Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (11) : 1207-1219     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01207
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements
ZHANG Kuo1,ZHAO Ying2,WANG Jingxin1, 2()
1. Department of Social Psychology, Zhou Enlai School of Government, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
2. Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China
Download: PDF(740 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

A wealth of research shows that positive and negative reinforcement critically influence behavior. While it is well established that rewards and penalties can strongly influence mechanisms of executive control, it is unclear whether these two factors exert symmetric or qualitatively distinct behavioral effects. In the current research, we conducted two eye-movement experiments to investigate the influence of monetary reward or punishment on attentional control. We employed these cues in Pro/Anti-saccade tasks in Experiment 1 and Go/No-go tasks in Experiment 2. Crucially, we investigated how either a reward (also referred to as “gain”) or penalty (also referred to as “loss”) influenced inhibitory control in the following trial.

In Experiment 1, participants were instructed to produce simple pro-saccades or more difficult anti-saccades, in conditions in which they received a reward for correct responses or a punishment for incorrect responses or either a reward or punishment. The results showed that, while the accuracy of the pro-saccades was facilitated by reward, the accuracy of the anti-saccades was facilitated by punishment. And the velocity of pro-saccades and anti-saccades were significantly improved by both reward and punishment. In Experiment 2, we further adopted the Go/No-go tasks to explore how reward and punishment affect attentional control via exogenous parafoveal visual cues. This showed essentially the same pattern of effects as Experiment 1. For the Go task, saccade latency significantly decreased when rewards were given relative to punishment or no motivation conditions. And for the No-go task, accuracy increased more in the punishment condition compared to the reward or no motivation conditions. An increase in saccade velocity was observed in the no motivation condition, similarly to in Experiment 1.

In sum, the overall results suggest that both reward and punishment can facilitate the oculomotor control, although the findings reveal a striking asymmetry in the effects of the reward and punishment on behavior. Specifically, positive reinforcement appears to improve approach behaviors, while punishment influences inhibitory behavior. These findings suggest that the two forms of reinforcement are distinct in their influence on behavior.

Keywords control attention      reward      punishment      motivation      saccade     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors:      E-mail: wjxpsy@126.com
Issue Date: 24 September 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Kuo ZHANG
Ying ZHAO
Jingxin WANG
Cite this article:   
Kuo ZHANG,Ying ZHAO,Jingxin WANG. Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1207-1219.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01207     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I11/1207
  
  
  
  
[1] Aarts, E., van Holstein, M., Hoogman, M., Onnink, M., Kan, C., Franke, B., … Cools, R . (2015). Reward modulation of cognitive function in adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: A pilot study on the role of striatal dopamine. Behavioural Pharmacology, 26(1&2), 227-240.
[2] Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S . (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(25), 10367-10371.
[3] Arnett,P. A., & Newman, J., , P . (2000). Gray's three-arousal model: An empirical investigation. Personality and Individual Differences, 28(6), 1171-1189.
[4] Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D . (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323-370.
[5] Becker, S. P., Fite, P. J., Garner, A. A., Greening, L., Stoppelbein, L., & Luebbe, A. M . (2013). Reward and punishment sensitivity are differentially associated with ADHD and sluggish cognitive tempo symptoms in children. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 719-727.
[6] Berridge, K. C., Robinson, T. E., & Aldridge, J. W . (2009). Dissecting components of reward: ‘liking’, ‘wanting’, and learning. Current opinion in Pharmacology, 9(1), 65-73.
[7] Braem, S., Hickey, C., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W . (2014). Reward determines the context-sensitivity of cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 40(5), 1769-1778.
[8] Bucker, B., Silvis, J. D., Donk, M., & Theeuwes, J . (2015). Reward modulates oculomotor competition between differently valued stimuli. Vision Research, 108, 103-112.
[9] Chambers, C. D., Garavan, H., & Bellgrove, M. A . (2009). Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(5), 631-646.
[10] Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E., & Libera, C. D . (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85(24), 58-72.
[11] Corr, P. J . (2001). Testing problems in J. A. Gray’s personality theory: A commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999). Personality and Individual Differences, 30(2), 333-352.
[12] Dafoe, J. M., Armstrong, I. T., & Munoz, D. P . (2007). The influence of stimulus direction and eccentricity on pro- and anti-saccades in humans. Experimental Brain Research, 179(4), 563-570.
[13] Derakshan, N., Ansari, T. L., Hansard, M., Shoker, L., & Eysenck, M. W . (2009). Anxiety, inhibition, efficiency, and effectiveness: An investigation using the antisaccade task. Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 48-55.
[14] de Pascalis, V. . (2014). Neurocognitive components of behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation systems: Relation of EEG-alpha asymmetry, BIS/BAS and optimism. Personality and Individual Differences, 60, S4.
[15] Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135-168.
[16] Eliana, V., Massimo, S., Boehler, C. N., Eric, A., Wim, F., & Tom, V . (2014). Overlapping neural systems represent cognitive effort and reward anticipation. Plos One, 9(3), e91008.
[17] Engelmann, J. B., Damaraju, E., Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L . (2009). Combined effects of attention and motivation on visual task performance: Transient and sustained motivational effects. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 3(4), 1-17.
[18] Engelmann, J. B., & Pessoa, L. (2007). Motivation sharpens exogenous spatial attention. Emotion, 7(3), 668-674.
[19] Freeman, S. M., & Aron, A. R . (2016). Withholding a reward-driven action: Studies of the rise and fall of motor activation and the effect of cognitive depletion. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 28(2), 237-251.
[20] Geier, C. F., & Luna, B. (2012). Developmental effects of incentives on response inhibition. Child Development, 83(4), 1262-1274.
[21] Gray, J. A. (1987). The psychology of fear and stress. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Gu, L., Bai, X. J., & Wang, Q . (2015). Impact of reward/punishment conditions on behavioral inhibition and automatic physiological responses in the stages. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47 (1), 39-49.
[23] [ 谷莉, 白学军, 王芹 . (2015). 奖惩对行为抑制及程序阶段中自主生理反应的影响. 心理学报, 47(1), 39-49.]
[24] Hardin, M. G., Schroth, E., & Ernst, M . (2007). Incentive- related modulation of cognitive control in healthy, anxious, and depressed adolescents: Development and psychopathology related differences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48(5), 446-454.
[25] Hauser, T. U., Iannaccone, R., Walitza, S., Brandeis, D., & Brem, S . (2015). Cognitive flexibility in adolescence: Neural and behavioral mechanisms of reward prediction error processing in adaptive decision making during development. Neurolmage, 104, 347-354.
[26] Herrera, P. M., Speranza, M., Hampshire, A., & Bekinschtein, T. A . (2014). Monetary rewards modulate inhibitory control. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(4), 442-449.
[27] Heym, N., Kantini, E., Checkley, H. L. R., & Cassaday, H. J . (2015). Gray’s revised reinforcement sensitivity theory in relation to attention-deficit/hyperactivity and tourette-like behaviors in the general population. Personality and Individual Differences, 78, 24-28.
[28] Jazbec, S., Hardin, M. G., Schroth, E., McClure, E., Pine, D. S., & Ernst, M . (2006). Age-related influence of contingencies on a saccade task. Experimental Brain Research, 174(4), 754-762.
[29] Ji, L. Y., Chen, N. X., Ding, J. H., & Wei, P . (2015). Monetary incentive modulates the localized attentional interference effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 721-733.
[30] [ 纪丽燕, 陈宁轩, 丁锦红, 魏萍 . (2015). 奖赏预期调节局部注意干扰效应. 心理学报, 47(6), 721-733.]
[31] Kilpel?inen, M., & Theeuwes, J. (2016). Efficient avoidance of the penalty zone in human eye movements. Plos One, 11(12), 1-15.
[32] Kubanek, J., Snyder, L. H., & Abrams, R. A . (2015). Reward and punishment act as distinct factors in guiding behavior. Cognition, 139, 154-167.
[33] Machado, H., & Rafal, R. D . (2000). Strategic control over saccadic eye movements: Studies of the fixation offset effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 62(6), 1236-1242.
[34] Masui, K., & Nomura, M. (2011). The effects of reward and punishment on response inhibition in non-clinical psychopathy. Personality and Individual Differences, 50(1), 69-73.
[35] Munoz, D., P., & Everling, S. (2004). Look away: The anti- saccade task and the voluntary control of eye movement. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 5(3), 218-228.
[36] Murty, V. P., LaBar, K. S., & Adcock, R. A . (2016). Distinct medial temporal networks encode surprise during motivation by reward versus punishment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 134, 55-64.
[37] Padmala, S., & Pessoa, L. (2010). Interactions between cognition and motivation during response inhibition. Neuropsychologia, 48(2), 558-565.
[38] Peck, C. J., Jangraw, D. C., Suzuki, M., Efem, R., & Gottlieb, J . (2009). Reward modulates attention independently of action value in posterior parietal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(36), 11182-11191.
[39] Pekny, S. E., Izawa, J., & Shadmehr, R . (2015). Reward- dependent modulation of movement variability. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(9), 4015-4024.
[40] Pessoa, L. (2009). How do emotion and motivation direct executive control? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 160-166.
[41] Ross, M., Lanyon, L. J., Viswanathan, J., Manoach, D. S Barton, J. J. S.& (2011). Human prosaccades and antisaccades under risk: Effects of penalties and rewards on visual selection and the value of actions. Neuroscience, 196, 168-177.
[42] Schmitt, H., Ferdinand, N. K., & Kray, J . (2015). The influence of monetary incentives on context processing in younger and older adults: An event-related potential study. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(2), 416-434
[43] Sommer, M. A., & Wurtz, R. H . (2001). Frontal eye field sends delay activity related to movement, memory, and vision to the superior colliculus. Journal of Neurophysiology, 85(4), 1673-1685.
[44] Spear, L. P . (2011). Rewards, aversions and affect in adolescence: Emerging convergences across laboratory animal and human data. Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience, 1(4), 390-403.
[45] Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5(4), 297-323.
[46] van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P. H., & Hommel, B . (2012). Reward valence modulates conflict-driven attentional adaptation: Electrophysiological evidence. Biological Psychology, 90(3), 234-241.
[47] Wang, Y. Q., Chen, A. T., Hu, X. P., & Yin, S. H . (2019). Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 51(1), 48-57.
[48] [ 王宴庆, 陈安涛, 胡学平, 尹首航 . (2019). 奖赏通过增强信号监测提升认知控制. 心理学报, 51(1), 48-57.]
[49] Wolf, C., Heuer, A., Schub?, A., & Schütz, A. C . (2017). The necessity to choose causes the effects of reward on saccade preparation. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 16966. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-17164-w.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17164-w
[50] Yechiam, E., & Hochman, G. (2013). Loss-aversion or loss- attention: The impact of losses on cognitive performance. Cognitive Psychology, 66(2), 212-231.
[51] Zhang, X. W., Xuan, Y. M., & Fu, X. L . (2012). The effect of emotional valences on approach and avoidance responses. Advances in Psychological Science, 20(7), 1023-1030.
[52] [ 张晓雯, 禤宇明, 傅小兰 . (2012). 情绪效价对趋避反应的作用. 心理科学进展, 20(7), 1023-1030.]
[1] ZHANG Ruqian,LIU Jieqiong,LI Xianchun. Neural mechanisms of fairness formation in the perspective of social interactions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1007-1017.
[2] LIANG Feifei,MA Jie,LI Xin,LIAN Kunyu,TAN Ke,BAI Xuejun. Saccadic targeting deficits of Chinese children with developmental dyslexia: Evidence from novel word learning in reading[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 805-815.
[3] LI Hong,YANG Xiaoguang,ZHENG Wenyu,WANG Chao. Emotional regulation goals of young adults with depression inclination: An event-related potential study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 637-647.
[4] YIN Xile,LI Jianbiao,CHEN Siyu,LIU Xiaoli,HAO Jie. Neural mechanisms of third-party punishment: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 571-583.
[5] YANG Ling,WANG Binqiang,GEN Yinfeng,YAO Dongwei,CAO Hua,ZHANG Jianxun,XU Qiongying. The influence of hypothetical and real money rewards on the risky decision-making of the abstinent heroin user[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 507-516.
[6] XING Cai,MENG Yuqi,LIN Qingqing,QIN Ziyu. Effect of childbearing deadline on women’s wanted fertility[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 428-436.
[7] ZHONG Luojin, RU Taotao, FAN Meng, MO Lei. The effect of cognitive vagueness and motivation on conscious and unconscious self-deception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(12): 1330-1340.
[8] WANG Yanqing,CHEN Antao,HU Xueping,YIN Shouhang. Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 48-57.
[9] HU Yue, WANG Bin, MA Hongyu, LI Gai.  Fate control and problem lottery playing: The perspective of meaning maintenance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
[10] ZHANG Yan, CAO Huimin, ZHENG Yuanjie, REN Yanju.  Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to and disengagement from rewarded distractors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 377-389.
[11] WANG Yongsheng, ZHAO Bingjie, CHEN Mingjing, LI Xin, YAN Guoli, BAI Xuejun. Influence of the frequency of fixated words and the number of strokes of parafoveal words on saccadic target selection in Chinese reading[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1336-1345.
[12] YANG Ruijuan, YOU Xuqun.  Advancing the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: Economic rewards influence on teachers’ mental health[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1184-1194.
[13] GU Honglei, LIU Jun, XIA Tiansheng.  Effect of family socioeconomic status on reading autonomy among elementary school students: The mediating effects of parents' encouragement and reading motivation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1063-1071.
[14] CUI Liying, HE Xing, LUO Junlong, HUANG Xiaojiao, CAO Weijia, CHEN Xiaomei.  The effects of moral punishment and relationship punishment on junior middle school students’ cooperation behaviors in public goods dilemma[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1322-1333.
[15] LIU Fang; DING Jinhong; ZHANG Qin. Positive affect and selective attention: Approach-motivation intensity influences the early and late attention processing stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 794-803.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech