Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (5) : 571-583     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00571
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Neural mechanisms of third-party punishment: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation
YIN Xile1,2,LI Jianbiao3,4(),CHEN Siyu1,LIU Xiaoli4,HAO Jie5()
1 School of Business Administration, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
2 Zheshang Research Institute, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
3 MBA School, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
4 Selten Laboratory, Binhai College, Nankai University, Tianjin 300071, China
5 School of Accounting, Zhejiang Gongshang University, Hangzhou 310018, China
Download: PDF(1088 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The social order of human societies is largely maintained by social norms. However, we still know little about the cognitive and emotional foundations that shape social norms, which makes it difficult, if not impossible, to understand how social norms are developed and maintained. Prior neural studies, which mainly perform second-party punishment based on the ultimatum framework, rarely explore the relevant brain areas as well as the neural mechanisms of third-party punishment driven by social norms. In the current study, we provide evidences that support the influences of two types of mechanisms (i.e., negative emotions and self-interest mechanisms) on social norms compliance of third parties at opposite directions. Meanwhile, right dorsolateral prefrontal area (DLPFC) is found to play a crucial role in this process.
In this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to investigate whether increasing or decreasing right DLPFC excitability influenced third-party punishment in a dictator game. Following an experimental design of “between-subject (tDCS treatments: anodal, cathodal, sham) × within-subject (cost of punishment treatments: without cost, with cost)”, ninety participants were first randomly assigned to receive anodal, cathodal, or sham stimulation in 15 minutes. They then performed two dictator game tasks as third parties. In Task Ⅰ (without cost) participants did not need to carry any costs for their punishment (none-cost task), while in Task Ⅱ (with cost) they were required to pay for their punishment actions.
The results are given as follows. We first performed repeated measured ANOVA and one-way ANOVA to examine the effect of tDCS treatment (anodal, cathodal and sham) on emotion response. We found a significant main effect of tDCS on emotion response. Meanwhile, post-hoc analysis (SNK) showed that anodal stimulation decreased negative emotions while cathodal stimulation enhanced negative emotions. Second, the results of repeated measured ANOVA and one-way ANOVA showed a significant main effect of tDCS on punishment in the none-cost Task Ⅰ, and post-hoc analysis (SNK) showed that cathodal stimulation significantly increased punishment while the effect of anodal stimulation was insignificant. Third, we also conducted repeated measured ANOVA and one-way ANOVA to test whether the difference of the punishment between the two tasks was affected by tDCS treatments. We found that the main effect of tDCS was significant. Moreover, post-hoc analysis (SNK) showed that the difference of punishment between the two tasks was significantly higher for cathodal stimulation than for sham stimulation, while the difference of punishment between the two tasks for anodal stimulation was insignificant compared to that of sham stimulation.
The present study provides one of the first neural evidences for the role of right DLPFC in third-parties’ social norms compliance. The results indicate that DLPFC, by affecting the processes of negative emotions and self-interest, is an important brain area of social norms compliance. When third parties face violations of social norms, their brains first release negative emotions that drive third parties to punish violators. Further, if third parties need to pay for their compliance with social norms, their rational goals about self-interest weaken negative emotional impulses. Finally, the compliance with social norms depends on the trade-offs between negative emotions and self-interest mechanisms.

Keywords social norms      third-party punishment      dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)      transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)      emotion     
ZTFLH:  B845  
  B849: C91  
Corresponding Authors: Jianbiao LI,Jie HAO     E-mail: biaojl@126.com;haojie@mail.zjgsu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 20 March 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xile YIN
Jianbiao LI
Siyu CHEN
Xiaoli LIU
Jie HAO
Cite this article:   
Xile YIN,Jianbiao LI,Siyu CHEN, et al. Neural mechanisms of third-party punishment: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 571-583.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00571     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I5/571
  
  
  
方案公平性 tDCS n M SD ANOVA
不公平 阴极 29 -1.38 0.78 F(2, 86) = 12.07,
p < 0.001,
η2 = 0.219
虚拟 30 -0.97 0.72
阳极 30 -0.33 0.96
总体 89 -0.89 0.92
中等 阴极 29 0.00 0.80 F(2, 86) = 0.83,
p = 0.438
虚拟 30 0.23 0.77
阳极 30 0.20 0.66
总体 89 0.15 0.75
公平 阴极 29 1.52 0.57 F(2, 86) = 1.43,
p = 0.245
虚拟 30 1.30 0.70
阳极 30 1.23 0.73
总体 89 1.35 0.68
  
方案公平性 tDCS n M SD ANOVA
不公平 阴极 29 29.59 9.88 F(2, 86) = 9.29,
p < 0.001,
η2 = 0.178
虚拟 30 19.37 13.74
阳极 30 16.23 13.19
总体 89 21.64 13.54
中等 阴极 29 9.69 8.61 F(2, 86) = 1.43,
p = 0.246
虚拟 30 6.53 6.75
阳极 30 6.50 9.35
总体 89 7.55 8.35
公平 阴极 29 1.76 9.28 F(2, 86) = 0.07,
p = 0.935
虚拟 30 1.83 9.14
阳极 30 1.17 3.13
总体 89 1.58 7.63
  
方案公平性 tDCS n M SD ANOVA
不公平 阴极 29 21.90 13.10 F(2, 86) = 6.62, p = 0.002,
η2 = 0.133
虚拟 30 12.67 12.92
阳极 30 10.10 13.17
总体 89 14.81 13.87
中等 阴极 29 7.48 9.48 F(2, 86) = 1.7, p = 0.188
虚拟 30 4.00 6.68
阳极 30 3.07 12.07
总体 89 4.82 9.74
公平 阴极 29 1.76 9.28 F(2, 86) = 0.08, p = 0.925
虚拟 30 1.33 9.28
阳极 30 0.97 2.65
总体 89 1.35 7.63
  
1 Chen, S. J., & Ma, J. H . ( 2011). Third-party punishment and social norm activation: The influence of social responsibility and emotion. Journal of Psychological Science, 34( 3), 670-675.
1 [ 陈思静, 马剑虹 . ( 2011). 第三方惩罚与社会规范激活——社会责任感与情绪的作用. 心理科学, 34( 3), 670-675.]
2 Chen S. J., He Q., & Ma J. H . ( 2015). The influence of third- party punishment on cooperation: An explanation of social norm activation. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 3), 389-405.
2 [ 陈思静, 何铨, 马剑虹 . ( 2015). 第三方惩罚对合作行为的影响: 基于社会规范激活的解释. 心理学报, 47( 3), 389-405.]
3 Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, , M. R . ( 1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity and compliance. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology ( pp. 1-17). New York, NY, US: McGraw-Hill.
4 Civai C., Miniussi C., & Rumiati R. I . ( 2015). Medial prefrontal cortex reacts to unfairness if this damages the self: A tDCS study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10( 8), 1054-1060.
5 Cohen, J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
6 Corradi-Dell'Acqua C., Civai C., Rumiati R. I., & Fink G. R . ( 2012). Disentangling self- and fairness-related neural mechanisms involved in the ultimatum game: An fMRI study. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8( 4), 424-431.
7 de la Fuente-Fernández R., Ruth T. J., Sossi V., Schulzer M., Calne D. B., & Stoessl A. J . ( 2001). Expectation and dopamine release: Mechanism of the placebo effect in Parkinson's disease. Science, 293( 5532), 1164-1166.
8 Elster, J. ( 1989). Social norms and economic theory. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3( 4), 99-117.
9 Fan L. C., Lu L., & Liang J . ( 2013). The demand for the third party punishment: An Experimental Examination. Economic Research Journal, ( 5), 98-111.
9 [ 范良聪, 刘璐, 梁捷 . ( 2013). 第三方的惩罚需求: 一个实验研究. 经济研究, ( 5), 98-111.]
10 Fehr, E., & Fischbacher, U . ( 2004). Third-party punishment and social norms. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25( 2), 63-87.
11 Fehr, E., & Gächter, S . ( 2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415( 6868), 137-140.
12 Feinstein J. S., Adolphs R., Damasio A., & Tranel D . ( 2011). The human amygdala and the induction and experience of fear. Current Biology, 21( 1), 34-38.
13 Feng C., Luo Y-J., & Krueger F . ( 2015). Neural signatures of fairness-related normative decision making in the ultimatum game: A coordinate-based meta-analysis. Human Brain Mapping, 36( 2), 591-602.
14 Filmer H. L., Dux P. E., & Mattingley J. B . ( 2014). Applications of transcranial direct current stimulation for understanding brain function. Trends in Neurosciences, 37( 12), 742-753.
15 Filmer H. L., Mattingley J. B., & Dux P. E . ( 2013). Improved multitasking following prefrontal tDCS. Cortex, 49( 10), 2845-2852.
16 Fischbacher, U. ( 2007). z-Tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10( 2), 171-178.
17 Fischbacher U., Gächter S., & Fehr E . ( 2001). Are people conditionally cooperative? Evidence from a public goods experiment. Economics Letters, 71( 3), 397-404.
18 Gan T., Li W. Q., Tang H. H., Lu X. P., Li, X. L, Liu, C., & Luo Y. J . ( 2013). Exciting the right temporo-parietal junction with transcranial direct current stimulation influences moral intention processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45( 9), 1004-1014.
18 [ 甘甜, 李万清, 唐红红, 陆夏平, 李小俚, 刘超, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2013). 经颅直流电刺激右侧颞顶联合区对道德意图加工的影响. 心理学报, 45( 9), 1004-1014.]
19 Gan T., Shi R., Liu C., & Luo Y. J . ( 2018). Cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation on the right temporo-parietal junction modulates the helpful intention processing. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50( 1), 36-46.
19 [ 甘甜, 石睿, 刘超, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2018). 经颅直流电刺激右侧颞顶联合区对助人意图加工的影响. 心理学报, 50( 1), 36-46.]
20 Gospic K., Mohlin E., Fransson P., Petrovic P., Johannesson M., & Ingvar M . ( 2011). Limbic justice--Amygdala involvement in immediate rejection in the Ultimatum Game. PLoS Biology, 9( 5), e1001054.
21 Harty S., Robertson I. H., Miniussi C., Sheehy O. C., Devine C. A., McCreery S., & O'Connell R. G . ( 2014). Transcranial direct current stimulation over right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex enhances error awareness in older age. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34( 10), 3646-3652.
22 Hummel F., Celnik P., Giraux P., Floel A., Wu W.-H., Gerloff C., & Cohen L. G . ( 2005). Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain, 128( 3), 490-499.
23 Jacobson L., Koslowsky M., & Lavidor M . ( 2012). tDCS polarity effects in motor and cognitive domains: A meta- analytical review. Experimental Brain Research, 216( 1), 1-10.
24 Jordan J., Mcauliffe K., & Rand D . ( 2016). The effects of endowment size and strategy method on third party punishment. Experimental Economics, 19( 4), 741-763.
25 Knoch D., Nitsche M. A., Fischbacher U., Eisenegger C., Pascual-Leone A., & Fehr E . ( 2008). Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation—The example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral Cortex, 18( 9), 1987-1990.
26 Knoch D., Pascual-Leone A., Meyer K., Treyer V., & Fehr E . ( 2006). Diminishing reciprocal fairness by disrupting the right prefrontal cortex. Science, 314( 5800), 829-832.
27 Li J., Yin X., Li D., Liu X., Wang G., & Qu L . ( 2017). Controlling the anchoring effect through transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1079.
28 Luo J., Ye H., Zheng H. L., Jia Y. M., Chen S., & Huang D. Q . ( 2017). Modulating the activities of right and left temporo-parietal junction influences the capability of moral intention processing: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 2), 228-240.
28 [ 罗俊, 叶航, 郑昊力, 贾拥民, 陈姝, 黄达强 . ( 2017). 左右侧颞顶联合区对道德意图信息加工能力的共同作用——基于经颅直流电刺激技术. 心理学报, 49( 2), 228-240.]
29 Luo Y., Feng C. L., Gu R. L., Wu T. T., & Luo Y. J . ( 2013). The fairness norm in social decision-making: Behavioral and neuroscience studies. Advances in Psychological Science, 21( 2), 300-308.
29 [ 罗艺, 封春亮, 古若雷, 吴婷婷, 罗跃嘉 . ( 2013). 社会决策中的公平准则及其神经机制. 心理科学进展, 21( 2), 300-308.]
30 Meiron, O., & Lavidor, M . ( 2013). Unilateral prefrontal direct current stimulation effects are modulated by working memory load and gender. Brain Stimulation, 6( 3), 440-447.
31 Nitsche, M. A., & Paulus, W . ( 2001). Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans. Neurology, 57( 10), 1899-1901.
32 Ochsner K. N., Ray R. D., Cooper J. C., Robertson E. R., Chopra S., Gabrieli J. D., & Gross J. J . ( 2004). For better or for worse: Neural systems supporting the cognitive down-and up-regulation of negative emotion. Neuroimage, 23( 2), 483-499.
33 Ravizza, S. M., & Carter, C. S . ( 2008). Shifting set about task switching: Behavioral and neural evidence for distinct forms of cognitive flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 46( 12), 2924-2935.
34 Rêgo G. G., Lapenta O. M., Marques L. M., Costa T. L., Leite J., Carvalho S., .. Boggio P. S . ( 2015). Hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lateralization in the regulation of empathy for pain. Neuroscience Letters, 594, 12-16.
35 Reno R. R., Cialdini R. B., & Kallgren C. A . ( 1993). The transsituational influence of social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64( 1), 104-112.
36 Rowe J. B., Sakai K., Lund T. E., Ramsøy T., Christensen M. S., Baare W. F. C., .. Passingham R. E . ( 2007). Is the prefrontal cortex necessary for establishing cognitive sets? Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 48), 13303-13310.
37 Ruff C. C., Ugazio G., & Fehr E . ( 2013). Changing social norm compliance with noninvasive brain stimulation. Science, 342( 6157), 482-484.
38 Sakai, K. ( 2008). Task set and prefrontal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 31( 1), 219-245.
39 Sanfey A. G., Rilling J. K., Aronson J. A., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . ( 2003). The neural basis of economic decision- making in the ultimatum game. Science, 300( 5626), 1755-1758.
40 Sellaro R., Nitsche M. A., & Colzato L. S . ( 2016). The stimulated social brain: Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1369( 1), 218-239.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/nyas.13098
41 Spitzer M., Fischbacher U., Herrnberger B., Grön G., & Fehr E . ( 2007). The neural signature of social norm compliance. Neuron, 56( 1), 185-196.
42 Tremblay S., Lepage J.-F., Latulipe-Loiselle A., Fregni F., Pascual-Leone A., & Théoret H . ( 2014). The uncertain outcome of prefrontal tDCS. Brain Stimulation, 7( 6), 773-783.
43 Wang G., Li J., Yin X., Li S., & Wei M . ( 2016). Modulating activity in the orbitofrontal cortex changes trustees' cooperation: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Behavioural Brain Research, 303( 4), 71-75.
44 Wang Y., Wang Y., Lin C., Chen X., Yuan B., & Shen D . ( 2011). Modulation of conscientiousness on medial frontal negativity in negative emotions: An ERP study on ultimatum Game. Scientia Sinica Vitae, 41( 4), 320-331.
44 [ 王益文, 王钰, 林崇德, 陈雪莹, 袁博, 沈德立 . ( 2011). 内侧额叶负波受负性情绪下责任感影响: 最后通牒任务的ERP研究. 中国科学: 生命科学, 41( 4), 320-331.]
45 Wang Y., Zhang Z., Zhang W., Huang L., Guo F., & Yuan S . ( 2014). Group membership modulates the recipient’s fairness consideration in ultimatum game. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 12), 1850-1859.
45 [ 王益文, 张振, 张蔚, 黄亮, 郭丰波, 原胜 . ( 2014). 群体身份调节最后通牒博弈的公平关注. 心理学报, 46( 12), 1850-1859.]
46 Willis M. L., Murphy J. M., Ridley N. J., & Vercammen A . ( 2015). Anodal tDCS targeting the right orbitofrontal cortex enhances facial expression recognition. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 10( 12), 1677-1683.
47 Wu, Y., & Zhou, X. L . ( 2012). The context-dependency of fairness processing: Evidence from ERP study. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44( 6), 797-806.
47 [ 吴燕, 周晓林 . ( 2012). 公平加工的情境依赖性: 来自ERP的证据. 心理学报, 44( 6), 797-806.]
48 Ye H., Chen S., Huang D., Wang S., & Luo J . ( 2015). Modulating activity in the prefrontal cortex changes decision-making for risky gains and losses: A transcranial direct current stimulation study. Behavioural Brain Research, 286, 17-21.
49 Zhou P. Y., Wang K., Li Q., & Liu X . ( 2012). Neural mechanisms of emotional modulation on memory. Chinese Science Bulletin, 57( 35), 3367-3375.
49 [ 周平艳, 王凯, 李琦, 刘勋 . ( 2012). 情绪影响记忆的神经机制. 科学通报, 57( 35), 3367-3375.]
50 Zhou Y., Wang Y., Rao L.-L., Yang L.-Q., & Li S . ( 2014). Money talks: Neural substrate of modulation of fairness by monetary incentives. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 150.
[1] PENG Wanqing, LUO Wei, ZHOU Renlai. HRV evidence for the improvement of emotion regulation in university students with depression tendency by working memory training[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 648-661.
[2] LI Hong, YANG Xiaoguang, ZHENG Wenyu, WANG Chao. Emotional regulation goals of young adults with depression inclination: An event-related potential study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 637-647.
[3] FANG Yanran,WEI Wei,LUO Ping,LIU Xiaodong,SHI Junqi,ZHAN Yujie. Daily negative affect and emotional labor strategies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 353-365.
[4] REN Xiaoyun,LI Yuting,MAO Weibin,GENG Qiuchen. The effect of emotion on directed forgetting for continuous events[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 269-279.
[5] GAO Zhihua,LU Zhongyi. Why “no” implies “negative emotion”? Emotional representation in negation processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 177-187.
[6] ZHANG Dandan,LIU Zhenli,CHEN Yu,MAI Xiaoqin. The role of right ventrolateral prefrontal cortex on social emotional regulation in subclinical depression: An tDCS study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 207-2015.
[7] ZHANG Dandan,LIN Yiqin,LIU Yunzhe,LUO Yuejia,JIANG Donghong. Memory encoding, retention and retrieval of disgusting and fearful faces[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 36-47.
[8] HU Zhiguo,CHEN Jing,WU Huijun,Georg Northoff. Future thinking in non-clinical depression: the relevance of personal goals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 58-70.
[9] Yiping ZHONG, Wenjie ZHANG, Yalei LI, Wei FAN. Influence of time stress on mood-congruent false memories[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 929-939.
[10] LU Wei, HUANG Erqi, YUAN Jinxia. The effects of music mode and lamplight color on human emotion based on quantitative EEG[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(8): 880-891.
[11] Hui Hui WANG, Yu Dan LUO, Bing SHI, Feng Qiong YU, Kai WANG. Excitation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation influences response inhibition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 647-654.
[12] Jinsheng HU, Chengshi LI, Qi WANG, Songze LI, Taotao LI, Shuqing LIU. The deficiency of attention bias to emotional prosody in the teenagers with autism spectrum disorders: A perceptual mode of low efficiency[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 637-646.
[13] YE Wanqing, LE Xiaotong, WANG Dahua.  The relationship between cognitive emotion regulation of negative marital events and marital satisfaction among older people: A cross-lagged analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 426-435.
[14] LI Qiao, LIU Fengjun.  Effects of display blurriness on consumers’ attitude toward products[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 349-357.
[15] ZHANG Weixia, WANG Wanqi, ZHOU Linshu, JIANG Cunmei. Effects of lyrics on the processing of musical emotion: Behavioural and ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1346-1355.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech