Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (2) : 143-153     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00143
|
Distinct effects of age of acquisition in Chinese object and action picture naming: An ERP study
LOU Hao,LI Cong,ZHANG Qingfang()
Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China
Download: PDF(705 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Age of Acquisition (AoA) refers to the age at which a concept is learned. Early-acquired words have an advantage over late-acquired words in processing accuracy and speed. Which stage of AoA playing its role in spoken word production remains controversial. The phonological completeness hypothesis assumes that AoA may have a phonological locus, while the semantic hypothesis assumes that AoA affects semantic processing (i.e., conceptual preparation, lexical selection). The network plasticity hypothesis assumes that AoA arises at multiple processing levels, in spoken word production.
In a picture naming task, we used the event-related potential (ERP) technique to examine the loci of AoA effect in object and action pictures naming. Twenty-eight participants (9 males, mean range: 22.18, SD: 2.56) participated in this study. We selected a total of 188 words and their corresponding black and white line pictures, half of which were object pictures, and half were action pictures. Within each type of picture, half were early acquired, and half were late acquired. Therefore, the age of acquisition of picture names (early vs. late) and word type (noun vs. verb) served as within-participants variables. During the experiment, participants were asked to name each picture as accurately and quickly as possible.
Behavioral data indicated a typical AoA effect in object pictures naming, showing that object pictures corresponding to early-acquired nouns were named faster than those corresponding to late-acquired ones. In contrast, action pictures corresponding to early-acquired verbs were named slower than those corresponding to late-acquired verbs. ERP data also showed distinct AoA effect patterns in object and action picture naming. For object picture naming, late-acquired nouns elicited a larger positivity than early-acquired nouns between 250~300 ms over left-prefrontal regions. In contrast, for action picture naming, early-acquired verbs evoked a larger positivity than late-acquired verbs within 200~250 ms, 300~400 ms and 450~600 ms time windows over the left hemisphere.
We suggest that the AoA effect in object naming may originate in the lexical selection of spoken word production, supporting the semantic hypothesis. In contrast, the AoA effects in action naming may originate in multiple processes, such as lexical selection, phonological encoding and phonetic encoding, supporting the network plasticity hypothesis. The distinct AoA effects between the naming of object and action pictures probably relate to the distinct semantic networks that represent objects and actions. Therefore, the AoA effect in action picture naming is much more complicated than in object picture naming and needs further investigation.

Keywords spoken word production      picture naming      object picture      action picture      age of acquisition effect     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Qingfang ZHANG     E-mail: zhang@ruc.edu.cn
Issue Date: 24 December 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hao LOU
Cong LI
Qingfang ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Hao LOU,Cong LI,Qingfang ZHANG. Distinct effects of age of acquisition in Chinese object and action picture naming: An ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 143-153.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00143     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I2/143
各项指标 客体图画 动作图画
早习得词 晚习得词 t p 早习得词 晚习得词 t p
习得年龄 2.58 (0.59) 4.42 (0.73) -13.19 < 0.01 2.53 (0.37) 3.38 (0.25) -14.15 < 0.01
命名一致性(%) 69.78 (18.36) 70.24 (0.22) -0.11 0.91 71.68 (18.34) 78.97 (16.37) -0.95 0.35
熟悉性 4.36 (0.47) 4.38 (0.37) -0.19 0.85 3.22 (0.73) 3.35 (0.88) -0.24 0.81
具体性 3.84 (0.43) 3.94 (0.42) -1.19 0.24 2.01 (0.38) 1.91 (0.40) 0.61 0.55
视觉复杂性 3.13 (0.94) 3.27 (0.80) -0.78 0.44 3.05 (0.64) 3.17 (0.58) -1.04 0.30
表象一致性 - - - - 3.84 (0.62) 3.89 (0.58) -1.13 0.26
表象变异性 3.18 (0.37) 3.11 (0.35) 0.96 0.34 - - - -
词频对数 3.86 (0.92) 3.57 (0.72) 1.66 0.11 3.63 (0.93) 3.34 (0.63) 1.80 0.08
  
变异来源 200~250 ms 250~300 ms 300~350 ms 350~400 ms 400~450 ms 450~500 ms 500~550 ms 550~600 ms
F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2 F ηp2
词类(1, 20) 8.07** 0.29 3.46? 0.15
AoA (1, 20)
词类×AoA (1, 20) 3.54? 0.15 3.42? 0.15 3.20? 0.14 3.38? 0.14
词类×脑区(2, 40) 34.40** 0.63 28.57** 0.59 18.53** 0.48 13.15** 0.40
AoA×脑区(2, 40)
词类×AoA×脑区(2, 40)
词类×半球(2, 40) 2.69? 0.12 2.53? 0.11 2.52? 0.11
AoA×半球(2, 40) 6.24* 0.24 4.03* 0.17 5.69* 0.22 7.46** 0.27 5.44* 0.21 5.08* 0.20
词类×AoA×半球(2, 40) 5.35* 0.21 7.95** 0.28 9.46** 0.32 9.81** 0.33 11.83** 0.37 17.52** 0.47 9.67** 0.33
词类×脑区×半球(4, 80) 2.35? 0.11 3.14* 0.14 2.07? 0.09
AoA×脑区×半球(4, 80) 2.87* 0.13 3.40* 0.15
词类×AoA×脑区×半球(4, 80) 7.16** 0.26 8.89** 0.31 9.78** 0.33 8.36** 0.29 11.38** 0.36 18.53** 0.48 15.71*** 0.44 7.69** 0.28
  
  
  
1 Akinina Y. L., Malyutina S., Ivanova M., Iskra E., Mannova E., & Dragoy O . ( 2015). Russian normative data for 375 action pictures and verbs. Behavior Research Methods, 47 (3), 691-707.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13428-014-0492-9
2 Alario F. X., Ferrand L., Laganaro M., New B., Frauenfelder U. H., & Segui J . ( 2004). Predictors of picture naming speed. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (1), 140-155.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03195559
3 Arévalo A. L., Lu C. C., Huang L. B. Y., Bates E. A., & Dronkers N. F . ( 2011). Action and object processing in brain-injured speakers of Chinese. Neuropsychology, 25 (6), 792-805.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0024272
4 Bai X. J., Wang L. H., Lv Y., & Hu W . ( 2010). An ERP study on age of acquisition effect. Psychological Exploration, 30 (1), 21-26.
4 [ 白学军, 王丽红, 吕勇, 胡伟 . ( 2010). 词汇的获得年龄效应: ERP研究. 心理学探新, 30(1), 21-26.]
5 Bakhtiar M., Su I. F., Lee H. K., & Weekes B. S . ( 2016). Neural correlates of age of acquisition on visual word recognition in Persian. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 39, 1-9.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0911604415300300
6 Barry C., Johnston R. A., & Wood R. F . ( 2006). Effects of age of acquisition, age, and repetition priming on object naming. Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 911-927.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000101
7 Bates E., D'Amico S., Jacobsen T., Székely A., Andonova E., & Devescovi A., … Tzeng O . ( 2003). Timed picture naming in seven languages. Psychonomic Bulletin Review, 10 (2), 344-380.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03196494
8 Belke E., Brysbaert M., Meyer A. S., & Ghyselinck M . ( 2005). Age of acquisition effects in picture naming: Evidence for a lexical-semantic competition hypothesis. Cognition, 96 (2), B45-B54.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027704002239
9 Bonin P., Boyer B., Méot A., Fayol M., & Droit S . ( 2004). Psycholinguistic norms for action photographs in French and their relationships with spoken and written latencies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (1), 127-139.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03195558
10 Brown, G. D.A., &Watson, F.L ., ( 1987). First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency. Memory and cognition, 15 (3), 208-216.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03197718
11 Brysbaert M., Van W. I., & De Deyne. S . ( 2000). Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. Acta Psychologica, 104 (2), 215-226.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001691800000214
12 Carroll, J.B., &White, M.N ., ( 1973). Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12 (5), 563-576.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022537173800362
13 Catling, J.C., &Johnston R.A ., ( 2006). The effects of age of acquisition on an object classification task. Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 968-980.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000138
14 Catling, J.C., &Johnston R.A ., ( 2009). The varying effects of age of acquisition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62 (1), 50-62.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210701814352
15 Catling J. C., Dent K., Johnston R. A., & Balding R . ( 2010). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and picture-word interference. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63 (7), 1304-1317.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210903380830
16 Chalard, M., &Bonin P ., ( 2006). Age-of-acquisition effects in picture naming: Are they structural and/or semantic in nature? Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 864-883.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000084
17 Chen B. G., Dent, K. You, W. P., & Wu G. L . ( 2009). Age of acquisition affects early orthographic processing during Chinese character recognition. Acta Psychologica, 130 (3), 196-203.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S000169180800156X
18 Chen B. G., You W. P., & Wang L. X . ( 2006). The research development of the age-of-acquisition effect in lexical processing. Psychological Science, 29 (6), 1515-1517.
18 [ 陈宝国, 尤文平, 王立新 . ( 2006). 词汇习得年龄效应的研究进展. 心理科学, 29(6), 1515-1517.]
19 Chen B. G., You W. P., & Zhou H. X . ( 2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favor of the semantic hypothesis. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 39, 9-17.
19 [ 陈宝国, 尤文平, 周会霞 . ( 2007). 汉语词汇习得的年龄效应: 语义假设的证据. 心理学报, 39(1), 9-17.]
20 Chen B. G., You W. P., Zhang Y. F., & Liu W. H . ( 2010) Acquisition age of effects on the early orthographic processing stage of Chinese character recognition. Psychological Science, 33 (3), 726-728.
20 [ 陈宝国, 尤文平, 张亚峰, 刘文唤 . ( 2010). 汉字早期字形加工阶段的习得年龄效应. 心理科学, 33(3), 726-728.]
21 Chen B. G., Zhou H. X., Dunlap S., & Perfetti C. A . ( 2007). Age of acquisition effects in reading Chinese: Evidence in favour of the arbitrary mapping hypothesis. British Journal of Psychology, 98 (3), 499-516.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1348/000712606X165484
22 Chen J., Lin S. H., & Zhang J. J . ( 2011). The word AoA effects in Chaoshan-Putonghua bilinguals’ experimental performance. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43 (2), 111-112.
22 [ 陈俊, 林少惠, 张积家 . ( 2011). 潮汕话-普通话双言者的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 43(2), 111-112.]
23 Chen, Y.X., &Zhu L.Q ., ( 2015). Predictors of action picture naming in Mandarin Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47 (1), 11-18.
23 [ 陈永香, 朱莉琪 . ( 2015). 影响动作图片命名的因素. 心理学报, 47(1), 11-18.]
24 Cuetos, F., &Alija M . ( 2003). Normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research Methods Instruments and Computers, 35 (1), 168-177.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03195508
25 Damian, M.F., &Martin R.C . ( 1999). Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25 (2), 345-361.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.25.2.345
26 Dell’Acqua R., Sessa P., Peressotti F., Mulatti C., Navarrete E., & Grainger J . ( 2010). ERP evidence for ultra-fast semantic processing in the picture-word interference paradigm. Frontiers in Psychology, 1, 177.
27 Druks J., Masterson J., Kopelman M., Claire L., Rose A., & Ray G . ( 2006). Is action naming better preserved (than object naming) in Alzheimer’s disease and why should we ask? Brain and Language, 98 (3), 332-340.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X06001167
28 Ellis, A.W., & Lambon Ralph M.A . ( 2000). Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing system: Insights from connectionist networks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 26 (5), 1103-1123.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.26.5.1103
29 Fang, J.M., & Zhang Z . ( 1998). Comparative study on cognitive processing of Chinese characters between hearing-impaired and normal children. Chinese Journal of Special Education,(4), 19-21.
29 [ 方俊明, 张朝 . ( 1998). 聋人与听力正常人汉字加工认知途径的比较研究. 中国特殊教育, (4), 19-22.]
30 Gentner, D . ( 1982). Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning. Language, 2, 301-334.
31 Gerhand, S., &Barry C . ( 1999). Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task. Memory and Cognition, 27 (4), 592-602.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03211553
32 Holmes, S.J., &Ellis A.W . ( 2006). Age of acquisition and typicality effects in three object processing tasks. Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 884-910.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000093
33 Indefrey, P . ( 2011). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components: A critical update. Frontiers in Psychology, 2, 255-275.
34 Indefrey P., &Levelt W. J. M . ( 2004). The spatial and temporal signatures of word production components. Cognition. 92 (1-2), 101-144.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027703002294
35 Johnston, R.A., &Barry, C . ( 2006). Age of acquisition and lexical processing. Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 789-845.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000066
36 Laganaro, M., &Perret C . ( 2011). Comparing electrophysiological correlates of word production in immediate and delayed naming through the analysis of word age of acquisition effects. Brain Topography, 24 (1), 19-29.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10548-010-0162-x
37 Laganaro M., Valente A., & Perret C . ( 2012). Time course of word production in fast and slow speakers: A high density ERP topographic study. Neuroimage, 59 (4), 3881-3888.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811911012523
38 Levelt W. J.M., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. S . 1999). A theory of lexical access in speech production. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (1), 1-75.
39 Li C., Zhang Q. F., & Huang R . ( 2017). The opposite effects of age of acquisition in object and action pictures naming. Psychological Exploration, 37 (3), 220-225.
39 [ 李丛, 张清芳, 黄韧 . ( 2017). 词汇获得年龄在物体和动作图画命名中的不同作用. 心理学探新, 37(3), 220-225.]
40 Liu Y. Y., Hao M. L., Li P., & Shu H . ( 2011). Timed picture naming norms for Mandarin Chinese. Plos One, 6 (1), e16505.
url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0016505
41 Masterson, J., &Druks, J . ( 1998). Description of a set of 164 nouns and 102 verbs matched for printed word frequency, familiarity and age of- acquisition. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 11, 331-354.
42 Mätzig S., Druks J., Masterson J., & Vigliocco G . ( 2009). Noun and verb differences in picture naming: Past studies and new evidence. Cortex, 45 (6), 738-758.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945208002323
43 &Mobaghan, J., Ellis, A.W . ( 2002). Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations. Reading and Writing, 15 (7-8), 759-788.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1023/A:1020958722472
44 Morrison, C.M., &Gibbons, Z.C . ( 2006). Lexical determinants of semantic processing speed. Visual Cognition, 13 (7-8), 949-967.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280544000129
45 Perret C., Bonin P., & Laganaro M . ( 2014). Exploring the multiple-level hypothesis of AoA effects in spoken and written object naming using a topographic ERP analysis. Brain and Language, 135, 20-31.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X14000662
46 Pulvermüller F . ( 1999). Words in the brain's language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22 (2), 253-279.
url: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0140525X9900182X
47 Schuhmann T., Schiller N. O., Goebel R., & Sack A. T . ( 2009). The temporal characteristics of functional activation in broca's area during overt picture naming. Cortex, 45 (9), 1111-1116.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945208002888
48 Schwitter V., Boyer B., Méot A., Bonin P., & Laganaro M . ( 2004). French normative data and naming times for action pictures. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36 (3), 564-576.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03195603
49 Shao Z. S., Roelofs A., & Meyer A. S . ( 2013). Predicting naming latencies for action pictures: Dutch norms. Behavior Research Methods, 46 (1), 274-283.
50 Starreveld, P.A., & La Heij, W . ( 1995). Semantic interference, orthographic facilitation, and their interaction in naming tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21 (3), 686-698.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.21.3.686
51 Starreveld, P.A., & La Heij, W . ( 1996). The locus of orthographic-phonological facilitation: Reply to Roelofs, Meyer, and Levelt (1996). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22 (1), 252-255.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.252
52 Tardif, T . ( 1996). Nouns are not always learned before verbs: Evidence from Mandarin speakers' early vocabularies. Developmental Psychology, 32 (3), 492-504.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0012-1649.32.3.492
53 Warrington, E.K., &McCarthy R.A . ( 1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionations and attempted integration. Brain, 110 (5), 1273-1296.
url: https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/brain/110.5.1273
54 Weekes, B . ( 2011). Age of acquisition effects on Chinese character recognition: Evidence from EEG. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 23 (23), 67-68.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042811017010
55 Weekes B. S., Shu H., Hao M. L., Liu Y. Y., & Tan L. H . ( 2007). Predictors of timed picture naming in Chinese. Behavior Research Methods, 39 (2), 335-342.
url: http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.3758/BF03193165
56 Zevin, J.D., &Seidenberg M.S . ( 2002). Age of acquisition effects in word reading and other tasks. Journal of Memory and Language, 47 (1), 1-29.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749596X01928347
57 Zhang J. J., Chen S. Q., Zhang G. Y., & Dai D. H . ( 2012). Age of acquisition effects in deaf college students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44 (11), 1421-1433.
57 [ 张积家, 陈穗清, 张广岩, 戴东红 . ( 2012). 聋大学生的词汇习得年龄效应. 心理学报, 44(11), 1421-1433.]
58 Zhang Z. J., You W. P., & Chen B. G . ( 2011). Age-of- acquisition effects of Chinese character: Test of phonological completeness hypothesis. Psychological Development and Education, 27 (6), 577-583.
58 [ 张振军, 丁国盛, 陈宝国 . ( 2011). 汉字习得的年龄效应: 语音完整性假设的检验. 心理发展与教育, 27(6), 577-583. ]
59 Zhu X. D., Damian M. F., & Zhang Q. F . ( 2015). Seriality of semantic and phonological processes during overt speech in Mandarin as revealed by event-related brain potentials. Brain and Language, 144, 16-25.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X15000723
60 Zhu X. B., Zhang Q. F., & Damian M. F . ( 2016). Additivity of semantic and phonological effects: Evidence from speech production in Mandarin. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 69 (11), 2285-2304.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2015.1129427
[1] CHEN Yongxiang; ZHU Liqi. Predictors of Action Picture Naming in Mandarin Chinese[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 11-18.
[2] ZHANG Ji-Jia,ZHANG Feng-Ling.

The Asymmetric Effect of Bilingualism and Diglossia on Picture Naming and Picture Classification

[J]. , 2010, 42(04): 452-466.
[3] CHEN Xu–Hai,HUANG Xi-Ting. The Encoding of Constituent Morphemes in the Oral Production of Chinese Disyllable Compound Words[J]. , 2010, 42(03): 377-386.
[4] Ning Ning,Lu Chunming,Peng Danling,Ding Guosheng. The Speech Plan Deficit of People who stutter: Evidence from Word Length Effect[J]. , 2007, 39(02): 215-224.
[5] Zhou-Xiaolin,Zhuang-Jie,Wu-Jiayin,Yang-Dahe. PHONOLOGICAL, ORTHOGRAPHIC, AND SEMANTIC ACTIVATION IN THE SPEECH PRODUCTION OF CHINESE[J]. , 2003, 35(06): 712-718.
[6] Zhang Qingfang,Yang YUfang. THE DETERMINERS OF PICTURE-NAMING LATENCY[J]. , 2003, 35(04): 447-454.
[7] Zhuang Jie,Zhou Xiaolin. THE INTERACTION BETWEEN SEMANTICS AND PHONOLOGY IN THE SPEECH PRODUCTION OF CHINESE[J]. , 2003, 35(03): 300-308.
[8] Zhuang Jie (Department of Psychology,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875, Department of Psychology,Peking University,Beijing 100871) Zhou Xiaolin (Department of Psychology,Peking University,Beijing 100871). WORD LENGTH EFFECT IN SPEECH PRODUCTION OF CHINESE[J]. , 2001, 33(03): 23-27.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech