Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (9) : 992-1006     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00992
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The influence of shame on deceptive behavior: The role of self-control
FAN Wei1,REN Mengmeng1,XIAO Junze1,JIAN Zengdan1,DU Xiaoming1,FU Xiaolan2,3()
1. Cognition and Human Behavior Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
2. State Key Laboratory of Brain and Cognitive Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 China
3. Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101 China
Download: PDF(1000 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Shame, as a typical moral emotion, has an influence on individual behavior that is both complex and controversial. Previous studies have found that shame produces both an unpleasant experience and a moral emotion that encourages individuals to produce positive behaviors. In recent years, Hooge’s research has proceeded from the perspective of motivation. He believes that, no matter how shame makes individuals perform, their motivation is to restore and protect the damaged self. Therefore, based on Hooge's theory, this research will examine this typical immoral behavior as an example to discuss the impact of shame upon it and its ways.

In this study, students from a university were randomly selected as participants, and the number of each experiment’s participants was arranged according to the experimental requirements. Questionnaires and behavioral experiments were used throughout the experiment, and the experimental procedures were completed in accordance with the regulations of each experiment. The requirements for each experiment were different and the procedures for conducting the experiment were different. The statistical methods of the study were also based on the requirements of each experiment.

Experiment 1 examines whether shame has an effect on deceptive behavior. Its results show that the number and tendency of deception in the shamed group were significantly lower than in the control group. To more fully explore the impact of shame on deceptive behavior in different contexts, Experiment 2 improved upon the deficiencies of Experiment 1 and divided shame situations into two types: moral anomie and lack of ability. It was found that the number of deceptions in the moral anomie shamed group was significantly lower than that in the control group, and the number of deceptions in the lack of ability shamed group was significantly higher than that in the control group. To examine the specific methods and mechanisms of shame in affecting deception, we propose that shamed individuals increase their self-control resources and, thus, reduce the theory of fraud. Experiment 3a examined the impact of shame on self-control resources and found that the self-control resources of the shamed group were significantly higher than those of the control group. Experiment 3b explored the specific mechanisms of shame affecting deceptive behavior. It was found that self-control resources played a complete mediating role in the process of shame in affecting deception.

In summary, these findings suggest that shame can deter deception under certain conditions. The condition is that shame is caused by moral disorder rather than lack of ability; the mechanism of shame in affecting behavior may be: Individuals who feel shame will restore and protect the damaged moral self by mobilizing more self-control resources to influence behavior.

Keywords shame      self-control resources      deception      influence mechanism      mediating role     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Xiaolan FU     E-mail: fuxl@psych.ac.cn
Issue Date: 24 July 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Wei FAN
Mengmeng REN
Junze XIAO
Zengdan JIAN
Xiaoming DU
Xiaolan FU
Cite this article:   
Wei FAN,Mengmeng REN,Junze XIAO, et al. The influence of shame on deceptive behavior: The role of self-control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 992-1006.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00992     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I9/992
  
  
道德同一性 羞耻组 控制组 t
情感认同 4.05 ± 0.24 4.22 ± 0.37 -1.26
认知认同 4.11 ± 0.56 3.92 ± 0.26 1.23
态度认同 3.87 ± 0.21 3.92 ± 0.35 -0.58
行为认同 3.68 ± 0.54 3.60 ± 0.60 0.60
外部认同 3.92 ± 0.43 3.90 ± 0.40 0.21
  
组别 最低
欺骗
最高
欺骗
最低
倾向
最高
倾向
高欺骗
比例/%
高倾向
比例/%
羞耻组 2 26 61 95 4 56
控制组 6 46 56 98 44 92
  
  
  
道德
同一性
能力不足
羞耻组
控制组 道德失范
羞耻组
F
情感认同 4.15 ± 0.26 3.92 ± 0.67 4.13 ± 0.21 -1.26
认知认同 3.93 ± 0.62 3.92 ± 0.26 3.95 ± 0.33 1.23
态度认同 3.84 ± 0.26 4.02 ± 0.35 3.84 ± 0.24 -0.58
行为认同 3.68 ± 0.64 3.65 ± 0.31 3.66 ± 0.47 0.60
外部认同 3.88 ± 0.43 3.80 ± 0.45 3.87 ± 0.32 0.21
  
  
组别 最低欺骗 最高欺骗 高欺骗比例/%
能力不足羞耻组 4 17 48
控制组 1 15 6
道德失范羞耻组 0 7 0
  
  
变异源 df MS F p
情绪诱发 1 204967.16 29.29*** 0.000
资源衰竭 1 55275.94 7.9** 0.006
情绪诱发×资源衰竭 1 2010.89 0.287 0.477
  
  
变量 羞耻情绪 自我控制资源 欺骗行为
羞耻情绪 1
自我控制资源 0.452** 1
欺骗行为 -0.221* -0.281* 1
  
步骤 标准化回归方程 SE 回归系数检验
第一步 y = -0.221x+ 5.278 0.124 -2.473*
第二步 m = 0.452x+ 222.729 5.186 5.529***
第三步 y = -0.118x+ 0.227m + 6.387 0.137 -1.202
0.002 -2.309*
  
1 Bai H. .( 2007). Judicature and administration of prefectures and counties in the qing dynasty-Huang Liuhong and 《Fu Hui quan shu》. Northern Methodology.1( 3), 99-109.
2 [ 柏桦 . ( 2007). 清代州县司法与行政——黄六鸿与《福惠全书》. 北方法学.1( 3), 99-109.]
3 Baumeister R.F., & Alquist J.L . ( 2009). Is there a downside to good self-control? Self and Identity.8( 2-3), 115-130.
4 Baumeister R. F., Gailliot M., DeWall C. N., & Oaten M . ( 2010). Self-regulation and personality: How interventions increase regulatory success, and how depletion moderates the effects of traits on behavior. Journal of Personality.74( 6), 1773-1802.
5 Bok B.J . ( 1978). Star formation in or very close to a southern globule. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.90( 537), 489-490.
6 Chance Z., Norton M. I., Gino F., & Ariely D . ( 2011). Temporal view of the costs and benefits of self-deception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.108( Sup. 3), 15655-15659.
7 Cohen T. R., Wolf S. T., Panter A. T., & Insko C. A . ( 2011). Introducing the gasp scale: A new measure of guilt and shame proneness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.100( 5), 947-966.
8 DePaulo B. M., Kashy D. A., Kirkendol S. E., Wyer M. M., & Epstein J. A . ( 1996). Lying in everyday life. Journal of personality and social psychology.70( 5), 979-995.
9 Dewall C. N., Baumeister R. F., Gailliot M. T., & Maner J. K . ( 2008). Depletion makes the heart grow less helpful: Helping as a function of self-regulatory energy and genetic relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin.34( 12), 1653-1662.
10 de Hooge, I. E . ( 2014). Predicting consumer behavior with two emotion appraisal dimensions: Emotion valence and agency in gift giving. International Journal of Research in Marketing.31( 4), 380-394.
11 de Hooge I. E., Breugelmans S. M., Wagemans F. M. A., & Zeelenberg M . ( 2018). The social side of shame: Approach versus withdrawal. Cognition and Emotion.32( 8), 1671-1677.
12 de Hooge I. E., Breugelmans S. M., & Zeelenberg M . ( 2008). Not so ugly after all: When shame acts as a commitment device. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.95( 4), 933-943.
13 de Hooge I. E., Zeelenberg M., & Breugelmans S. M . ( 2010). Restore and protect motivations following shame. Cognition and Emotion.24( 1), 111-127.
14 de Hooge I. E., Zeelenberg M., & Breugelmans S. M . ( 2011). A functionalist account of shame-induced behaviour. Cognition and Emotion.25( 5), 939-946.
15 Ding X. P., Gao X., Fu G., & Lee K . ( 2013). Neural correlates of spontaneous deception: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS)study. Neuropsychologia.51( 4), 704-712.
16 Eisenberg N. ( 2000). Emotion, regulation, and moral development. Annual Review of Psychology.51( 1), 665-697.
17 Fan W., Zhong, Y P., Li H. Y., Meng C. Y., You C., & Fu X. L . ( 2016). The influence of self-control in the perceived of deception and deception. Acta Psychologica Sinica.48( 7), 845-856.
18 [ 范伟, 钟毅平, 李慧云, 孟楚熠, 游畅, 傅小兰 . ( 2016). 欺骗判断与欺骗行为中自我控制的影响. 心理学报.48( 7), 845-856.]
19 Gao X.D . ( 2006). An empirical study of the relationship between counterfactual thinking and guilt and shame (Unpublished master’s thesis), Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou.
20 [ 高学德 . ( 2006). 反事实思维与内疚和羞耻关系的实证研究(硕士学位论文), 西北师范大学,兰州.]
21 Gao X.D . ( 2013). The effects of locus of control and guilt and shame on counterfactual thinking. Psychological development and education.29( 2), 159-165.
22 [ 高学德 . ( 2013). 大学生心理控制源与内疚感和羞耻感对反事实思维的影响. 心理发展与教育.29( 2), 159-165.]
23 Gino F., Schweitzer M. E., Mead N. L., & Dan A . ( 2011). Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes.115( 2), 191-203.
24 Gomez R., Bounds J., Holmberg K., Fullarton C., & Gomez A . ( 1998). Effects of neuroticism and avoidant coping style on maladjustment during early adolescence. Personality & Individual Differences.26( 2), 305-319.
25 Guan Y., &He J.M . ( 2018). Self-control: Definition, theory and expectation. Psychology: Techniques and Application, 6( 2), 118-128.
26 [ 关元, 何嘉梅 . ( 2018). 自我控制: 内涵、理论及展望. 心理技术与应用.6( 2), 118-128.]
url: 研究点分析
27 Hetherington, E. M., & Feldman, S. E . ( 1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology.55( 4), 212-218.
28 Horberg E. J., Oveis C., & Keltner D . ( 2011). Emotions as moral amplifiers: An appraisal tendency approach to the influences of distinct emotions upon moral judgment. Emotion Review.3( 3), 237-244.
29 Hundt, N. E., & Holohan, D. R . ( 2012). The role of shame in distinguishing perpetrators of intimate partner violence in US veterans. Journal of Traumatic Stress.25( 2), 191-197.
30 Izard C. E. ( 1977). Human emotions. New York: Plenum Press.
31 Inzlicht M., Schmeichel B. J., & Macrae C. N . ( 2014). Why self-control seems (but may not be) limited. Trends in Cognitive Sciences.18( 3), 127-133.
32 Jones T.M . ( 1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review.16( 2), 366-395.
33 Keltner D., & Haidt , J. ( 1999). Social functions of emotions at four levels of analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 13(5), 505-521.
34 Kool W., McGuire J. T., Rosen Z. B., & Botvinick M. M . ( 2010). Decision making and the avoidance of cognitive demand. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General.139( 4), 665-682.
35 Leng B. B., Wang X. L., Gao H. M., & Li F. H . ( 2015). Cognitive and emotional activities of guilt and the corresponding brain network. Advances in Psychological Science.23( 12), 2064-2071.
36 [ 冷冰冰, 王香玲, 高贺明, 李富洪 . ( 2015). 内疚的认知和情绪活动及其脑区调控. 心理科学进展.2 3(12), 2064-2071.]
37 Li X.P., &Yun X. , ( 2012). Will power lead to deception? Psychological Research.5( 6), 40-43.
38 [ 李小平, 云祥 . ( 2012). 权力会导致欺骗吗? 心理研究.5( 6), 40-43.]
39 Liu X. L., & Che, W. B . ( 2005). New advances in the study of child deception in the West. Psychological Science.28( 1), 122-124.
40 [ 刘秀丽, 车文博 . ( 2005). 西方关于儿童欺骗研究的新进展. 心理科学.28( 1), 122-124.]
41 Masicampo, E. J., & Baumeister, R. F . ( 2011). Unfulfilled goals interfere with tasks that require executive functions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.47( 2), 300-311.
42 Mead N. L., Baumeister R. F., Gino F., Schweitzer M. E., & Dan A . ( 2009). Too tired to tell the truth: Self-control resource depletion and dishonesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.45( 3), 594-597.
43 Muraven M., &Baumeister R.F . ( 2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin.126( 2), 247-259.
44 Muraven M., Pogarsky G., & Shmueli D . ( 2006). Self-control depletion and the general theory of crime. Journal of Quantitative Criminology.22( 3), 263-277.
45 Muraven M., Tice D. M., & Baumeister R. F . ( 1998). Self-control as limited resource: Regulatory depletion patterns. Journal of personality and social psychology.74( 3), 774-789.
46 , Preacher K.J., & Hayes A.F, . ( 2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods Instruments & Computers.36( 4), 717-731.
47 , Qian M.Y., & Yan J.L . ( 2002). A comparative study of college students' shame and guilt. Acta Psychologica Sinica.34( 6), 74-81.
48 [ 钱铭怡, 戚健俐 . ( 2002). 大学生羞耻和内疚差异的对比研究. 心理学报.34( 6), 74-81.]
49 , Seiter J.S., & Bruschke J. ,( 2007). Deception and emotion: the effects of motivation, relationship type, and sex on expected feelings of guilt and shame following acts of deception in united states and chinese samples. Communication Studies.58( 1), 1-16.
50 Shmueli D., &Prochaska J.J . ( 2009). Resisting tempting foods and smoking behavior: Implications from a self-control theory perspective. Health Psychology.28( 3), 300-306.
51 Stucke T.S., & BaumeisterR.F, . ( 2006). Ego depletion and aggressive behavior: Is the inhibition of aggression a limited resource? European Journal of Social Psychology.36( 1), 1-13.
52 Tan Y.L . ( 2017). Relationship between shame, guilt and adolescents' self-injury behavior (Unpublished master’s thesis), Hunan Normal University, Changsha.
53 [ 覃雅兰 . ( 2017). 羞耻、内疚与青少年自伤行为的关系 (硕士学位论文), 湖南师范大学, 长沙.]
54 Tangney, J. P . ( 1995). Recent advances in the empirical study of shame and guilt. American Behavioral Scientist.38( 8), 1132-1145.
55 Tangney J. P., Dearing R. L., & Gamble D . ( 2003). Shame and guilt. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology.14, 669-674.
56 Tangney J. P., Stuewig J., & Mashek D. J . ( 2007a). Moral emotions and moral behavior. Annual Review of Psychology.58( 1), 345-372.
57 Tangney J. P., Stuewig J. & Mashek. D.J., (2007b). What's moral about the self-conscious emotions? In J. L. Tracy, R. W. Robins, & J. P. Tangney (Eds.), The self-conscious emotions:Theory and research (pp. 21-37). New York, NY, US: Guilford Press.
58 , Wang Y.N., & Yang Z.F, . ( 2007). Discussion on the relationship between ego struggle and ego struggle. Journal of Southwest University (Social Sciences Edition).33( 6), 20-27.
59 [ 王轶楠, 杨中芳 . ( 2007). 小我争(护)面子与大我争面子导向之关系的探讨. 西南大学学报(社会科学版).33( 6), 20-27.]
60 Wen B.., (2012). The relationship between college students' moral judgment ability, moral self-identity and academic deception (Unpublished master’s thesis), Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu.
61 [ 文斌 . ( 2012). 大学生道德判断能力、道德自我认同与学业欺骗行为的关系(硕士学位论文),四川师范大学, 成都.]
62 Wong E. M., Haselhuhn M. P., & Kray L. J . ( 2012). Improving the future by considering the past: The impact of upward counterfactual reflection and implicit beliefs on negotiation performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.48( 1), 403-406.
63 , Yu G.L., & Zhao J.Y, . ( 2009). Self-conscious emotions: Research on self-focused moral emotions. Psychological Development and Education.25( 2), 116-120.
64 [ 俞国良, 赵军燕 . ( 2009). 自我意识情绪: 聚焦于自我的道德情绪研究. 心理发展与教育.25( 2), 116-120.]
65 Zeng Y.L . ( 2016). The influence of shame on deception (Unpublished master’s thesis), Guangzhou University.
66 [ 曾燕玲 . ( 2016). 羞耻情绪对欺骗行为的影响(硕士学位论文), 广州大学.]
67 Zhao C.P . ( 2010). Evolutionary psychological analysis of face-loving Chinese. Psychological Exploration.30( 5), 20-23.
68 [ 赵昌平 . ( 2010). 中国人爱面子的进化心理学分析. 心理学探新.30( 5), 20-23.]
[1] FAN Wei; ZHONG Yiping; LI Huiyun; MENG Chuyi; YOU Chang; FU Xiaolan. The influence of self-control in the perceived of deception and deception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 845-856.
[2] MA Huixia; XUE Yang; LIU Jing. The academic shame of middle school students: Measurement, physical arousal, and its relation with students’ academic achievement[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 529-539.
[3] FU Xinyuan; LU Zhiyuan; KOU Yu. Effects of a Stranger’s Presence and Behavior on Moral Hypocrisy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1058-1066.
[4] LU Hui-Jing. Self-Deception: Deceiving Yourself to Better Deceive Others[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(9): 1265-1278.
[5] ZHANG Li-Jin,WU Nan,ZHENG Yan. The Training Effects of Different Linguistic Interference on Young Chinese Children’s Performance on A Theory of Mind Task[J]. , 2008, 40(07): 819-827.
[6] Shi-Bing,Su-Yanjie. Children’s Deceptive Behaviors And Related Social Characters[J]. , 2007, 39(01): 111-117.
[7] Qian-Mingyi,Liu-Jia,Zhang-Zheyu. THE DIFFERENCE OF SHAME PRONENESS AND COPING STYLE TOWARDS SHAME STORIES[J]. , 2003, 35(03): 387-392.
[8] Qian Mingyi 1,2, Qi Jianli2 (1Psychology and Behavior Research Center, Tianjin 300074) (2Department of Psychology, Peking University, 100871). A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SHAME AND GUILT AMONG CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTS[J]. , 2002, 34(06): 74-81.
[9] Xie Bo, Qian Mingyi(Beijing Univerity,Beijing 100871). PHENOMENOLOGICAL DIFFERENCES BETWEEN SHAME AND GUILT AMONG CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTS[J]. , 2000, 32(01): 105-109.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech