Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (12) : 1323-1335     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01323
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Neural processing of ambiguous Chinese phrases of stutters
LI Weijun(),LIU Meng,ZHANG Zhenghua,DENG Nali,XING Yushan
Research Center of Brain and Cognitive Neuroscience, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
Download: PDF(694 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Prosodic boundary is an integrative part of spoken language that segments ongoing utterance into prosodic units. These boundaries are correlated with the perception of a pause, a lengthening of the pre-boundary syllable and tonal movement at the end of the phrase. Stuttering is characterized by involuntary disruptions in the flow and rhythm of speech, which was reflected by repetitions of words, sounds or syllables, prolongations and silent blocks. Behavioral response and neural processing results in the past few years indicated that adults who stutters exhibit processing differences compared with fluent speakers during syntactic, semantic and phonological (rhyme) processing. However, existing studies did not examine whether stutters encounter difficulty during perception of prosodic boundary.

The present study aims to explore how stutters and fluent speakers process prosodic boundary of ambiguous Chinese phrases (Verb NP1 Aux NP2) in lexical and structural judgment task using ERPs. We used 168 typical ambiguous Chinese phrases as experimental materials. These phrases were temporarily ambiguous between modifier-noun construction (MNC) and narrative-object structure (NOS). Eighty-four phrases without ambiguity were used as fillers. Twenty-four (20 males) undergraduates/graduates participated in the experiment. They were told to listen carefully to pairs of phrase in two sessions with the same materials. In session one, they completed a lexical judgment task (to determine whether a visually presented word appeared in the pairs of phrase they heard), while in session two they were asked to complete a structural judgment task (to judge whether the pairs of phrase they heard belong to one kind of structure or not). Electrophysiological data were recorded by a set of 64 electrodes from eegmagine (ANT Neuro) according to the extended 10-20 positioning system. EEG data were time-locked to the offset of verb and Aux (de) of the first phrase using a 100-msec pre-stimulus baseline and an averaging time window of 800 msec. We selected two time windows (0~300 ms and 300~600 ms) for statistical analysis in the midline and lateral areas.

During 0~300 ms, we found that prosodic boundary (v.s. non-boundary) elicited positivity in the midline, F (1, 22) = 24.28, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.52, and lateral areas, F (1, 22) = 45.51, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.67. Besides, the interaction between Structure and Boundary was significant in the midline, F (1, 22) = 5.84, p < 0.05, ηp 2= 0.21, and lateral areas, F (1, 22) = 4.18, p = 0.053, ηp 2= 0.16. Simple effect analysis indicated that prosodic boundary elicited positive effect for MNC in the midline, while in the lateral areas prosodic boundary elicited positivity for both of NOS and MNC, F (1, 22) = 10.35, p < 0.005, ηp 2= 0.32; F (1, 22) = 29.69, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.57. During 300~600 ms, we found that prosodic boundary (v.s. non-boundary) elicited positivity in the midline, F (1, 22) = 36.61, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.61, and lateral areas, F (1, 22) = 36.59, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.71. Besides, the interaction between Region and Boundary was significant in the midline, F (2, 44) = 10.07, p < 0.005, ηp 2= 0.31, and lateral areas, F (2, 44) = 24.16, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.52. Simple effect analysis indicated that although the positivity elicited by prosodic boundary was broadly distributed in the whole scalp area, it was prominent in frontal-central area. More importantly, the interaction between Task, Boundary and Structure was significant in the lateral area, F (2, 44) = 3.95, p < 0.05, ηp 2= 0.15. Simple effect analysis indicated that in lexical judgment task, prosodic boundary of MNP elicited positive shift, F (1, 22) = 23.41, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.52, but NOS didn’t, F (1, 22) = 2.47, p = 0.131. However, prosodic boundaries of both MNP and NOS elicited positive effect in structure judgment task, F (1, 22) = 17.02, p < 0.001, ηp 2= 0.44; F (1, 22) = 11.65, p < 0.005, ηp 2= 0.35.

Overall, we found that stutters and fluent speakers exhibit similar neural process during prosodic boundary processing. This finding was reflected by the fact that the stable CPS was elicited by prosodic boundaries of both MNP and NOS. The positive effect elicited by MNC in an earlier time window was distributed more broadly in scalp than that elicited by NOS in both kinds of task. In a later time window, prosodic boundaries of both MNC and NOS elicited the stable CPS regardless of the kind of experimental task in the midline. In the lateral areas, the CPS was detected in the prosodic boundary of MNC in both kinds of task, whereas the CPS was stably observed at the boundary of NOS in structure judgment task. In conclusion, we contend that stutters and fluent speakers are both sensitive to prosodic boundary and their processing was influenced by the structure of ambiguous phrases and experimental task.

Keywords stutter      prosodic boundary      ambiguous phrase      CPS     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 30 October 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Weijun
LIU Meng
ZHANG Zhenghua
DENG Nali
XING Yushan
Cite this article:   
LI Weijun,LIU Meng,ZHANG Zhenghua, et al. Neural processing of ambiguous Chinese phrases of stutters[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1323-1335.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01323     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I12/1323
被试 口吃被试 正常被试
年龄(岁) 性别 教育程度 严重程度 年龄(岁) 性别 教育程度
1 24 研究生 轻度到中度 23 研究生
2 20 大学 中度 20 大学
3 22 大学 轻度到中度 22 大学
4 25 研究生 中度到严重 25 研究生
5 23 大学 中度 23 大学
6 24 大学 中度到严重 24 大学
7 22 大学 轻度到中度 23 大学
8 23 研究生 轻度到中度 23 研究生
9 20 大学 中度 22 大学
10 24 大学 轻度到中度 24 大学
11 24 大学 轻度到中度 24 大学
12 24 大学 中度 24 大学
M 22.92 23.08
SD 1.62 1.31
  
  
  
  
  
1 Baddeley, A. ( 1992). Working memory. Science, 255( 5044), 556-559.
2 Bogels S., Schriefers H., Vonk W., Chwilla D. J., & Kerkhofs R . ( 2010). The interplay between prosody and syntax in sentence processing: The case of subject-and object-control verbs. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 5), 1036-1053.
pmid: 19445602 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM19445602
3 Bosshardt H.-G., Ballmer W., & de Nil L . ( 2002). Effects of category and rhyme decisions on sentence production. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 45, 844-857.
pmid: 12381043 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM12381043
4 Chang S., Kenney M. K., Loucks T. M. J., & Ludlow C. L . ( 2009). Brain activation abnormalities during speech and non-speech in stuttering speakers. NeuroImage, 46( 1), 201-212.
pmid: 2693291 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811909001372
5 Chang S. E., Horwitz B., Ostuni J., Reynolds R., & Ludlow C. L . ( 2011). Evidence of left inferior frontal-premotor structural and functional connectivity deficits in adults who stutter. Cerebral Cortex, 21( 11), 2507-2518.
pmid: 3183422 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM21471556
6 Christophe A., Peperkamp S., Pallier C., Block E., & Mehler J . ( 2004). Phonological phrase boundaries constrain lexical access. i. Adult data. Journal of Memory and Language, 51( 4), 523-547.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X04000828
7 Corbera S., Corral M. J., Escera C., & Idiazábal M. A . ( 2005). Abnormal speech sound representation in persistent developmental stuttering. Neurology, 65( 8), 1246-1252.
pmid: 16247052 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM16247052
8 Cuadrado,E. M., & Weber-Fox, C. M . ( 2003). Atypical syntactic processing in individuals who stutter: Evidence from event-related brain potentials and behavioral measures. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 46, 960-76.
pmid: 12959473 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_JJ02119458
9 Cykowski M. D., Fox P. T., Ingham R. J., Ingham J. C., & Robin D. A . ( 2010). A study of the reproducibility and etiology of diffusion anisotropy differences in developmental stuttering: A potential role for impaired myelination. Neuroimage, 52( 4), 1495-1504.
pmid: 4135434 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811910007172
10 Dorman,M. F., & Porter Jr, R. J . ( 1975). Hemispheric lateralization for speech perception in stutterers 1. Cortex, 11( 2), 181-185.
pmid: 1149477 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010945275800426
11 Etchell A. C., Civier O., Ballard K. J., & Sowman P. F . ( 2017). A systematic literature review of neuroimaging research on developmental stuttering between 1995 and 2016. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 55, 6-45.
pmid: 28778745 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X16300651
12 Foundas A. L., Corey D. M., Hurley M. M., & Heilman K. M . ( 2004). Verbal dichotic listening in developmental stuttering: Subgroups with atypical auditory processing. Cognitive & Behavioral Neurology, 17( 4), 224-232.
pmid: 15622019 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM15622019
13 Fox P. T., Ingham R. J., Ingham J. C., Hirsch T. B., Downs J. H., Martin C., Jerabek P., Glass T., & Lancaster J. L . ( 1996). A PET study of the neural systems of stuttering. Nature, 382, 158-162.
pmid: 8700204 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM8700204
14 Giraud A. L., Neumann K., Bachoud-Levi A. C., von Gudenberg A.W., Euler H.A., Lanfermann H., & Preibisch C . ( 2008). Severity of dysfluency correlates with basal ganglia activity in persistent developmental stuttering. Brain and Language. 104 ( 2), 190-199.
15 Hall, J. W., &Jerger, J. ( 1978). Central auditory function in stutterers. Journal of Speech & Hearing Research, 21( 2), 324-337.
pmid: 703279 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1979-31260-001
16 Hannley M, & Dorman, M. F . ( 1982). Some observations on auditory function and stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 7( 1), 93-108.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X8280003X
17 Holzgrefe H., Wellmann C., Petrone, C, Truckenbrodt, H, H?hle, B., & Wartenburger I . ( 2013). Brain response to prosodic boundary cues depends on boundary position. Frontiers in Psychology, 4( 14), 1-14.
pmid: 3714540 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3714540/
18 Howell P., Davis S., & Williams S. M . ( 2006). Auditory abilities of speakers who persisted, or recovered, from stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31( 4), 257-270.
pmid: 16920188 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X06000635
19 Kerkhofs R., Vonk W., Schriefers H., & Chwilla D. J . ( 2007). Discourse, syntax, and prosody: The brain reveals an immediate interaction. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19( 9), 1421-1434.
pmid: 17714005 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM17714005
20 Kjelgaard,M. M., & Speer, S. R . ( 1999). Prosodic facilitation and interference in the resolution of temporary syntactic closure ambiguity. Journal of Memory & Language, 40( 2), 153-194.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749596X98926201
21 Kn?sche T. R., Neuhaus C., Haueisen J., Alter K., Maess B., & Witte O. W., & Friederici A. D . ( 2005). Perception of phrase structure in music. Human Brain Mapping, 24( 4), 259-273.
pmid: 15678484 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hbm.20088/pdf
22 Li Li & Yang Y . ( 2007). Prosodic resolution of syntactic ambiguity: From the point of view of speaker and listener. Advances in Psychological Science, 15( 2), 282-287.
url: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-XLXD200702014.htm
23 [ 李卫君, 杨玉芳 . ( 2007). 从讲话者和听话者两个角度看韵律的句法解歧. 心理科学进展, 15( 2), 282-287.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt200702015
24 Li W.& Yang , Y. ( 2009). Perception of prosodic hierarchical boundaries in Mandarin Chinese sentences. Neuroscience, 158( 4), 1416-1425.
pmid: 19111906 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452208015510
25 Li W& Yang Y . ( 2010). The cognitive processing of prosodic boundary and its related brain effect in quatrain. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42( 11), 1021-1032.
26 [ 李卫君, 杨玉芳 . ( 2010). 绝句韵律边界的认知加工及其脑电效应. 心理学报, 42( 11), 1021-1032.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201011001
27 , ., Li W& Yang Y . ( 2010). Perception of Chinese poem and its electrophysiological effects. Neuroscience, 168( 3), 757-768.
pmid: 20382205 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306452210005051
28 Li X. Q., Yang Y. F., & Lu Y . ( 2010). How and when prosodic boundaries influence syntactic parsing under different discourse contexts: An ERP study. Biological Psychology, 83( 3), 250-259.
pmid: 20083152 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301051110000141
29 Lincoln M., Packman A., & Onslow M . ( 2006). Altered auditory feedback and the treatment of stuttering: A review. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31( 2), 71-89.
pmid: 16750562 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X06000301
30 Liu B., Wang Z., & Jin Z . ( 2010). The effects of punctuations in Chinese sentence comprehension: An ERP study. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 23( 1), 66-80.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0911604409000608
31 Nan Y., Knosche T. R., & Friederici A. D . ( 2006). The perception of musical phrase structure: A cross-cultural ERP study. Brain Research, 1094( 1), 179-191.
pmid: 16712816 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0006899306009097
32 Pannekamp A., Toepel U., Alter K., Hahne A., & Friederici A. D . ( 2005). Prosody-driven sentence processing: An event-related brain potential study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17( 3), 407-421.
pmid: 15814001 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM15814001
33 Peter V., Mcarthur G., & Crain S . ( 2014). Using event-related potentials to measure phrase boundary perception in English. BMC Neuroscience, 15( 1), 1-11.
pmid: 25424987 url: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2202/15/129
34 Ramus F., Hauser M. D., Miller C., Morris D., & Mehler J . ( 2000). Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys. Science, 288, 349-351.
pmid: 10764650 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM10764650
35 Salverda A. P., Dahan D., & McQueen J. M . ( 2003). The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition, 90( 1), 51-89.
pmid: 14597270 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027703001392
36 , ., Schepman A0 &Rodway p , ( 2000). Prosody and parsing in coordination structures. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 53( 2), 377-396.
pmid: 10881611 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM10881611
37 Shattuck-Hufnagel S, &Turk A. E . ( 1996). A prosody tutorial for investigators of auditory sentence processing. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 25( 2), 193-246.
pmid: 8667297 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/BF01708572
38 Smith A, &Weber C . ( 2017). How stuttering develops: The multifactorial dynamic pathways theory. Journal of Speech and Language Hearing Research, 60( 9), 2483-2505.
pmid: 28837728 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28837728
39 Steinhauer K., Alter K., & Friederici A. D . ( 1999). Brain potentials indicate immediate use of prosodic cues in natural speech processing. Nature Neuroscience, 2( 2), 191-196.
pmid: 10195205 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM10195205
40 Steinhauer K, &Friederici ,A.D . ( 2001). Prosodic boundaries, comma rules, and brain responses: The closure positive shift in ERPs as a universal marker for prosodic phrasing in listeners and readers. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 30( 3), 267-295.
pmid: 11523275 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A%3A1010443001646
41 Weber-Fox C . ( 2001). Neural systems for sentence processing in stuttering. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 44( 4), 814-825.
pmid: 11521774 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM11521774
42 Weber-Fox C, &Hampton A . ( 2008). Stuttering and natural speech processing of semantic and syntactic constraints on verbs. Journal of Speech Language & Hearing Research, 51( 5), 1058-1071.
pmid: 2638126 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_JJ0210146650
43 Weber-Fox C., Spencer R. M. C., Spruill J. E., & Smith A . ( 2004). Phonologic processing in adults who stutter: Electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Journal of Speech Language& Hearing Research, 47( 6), 1244-1258.
pmid: 15842008 url: http://med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail/PeriodicalPaper_PM15842008
44 Wei H., Dong Y., Boland J. E., & Yuan F . ( 2016). Structural priming and frequency effects interact in Chinese sentence comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 7( 45), 1-9.
pmid: 26869954 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4735403/
45 World Health Organization. ( 2010). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Retrieved from < 2010). International statistical classification of diseases and related health problems. Retrieved from .
url: http://apps.who.int/classifications/icd10/browse/2010/en#/F98.5
46 Yairi E,& Ambrose N , . ( 2013). Epidemiology of stuttering: 21st century advances. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 38( 2), 66-87.
pmid: 3687212 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X12001052
47 Yang X., Shen X., Li W., & Yang Y . ( 2014). How listeners weight acoustic cues to intonational phrase boundaries. Plos One, 9( 7), 1-9.
pmid: 25019156 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4096911/
48 Yaruss J. S., & Quesal, R. W . ( 2006). Overall assessment of the speaker's experience of stuttering (OASES): Documenting multiple outcomes in stuttering treatment. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 31( 2), 90-115.
pmid: 16620945 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0094730X06000295
49 Zhang J., Jiang C., Zhou L., & Yang Y . ( 2016). Perception of hierarchical boundaries in music and its modulation by expertise. Neuropsychologia, 91, 490-498.
pmid: 27659874 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0028393216303505
50 Zhang Y., Zhang H., & Shu H . ( 2000). A study on the processing of ambiguous phrases in Chinese. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 32( 1), 13-19.
51 [ 张亚旭, 张厚粲, 舒华 . ( 2000). 汉语偏正/述宾歧义短语加工初探. 心理学报, 32( 1), 13-19.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xlxb200001003.aspx
[1] CHEN Sui-Qing,ZHANG Ji-Jia,XIAO Er-Ping. zhangjj@scnu.edu.cn[J]. , 2011, 43(09): 1013-1025.
[2] LI Wei-Jun,YANG Yu-Fang. The Cognitive Processing of Prosodic Boundary and Its Related Brain Effect in Quatrain[J]. , 2010, 42(11): 1021-1032.
[3] NING Ning,YANG Shuang,PENG Dan-Ling,DING Guo-Sheng,DONG Fang-Bai. The Effect of Preparatory Interval on Verbal Response of People Who Stutter[J]. , 2009, 41(05): 387-396.
[4] Zhang Jijia,Xiao Erping. Phonological Encoding in the Silent Speech of Persons Who Stutter[J]. , 2008, 40(03): 263-273.
[5] Ning Ning,Lu Chunming,Peng Danling,Ding Guosheng. The Speech Plan Deficit of People who stutter: Evidence from Word Length Effect[J]. , 2007, 39(02): 215-224.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech