Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (7) : 781-794     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00781
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The implicit advantage of a high kindness trait in the action control of emotion regulation
SUN Juncai1(),XUN Fengjiao1,LIU Ping2,ZHANG Wenhai3
1 School of Education, Qufu Normal University, Qufu 273165, China
2 Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
3 Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 224001, China
Download: PDF(837 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Kindness is a desirable trait to possess, and it is therefore commendable to investigate its link with self-regulation and, in particular, emotion regulation. Implicit processes in general are much more consistent and reliable, as they are triggered automatically and run to completion without conscious effort or monitoring. Therefore, the effect of implicit emotion regulation on psychological health is more important than that of explicit cognitive behavior and ability. Based on an action control perspective, which suggests that the regulatory process for emotions usually includes three sub-tasks, in this study, a set of implicit tasks were designed to investigate the influence of the kindness trait on implicit emotion regulation among undergraduate students with different levels of kindness.
The Chinese Personality Scale was used to assess level of kindness. This study surveyed 399 college students, ultimately selecting 60 participants (30 with high scores and 30 with low scores). The results showed that the high-kindness group had significantly higher scores (M = 90.57, SD = 6.17) than did the low-kindness group (M = 52.28, SD = 3.83), t (58) = 28.70, p < 0.001). A subset of participants was selected based on their kindness scores. They then completed three experimental tasks. First, an emotional Stroop task was conducted to compare the interference effect in color identification caused by emotional valence between the two groups. In this task, the experiment materials were positive and negative emotional words related to interpersonal relationships. The second task used an implicit association test of emotion regulation (ER-IAT) to assess differences in implicit attitude toward emotion regulation between the two groups. The third task was a visual face detection task, which used different expressions to determine the efficiency of implicit emotion recovery in the two groups after a negative emotion induction.
The results showed that (1) in the first task, the high-kindness group had a significantly longer reaction time to words describing positive interpersonal relationships than to negative words (p = 0.02). In contrast, the low-kindness participants did not show any difference in reaction times to the two types of words (p = 0.4). (2) In the second task, the high-kindness group had a significantly higher D value (0.34 ± 0.64) than did the low-kindness group (-0.30 ± 0.68), t(54) = 3.64, p = 0.001. (3) In the third task, although the explicit emotion changes did not differ significantly between the two groups at any time point (all p > 0.05), the reaction times for the high-kindness participants were significantly shorter than those for the low-kindness participants in the visual face search tasks using happy-angry combination matrixes (p = 0.01).
This study presented the link between the personality trait of kindness and implicit emotional responses according to action control theory. These results suggested that (1) the emotional valence of words only interferes with the reaction times of high-kindness participants’ color judgment, and a more significant Stroop interference effect was only found for positive valence words. (2) High-kindness individuals were more inclined to demonstrate a positive implicit attitude in emotion regulation and preferred a deliberate, appropriate control of emotions. In contrast, the low-kindness individuals were more inclined toward a negative implicit attitude towards emotion regulation and preferred a direct expression of emotions. (3) The high-kindness individuals shifted their attention away from angry faces more quickly and had greater implicit emotion regulation ability. This study provided experimental evidence that there was an advantage for kindness traits with regard to implicit emotion regulation.

Keywords kindness personality trait      implicit emotion regulation      action control theory      controlled implicit regulation      face visual search task     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Juncai SUN     E-mail: sunjc@qfnu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 22 May 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Juncai SUN
Fengjiao XUN
Ping LIU
Wenhai ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Juncai SUN,Fengjiao XUN,Ping LIU, et al. The implicit advantage of a high kindness trait in the action control of emotion regulation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 781-794.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00781     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I7/781
  
  
人际关系情感词 高善良特质组(n = 25) 低善良特质组(n = 25)
M SD M SD
人际关系积极词 669.89 63.20 611.57 57.04
人际关系消极词 651.17 63.69 618.20 55.21
  
步骤 任务 试次 按F键反应 按J键反应
1 对情绪调节词反应(练习) 20 情绪控制词 情绪表达词
2 对属性词的反应(练习) 20 积极词 消极词
3 对联合分类任务1反应 (练习) 20 情绪控制词+积极词 情绪表达词+消极词
4 对联合分类任务1反应 (测试) 40 情绪控制词+积极词 情绪表达词+消极词
5 对情绪调节词反应(练习) 20 情绪表达词 情绪控制词
6 对联合分类任务2反应(练习) 20 情绪表达词+积极词 情绪控制词+消极词
7 对联合分类任务2反应(测试) 40 情绪表达词+积极词 情绪控制词+消极词
  
  
  
实验任务 高善良特质组(n = 28) 低善良特质组(n = 28)
M SD M SD
相容任务 961.23 351.72 1136.25 388.29
不相容任务 1122.72 337.83 953.65 254.03
  
  
  
测试时间 PA t NA t
高善良(n = 29) 低善良(n = 28) 高善良(n = 29) 低善良(n = 28)
M SD M SD M SD M SD
基线情绪(时间1) 31.10 4.76 33.25 7.06 -1.35 21.07 7.83 21.21 7.86 -0.07
诱发情绪后(时间2) 29.10 6.24 30.50 8.74 -0.96 25.45 7.85 23.43 8.41 0.94
实验结束后(时间3) 29.24 5.54 29.86 8.66 -0.32 22.55 6.96 21.82 7.75 0.37
  
面孔组合 高善良特质组(n = 29) 低善良特质组(n = 28) t
M SD M SD
高兴-愤怒 1301.99 202.11 1445.31 202.08 -2.68*
高兴-中性 1255.04 188.41 1313.31 198.64 -1.33
愤怒-中性 1390.51 199.93 1447.72 209.02 -1.05
  
[1] Aknin L. B., Barrington-Leigh C. P., Dunn E. W., Helliwell J. F., Burns J., Biswas-Diener R., … Norton M. I . ( 2013). Prosocial spending and well-being: Cross-cultural evidence for a psychological universal. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104( 4), 635-652.
[2] Aknin L. B., Broesch T., Hamlin J. K & van de Vondervoort, J. W. ., ( 2015). Prosocial behavior leads to happiness in a small-scale rural society. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144( 4), 788-795.
[3] Aldao A. , ( 2013). The future of emotion regulation research: Capturing context. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8( 2), 155-172.
[4] Alden L.E., & Trew J.L . ( 2013). If it makes you happy: Engaging in kind acts increases positive affect in socially anxious individuals. Emotion, 13( 1), 64-75.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0027761
[5] Algom D., Chajut E., & Lev S . ( 2004). A rational look at the emotional Stroop phenomenon: A generic slowdown, not a stroop effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 133( 3), 323-338.
[6] Bai X. J., Jia L. P., & Wang J. X . ( 2016). Emotional priming effects on difficult Stroop task for trait anxiety. Journal of Psychological Science, 39( 1), 8-12.
[6] [ 白学军, 贾丽萍, 王敬欣 . ( 2016). 特质焦虑个体在高难度Stroop任务下的情绪启动效应. 心理科学, 39( 1), 8-12.]
[7] Bartoszek G., & Cervone D. , ( 2016). Toward an implicit measure of emotions: Ratings of abstract images reveal distinct emotional states. Cognition and Emotion, 31( 7), 1377-1391.
[8] Baumeister R. F., Bratslavsky E., Finkenauer C., & Vohs K. D . ( 2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5( 4), 477-509.
[9] Braunstein L. M., Gross J. J., & Ochsner K. N . ( 2017). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A multi-level framework. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 12( 10), 1545-1557.
url: https://academic.oup.com/scan/article/12/10/1545/4158838
[10] Buchanan K.E., & Bardi A. , ( 2010). Acts of kindness and acts of novelty affect life satisfaction. Journal of Social Psychology, 150( 3), 235-237.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224540903365554
[11] Cai H., Sriram N., Greenwald A. G., & Mcfarland S. G . ( 2004). The implicit association test's D measure can minimize a cognitive skill confound: Comment on Mcfarland and Crouch. Social Cognition, 22( 6), 673-684.
url: http://guilfordjournals.com/doi/10.1521/soco.22.6.673.54821
[12] Christou-champi S., Farrow T. F. D., & Webb T. L . ( 2015). Automatic control of negative emotions: Evidence that structured practice increases the efficiency of emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 29( 2), 319-331.
[13] Cornwell J. F.M., & Higgins E.T . ( 2015). The 'ought' premise of moral psychology and the importance of the ethical 'ideal'. Review Of General Psychology, 19( 3), 311-328.
[14] Ehring T., Tuschen-Caffier B., Schnülle J., Fischer S., & Gross J. J . ( 2010). Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: Spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion, 10( 10), 563-572.
[15] Etkin A., Prater K. E., Hoeft F., Menon V., & Schatzberg A. F . ( 2010). Failure of anterior cingulate activation and connectivity with the amygdala during implicit regulation of emotional processing in generalized anxiety disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 167( 5), 545-554.
[16] Feldmann-Wüstefeld T., Schmidt-Daffy M., & Schubö A . ( 2011). Neural evidence for the threat detection advantage: Differential attention allocation to angry and happy faces. Psychophysiology, 48( 5), 697-707.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-5
[17] Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., & Glick P . ( 2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 2), 77-83.
[18] Gan Y. Q., Wang C., & Hu X. X .( 2007). The theoretical construct of Chinese core self-evaluation. Advances in Psychological Science, 15( 2), 217-223.
[18] [ 甘怡群, 王纯, 胡潇潇 . ( 2007). 中国人的核心自我评价的理论构想. 心理科学进展, 15( 2), 217-223.]
[19] Gong X., Huang Y. X., Wang Y., & Luo Y. J . ( 2011). Revision of the Chinese facial affective picture system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 25( 1), 40-46.
[19] [ 龚栩, 黄宇霞, 王妍, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2011). 中国面孔表情图片系统的修订. 中国心理卫生杂志, 25( 1), 40-46.]
[20] Greenwald A. G., Nosek B. A., & Banaji M. R . ( 2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85( 2), 197-216.
[21] Gross J. J. & Thompson, R. A.. ,( 2007) .Emotion regulation: Conceptual foundations In J J Gross (Ed), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp 3-24). New York, NY, US: The Guilford Press.
[22] Gyurak A., Gross J. J., & Etkin A . ( 2011). Explicit and implicit emotion regulation: A dual-process framework. Cognition and Emotion, 25( 3), 400-412.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699931.2010.544160
[23] Hopp H., Troy A. S., & Mauss I. B . ( 2011). The unconscious pursuit of emotion regulation: Implications for psychological health. Cognition and Emotion, 25( 3), 532-545.
[24] Jostmann N. B., Koole S. L., van der Wulp, N. Y., & Fockenberg D. A . ( 2005). Subliminal affect regulation: The moderating role of action vs. state orientation. European Psychologist, 10( 3), 209-217.
[25] Kazén M., Kuhl J., & Quirin M . ( 2015). Personality interacts with implicit affect to predict performance in analytic versus holistic processing. Journal of Personality, 83( 3), 251-261.
[26] Kokkonen M. & Pulkkinen L. , ( 2001). Examination of the paths between personality, current mood, its evaluation, and emotion regulation. European Journal of Personality, 15( 2), 83-104.
[27] Koole S.L., & Fockenberg D. ,( 2011). Implicit emotion regulation under demanding conditions: The moderating role of action versus state orientation. Cognition and Emotion, 25( 3), 440-452.
[28] Koole S.L., & Jostmann N.B . ( 2004). Getting a grip on your feelings: Effects of action orientation and external demands on intuitive affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87( 6), 974-990.
[29] Koole S.L., & Rothermund K. , ( 2011). "I feel better but I don't know why": The psychology of implicit emotion regulation. Cognition and Emotion, 25( 3), 389-399.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699931.2010.550505
[30] Koole S. L., Webb T. L., & Sheeran P. L . ( 2015). Implicit emotion regulation: Feeling better without knowing why. Current Opinion in Psychology, 3, 6-10.
[31] Lamers M. J. M., & Roelofs A. , ( 2011). Attentional control adjustments in Eriksen and Stroop task performance can be independent of response conflict. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64( 6), 1056-1081.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2010.523792
[32] Liu J.S, & Sang B. , ( 2009). Effects of the implicit attitude towards emotion regulation on individual emotion regulation. Journal of Psychological Science, 32( 3), 571-574.
[32] [ 刘俊升, 桑标 . ( 2009). 情绪调节内隐态度对个体情绪调节的影响. 心理科学, 32( 3), 571-574.]
[33] Liu J. S., & Sang B.,( 2011). The development of implicit and explicit attitude to emotion regulation among adolescence. Journal of Psychological Science, 34( 5), 1095-1100.
[33] [ 刘俊升, 桑标 . ( 2011). 情绪调节内隐和外显态度在青少年阶段的发展特点. 心理科学, 34( 5), 1095-1100.]
[34] Liu W. W., Jiang Q., Ren J. J., L S. F., & X Y. P . ( 2015). The impact of trait anger on aggressive behavior: Moderated mediating effect of hostile cognition and impulsivity level. Psychological Development and Education, 31( 4), 485-493.
[34] [ 刘文文, 江琦, 任晶晶, 李树芳, 徐雅珮 . ( 2015). 特质愤怒对攻击行为的影响: 敌意认知和冲动性水平有调节的中介作用. 心理发展与教育, 31( 4), 485-493.]
[35] Liu Y., & Wang Z. H. ( 2011). The relationship between the emotional Stroop effect and the Stroop effect. Journal of Psychological Science, 34( 4), 806-812.
[35] [ 刘亚, 王振宏 . ( 2011). 情绪Stroop效应与Stroop效应的关系. 心理科学, 34( 4), 806-812.]
[36] Lipp O. V., Price S. M., & Tellegen C. L . ( 2009). Emotional faces in neutral crowds: Detecting displays of anger, happiness, and sadness on schematic and photographic images of faces. Motivation and Emotion, 33( 3), 249-260.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11031-009-9136-2
[37] Mauss I. B., Bunge S. A., & Gross J. J . ( 2010). Automatic emotion regulation. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1( 1), 146-167.
[38] Mauss I. B., Evers C., Wilhelm F. H., & Gross J. J . ( 2006). How to bite your tongue without blowing your top: Implicit evaluation of emotion regulation predicts affective responding to anger provocation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32( 5), 589-602.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167205283841
[39] Morawetz C., Alexandrowicz R. W., & Heekeren H. R . ( 2016). Successful emotion regulation is predicted by amygdala activity and aspects of personality: A latent variable approach. Emotion, 17( 3), 421-441.
[40] öhman A., Juth P., & Lundqvist D . ( 2010). Finding the face in a crowd: Relationships between distractor redundancy, target emotion, and target gender. Cognition and Emotion, 24( 7), 1216-1228.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699930903166882
[41] öhman A., Lundqvist D., & Esteves F . ( 2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80( 3), 381-396.
[42] Otake K., Shimai S., Tanaka-Matsumi J., Otsui K., & Fredrickson B. L . ( 2006). Happy people become happier through kindness: A counting kindnesses intervention. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7( 3), 361-375.
[43] Paschke L. M., Dörfel D., Steimke R., Trempler I., Magrabi A., Ludwig V. U., … Walter H . ( 2016). Individual differences in self-reported self-control predict successful emotion regulation. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11( 8), 1193-1204.
[44] Pollock N. C., Mccabe G. A., Southard A. C., & Zeigler-Hill V . ( 2016). Pathological personality traits and emotion regulation difficulties. Personality and Individual Differences, 95, 168-177.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886916301040
[45] Quirin M., Bode R. C., & Kuhl J . ( 2011). Recovering from negative events by boosting implicit positive affect. Cognition and Emotion, 25( 3), 559-570.
[46] Quirin M., & Lane R.D . ( 2012). The construction of emotional experience requires the integration of implicit and explicit emotional processes. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35( 3), 159-160.
[47] Ren J., & Zhu Q. C. ( 2015). Implicit emotion regulation: Protecting the self against escalating affective states. Advances in Psychological Science, 23( 12), 2054-2063.
[47] [ 任俊, 朱琼嫦 . ( 2015). 内隐情绪调节: 一种有效的自我保护. 心理科学进展, 23( 12), 2054-2063.]
[48] Rive M. M., van Rooijen G., Veltman D. J., Phillips M. L., Schene A. H., & Ruhé H. G . ( 2013). Neural correlates of dysfunctional emotion regulation in major depressive disorder. A systematic review of neuroimaging studies. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 37( 10), 2529-2553.
[49] Schmidt-Daffy& Martin . ( 2011). Modeling automatic threat detection: Development of a face-in-the-crowd task. Emotion, 11( 1), 153-168.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0022018
[50] Sheppes G., Scheibe S., Suri G., & Gross J. J . ( 2011). Emotion-regulation choice. Psychological Science, 22( 11), 1391-1396.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797611418350
[51] Sperduti M., Makowski D., Arcangeli M., Wantzen P., Zalla T., Lemaire S., … Piolino P . ( 2017). The distinctive role of executive functions in implicit emotion regulation. Acta Psychologica, 173, 13-20.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000169181630378X
[52] Steel P., Schmidt J., & Shultz J . ( 2008). Refining the relationship between personality and subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 134( 1), 138-161.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-2909.134.1.138
[53] Webb T. L., Gallo I. S., Miles E., Gollwitzer P. M., & Sheeran P . ( 2012). Effective regulation of affect: An action control perspective on emotion regulation. European Review of Social Psychology, 23( 1), 143-186.
[54] Tobin R. M., Graziano W. G., Vanman E. J., & Tassinary L. G . ( 2000). Personality, emotional experience, and efforts to control emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79( 4), 656-669.
[55] Trew J. L., & Alden L. E . ( 2015). Kindness reduces avoidance goals in socially anxious individuals. Motivation and Emotion, 39( 6), 892-907.
[56] Uhlmann E. L., Leavitt K., Menges J. I., Koopman J., Howe M., & Johnson R. E . ( 2012). Getting explicit about the implicit: A taxonomy of implicit measures and guide for their use in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 15( 4), 553-601.
[57] Wang D. F., & Cui H.,( 2003). Processes and preliminary results in the construction of the Chinese personality scale (QZPS). Acta Psychologica Sinica, 35( 1), 127-136.
[57] [ 王登峰, 崔红 . ( 2003). 中国人人格量表(QZPS)的编制过程与初步结果. 心理学报, 35( 1), 127-136.]
[58] Wang D., Cui H., & Zhou F . ( 2005). Measuring the personality of Chinese: QZPS versus NEO PI-R. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8( 1), 97-122.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/ajsp/8/1
[59] Wang D. F., & Cui H.,( 2007). A predictive research on psychosomatic symptoms with personality dimensions, self-experience inconsistency, and behavior inhibition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39( 5), 861-872.
[59] [ 王登峰, 崔红 . ( 2007). 人格维度、自我和谐及行为抑制与心身症状的关系. 心理学报, 39( 5), 861-872.]
[60] Wang Y. N., Zhou L. M., & Luo Y. J . ( 2008). The pilot establishment and evaluation of Chinese affective words system. Chinese Mental Health Journal, 22( 8), 608-612.
[60] [ 王一牛, 周立明, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2008). 汉语情感词系统的初步编制及评定. 中国心理卫生杂志, 22( 8), 608-612.]
[61] Zhang D. , (2014). Relationship between personality traits and emotion regulation strategies for Chinese college students. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Studies, 2( 5), 666-670.
[62] Zhang W. D., Diao J., & Schick C. J . ( 2004). The cross-cultural measurement of positive and negative affect examining the dimensionality of PANAS. Journal of Psychological Science, 27( 1), 77-79.
[62] [ 张卫东, 刁静, Constance J.Schick . ( 2004). 正、负性情绪的跨文化心理测量: PANAS维度结构检验. 心理科学, 27( 1), 77-79.]
[63] Zheng P., Liu C. H., & Yu G. L . ( 2012). An overview of mood-induction methods. Advances in Psychological Science, 20( 1), 45-55.
[63] [ 郑璞, 刘聪慧, 俞国良 . ( 2012). 情绪诱发方法述评. 心理科学进展, 20( 1), 45-55.]
[64] Zuo B., Dai T. T., Wen F. F., & Suo Y. X . ( 2015). The big two model in social cognition. Journal of Psychological Science, 38( 4), 1019-1023.
[64] [ 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤 . ( 2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38( 4), 1019-1023.]
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech