Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (9) : 1068-1078     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01068
Theory and History of Psychology |
An “operational definition” and a “falsifiability criterion” are not sufficient to lay the foundation for scientific psychology
SHU Yueyu(),SHI Yingbo,YUAN Yan()
School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University & Key Laboratory of Behavioral and Mental Health of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730070, China
Download: PDF(697 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

In the mainstream narrative of the discipline, a “controlled experiment” and a “quantitative research” are considered to be the basic characteristics of psychology. For a long time, the methodology of positivism has provided the subject of psychology with a spiritual connotation. Specifically, the “operational definition” based on positivism and the “falsifiability criterion” based on falsificationism, have become the “golden rules” of psychology’s scientificity. For decades, the field of philosophy of science has acquired a renewed understanding of positivism and falsificationism. However, while mainstream psychology ignores these advancements, it still regards these two outdated philosophies as its metaphysical foundation. More importantly, while indulging in outdated methodological assumptions, mainstream psychology is unable to provide a systematic demonstration for the ontological preset of disciplines. This lack of ontology and the over-reliance on outdated methodological presuppositions focus on popular mainstream psychology textbooks, such as How to Think Straight about Psychology by Keith E. Stanovich, who is a Canadian psychologist.

Based on the representative position of Keith E. Stanovich’s work in mainstream psychology, and in the foundation of refining and summarizing specific features of heavy reliance on the methodology of mainstream experimental psychology, by using the process of logical analysis and philosophical speculation, this paper suggests that mainstream psychology has always defined itself through a methodology shared with other natural sciences, which is the root cause of the psychological disintegration crisis.!!!This study contends that the methodological basis of psychology itself has several problems. First of all, not all scientific concepts can be defined operationally. Thus, an operational definition by itself does not provide a solid philosophical foundation for empirical science. Furthermore, universal existence propositions and statistical law cannot be verified and falsified by experience. Therefore, the falsifiability criterion is not sufficient to guarantee the scientificity of psychology. In the end, common natural science methods are not sufficient to reflect the unique value of psychology. For this reason, the methodology of mature natural science is not enough to lay the foundation for psychology, which is an independent discipline.

This research proposes that the logical starting point of psychology as an independent discipline lies in its unique values, which provide an ontological commitment not only to the subject, but also to the underlying psychology, making its own special requests for the selection method of the subject. Only discipline motivation, and ontological commitment can provide a philosophical basis for psychology as an independent subject. In psychology, it is possible to solve a split subject crisis only on the premise of breaking away from the method center and rethinking the logical basis of psychology—which is an independent subject—thereby leading the discipline from a “pre-paradigm science” to a “normal science.”

Keywords psychology      split crisis      ontological commitment      methodology     
ZTFLH:  B84.05  
  N031  
Corresponding Authors: Yueyu SHU,Yan YUAN     E-mail: shuyueyu@nwnu.edu.cn;yuanyan1@nwnu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 24 July 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Yueyu SHU
Yingbo SHI
Yan YUAN
Cite this article:   
Yueyu SHU,Yingbo SHI,Yan YUAN. An “operational definition” and a “falsifiability criterion” are not sufficient to lay the foundation for scientific psychology[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1068-1078.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.01068     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I9/1068
  
1 Bensley D. A. ( 2005). Critical thinking in psychology (Trans.By X. P. Li et al.). Beijing: China Light Industry Press.
2 [ 本斯利 . ( 2005). 心理学批判性思维 (李小平等译).北京: 中国轻工业出版社.]
3 Boring E. G. ( 1981). A history of experimental psychology (Trans.By J. F. Gao). Beijing: The Commercial Press.
4 [ 波林 . ( 1981). 实验心理学史 (高觉敷译). 北京: 商务印书馆.]
5 Dienes Z. ( 2018). Understanding psychology as a science:An introduction to scientific and statistical inference (Trans. By L. N. Sun et al.). Shanghai: East China Normal University Press.
6 [卓顿·迪恩斯.(2018). 如何理解心理学:科学推断与统计推断 (孙里宁等, 译).上海: 华东师范大学出版社.]
7 Gao S.C . ( 2013). A theoretical observation of and reflection on some development patterns of western psychology. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), ( 4), 105-116.
8 [ 高申春 . ( 2013). 西方心理学若干历史发展模式的审视与省思. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), ( 4), 105-116.]
9 Gao S. C. & Sun N . ( 2015). The notion of psychology as a science: Its dilemma and solutions. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), ( 3), 92-99.
10 [ 高申春, 孙楠 . ( 2015). 论心理学作为科学的观念及其困境与出路. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), ( 3), 92-99.]
11 Gao S. C., &Zhen . ( 2018). Cassirer and the phenomenological approach to psychology. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences).57( 6), 183-190.
12 [ 高申春, 甄洁 . ( 2018). 卡西尔与心理学的现象学道路. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版).57( 6), 183-190. ]
url: 研究点分析
13 Ge L.j . (1995). On the mental culture. Dalian: Liaoning Normal University Press.
14 [ 葛鲁嘉 . ( 1995). 心理文化论要. 大连: 辽宁师范大学出版社.]
15 Guo Y. Y. ( 2002a). Spiritual pursuit: Research on transpersonal psychology and its therapeutic theory. Wuhan: Central China Normal University Press.
16 [ 郭永玉 . ( 2002 a). 精神的追求: 超个人心理学及其治疗理论研究. 武汉: 华中师范大学出版社.]
17 Guo Y.Y . (2002b). On physics as a model of psychology. Educational Research and Experiment, ( 4), 41-43.
18 [ 郭永玉 . (2002b). 论物理学作为心理学的榜样. 教育研究与实验, ( 4), 41-43.]
19 Guo Y.Y . ( 2003). Transpersonal psychology: A literature review. Journal of Nanjing Normal University (Social Science Edition), ( 4), 96-103.
20 [ 郭永玉 . (2003). 超个人心理学观评析. 南京师大学报(社会科学版), ( 4), 96-103.]
21 Hao, Q. & Yue, G. A . ( 1999). The enlightenment of "non-scientific psychology" on social psychology Methodology. Journal of Dialectics of Nature, ( 6), 14-19.
22 [ 郝琦, 乐国安 . ( 1999). “非科学的心理学”对社会心理学方法论的启示. 自然辩证法通讯, ( 6), 14-19.]
23 Huo Y. Q. (2009). Rediscovery of the theoretical value of psychology. Beijing: China Social Sciences Press.
24 [ 霍涌泉 . ( 2009). 心理学理论价值的再发现. 北京: 中国社会科学出版社.]
25 Li H. F. ( 2009). The classical theory of Western philosophy of science. Changchun: Jilin People's Publishing House.
26 [ 李海峰 . ( 2009). 西方科学哲学经典理论教程.长春: 吉林人民出版社.]
27 , Li H. W. & Xiao, Y.L . ( 2018). 40 Years of autoposesis theory: Review and contemplatiom. Journal of Northwest Normal University (Social Science Edition).55( 1), 98-109.
28 [ 李恒威, 肖云龙 . (2018). 自创生理论40年: 回顾和思考. 西北师大学报(社会科学版).55( 1), 98-109.]
29 Leahey T. H. ( 2013). A history of psychology: Main currents in psychological thought (Sixth Edition) (Trans. by K. Jiang et al.). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
30 [ 黎黑 . ( 2013). 心理学史——心理学思想的主要流派(第六版) (蒋柯等, 译). 上海: 上海人民出版社.]
31 Mahner M.. ( 2015). Demarcation between science and non-science. In Gabbay, D. (Eds). Elsevier handbook of philosophy of science · General philosophy of science: Focus issues (pp. 577-644) (Trans. by Guo G. C. et al. )BeijingNormal University Press.
32 [马丁·曼纳. (2015).科学与非科学的划界. 见: 道·加比等(主编). 爱思唯尔科学哲学手册·一般科学哲学:焦点主题(pp. 577-644) (郭贵春等译). 北京师范大学出版社.]
33 Maslow A.. ( 2007). Motivation and personality (Third Edition) (Trans.by J. S. Xu). Beijing: Renmin University of China Press.
34 [ 马斯洛 . ( 2007). 动机与人格(第三版) (许金声, 译).北京: 中国人民大学出版社.]
35 Popper K.. ( 1963). Conjectures and refutations. New York: Basic Books.
36 Popper K.. ( 2008). The logic of scientific discovery (Trans.by R. Q. Cha et al.). Hangzhou: China Academy of Art Press.
37 [ 波普尔 . ( 2008). 科学发现的逻辑 (查汝强等译). 杭州: 中国美术学院出版社.]
38 Peng Y. S. ( 2009). Deconstruction and reconstruction of human. Changsha: Hunan Educational Press.
39 [ 彭运石 . ( 2009). 人的消解与重构. 长沙: 湖南教育出版社.]
40 Shu Y.Y . ( 2012). Psychological dynamics system and the principle of teleology of psychology: On the fundamental status of motivation in psychology (Unpublished doctorial dissertation).Jilin University
41 [ 舒跃育 . ( 2012). 心理动力系统与心理学的目的论原则——论动机在心理学中的基础性地位(博士学位论文). 吉林大学.]
42 Shu Y.Y . ( 2013). The essential and resolution of the crisis in psychology. Journal of Psychological Science.36( 6), 1510-1516.
43 [ 舒跃育 . ( 2013). 心理学危机的实质与解决方案. 心理科学.36( 6), 1510-1516.]
44 Stanovich K. E. ( 2012). How to think straight about psychology (Trans.by D. H. Dou & X. C. Liu). Beijing: Posts & Telecon Press.
45 [基斯·斯坦诺维奇. (2012). 对“伪心理学”说不 (窦东辉, 刘肖岑, 译). 北京:人民邮电出版社.]
46 Viney W., &King B. D. ,( 2009). A history of psychology:Ideas and context (Third Edition) (Trans. by B. Y. Guo).Beijing: Beijing World Publishing Corporation.
47 [韦恩·瓦伊尼.布雷特·金. (2009). 心理学史: 观念与背景(第三版). 北京:世界图书出版公司北京公司.]
48 Wang R.J . ( 2008). Ontiological promise and the origin of the indeterminacy of scientific knowledge. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, ( 2), 16-19.
49 [ 王荣江 . ( 2008). “本体论承诺”与科学知识不确定性的根源. 自然辩证法研究, ( 2), 16-19.]
50 Xin Z.Q . ( 2017). Psychology oriented to changing reality: Some necessary transformations in methodology. Psychology: Techniques and Applications.5( 4), 245-256.
51 [ 辛自强 . ( 2017). 改变现实的心理学: 必要的方法论变革. 心理技术与应用.5( 4), 245-256.]
52 , Yang C.F., & Tang X.J . ( 2008). Scientific meaning of Quine's thought for ontological commitment. Studies in Dialectics of Nature, ( 10), 6-12.
53 [ 杨长福, 唐晓嘉 . ( 2008). 蒯因“本体论承诺”思想的科学意义. 自然辩证法研究, ( 10), 6-12.]
54 Yang G.S . ( 1985). A feeling of a behavioral scientist. In Yang G. S. Psychological adaptation of modern society(pp. 265-266). Taipei: Juliu Book Company.
55 [ 杨国枢 . ( 1985). 一个行为科学者的感想. 见杨国枢著, 现代社会的心理适应 (pp. 265-266). 台北: 巨流图书公司.]
56 Zhang C. X. ( 1994). Modern psychology. Shanghai: Shanghai People's Publishing House.
57 [ 张春兴 . ( 1994). 现代心理学. 上海: 上海人民出版社.]
58 Zhang, C. X . ( 2002). On the predicaments and prespects of development of psychology. Journal of Psychological Science.25( 5), 591-596.
59 [ 张春兴 . ( 2002). 论心理学发展的困境与出路. 心理科学.25( 5), 591-596.]
60 Zhang H. C. ( 2003). Behavioral psychology. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Education Press.
61 [ 张厚粲 . ( 2003). 行为主义心理学.杭州: 浙江教育出版社.]
[1] YAN Shu-Chang; GAO Zhipeng. A microhistory of psychology in letters: What happened to I. Huang’s research reports on the size-weight illusion?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 554-568.
[2] HUO Yongquan; SONG Peipei; CHEN Xiaopu; ZHU Yi; CHEN Yuanyuan. The orientation of Bruner’s psychological research at his later age and its academic relevance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 416-426.
[3] WANG Jiaying; CHEN Bin-Bin. The influence of childhood stress and mortality threat on mating standards[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 857-866.
[4] YE Haosheng. Theoretical Analysis of the Meaning of Embodiment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042.
[5] YE Haosheng. Cognition and Body: A Perspective from Theoretical Psychology[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 481-488.
[6] HUO Yongquan1; CHEN Yongyong1,2; GUO Zhuyi. An Exploration on the Inter Complementary Optimistic Psychological Thoughts of the Confucianism and Taoism in the Traditional Chinese Culture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1305-1312.
[7] LU Hui-Jing. Self-Deception: Deceiving Yourself to Better Deceive Others[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(9): 1265-1278.
[8] LIU Bang-Hui,PENG Kai-Ping. Challenge and Contribution of Cultural Psychology to Empirical Legal Studies[J]. , 2012, 44(3): 413-426.
[9] LV Xiao-Kang,WANG Xin-Jian. Image Thinking: The Cultural-Psychological Underpinning of Chinese Patients’ Somatic Propensity[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 276-284.
[10] TIAN Wei,XIN Tao. A Polytomous Extension of Rule Space Method Based on Graded Response Model[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 249-262.
[11] YAN Shu-Chang;CHEN Jing;ZHANG Hong-Mei. Siegen K. Chou's Military Psychological Practices and Thoughts During the War of Resistance Against Japan[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(11): 1554-1562.
[12] YE Hao-Sheng,Henderikus J. Stam. What Is a Good Theory? A Perspective from Theoretical Psychology[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 133-137.
[13] Ying-yi HONG,Melody Manchi CHAO. Steps to Building a Good Theory — Embracing Diversity[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 138-141.
[14] HUO Yong-Quan,WEI Ping. On the New Characteristics and Achievements of the Marxism Orientation in Western Psychology[J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1468-1475.
[15] YANG Siliang. Chen Li and 20th Century Industrial Psychology in China[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1341-1354.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech