Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (11) : 1292-1302     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01292
|
The influence of facial trustworthiness on helping behavior: The role of attachment type
Xiujuan WANG1,Na WANG1,Shangfeng HAN1,Shen LIU2(),Lin ZHANG1()
1 Department and Institute of Psychology, Ningbo University, Ningbo 315211, China
2 School of Humanities and Social Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230022, China
Download: PDF(785 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Researches on helping behaviors have always been a hot topic. Especially nowadays, helping others has become a risk-taking decision-making. Helping behavior is defined as an action that benefits others without return. In strange situations, the face, as the only clue to communicate or obtain information from, can affect people’s behaviors to a great extent. However, previous studies on helping behaviors did not take this issue into account, this study intended to combine situational factors and individual factors to comprehensively explore their impact on helping behaviors and to further investigate the moderating role of attachment security in the relationship between facial trustworthiness and helping behaviors.

This study included two experiments. Experiment 1 explored the effect of the characteristics of helpers’ trait attachment and facial trustworthiness by using a mixed experimental design of 2 (facial trustworthiness: high/low) × 3 (attachment type: security/anxiety/avoidance). Experiment 2 used a 2 (facial trustworthiness: high/low) × 2 (state-security attachment priming: yes/no) to investigate whether priming security attachment had safe influence as trait security attachment. During both experiments, subjects were presented randomly with faces of different facial trustworthiness. Participants selected their willingness to help others and donate money. The amount of money they donated represented their helping behaviors. These two indices were selected as dependent variables. A 7-point scale was used to measure help-willingness. The higher the score, the stronger of the willingness to help the seeker of participants. The amount of donation was between 0-100. The larger the number of donation, the more they were willing to contribute.

This study used SPSS 20.0 to analyze the data of the experiment, and the results verified the research hypotheses. The results of experiment 1 showed that there was a significant interaction between facial trustworthiness and the types of helpers’ attachment. The simple effect analysis showed that there were significant differences in the willingness and people’s behaviors with security attachments in both of the two facial trustworthiness, the willingness and money they input in high-facial trustworthiness were significantly higher than those in low-facial trustworthiness situation. There were also significant differences in the willingness and behaviors between low and high facial trustworthiness both anxious individuals and avoidance individuals. The willingness and behaviors to help in high-facial trustworthiness situation were significantly higher than those in low-facial trustworthiness situation. The results of experiment 2 on willingness and behaviors showed that there was a significant different in the interaction between facial trustworthiness and the types of helpers’ attachment. The simple effect analysis showed that there was a significant difference between the two facial trustworthiness situations for individuals of security attachment and a significant difference between the two facial trustworthiness situations for individuals of insecurity attachment, the willingness and helping behaviors in the high facial trustworthiness situation was higher significantly than low-facial trustworthiness situation. The different value in willingness and behavior in both experiment 1and experiment 2 under two facial trustworthiness situations for individuals of security attachment were significantly smaller than those for individuals of insecure attachment, indicating that attachment security to some extent had a regulatory role, it could buffer the risk-aided behavior to bring down.

This study has some significance. First of all, this study incorporated facial trustworthiness into helping behaviors, which provided a new way of researches of helping behaviors. Looking from the perspective of the face helped to distinguish the unfamiliar environment’s helping behaviors from the familiar environments. Second, the study found that individuals’ attachment types and the seeker’s face trustworthiness affects the helping behavior, indicating that the help-taking behaviors were the result of multiple factors, to remind the public to combine the help-seeking environment objectively and justly to see others’ behaviors. The media should also adopt a pragmatic attitude towards reports of people’s help behaviors so as to avoid reporting off the factual basis.

Keywords helping behaviors      helping willingness      facial trustworthiness      attachment security     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Corresponding Authors: Shen LIU,Lin ZHANG     E-mail: liushenpsy@ustc.edu.cn;zhanglin1@nbu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 25 September 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xiujuan WANG
Na WANG
Shangfeng HAN
Shen LIU
Lin ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Xiujuan WANG,Na WANG,Shangfeng HAN, et al. The influence of facial trustworthiness on helping behavior: The role of attachment type[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1292-1302.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01292     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I11/1292
  
助人行为 依恋类型 高面孔可信度 低面孔可信度
助人意愿 安全 5.38 ± 0.54 4.41 ± 0.39
焦虑 4.50 ± 0.38 2.30 ± 0.33
回避 3.96 ± 0.49 2.44 ± 0.30
捐助金额 安全 68.37 ± 5.99 61.67 ± 3.57
焦虑 53.44 ± 3.37 37.81 ± 4.09
回避 41.32 ± 5.26 27.95 ± 4.85
  
  
  
助人行为 启动条件 高面孔可信度 低面孔可信度
助人意愿 启动组 4.54 ± 0.58 4.52 ± 0.37
控制组 3.69 ± 0.42 3.34 ± 0.49
捐助金额 启动组 63.40 ± 6.99 60.23 ± 6.50
控制组 50.16 ± 7.08 40.71 ± 6.10
  
  
  
[1] Aquino K., Freeman D., Reed A., Felps W ., & Lim, V. K. G. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 1), 123-141.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0015406
[2] Boag, E. M., & Carnelley, K. B . (2016). Attachment and prejudice: The mediating role of empathy. British Journal of Social Psychology, 55( 2), 337-376.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjso.2016.55.issue-2
[3] Bowlby, J. (1973). Attachment and loss: Vol. 2. Separation: Anxiety and anger (Vol. II). New York: Basic Books.
[4] Carnelley, K. B., & Rowe, A. C . (2010). Priming a sense of security: What goes through people’s minds? Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27( 2), 253-261.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0265407509360901
[5] Chen C. K., Waters H. S., Hartman M., Zimmerman S., Miklowitz D. J., & Waters E . (2013). The secure base script and the task of caring for elderly parents: Implications for attachment theory and clinical practice. Attachment and Human Development, 15( 3), 332-348.
[6] Chen F. F., Jing Y. M., & Lee J. M . (2014). The looks of a leader: Competent and trustworthy, but not dominant. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51, 27-33.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103113001844
[7] Collins, T. J., & Gillath, O. (2012). Attachment, breakup strategies, and associated outcomes: The effects of security enhancement on the selection of breakup strategies. Journal of Research in Personality, 46( 2), 210-222.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0092656612000098
[8] Dykas, M. J., & Cassidy, J. (2011). Attachment and the processing of social information across the life span: Theory and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 137( 1), 19-46.
pmid: 21219056 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0021367
[9] Ein-Dor T., Mikulincer M., & Shaver P. R . (2011). Attachment insecurities and the processing of threat-related information: Studying the schemas involved in insecure people’s coping strategies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101( 1), 78-93.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0022503
[10] Emswiller T., Deaux K., & Willits J. E . (1971). Similarity, sex, and requests for small favors. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 1( 3), 284-291.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/1972-22926-001
[11] Ewing L., Caulfield F., Read A., & Rhodes G . (2015). Perceived trustworthiness of faces drives trust behaviour in children. Developmental Science, 18( 2), 327-357.
pmid: 25051999 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/desc.2015.18.issue-2
[12] Fischer P., Krueger J. I., Greitemeyer T., Vogrincic C., Kastenmüller A., Frey D., Heene M., … Kainbacher M . (2011). The bystander-effect: A meta-analytic review on bystander intervention in dangerous and non-dangerous emergencies. Psychological Bulletin, 137( 4), 517-537.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0023304
[13] Funk, F., & Todorov, A. (2013). Criminal stereotypes in the courtroom: Facial tattoos affect guilt and punishment differently. Psychology Public Policy and Law, 19(4), 466-478.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/law/19/4/466/
[14] Gaesser, B., & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Episodic simulation and episodic memory can increase intentions to help others. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111( 12), 4415-4420.
url: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1402461111
[15] Hortensius R., Schutter D. J. L. G., & Gelder B. D . (2016). Personal distress and the influence of bystanders on responding to an emergency. Cognitive Affective and Behavioral Neuroscience, 16( 4), 672-688.
[16] Jarvinen, M. J., & Paulus, T. B . (2017). Attachment and cognitive openness: Emotional underpinnings of intellectual humility. Journal of Positive Psychology, 12( 1), 74-86.
url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/17439760.2016.1167944
[17] Jessen, S., & Grossmann, T. (2017). Exploring the role of spatial frequency information during neural emotion processing in human infants. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 11: 486.
[18] Jiang, Y. Z. . ( 2013). The system info of situation interaction: Dialectical psychology and inter behavioral psychology. Journal of Psychological Science, 36( 2), 496-500.
[18] [ 姜永志 . ( 2013). 情境交互作用理论体系: 辩证心理学与交互行为心理学. 心理科学, 36( 2), 496-500.]
[19] Kahneman, D., & Tversky. (1979). A prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk. Econometrica, 47( 2), 262-292.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02109395.1987.10821483
[20] Kogut, T., & Kogut, E. (2013). Exploring the relationship between adult attachment style and the identifiable victim effect in helping behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 4), 651-660.
[21] Kong. M., & Qian, X. J . ( 2015). Mr. right and surperman: Effect of implicit followership on employee’s behavior. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 9), 1162-1171.
[21] [ 孔茗, 钱小军 . ( 2015). 被领导者“看好”的员工其行为也一定好吗?——内隐追随对员工行为的影响. 心理学报, 47( 9), 1162-1171.]
[22] Li C. N., Shi X. X., Huang F., & Ma J . ( 2013). Concept, mechanism and function of attachment security. Journal of Beijing Normal University (Social Sciences), 63( 6), 30-37.
[22] [ 李彩娜, 石鑫欣, 黄凤, 马婧 . ( 2013). 安全依恋的概念、机制与功能. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 63( 6), 30-37.]
[23] Li C. N., Sun Y., Tuo R., & Liu J . ( 2016). The effects of attachment security on interpersonal trust: The moderating role of attachment anxiety. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 8), 989-1001.
[23] [ 李彩娜, 孙颖, 拓瑞, 刘佳 . ( 2016). 安全依恋对人际信任的影响: 依恋焦虑的调节效应. 心理学报, 48( 8), 989-1001.]
[24] Li, T, G., & K, Kazuo. ( 2006). Measuring adult attachment: Chinese adaption of the ECR scale. Acta Psychology Sinica, 38( 3), 300-406.
[24] [ 李同归, 加藤和生 . ( 2006). 成人依恋的测量:亲密关系经历量表(ecr)中文版. 心理学报, 38( 3), 399-406.]
[25] Luke M. A., Sedikides C., & Carnelley K . (2012). Your love lifts me higher! The energizing quality of secure relationships. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38( 6), 721-733.
pmid: 22378830 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167211436117
[26] Ma F. L., Evans A. D., Liu Y., Luo X. M., & Xu F . (2015). To lie or not to lie? The influence of parenting and theory-of-mind understanding on three-year-old children’s honesty. Journal of Moral Education, 44( 2), 198-212.
[27] Ma F. L., Tang, Y L., Zheng, T T., & Xu F . ( 2014). The development of 3-to 5-year-olds’ trust judgment based on face. Psychological Development and Education, 30( 4), 337-344.
[27] [ 马凤玲, 汤玉龙, 郑婷婷, 徐芬 . ( 2014). 3~5岁幼儿基于面孔的信任判断的发展. 心理发展与教育, 30( 4), 337-344.]
[28] Mi L., Tao S., Wang W. J., Dong Q., Jin S. H., & Liu C . (2013). English vowel identification in long-term speech-shaped noise and multi-talker babble for English and Chinese listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133( 5), EL391-EL397.
[29] Michniewicz, K. S., & Vandello, J. A . (2014). The attractive underdog: When disadvantage bolsters attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 30( 7), 942-952.
[30] Mikulincer, M. (1998). Attachment working models and the sense of trust: an exploration of interaction goals and affect regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74( 74), 1209-1224.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1209
[31] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53-152.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0065260103010025
[32] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2007). Reflections on security dynamics: Core constructs, psychological mechanisms, relational contexts, and the need for an integrative theory. Psychological Inquiry, 18( 3), 197-209.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10478400701512893
[33] Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2015). The psychological effects of the contextual activation of security-enhancing mental representations in adulthood. Current Opinion in Psychology, 1, 18-21.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352250X1500055X
[34] Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R., Gillath O., & Nitzberg R. A . (2005). Attachment, caregiving, and altruism: Boosting attachment security increases compassion and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89( 5), 817-839.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.89.5.817
[35] Oldfield J., Humphrey N., & Hebron J . (2016). The role of parental and peer attachment relationships and school connectedness in predicting adolescent mental health outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 21( 1), 21-29.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/camh.2016.21.issue-1
[36] Oosterhof, N. N., & Todorov, A. (2008). The functional basis of face evaluation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105( 32), 11087-11092.
url: http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0805664105
[37] Overall N. C., Fletcher G. J., Simpson J. A., & Fillo J . (2015). Attachment insecurity, biased perceptions of romantic partners’ negative emotions, and hostile relationship behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108( 5), 730-749.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0038987
[38] Pan Y. G., Zhang D. J., Liu Y. L., Ran G. M., & Teng Z. J . (2016). The effects of attachment style and security priming on the perception of others’ pain. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 34( 2), 184-208.
[39] Park, S., & Shin, J. (2017). The influence of anonymous peers on prosocial behavior. Plos One, 12( 10), e0185521.
[40] Ritchie K. L., Palermo R., & Rhodes G . (2017). Forming impressions of facial attractiveness is mandatory. Scientific Reports, 7( 1), 469-477.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-00526-9
[41] Shentu T., Ma J., & Guo Y . (2018). Social attachment shapes emergency responses: Evidence from a postfire study. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46( 1), 139-150.
url: http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/10.2224/sbp.6946
[42] Thomas R., Hochschild Jr., & Casey B . (2011). About face: The association between facial appearance and status attainment among military personnel. Sociological Spectrum, 31( 3), 369-395.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02732173.2011.557132
[43] Todorov A., Olivola C. Y., Dotsch R., & Mende-Siedlecki P . (2015). Social attributions from faces: Determinants, consequences, accuracy, and functional significance. Annual Review of Psychology, 66( 1), 519-545.
url: http://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143831
[44] Wang Y. H., Li D. P., Sun W. Q., Zhao L. Y., Lai X. F., & Zhou Y. Y . ( 2017). Parent-child attachment and prosocial behavior among junior high school students: Moderated mediation effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 5), 663-679.
[44] [ 王艳辉, 李董平, 孙文强, 赵力燕, 赖雪芬, 周月月 . ( 2017). 亲子依恋与初中生亲社会行为: 有调节的中介效应. 心理学报, 49( 5), 663-679.]
[45] Wilson, J. P., & Rule, N. O . (2015). Facial trustworthiness predicts extreme criminal-sentencing outcomes. Psychological Science, 26( 8), 1325-1331.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797615590992
[46] Xia, M., & Wang, Y. W . ( 2015). The effect of empathy and situation safety on helping behavior-The moderating role of interpersonal trust. Journal of Central China Normal University (Humanities and Social Sciences), 54( 4), 168-176.
[46] [ 夏勉, 王远伟 . ( 2015). 状态共情、情境安全程度对助人行为的影响——人际信任的调节作用. 华中师范大学学报(人文社会科学版), 54( 4), 168-176.]
[47] Xing C., Liu, T T., & Zhang X . ( 2015). Prosocial behaviors in emergencies: Mating motive change men and women’s herico helping tendencies differently. Journal of Psychological Science, 38( 1), 172-178.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201501/663377647.html
[47] [ 邢采, 刘婷婷, 张希 . ( 2015). 危机情境下的亲社会行为: 求偶动机对危机救助意愿的影响. 心理科学 38( 1), 172-178.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201501/663377647.html
[48] Zhang, F., & Labouvie-vief, G. (2004). Stability and fluctuation in adult attachment style over a 6-year period. Attachment and Human Development, 6( 4), 419-438.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1461673042000303127
[49] Zhang L., Li Y., Liu S., Tan Q., Xu Q., & Yang Y. P . ( 2016). The impression processing of unfamiliar faces: Based on the facial characteristics. Journal of Psychological Science, 39( 6), 1373-1378.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201606/670638057.html
[49] [ 张林, 李玥, 刘燊, 谭群, 徐强, 杨亚平 . ( 2016). 陌生面孔的印象加工: 基于面孔特征的视角. 心理科学, 39( 6), 1373-1378.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201606/670638057.html
[50] Zhang Y., Kong F. C., Zhong Y. L., & Kou H . (2014). Personality manipulations: Do they modulate facial attractiveness ratings? Personality and Individual Differences, 70( 11), 80-84.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191886914003626
[51] Zhong, Y P., Yang, Z L., & Fan W . ( 2015). The effect of self-other overlap on helping behavior: Moderating of perspective taking. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 8), 1050-1057.
[51] [ 钟毅平, 杨子鹿, 范伟 . ( 2015). 自我-他人重叠对助人行为的影响: 观点采择的调节作用. 心理学报, 47( 8), 1050-1057.]
[1] LI Caina; SUN Ying; TUO Rui; LIU Jia. The effects of attachment security on interpersonal trust: The moderating role of attachment anxiety[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 989-1001.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech