Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (12) : 1381-1389     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01381
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The development of preschool children’s inductive reasoning about weight: A cross-cultural comparison of Sino-US
WANG Zhidan1,ZHOU Aibao2(),ZHANG Ronghua2,BU Mengjin1,LI Yuwen1,WANG Haijing1,WILLIAMSON Rebecca3
1 School of Education Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China
2 School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University, Lanzhou 730070, China
3 Department of Psychology, Georgia State University, Atlanta 30302, USA
Download: PDF(2196 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Weight has been of interest to scientists from early in the study of cognitive development. More recent research indicates that preschool is an important transition period for using weight generally across tasks in the physical domain. For example, 4-year-olds, but not 3-year-olds, can choose a heavy versus a light object to make a balance with an intermediate weight tip and category objects by weight through observing others’ demonstration. In this research, we investigate when American (Study 1) and Chinese children (Study 2) can use verbal labels to make inductive reasoning about weight, and whether this ability is cross-cultural universal.

In Study 1, two- to 6-year-old American children (N = 100) were familiarized with three identical-appearing objects, two of them have one weight, the third one has another weight (e.g., two heavy, one light). The experimenter picked up one object and said “This is a dax.” Children were requested to find another “dax” from the left two objects and give it to the experimenter. If the experimenter label a heavy object, the child chooses the heavy one of the two objects, s/he was scored as a 1. In contrast, if s/he chooses the light one, s/he was scored as a 0. There are two trials, thus, the total scores ranged from 0 to 2. The results indicated that there was a significant effect of age, H (4) = 41.75, p < 0.001. Children’s responses were compared to chance levels and the results suggested that the performance of 4-year-olds (p = 0.004), 5-year-olds (p < 0.001), and 6-year-olds (p < 0.001) was significantly above chance. However, the performance of 3-year-olds (p = 0.16) was not significantly different from chance, the performance of 2-year-olds was marginal significantly below chance (p = 0.055). To sum up, children can successfully pass the task by the age of 4.

In Study 2, we examined whether Chinese children also can use the verbal label to make inductive reasoning about weight by age 4. Three- to 5-year-olds (N = 60) were recruited to participate in the experiment. All the procedures were the same as Study 1 except that: (a) children were tested in their school; (b) two new verbal labels were created to label the objects-"delu" and "peru". The results indicated that the effect of age is significant, H (2) = 18.71, p < 0.001. The performance of 4-year-olds (p < 0.001) and 5-year-olds (p < 0.001) was significantly above chance. However, the performance of 3-year-olds (p = 0.10) was not significantly different from chance.

Overall, this research provides a timeline for the development of children using verbal label in inductive reasoning about invisible weight in the physical domain. At age 4, both American and Chinese children can reliably apply the verbal categorical label to weight. In addition, it appears that age 3 to 4 is an important transition period for solving such task universally despite of cultural difference. The three possible reasons that could account for the developmental difference were discussed. Also discussed were the implications of cognitive development for science education.

Keywords weight      inductive reasoning      invisible property      cross-cultural universal     
ZTFLH:  B844  
Issue Date: 30 October 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Zhidan
ZHOU Aibao
ZHANG Ronghua
BU Mengjin
LI Yuwen
WANG Haijing
WILLIAMSON Rebecca
Cite this article:   
WANG Zhidan,ZHOU Aibao,ZHANG Ronghua, et al. The development of preschool children’s inductive reasoning about weight: A cross-cultural comparison of Sino-US[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1381-1389.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01381     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I12/1381
  
选择匹配<BR/>重量的次数 年龄
2岁 3岁 4岁 5岁 6岁
0 8 (40%) 2 (10%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%) 0 (0%)
1 10 (50%) 12 (60%) 6 (30%) 2 (10%) 1 (5%)
2 2 (10%) 6 (30%) 12 (60%) 17 (85%) 19 (95%)
  
选择正确<BR/>重量的次数 年龄
3岁 4岁 5岁
0 7 (35%) 0 (0%) 1 (5%)
1 11 (55%) 10 (50%) 5 (25%)
2 2 (10%) 10 (50%) 14 (70%)
  
  
1 Althaus N., &Westermann G. , ( 2016). Labels constructively shape object categories in 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 151, 5-17.
pmid: 26778468 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096515002891
2 Buchanan D.W., &Sobel , D. M . ( 2011). Mechanism-based causal reasoning in young children. Child Development, 82( 6), 2053-2066.
pmid: 21919900 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01646.x/full
3 Chen L., Wei X. M., Zhong L. J., & Mo L . ( 2014). The role of causal relations between new property and prototype in induction. Psychological Exploration, 34( 5), 398-404.
url: http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XLXT201405003.htm
4 [ 陈琳, 魏晓玛, 钟罗金, 莫雷 . ( 2014). 基于原型特征因果关系的归纳推理研究. 心理学探新, 34( 5), 398-404.]
5 Chiu L-H.., ( 1972). A cross-cultural comparison of cognitive styles in Chinese and American children. International Journal of Psychology, 7( 4), 235-242.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1080/00207597208246604/full
6 Erb C. D., Buchanan D. W., & Sobel D. M . ( 2013). Children’s developing understanding of the relation between variable causal efficacy and mechanistic complexity. Cognition, 129( 3), 494-500.
pmid: 24041835 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027713001595
7 Erdfelder E., Faul F., & Buchner A . ( 1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 28( 1), 1-11.
url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03203630
8 Flavell J. H., Green F. L., Flavell E. R., Harris P. L., & Astington J. W . ( 1995). Young children’s knowledge about thinking. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 60( 1), 1-96.
pmid: 7877641 url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1166124
9 Fulkerson A. L., Waxman S. R. , & Seymour, J. M.( 2006) . .Linking object names and object categories:Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month- olds In Bamman, D, Magnitskaia, T, & Zaller, C (Eds) Supplement to the Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development Cascadilla Press Words (but not tones) facilitate object categorization in 6- and 12-month- olds. In Bamman, D., Magnitskaia, T., & Zaller, C. (Eds.) Supplement to the Proceedings of the 30th Boston University Conference on Language Development. Cascadilla Press.
10 Gelman. SA., &Markman , E. M . ( 1986). Categories and induction in young children. Cognition, 23( 3), 183-209.
pmid: 3791915 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/001002778690034X
11 Gelman S.A., &Wellman , H. M . ( 1991). Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition, 38( 3), 213-244.
12 Graham S. A., Kilbreath C. S., & Welder A. N . ( 2004). Thirteen-month-olds rely on shared labels and shape similarity for inductive inferences. Child Development, 75( 2), 409-427.
13 Hauf P., &Paulus M. , ( 2011). Experience matters: 11-month- old infants can learn to use material information to predict the weight of novel objects. Infant Behavior and Development, 34( 3), 467-471.
pmid: 21665284 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016363831100052X
14 Hauf P., Paulus M., & Baillargeon R . ( 2012). Infants use compression information to infer objects’ weights: examining cognition, exploration, and prospective action in a preferential-reaching task. Child Development, 83( 6), 1978-1995.
pmid: 3492508 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2012.01824.x/full
15 Hochmann J-R., Mody S., & Carey S . ( 2016). Infants’ representations of same and different in match- and non-match-to-sample. Cognitive Psychology, 86, 87-111.
pmid: 26970605 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4935928/
16 Hochmann J-R., Tuerk A. S., Sanborn S., Zhu R., Long R., Dempster M., & Carey S . ( 2017). Children’s representation of abstract relations in relational/array match-to-sample tasks. Cognitive Psychology, 99, 17-43.
pmid: 29132016 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29132016
17 Johansen M. K., Savage J., Fouquet N., & Shanks D. R . ( 2015). Salience not status: How category labels influence feature inference. Cognitive Science, 39( 7), 1594-1621.
pmid: 25430964 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cogs.12206/full
18 Kalish C.W., &Lawson , C. A . ( 2007). Negative evidence and inductive generalisation. Thinking & Reasoning, 13( 4), 394-425.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13546780701273402
19 KemlerNelson D. G., Herron L., & Holt M. B . ( 2003). The sources of young children's name innovations for novel artifacts. Journal of Child Language, 30( 4), 823-843.
pmid: 14686086 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14686086
20 KemlerNelson D. G., Russell R., Duke N., & Jones K . ( 2000). Two-year-olds will name artifacts by their functions. Child Development, 71( 5), 1271-1288.
pmid: 11108096 url: http://mcs-dd.sagepub.com/lp/wiley/two-year-olds-will-name-artifacts-by-their-functions-NdfAP551lV
21 Legare C.H . ( 2012). Exploring explanation: Explaining inconsistent evidence informs exploratory, hypothesis- testing behavior in young children. Child Development, 83( 1), 173-185.
pmid: 22172010 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01691.x/full
22 Legare C.H . ( 2014). The contribution of explanation and exploration to children's scientific reasoning. Child Development Perspectives, 8( 2), 101-106.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/cdep.12070/full
23 Li F., Xie L., Yang X., & Cao B . ( 2017). The effect of feedback and operational experience on children’s rule learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 534.
pmid: 5390043 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5390043/
24 Liu D., Wellman H. M., Tardif T., & Sabbagh M. A . ( 2008). Theory of mind development in Chinese children: A meta-analysis of false-belief understanding across cultures and languages. Developmental Psychology, 44( 2), 523-531.
pmid: 18331141 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM18331141
25 Long C. Q., Wu R. M., Li H., Chen A. T., Feng T. Y., & Li F. H . ( 2006). 3.5~5.5 years older’s inductive reasoning in similarity vs conception confliction condition. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 38( 1), 47-55.
url: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-XLXB200601006.htm
26 [ 龙长权, 吴睿明, 李红, 陈安涛, 冯廷勇, 李富洪 . ( 2006). 3.5~5.5 岁儿童在知觉相似与概念冲突情形下的归纳推理. 心理学报, 38( 1), 47-55.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb200601007
27 Nazzi T., &Gopnik A. ,( 2000). A shift in children’s use of perceptual and causal cues to categorization. Developmental Science, 3( 4), 389-396.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-7687.00133/full
28 Nielsen M., &Haun D. , ( 2016). Why developmental psychology is incomplete without comparative and cross- cultural perspectives. Philosophical. Transactions. of the Royal. Society. B, 371( 1686), 20150071.
pmid: 4685517 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_PM26644590
29 Nielsen M., Haun D., K?rtner J., & Legare C. H . ( 2017). The persistent sampling bias in developmental psychology: A call to action. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 162, 31-38
pmid: 28575664 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28575664
30 Noles N., &Gelman S. , ( 2012). Effects of categorical labels on similarity judgments: A critical analysis of similarity- based approaches. Developmental Psychology, 48( 3), 890-896.
pmid: 22059447 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM22059447
31 Patnaik A., . ( 2008). The physical discrimination and possible concept of object weight that exists in infants and toddlers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Retrieved from 2008). The physical discrimination and possible concept of object weight that exists in infants and toddlers (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Retrieved from
url: http:// digitalcommons.wku.edu/theses/46/
32 Paulus M., &Hauf P. , ( 2011). Infants’ use of material properties to guide their actions with differently weighted objects. Infant and Child Development, 20( 4), 423-436.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.704/full
33 Piaget J. ( 1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.
34 Povinelli J. D. ( 2012). World without weight: Perspective on an alien mind. Oxford University Press.
35 Richland L. E., Chan T-K., Morrison R. G., & Au T. K-F . ( 2010). Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105( 1-2), 146-153.
36 Schrauf C., Call J., & Pauen S . ( 2011). The effect of plausible versus implausible balance scale feedback on the expectancies of 3- to 4-year-old children. Journal of Cognition and Development, 12( 4), 518-536.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/15248372.2011.571647
37 Siegler R.S., &Chen Z. , ( 1998). Developmental differences in rule learning: A microgenetic analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 36( 3), 273-310.
pmid: 9729904 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010028598906867
38 Sobel D. M., Yoachim C. M., Gopnik A., Meltzoff A. N., & Blumenthal E. J . ( 2007). The blicket within: Preschoolers’ inferences about insides and causes. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8( 2), 159-182.
pmid: 18458796 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/18458796
39 Walker C., Lombrozo T., Legare C. H., & Gopnik A . ( 2014). Explaining prompts children to privilege inductivity rich properties. Cognition, 133( 2), 343-357.
40 Wang X. Y., Yu W. Y., Liang P. P., Long Z. J., Guo X. L., Zhong N., … Zhou H. Y . ( 2014). Influence of knowledge on label effect during adults’ inductive reasoning. Journal of Psychological Science, 37( 4), 845-850.
url: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-XLKX201404013.htm
41 [ 王旭艳, 于伟艳, 梁佩鹏, 龙周军, 郭晓龙, 钟宁, 秦裕林, 周海燕 . ( 2014). 知识对成人归纳推理标签效应的影响. 心理科学, 37( 4), 845-850.]
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTotal-XLKX201404013.htm
42 Wang Z., ( 2014). Children’s imitation of a weight sorting rule (Unpublished Master’s thesis). Georgia State University.Retrieved from https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/psych_theses/126
43 Wang Z., Meltzoff A. N., & Williamson R. A . ( 2015). Social learning promotes understanding of the physical world: Preschool children’s imitation of weight sorting. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 136, 82-91.
pmid: 25866145 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022096515000375
44 Wang Z., Williamson R. A., & Meltzoff A. N . ( 2015). Imitation as a mechanism in cognitive development: A cross-cultural investigation of 4-year-old children’s rule learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 6:562.
pmid: 4429617 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4429617/
45 Wang Z., Williamson R. A., & Meltzoff A. N . ( 2018). Preschool physics: Using the invisible property of weight in causal reasoning tasks. PloS ONE, 13( 3), e0192054.
url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/29561840
46 Waxman S.R., &Klibanoff , R. S . ( 2000). The role of comparison in the extension of novel adjectives. Developmental Psychology, 36( 5), 571-581.
pmid: 10976598 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM10976598
47 Welder A.N., &Graham , S. A . ( 2001). The influence of shape similarity and shared labels on infants’ inductive inferences about nonobvious object properties. Child Development, 72( 6), 1653-1673.
pmid: 11768138 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8624.00371/full
48 Wellman H.M., &Gelman , S. A . ( 1988). Children’s understanding of the nonobvious. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 4, (pp. 99-135). Hillsdale, NJ, US: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
49 Wellman H. M., Fang F., Liu D., Zhu L., & Liu G . ( 2006). Scaling of theory-of-mind understandings in Chinese children. Psychological Science, 17( 12), 1075-1081.
pmid: 17201790 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/17201790
[1] WANG Xinxiao; YAN Xiuying; ZHANG Jijia; DONG Fanghong. Spatial metaphors and weight metaphors of seniority rules in the semantic processing of kinship words of the same generation: Evidence from Chinese Korean nationality and the Han nationality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 174-185.
[2] MENG Xiangbin; TAO Jian; CHEN Shali. Warm’sweighted maximum likelihood estimation of latent trait in the four-parameter logistic model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 1047-1056.
[3] WANG Tao; FENG Wenting; WEI Hua; ZHOU Nan. Loneliness makes me fall in love with you: The influence of product display on lonely individual’s product preference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 398-409.
[4] JIAN Xiaozhu; DAI Buyun; DAI Haiqi. The weighted-score logistic model and Monte Carlo simulation study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1625-1630.
[5] ZHOU Fan;SHI Yan. An Investigation of Female College Students’ Body Weight Perception Deviation and Its Reasons[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(1): 101-112 .
[6] CUI Ya-Fei,LI Hong,LI Fu-Hong. The Principle of Extracting Background Relations in Property Effect of Inductive Reasoning[J]. , 2010, 42(12): 1148-1155.
[7]

MEI Yang,LIANG Pei-Peng,LU Sheng-Fu,ZHONG Ning,LI Kun-Cheng,YANG Yan-Hui

. Neural Mechanism of Figural Inductive Reasoning: An fMRI Study[J]. , 2010, 42(04): 496-506.
[8] CHEN Qing-Fei,LEI Yi,LI Hong. The Interaction Effect of Conceptual Category and Property Category on Diversity Effects of Reasoning on Children[J]. , 2010, 42(02): 241-250.
[9] MA Xiao-Qing,FENG Ting-Yong,LI Hong,LONG Chang-Quan. The Roles of Thematic Relations in 4-5 Years Children’s Inductive Reasoning of Different Properties[J]. , 2009, 41(03): 249-258.
[10] WANG Mo-Yun. A Sampling Theory of Inductive Reasoning[J]. , 2008, 40(07): 800-808.
[11] Chen Rong,He Feng. Weighting of Small Probabilities and Its Market Applications[J]. , 2008, 40(02): 210-218.
[12] Zhang Tingting,Li Hong,Long Changquan,Feng Tingyong,Chen Antao,Li Fuhong,Wang Xiufang. Property Centrality Effect in Inductive Reasoning[J]. , 2007, 39(05): 826-836.
[13] Long-Changquan,-Wu-Ruiming,-Li-Hong,-Chen-Antoao,-Feng-Tingyong,-Li-Fuhong. 3.5~5.5 Years Older’s Inductive Reasoning in Similarity vs Conception Confliction Condition[J]. , 2006, 38(01): 47-55.
[14] Xu-Hongtu,-Li-Lihong. Application of AHP and Fuzzy Complex Evaluation on Consumer Psychology of Health Product[J]. , 2005, 37(06): 826-831.
[15] Wang Moyun, Fu Xiaolan. CAUSAL JUDGMENTS IN THE TRIAL-BY-TRIAL PRESENTATION[J]. , 2005, 37(01): 51-61.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech