implicit power on fair decision making[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[4] Xiaolei SONG, Yangyang LI, Qian YANG, Xuqun YOU. The influence of different status of the observer’s responding hands on observational learning in the joint task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[5] Xinxiao WANG, Shan JIANG, Jijia ZHANG. Effect of the spatial linguistic symbol on the container metaphor of seniority rules[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 953-964.
[6] Zhongyi YI,Wendeng YANG,Haosheng YE. Influence of soft and hard tactical experiences on gender role cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[7] YE Haosheng, MA Yankun, YANG Wendeng.  Body and cognitive representation: Understandings and divergences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[8] LIU Wenjuan; SHEN Manqiong; LI Ying; WANG Ruiming. The interaction between emotional concept processing and emotional face perception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[9] LIU Siyun; ZHOU Zongkui; LI Na. The Impact of Cyber-Experience on Action Verb Processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[10] LI Xiaodan; YE Haosheng. Embodied Cognition in Ancient Chinese Confucianism and Taoism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.
[11] TANG Peipei; YE Haosheng; DU Jianzheng. The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
[12] YE Haosheng. Theoretical Analysis of the Meaning of Embodiment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042.
[13] LI Huijuan;ZHANG Jijia;ZHANG Ruixin. The Vertically Spatial Metaphors of Kinship words of Qiang Nationality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 481-491.
[14] WU Xiangci; WANG Enguo. Power Shifts Attention on A Vertical Dimension: An ERP Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1871-1879.
[15] SHEN Manqiong; XIE Jiushu; ZHANG Kun; Li Ying; ZENG Chuxuan; WANG Ruiming. The Spatial Metaphor of Bilingual Affective Concepts Processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1671-1681.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech