Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2019, Vol. 51 Issue (1) : 24-35     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00024
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on multiple object tracking
Lü Xin1,LIU Jingyao1,WEI Liuqing1,ZHANG Xuemin1,2,*
1 Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University); Faculty of Psychology, Beijing Normal University
2 State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
Download: PDF(1132 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

The Multiple Object Tracking (MOT) task was initially designed by Pylyshyn and Storm (1988) and has been widely used to study the visual attentional mechanisms people use when viewing dynamic scenes. Previous research has usually used this task to explore participants’ abilities to track multiple moving objects in a static reference frame. But more recently, some researchers have started to investigate observers’ tracking performance in nonstable scenes. However, few studies have explored the effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style on tracking tasks from the point of view of individual differences. Previous research has revealed that field dependent-independent cognitive style affects people’s ways of perceiving and thinking. Field-independent individuals rely on an internal reference frame and tend to perceive objects separately from the background, while field-dependent individuals are more likely to rely on an external reference frame and perceive objects as a whole. We tested the effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on tracking performance in the MOT task.
This study included two experiments. Experiment 1 compared performance differences between field- independent individuals and field-dependent individuals in the MOT task. Nineteen participants who scored ≥15 in the Embedded Figures Test (EFT) were classified as the extreme field-independent group, and twenty-three participants who scored ≤11 were classified as extreme field-dependent group. The two groups of participants were required to track 3, 4, or 5 targets in a static reference frame. Experiment 2 explored the tracking differences of the two groups in a nonstable reference frame with four targets. The procedure of Experiment 2 was the same as Experiment 1, except that after the motion of 6s in each trial, the reference frame abruptly changed 0°, 20°, or 40°. Meanwhile, the participants still needed to keep track of the targets.
The two experiments found significant differences between field-independent individuals and field-dependent individuals. In the low-difficulty conditions (stable reference frame, 3 and 4 targets) and the medium-difficulty condition (reference frame abruptly changed 20°, 4 targets), the field-independent group performed significantly better than the field-dependent group. But in the high-difficulty conditions (stable reference frame, 5 targets and reference frame abruptly changed 40°, 4 targets), the performance of the field-independent group did not significantly differ from the field-dependent group. The results revealed that the tracking differences between the two groups of participants were influenced by task difficulty. In addition, participants’ tracking accuracy significantly decreased along with increases in the number of targets and the abrupt rotation of the reference frame. We speculate that the increased cognitive load and discontinuous scene made it more difficult for participants to track the targets, which contributed to the significant decline of tracking accuracy.
In general, by using the MOT task and changing the motion reference frame, we explored the different performances of field dependent-independent individuals in the classic MOT task and an MOT task with a changing reference frame. This study offers an explanation for the different characteristic of field dependent- independent cognitive style from the perspective of multiple object tracking. In addition, changing the MOT to include rotation of the reference frame allows us to study tracking in a situation that is similar to shifts of perspective in the real world, which provides some evidence for how people deploy attention while processing in dynamic scenes.

Keywords multiple object tracking      field dependence-independence      reference frame      scene rotation     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Xuemin ZHANG   
Issue Date: 26 November 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xin Lü
Jingyao LIU
Liuqing WEI
Xuemin ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Xin Lü,Jingyao LIU,Liuqing WEI, et al. The effects of field dependent-independent cognitive style and abrupt rotation of the reference frame on multiple object tracking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 24-35.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2019.00024     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2019/V51/I1/24
  
  
  
  
[1] Alvarez G.A., &FranconeriS.L, . ( 2007). How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. Journal of Vision, 7( 13), 1-10.
pmid: 17997642 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/17997642
[2] Bai T., Lyu C., Wei L. Q., Zhou Y. B., & Zhang X. M . ( 2015). The facilitating effect of target-nontarget categorical difference in identity on multiple identity tracking. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 2), 203-211.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201502/663973259.html
[2] [ 白田, 吕创, 魏柳青, 周义斌, 张学民 . ( 2015). 目标与非目标身份特征的范畴间差异对多身份追踪的促进作用. 心理学报, 47( 2), 203-211.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201502/663973259.html
[3] Bergum B.O., & Cooper T. , ( 1977). Undergraduate self-perceptions of creativity and independence. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 44( 1), 187-190.
pmid: 840589 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/840589
[4] Boccia M., Piccardi L., Di Marco M., Pizzamiglio L., & Guariglia C . ( 2016). Does field independence predict visuo-spatial abilities underpinning human navigation? Behavioural evidence. Experimental Brain Research, 234( 10), 2799-2807.
pmid: 27225254 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-016-4682-9
[5] Brockhoff A., Papenmeier F., Wolf K., Pfeiffer T., Jahn G., & Huff M . ( 2016). Viewpoint matters: Exploring the involvement of reference frames in multiple object tracking from a developmental perspective. Cognitive Development, 37, 1-8.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0885201415300125
[6] Evans C., Richardson J. T. E., & Waring M . ( 2013). Field independence: Reviewing the evidence. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 83( 2), 210-224.
pmid: 23692531 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23692531
[7] Howard I.P . ( 1982). Human visual orientation. Chichester:Wiley.
[8] Hu L. M., Lyu C., Zhang X. M., & Wei L. Q . ( 2018). The effect of identity switch in multiple identity tracking. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 50( 1), 9-27.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLXB201801002.htm
[8] [ 胡路明, 吕创, 张学民, 魏柳青 . ( 2018). 身份交换对多身份追踪表现的影响. 心理学报, 50( 1), 9-27.]
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLXB201801002.htm
[9] Huff M., Jahn G., & Schwan S . ( 2009). Tracking multiple objects across abrupt viewpoint changes. Visual Cognition, 17( 3), 297-306.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2009-04431-001
[10] Huff M., Papenmeier F., Jahn G., & Hesse F. W . ( 2010). Eye movements across viewpoint changes in multiple object tracking. Visual Cognition, 18( 9), 1368-1391.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2010.495878
[11] Jahn G., Papenmeier F., Meyerhoff H. S., & Huff M . ( 2012). Spatial reference in multiple object tracking. Experimental Psychology, 59, 163-173.
pmid: 22246062 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/zea/59/3/163/
[12] Jia S., Zhang Q., & Li S . ( 2014). Field dependence-independence modulates the efficiency of filtering out irrelevant information in a visual working memory task. Neuroscience, 278, 136-143.
pmid: 25135352 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25135352
[13] Jonassen D.H., & Grabowski B.L, . ( 1993). Handbook of individual differences, learning and institution . Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[14] Kagan J. ( 1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal Abnormal Psychology, 71( 1), 17-24.
pmid: 5902550 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/abn/71/1/17/
[15] Li H. T., Zhang Y. Q., Wu C. G., & Mei D . ( 2016). Effects of field dependence-independence and frame of reference on navigation performance using multi-dimensional electronic maps. Personality and Individual Differences, 97, 289-299.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886916302318
[16] Liang J.Y., & Zhang M. , ( 2012). Cognitive style interacts with constructions in sentence meaning processing. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 18( 4), 309-314.
[16] [ 梁君英, 张萌 . ( 2012). 认知风格与构式在句子意义理解中的作用. 应用心理学, 18, 309-314.]
[17] Liu G., Austen E. L., Booth K. S., Fisher B. D., Argue R., Rempel M. I., & Enns J. T . ( 2005). Multiple-object tracking is based on scene, not retinal, coordinates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31( 2), 235-247.
pmid: 15826227 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/15826227
[18] Messick S. .( 1984). The nature of cognitive styles: Problems and promise in educational practice. Educational Psychologist, 19( 2), 59-74.
[19] Miyake A., Witzki A. H., & Emerson M. J . ( 2001). Field dependence-independence from a working memory perspective: A dual-task investigation of the hidden figures test. Memory, 9( 4-6), 445-457.
pmid: 11747594 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11747594
[20] Nitzan-tamar O., Kramarski B., & Vakil E . ( 2016). Eye movement patterns characteristic of cognitive style. Experimental Psychology, 63( 3), 159-168.
pmid: 27404984 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27404984
[21] Pithers R.T . ( 2002). Cognitive learning style: A review of the field dependent-field independent approach. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 54( 1), 117-132.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13636820200200191
[22] Pylyshyn Z.W . ( 2001). Visual indexes, preconceptual objects, and situated vision. Cognition, 80( 1-2), 127-158.
pmid: 11245842 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2001-06760-005
[23] Pylyshyn Z. W. ( 2003). Life and mind. Seeing and visualizing: It's not what you think. Cambridge, MA, US: MIT Press.
[24] Pylyshyn Z.W., & Storm R.W . ( 1988). Tracking multiple independent targets: Evidence for a parallel tracking mechanism. Spatial Vision, 3( 3), 179-197.
pmid: 3153671 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3153671
[25] Riding R.& Cheema I. ,( 1991). Cognitive styles—An overview and integration. Educational Psychology, 11( 3-4), 193-215.
[26] Riding R.J., & Rayner S. , ( 1998). Cognitive styles and learning strategies: Understanding style differences in learning and behaviour. London: D. Fulton Publishers.
[27] Seiffert A.E . ( 2005). Attentional tracking across display translations. Journal of Vision, 5( 8), 643.
[28] Song G.W., & Han S.J, . ( 2007). The inhibitory mechanism of dependent-independent cognitive styles. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 5( 2), 100-104.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/24828247.html
[28] [ 宋广文, 韩树杰 . ( 2007). 场依存—独立认知方式干扰抑制的比较. 心理与行为研究, 5( 2), 100-104.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/24828247.html
[29] Tombu M., & Seiffert A.E . ( 2011). Tracking planets and moons: Mechanisms of object tracking revealed with a new paradigm. Attention Perception Psychophysics, 73, 738-750.
pmid: 4150655 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4150655
[30] Wang C. D., Zhang X. M., Li Y. N., & Lyu C . ( 2016). Additivity of feature-based and symmetry-based grouping effects in multiple object tracking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 657.
pmid: 4854980 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4854980/
[31] Wang Y.Z., & Ou Y.L . ( 2004). The influence of different cognition styles of University students to figure reasoning level--And concurrently discusses the function of personality in the cognitive process. Psychological Science, 27( 2), 389-391.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlkx200402041
[31] [ 王有智, 欧阳仑 . ( 2004). 大学生不同认知方式对图形推理水平的影响--兼谈认知过程中的人格作用. 心理科学, 27( 2), 389-391.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlkx200402041
[32] Wei L. Q., Liu B., Zhang X. M., & Zhao X . ( 2013). The effects of multiple object tracking difficulty on nontargets inhibition. Journal of Psychological Science, 36( 5), 1093-1100.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201305/47313976.html
[32] [ 魏柳青, 刘冰, 张学民, 赵霞 . ( 2013). 多目标追踪的任务难度对不同类型非目标选择性抑制的影响. 心理科学, 36( 5), 1093-1100.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201305/47313976.html
[33] Witkin H.A., & Goodenough D.R . ( 1981). Cognitive styles: essence and origins. Field dependence and field independence. Psychol Issues, 51, 1-141.
pmid: 7012884 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7012884
[34] Witkin H. A., Moore C. A., Goodenough D. R., & Cox. P. W . ( 1977). Field-dependent and field-independent cognitive styles and their educational implications. Review of Educational Research, 47( 1), 1-64.
url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1169967
[35] Witkin H. A., Oltman P., Raskin E.,& Karp S. A. ,( 1971) . A manual for the embedded figures test. California: Consulting Psychologists Press.
[36] Yantis S. ( 1992). Multielement visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology, 24( 3), 295-340.
[37] Yue P. F., Li T. X., & Bai X. J . ( 2012). Individuals of field dependence-independence cognitive style in three-dimensional mental rotation tasks showed differences in neural efficiency: Evidence from slow cortical potentials. Psychological Exploration, 32( 6), 531-535.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx201206010
[37] [ 岳鹏飞, 李寿欣, 白学军 . ( 2012). 不同场认知方式个体完成心理旋转任务时神经效能的差异:来自皮层慢电位的证据. 心理学探新, 32( 6), 531-535.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx201206010
[38] Zhang L.F . ( 2004). Field-dependence/independence: Cognitive style or perceptual ability? -- Validating against thinking styles and academic achievement. Personality and Individual Differences, 37( 6), 1295-1311.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-19562-017
[39] Zhao X.N., & You X.Q . ( 2007). The experimental research about the influence of field cognition mode on mental rotation. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 13( 4), 334-340.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YXNX200704009.htm
[39] [ 赵晓妮, 游旭群 . ( 2007). 场认知方式对心理旋转影响的实验研究. 应用心理学, 13( 4), 334-340.]
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-YXNX200704009.htm
[40] Zheng Y.H., & Shi L.C . ( 2015). The impact of field-independent and field-dependent cognitive styles on road scene observing: an eye movement study. Medical Journal of Communication, 29( 2), 131-134.
[40] [ 郑月红, 施利承 . ( 2015). 场独立和场依存认知风格影响道路场景注视的眼动研究. 交通医学, 29( 2), 131-134.]
[41] Zhou J. F., Zhou C. P., Li J. S., & Zhang M . ( 2015). Cognitive style modulates conscious but not unconscious thought: Comparing the deliberation-without-attention effect in analytics and wholists. Consciousness and Cognition, 36, 54-60.
pmid: 26069938 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/26069938
[1] Luming HU,Jing SU,Liuqing WEI,Xuemin ZHANG. The grouping effect of common fate in multiple object tracking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1235-1248.
[2] ZHANG Jing; CHEN Wei. Is body image plastic? The impact of synchrony and distance reference frame on body ownership[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 933-945.
[3] WANG Aijun; SHEN Lu; CHI Yingying; LIU Xiaole; CHEN Qi; ZHANG Ming. Interaction between spatial domain and spatial reference frame in deaf and hearing populations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 153-162.
[4] WEI Liuqing;ZHANG Xuemin;LI Yongna;MA Yu. The Effects of Visual and Auditory Dual-task on Multiple Object Tracking Performance: Interference or Promotion?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(6): 727-739.
[5] WANG Ling-Yun,ZHANG Ming,SUI Jie. Self-face Advantage Benefits from a Visual Self-reference Frame[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 494-499.
[6] YOU Xu-Qun,LI-Jing. Coordinate Spatial Relations Processing Based on Representation of Parameters[J]. , 2010, 42(12): 1097-1108.
[7] LIANG San-Cai,You Xu-Qun. Conceptual Control of Visual Images Scanning[J]. , 2010, 42(09): 889-898.
[8] ZHANG Xue-Min,LIU Bing,LU Xue-Ming. Mechanism of Different Moving Pattern on Nontarget Inhibition in Multiple Object Tracking[J]. , 2009, 41(10): 922-931.
[9] TAO Wei-Dong,HUANG Xi-Ting,ZHANG Hui,FENG Si-Hai,LIU Qiang,TAO Xiao-Li,XIE Chao-Xiang,LI Hong,SUN Hong-Jin. Observer’s Hand Orientation Influences Mental Rotation of A Hand Stimulus[J]. , 2009, 41(01): 10-25.
[10] ZHOU Rong-Gang,ZHANG Kan. Object Location Judgments in Spatial Memory Based on Coordinating Egocentric and Allocentric References[J]. , 2008, 40(12): 1229-1239.
[11] ZHOU Rong-Gang,ZHANG Ka. How Information Presentation Affect Absolute Direction Judgments Based on Spatial Reference Frames[J]. , 2008, 40(11): 1137-1148.
[12] TAO Wei-Dong,SUN Hong-Jin,YAN Jing-Jiang,ZHOU Liu. The Dissociation of Egocentric and Allocentric Mental Rotation through an In-Rotation Effect[J]. , 2008, 40(01): 14-24.
[13] Liang Sancai,You Xuqun. Effect of Conflicting Reference Frames on Image Updating[J]. , 2007, 39(06): 966-976.
[14] Zhao Mintao,Mou Weimin. ORIENTATION SPECIFICITY OF SPATIAL REPRESENTATION IN MULTI-VIEW LEARNING[J]. , 2005, 37(03): 308-313.
[15] Li Shouxin,Song Guangwen(Department of Education,Qufu Normal University). A STUDY ON THE CONGNITIVE STYLES OF SENIOR MIDDLE SCHOOL STUDENTS[J]. , 1994, 26(04): 378-384.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech