Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (3) : 280-292     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00280
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Impacts of chunking strategy on memorising similar words
ZHANG Lei,LU Chengrou,LIN Junfeng,MEI Leilei()
Center for Studies of Psychological Application, School of Psychology, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Mental Health and Cognitive Science, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China
Download: PDF(1009 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The successful memorisation of similar words is critical for individuals’ vocabulary acquisition. Previous studies have found that individuals perform significantly better in an immediate serial memory test for dissimilar words than similar words. However, the memory advantage for dissimilar words in those studies was mainly based on the comparison of two sets of different learning materials (i.e., similar and dissimilar words). Therefore, whether similar words are memorised better in a similar chunking condition (similar words are successively presented) or dissimilar chunking condition (similar words are alternately presented by other dissimilar words) is unclear.
To address the above question, we performed four experiments in this study, in which within-subject design and study-test paradigm were used. Experiment 1A aims to explore the effects of chunking strategy on the memory of similar words. In this experiment, two matched sets of similar English pseudowords were used for the similar and dissimilar chunking conditions, respectively. In the similar chunking condition, similar words were successively presented, whereas in the dissimilar chunking condition, similar words were alternately presented with other dissimilar words. Participants were instructed to memorise the words during the study phase. A recognition memory test was administered one hour after the study phase. Experiment 1B aims to investigate the memory advantage of the dissimilar chunking condition for long-term retention. Experimental materials and tasks were the same with those of Experiment 1A, but the interval between study and test was prolonged to one week. Experiment 2 used Deese-Roediger-McDermott (DRM) paradigm to examine whether the dissimilar chunking strategy facilitated the memory of similar words by improving the memory of individual words or enhancing the memory of shared parts across similar words. Experiment 3 included unfamiliar Korean characters as materials to further disentangle the contributions of visual and phonological similarities on the memory of similar words.
Results show that: 1) Compared with the similar chunking strategy, the dissimilar chunking strategy show better memory performance on similar words, which can be maintained for at least one week. 2) The dissimilar chunking strategy improves the memory of similar words and results in a high false memory for similar lures. 3) The memory advantage for dissimilar chunking strategy is evident for phonologically similar words (i.e., English pseudowords) but not for visually similar words (i.e., Korean characters).
The results suggest that the dissimilar chunking strategy improves the memorisation of phonologically similar words by enhancing the memory of common parts across similar words. In other words, the dissimilar chunking strategy may be an effective way to improve the memorisation of similar words. These findings have important implications for language learning and education.

Keywords study-test paradigm      word memory      chunking strategy      similar words     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Leilei MEI     E-mail: mll830925@126.com
Issue Date: 22 January 2019
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Lei ZHANG
Chengrou LU
Junfeng LIN
Leilei MEI
Cite this article:   
Lei ZHANG,Chengrou LU,Junfeng LIN, et al. Impacts of chunking strategy on memorising similar words[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 280-292.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00280     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I3/280
  
实验编号 正确率 t d
实验1A 0.82 (0.09) 17.01*** 3.63
实验1B 0.70 (0.09) 9.87*** 2.10
实验2 0.71 (0.08) 11.71*** 2.49
实验3 0.67 (0.08) 10.17*** 1.99
  
  
实验编号 相似词组块 不相似词组块 t p
实验1A 2020.76 (757.13) 1908.26 (735.72) 1.55 0.136
实验1B 2151.65 (781.03) 2128.97 (727.22) 0.33 0.747
实验2 2386.15 (986.30) 2336.87 (925.58) 0.62 0.545
实验3 2286.98 (803.35) 2441.74 (1200.42) -0.84 0.409
  
实验编号 低自信 高自信
相似词组块 不相似词组块 t p 相似词组块 不相似词组块 t p
实验1A 0.24 (0.16) 0.25 (0.12) -0.68 0.506 0.55 (0.23) 0.61 (0.19) -2.66 0.015
实验1B 0.44 (0.18) 0.45 (0.18) -0.98 0.338 0.24 (0.20) 0.27 (0.21) -2.31 0.031
实验2 0.39 (0.17) 0.39 (0.17) 0.03 0.972 0.25 (0.19) 0.32 (0.20) -5.03 < 0.001
实验3 0.29 (0.15) 0.32 (0.18) -1.69 0.103 0.49 (0.24) 0.48 (0.26) 0.24 0.815
  
  
  
  
[1] Avons , S.E . ( 1999). Effects of visual similarity on serial report and item recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 52( 1), 217-240.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/713755809
[2] Balota D. A., Yap M. J., Hutchison K. A., Cortese M. J., Kessler B., Loftis B., … Treiman R . ( 2007). The English lexicon project. Behavior Research Methods, 39( 3), 445-459.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03193014
[3] Chen ,J.Y . ( 2007). Formulas and the definition of “word” in the Chinese language. Foreign Language Research,( 5), 1-7.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=26007952
[3] [ 陈嘉映 . ( 2007). 约定用法和“词”的定义. 外语学刊, ( 5), 1-7.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=26007952
[4] Cohen J. ( 1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. L. Erlbaum Associates.
[5] DeAnda S., Poulin-Dubois D., Zesiger P., &Friend M . ( 2016). Lexical processing and organization in bilingual first language acquisition: Guiding future research. Psychological Bulletin, 142( 6), 655-667. doi: 10.1037/bul0000042
doi: 10.1037/bul0000042 pmid: 26866430 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/bul0000042
[6] Gallo ,D.A . ( 2010). False memories and fantastic beliefs: 15 years of the DRM illusion. Memory & Cognition, 38( 7), 833-848. doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833
doi: 10.3758/MC.38.7.833 pmid: 20921097 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/MC.38.7.833
[7] Gilbert A. C., Boucher V. J., &Jemel B . ( 2014). Perceptual chunking and its effect on memory in speech processing: ERP and behavioral evidence. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 220. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00220
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00220 pmid: 24678304 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3959615/
[8] Glezer L. S., Jiang X., &Riesenhuber M . ( 2009). Evidence for highly selective neuronal tuning to whole words in the "visual word form area". Neuron, 62( 2), 199-204. doi: 10. 1016/j.neuron.2009.03.017
doi: 10. 1016/j.neuron.2009.03.017 pmid: 2706007 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896627309002426
[9] Glezer L. S., Kim J., Rule J., Jiang X., &Riesenhuber M . ( 2015). Adding words to the brain's visual dictionary: Novel word learning selectively sharpens orthographic representations in the VWFA. Journal of Neuroscience, 35( 12), 4965-4972. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4031-14.2015
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4031-14.2015 pmid: 25810526 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4031-14.2015
[10] Li M. ( 2015). A new exploration on the definition of modern Chinese word. Overseas English, 208-210.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/86238X/201511/72878989504849534949485754.html
[10] [ 李敏 . ( 2015). 关于现代汉语词的定义新探. 海外英语, 208-210.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/86238X/201511/72878989504849534949485754.html
[11] Li , X. &Liu ,S.Y . ( 2012). The effects of phonological similarity and visual similarity in immediate serial recall of Chinese characters. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44 ( 12), 1571-1582. doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2012.01571
doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2012.01571 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201212002
[11] [ 李轩, 刘思耘 . ( 2012). 汉语短时序列回忆中的语音相似性和视觉相似性效应. 心理学报, 44 ( 12), 1571-1582.]
doi: 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2012.01571 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201212002
[12] Lin Y. C., Chen H. Y., Lai Y. C., &Wu D. H . ( 2015). Phonological similarity and orthographic similarity affect probed serial recall of Chinese characters. Memory & Cognition, 43( 3), 538-554. doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0495-x
doi: 10.3758/s13421-014-0495-x pmid: 25537954 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25537954
[13] Logie R. H., Della Sala S., Wynn V., &Baddeley A. D . ( 2000). Visual similarity effects in immediate verbal serial recall. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53( 3), 626-646.
pmid: 10994221 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/713755916
[14] Logie R. H., Saito S., Morita A., Varma S., &Norris D . ( 2016). Recalling visual serial order for verbal sequences. Memory & Cognition, 44( 4), 590-607. doi: 10.3758/s13421- 015-0580-9
doi: 10.3758/s13421- 015-0580-9 pmid: 4835526 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4835526/
[15] Mei L., Qu J., &Li H. L . ( 2017). The cognitive neural mechanism of second language learning. Journal of South China Normal University (Society Science Edition),( 6), 63-73.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82786X/201706/673975266.html
[15] [ 梅磊磊, 屈婧, 李会玲 . ( 2017). 第二语言学习的认知神经机制. 华南师范大学学报(社会科学版), ( 6), 63-73.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82786X/201706/673975266.html
[16] Mei L., Xue G., Chen C. S., Xue F., Zhang M. X., &Dong Q . ( 2010). The "visual word form area" is involved in successful memory encoding of both words and faces. NeuroImage, 52( 1), 371-378. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010. 03.067
doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010. 03.067 pmid: 2883627 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S105381191000354X
[17] Nairne ,J.S . ( 1990). A feature model of immediate memory. Memory & Cognition, 18( 3), 251-269.
pmid: 2192233 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03213879
[18] Piguet O., Connally E., Krendl A. C., Huot J. R., &Corkin S . ( 2008). False memory in aging: Effects of emotional valence on word recognition accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 23( 2), 307-314. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.307
doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.307 pmid: 18573005 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0882-7974.23.2.307
[19] Poirer M., Saint-Aubin J., Musselwhite K., Mohanadas T., &Mahammed G . ( 2007). Visual similarity effects on short-term memory for order: The case of verbally labeled pictorial stimuli. Memory & Cognition, 35( 4), 711-723.
pmid: 17848029 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03193309
[20] Qu ,Z. &Ding ,Y.L . ( 2010). The effect of Chinese phonological association on false memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42 ( 2), 193-199.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/33054543.html
[20] [ 曲折, 丁玉珑 . ( 2010). 汉字语音关联对错误记忆的影响. 心理学报, 42 ( 2), 193-199.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/33054543.html
[21] Qu Z., Liu Y., &Bi Y. H . ( 2010). The effect of Chinese orthographic association on false memory. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 16 ( 2), 146-153.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=36611521
[21] [ 曲折, 刘优, 毕耀华 . ( 2010). 汉字字形关联对错误记忆的影响. 应用心理学, 16 ( 2), 146-153.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=36611521
[22] Reyna ,V. F. &Brainerd ,C.J . ( 1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7( 1), 1-75.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/1041608095900314
[23] Roediger ,H. L. &Mcdermott ,K.B . ( 1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory & Cognition, 21( 4), 803-814.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xlm/21/4/803
[24] Rugg ,M. D. &Yonelinas ,A.P . ( 2003). Human recognition memory: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7( 7), 313-319. doi: 10.1016/s1364- 6613(03)00131-1
doi: 10.1016/s1364- 6613(03)00131-1 pmid: 12860190 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661303001311
[25] Saito S., Logie R. H., Morita A., &Law A . ( 2008). Visual and phonological similarity effects in verbal immediate serial recall: A test with kanji materials. Journal of Memory and Language, 59( 1), 1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.004
doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2008.01.004 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X0800017X
[26] Sanchez ,C. A. &Naylor ,J.S . ( 2018). Disfluent presentations lead to the creation of more false memories. PLoS One, 13( 1), e0191735. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191735
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0191735 pmid: 29370255 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191735
[27] Smith C. N., Wixted J. T., &Squire L. R . ( 2011). The hippocampus supports both recollection and familiarity when memories are strong. The Journal of Neuroscience, 31( 44), 15693-15702. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011 pmid: 3220416 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3438-11.2011
[28] Smyth M. M., Hay D. C., Hitch G. J., &Horton N. J . ( 2005). Serial position memory in the visual-spatial domain: Reconstructing sequences of unfamiliar faces. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58( 5), 909-930.
pmid: 16194941 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/02724980443000412
[29] Squire L. R., Wixted J. T., &Clark R. E . ( 2007). Recognition memory and the medial temporal lobe: A new perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8( 11), 872-883. doi: 10.1038/nrn2154
doi: 10.1038/nrn2154 pmid: 2323975 url: http://www.biomedcentral.com/pubmed/17948032
[30] Wixted ,J. T. &Mickes ,L. ( 2010). A continuous dual-process model of remember/know judgments. Psychological Review, 117( 4), 1025-1054. doi: 10.1037/a0020874
doi: 10.1037/a0020874 pmid: 20836613 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0020874
[31] Xiao H. R., Huang Y. F., Gong X. M., &Wang D. H . ( 2015). Age alters the effects of emotional valence on false memory: Using the simplified conjoint recognition paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47 ( 1), 19-28. doi: 10.3724/SP. J.1041.2015.00019
doi: 10.3724/SP. J.1041.2015.00019 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201501003
[31] [ 肖红蕊, 黄一帆, 龚先旻, 王大华 . ( 2015). 简化的联合再认范式中情绪对错误记忆影响的年龄差异. 心理学报, 47 ( 1), 19-28.]
doi: 10.3724/SP. J.1041.2015.00019 url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201501003
[32] Xue H. L., Mei L., Xue G., Chen C., &Dong Q . ( 2017). The impact of learning method on unfamiliar visual form learning. Journal of Psychological Science, 40 ( 5), 1111-1116.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201705013.htm
[32] [ 薛红莉, 梅磊磊, 薛贵, 陈传升, 董奇 . ( 2017). 学习方法对陌生语言字形学习的影响. 心理科学, 40 ( 5), 1111-1116.]
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XLKX201705013.htm
[33] Ye Z. F., Zhu B., Zhuang L. P., Lu , Z. L, Chen , C. S., &Xue G . ( 2016). Neural global pattern similarity underlies true and false memories. The Journal of Neuroscience, 36( 25), 6792-6802. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016
doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016 pmid: 27335409 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/lookup/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0425-16.2016
[1] REN Xiaoyun,LI Yuting,MAO Weibin,GENG Qiuchen. The effect of emotion on directed forgetting for continuous events[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 269-279.
[2] WU Yan,GAO Yuefei,ZHAO Simin,WANG Suiping. The effects of discourse context and world knowledge on pronoun resolution[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 293-303.
[3] YANG Qun,FENG Yiran,ZHANG Jijia. The language and cultural differences of father-reference processing: Based on the retrieval-induced forgetting[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 304-315.
[4] LOU Hao,LI Cong,ZHANG Qingfang. Distinct effects of age of acquisition in Chinese object and action picture naming: An ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 143-153.
[5] CHEN Ying,LI Fengying,LI Weijian. The influence of learner’s beliefs about processing fluency on font-size effect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 154-162.
[6] WANG Dan,WANG Ting,QIN Song,ZHANG Jijia. Location effect of Chinese wordable components in the component priming paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 163-176.
[7] GAO Zhihua,LU Zhongyi. Why “no” implies “negative emotion”? Emotional representation in negation processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 177-187.
[8] GUO Jichengsi,HUANG Jianping,WAN Xiaoang. The influence of target knowledge on path integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 188-195.
[9] WU Baizhou,LI Jie,HE Hu,HOU You,JIA Yingqi,FENG Shenxing. Categorical perception of color can be instantly influenced by color vision fatigue and semantic satiation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 196-206.
[10] YANG Qun, WANG Yan, ZHANG Jijia. Effects of orthographic depth on Chinese word naming for Han and Uyghur students[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 1-13.
[11] LIU Guixiong,JIA Yongping,WANG Yujuan,MAIHEFULAITI ·Kanji,GUO Chunyan. The bilingual L2 advantage in associative recognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 14-23.
[12] Lü Xin,LIU Jingyao,WEI Liuqing,ZHANG Xuemin. The effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on multiple object tracking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 24-35.
[13] ZHANG Dandan,LIN Yiqin,LIU Yunzhe,LUO Yuejia,JIANG Donghong. Memory encoding, retention and retrieval of disgusting and fearful faces[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 36-47.
[14] WANG Yanqing,CHEN Antao,HU Xueping,YIN Shouhang. Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 48-57.
[15] LI Weijun, LIU Meng, ZHANG Zhenghua, DENG Nali, XING Yushan. Neural processing of ambiguous Chinese phrases of stutters[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1323-1335.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech