Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (11) : 1282-1291     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01282
The role of surface and structural similarity in analogical reasoning aging: Based on the problem-solving paradigm
LI Meijia1, ZHUANG Danqi2,1, PENG Huamao1
1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China;
2 Qianjin Network Information Technology Shanghai Co., LTD. Beijing branch, Beijing 100016, China
Download: PDF(651 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract  Analogical reasoning is a major form of abstract logical thinking. It refers to the transferring process of knowledge from one situation or field to another. To transfer successfully when facing new problems, it is important for the elderly to retrieve the appropriate sources of knowledge as quickly as possible. Additionally, the elderly rich in life experience are supposed to be the embodiment of wisdom, which is also helpful. Previous research about the elderly’s analogical reasoning mainly focused on the encoding stage, and, in most cases, the task paradigm was rigorous laboratory study. The task paradigm may have generated outcomes against participants’ reactions in natural settings, causing reduced ecological validity and inability to present their real competence. The present study was based on the problem-solving paradigm rather than a laboratory-based experiment. We aimed to figure out whether the elderly retrograde in the retrieval of source problems and whether there exist age differences in the usage of surface information and structural information. The encoding quality between the old and young participants was ensured to be identical.
Twenty-nine young adults (age: M = 21.86, SD = 1.43) and thirty-two old adults (age: M = 69.09, SD = 5.11) participated in the experiment. This study used a mixed design in which age group (old/young) was a between- subjects variable and surface similarity (high/low) and structural similarity (high/low) were within-subjects variables. There were two phases included in the whole procedure. During the learning phase, participants learnt twenty source stories and summarized the higher-order relation of each. Three days later, twenty other target stories were presented in which participants were to figure out how to solve the problems with the hints they recalled from the source stories learnt three days ago. The performance of reasoning (quality of solving the target problem according to the source problem) and retrieving (quantity of surface and structural information retrieved) were the dependent variables.
The results showed that the elderly experienced analogical reasoning aging. To be specific, they relied more on the surface feature similarity than did the younger adults. As for surface and structural information, the more the information was provided, the better was their reasoning. It was beneficial to both age groups in reasoning when the surface and structural similarity increased, which indicated that the reasoning of the elderly and young people could benefit from better retrieval to the source problems. As for interaction effect, for the elderly in lack of surface information, increasing structural similarity would not enhance their reasoning quality. When there was enough surface and structural information, they performed the best. It implied that the elderly could benefit from structural similarity only on the condition that enough surface information was given. When retrieving information from source problems, surface feature exerted an across-information-type promotion effect on retrieval quality. However, the increase in structural information could only help the elderly to improve their retrieval in structural information. As for the younger adults, structural features and surface features were conducive to their retrieval of homogeneous information. With regard to the relation between retrieval quality and reasoning performance, the correlation was significant in both age groups. It enlightened us that people who cannot reason correctly were probably poor in retrieval.
To improve the performance of the elderly in analogical reasoning, we can increase the transmission of surface features, such as designing mobile phone apps with similar interfaces, which can reduce their learning cost. Further studies should focus on designing more realistic contexts as well as delving into the process of how far transfer of learning happens.
Keywords analogical reasoning      transfer      problem solving paradigm      surface similarity      structural similarity     
ZTFLH:  B844  
Issue Date: 25 September 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LI Meijia
PENG Huamao
Cite this article:   
LI Meijia,ZHUANG Danqi,PENG Huamao. The role of surface and structural similarity in analogical reasoning aging: Based on the problem-solving paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1282-1291.
URL:     OR
[1] Aichelburg C., Urbanski M., Thiebaut de S. M., Humbert F., Levy R., & Volle E. (2016). Morphometry of left frontal and temporal poles predicts analogical reasoning abilities.Cerebral Cortex, 26(3), 915-932.
[2] Brown, A. L., & Kane, M. J. (1988). Preschool children can learn to transfer: Learning to learn and learning from example.Cognitive Psychology, 20(4), 493-523.
[3] Brown A. L., Kane M. J., & Echols C. H. (1986). Young children's mental models determine analogical transfer across problems with a common goal structure.Cognitive Development, 1(2), 103-121.
[4] Bugaiska, A., & Thibaut, J-P. (2015). Analogical reasoning and aging: The processing speed and inhibition hypothesis. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 22(3), 340-356.
[5] Bulloch, M. J., & Opfer, J. E. (2009). What makes relational reasoning smart? Revisiting the perceptual‐to‐relational shift in the development of generalization.Developmental Science, 12(1), 114-122.
[6] Bunge S. A., Wendelken C., Badre D., & Wagner A. D. (2005). Analogical reasoning and prefrontal cortex: Evidence for separable retrieval and integration mechanisms.Cerebral. Cortex, 15(3), 239-249.
[7] Catrambone, R. (2002). The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28(2), 318-334.
[8] Chan J., Paletz S. B. F., & Schunn C. D. (2012). Analogy as a strategy for supporting complex problem solving under uncertainty.Memory & Cognition, 40(8), 1352-1365.
[9] Chen, Z., & Siegler, R. S. (2013). Young children’s analogical problem solving: Gaining insights from video displays.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 116(4), 904-913.
[10] Chen Z., Mo L., & Honomichl R. (2004). Having the memory of an elephant: Long-term retrieval and the use of analogues in problem solving.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(3), 415-433.
[11] Clark E., Gardner M. K., Brown G., & Howell R. J. (1990). Changes in analogical reasoning in adulthood.Experimental Aging Research, 16(1-2), 95-99.
[12] Earles, J. L., & Kersten, A. W. (2000). Adult age differences in memory for verbs and nouns.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7(2), 130-139.
[13] Gao Y., Peng H. M., Wang D. H., & Wen J. (2014). The Role of Working Memory in Inductive Reasoning Aging.Journal of Psychological Science, 37(1), 106-110.
[高悦, 彭华茂, 王大华, 文静. (2014). 工作记忆在归纳推理能力老化中的作用.心理科学, 37(1), 106-110.]
[14] Gentner, D. (1983). Structure-mapping: A theoretical framework for analogy.Cognitive Science, 7(2), 155-170.
[15] Gentner, D. (1988). Metaphor as structure mapping: The relational shift.Child Development, 59(1), 47-59.
[16] Gentner D., Rattermann M. J., & Forbus K. D. (1993). The roles of similarity in transfer: Separating retrievability from inferential soundness.Cognitive Psychology, 25(4), 524-575.
[17] Gerstorf D., Ram N., Hoppmann C., Willis S. L., & Schaie K. W. (2011). Cohort differences in cognitive aging and terminal decline in the Seattle Longitudinal Study.Developmental Psychology, 47(4), 1026-1041.
[18] Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. L. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer.Cognitive Psychology, 15(1), 1-38.
[19] Goswami, U. (1991). Analogical reasoning: What develops? A review of research and theory.Child Development, 62(1), 1-22.
[20] Holyoak, K. J., & Koh, K. (1987). Surface and structural similarity in analogical transfer.Memory & Cognition, 15(4), 332-340.
[21] Hoppmann, C. A., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2011). Problem- solving variability in older spouses: How is it linked to problem-, person-, and couple-characteristics?Psychology and Aging, 26(3), 525-531.
[22] Hülür G., Ram N., & Gerstorf D. (2015). Historical improvements in well-being do not hold in late life: Birth- and death-year cohorts in the United States and Germany.Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 998-1012.
[23] Isella V., Molteni F., Mapelli C., & Ferrarese C. (2015). Short term memory for single surface features and bindings in ageing: A replication study.Brain and Cognition, 96, 38-42.
[24] Jablansky S., Alexander P. A., Dumas D., & Compton V. (2016). Developmental differences in relational reasoning among primary and secondary school students.Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(4), 592-608.
[25] Jeste, D. V., & Oswald, A. J. (2014). Individual and societal wisdom: Explaining the paradox of human aging and high well-being.Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 77(4), 317-330.
[26] Koehler D. J., Brenner L. A., Liberman V., & Tversky A. (1996). Confidence and accuracy in trait inference: Judgment by similarity.Acta Psychologica, 92(1), 33-57.
[27] Kossowska, M. (2007). The role of cognitive inhibition in motivation toward closure.Personality and Individual Differences, 42(6), 1117-1126.
[28] Kossowska M., Jaśko K., Bar-Tal Y., & Szastok M. (2012). The relationship between need for closure and memory for schema-related information among younger and older adults.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 19(1-2), 283-300.
[29] Liviatan I., Trope Y., & Liberman N. (2008). Interpersonal similarity as a social distance dimension: Implications for perception of others’ actions.Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1256-1269.
[30] Monge Z. A., Greenwood P. M., Parasuraman R., & Strenziok M. (2016). Individual differences in reasoning and visuospatial attention are associated with prefrontal and parietal white matter tracts in healthy older adults.Neuropsychology, 30(5), 558-567.
[31] Morrison R. G.(2005). Thinking in working memory, In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 457-473). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[32] Morrison, R. G., & Cho, S. (2008). Neurocognitive process constraints on analogy: What changes to allow children to reason like adults?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(4), 391-392.
[33] Pierce, K. A., & Gholson, B. (1994). Surface similarity and relational similarity in the development of analogical problem solving: Isomorphic and nonisomorphic transfer.Developmental Psychology, 30(5), 724-737.
[34] Rhodes S., Parra M. A., Cowan N., & Logie R. H. (2017). Healthy aging and visual working memory: The effect of mixing feature and conjunction changes.Psychology and Aging, 32(4), 354-366.
[35] Ross, B. H. (1984). Remindings and their effects in learning a cognitive skill.Cognitive Psychology, 16(3), 371-416.
[36] Ross, B. H. (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: Different effects on the access and use of earlier problems.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15(3), 456-468.
[37] Saczynski J. S., Willis S. L., & Schaie K. W. (2002). Strategy use in reasoning training with older adults.Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 9(1), 48-60.
[38] Salthouse, T. A. (1992b). Working-memory mediation of adult age differences in integrative reasoning.Memory & Cognition, 20(4), 413-423.
[39] Salthouse T. A.(2005). Effects of aging on reasoning. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 589-605). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
[40] Salthouse T. A., Legg S., Palmon R., & Mitchell D. R. (1990). Memory factors in age-related differences in simple reasoning.Psychology and Aging, 5(1), 9-15.
[41] Schilling, O. K. (2005). Cohort- and age-related decline in elder’s life satisfaction: Is there really a paradox?European Journal of Ageing, 2(4), 254-263.
[42] Schnotz, W., & Baadte, C. (2015). Surface and deep structures in graphics comprehension.Memory & Cognition, 43(4), 605-618.
[43] Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980). Development patterns in the solution of verbal analogies.Child Development, 51(1), 27-38.
[44] Thornton, W. J. L., & Dumke, H. A. (2005). Age differences in everyday problem-solving and decision-making effectiveness: A meta-analytic review.Psychology and Aging, 20(1), 85-99.
[45] Tunteler, E. & Resing, W. C. M. (2002). Spontaneous analogical transfer in 4-year-olds: A microgenetic study.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83(3), 149-166.
[46] Viskontas I. V., Holyoak K. J., & Knowlton B. J. (2005). Relational integration in older adults. Thinking & Reasoning, 11(4), 390-410.
[47] Viskontas I. V., Morrison R. G., Holyoak K. J., Hummel J. E., & Knowlton B. J. (2004). Relational integration, inhibition, and analogical reasoning in older adults.Psychology and Aging, 19(4), 581-591.
[48] Wright S. B., Matlen B. J., Baym C. L., Ferrer E., & Bunge S. A. (2008). Neural correlates of fluid reasoning in children and adults.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 1(1), 8.
[49] Xin, Z. Q. (2007). The Relation-representation complexity model.Psychological Development and Education. 23(3), 122-128.
[辛自强. (2007). 关系-表征复杂性模型.心理发展与教育. 23(3), 122-128.]
[50] Zhang, Q. L., & Wang, Y. M. (1999). A research on the mechanism of analogical transfer. Journal of Psychologicl Science (China), 22(2), 141-143+191.
[张庆林, 王永明. (1999). 类比迁移发生机制的研究. 心理科学, 22(2), 141-143+191.]
[1] Hui DAI, Chuanlin ZHU, Dianzhi LIU. Is implicit knowledge abstract? Evidence from implicit sequence learning transfer[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 965-974.
[2] Xiaolei SONG, Yangyang LI, Qian YANG, Xuqun YOU. The influence of different status of the observer’s responding hands on observational learning in the joint task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[3] Wumei LIU,Liang LEI,Zhiyuan LI,Yun SU,Xiaozhi HUANG. Touch or not touch? Prior touch facilitates consumers’ adoption of new products[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 782-792.
[4] Dong-ni PAN,Daotuan WANG,Xue-bing LI. Cognitive and emotional benefits of emotional dual dimension n-back training based on an APP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1105-1119.
[5] ZHU Zude, DUAN Yixing, WANG Suiping.  The baseline fluid intelligence modulated the transfer effect from working memory to fluid intelligence[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1022-1030.
[6] ZHAO Ming,XU Zhi-Yuan,LIU Tao,DU Feng-Lei,LI Yong-Xin,CHEN Fei-Yan. The Neuromechanism Underlying Language Analogical Reasoning: Evidence from An ERP Study[J]. , 2012, 44(6): 711-719.
[7] WANG Li,CHEN An-Tao. The Transfer of Acquired Spatial Associations Relies on Verbal Working Memory[J]. , 2012, 44(5): 605-613.
[8] CHEN Xiao-Li,QU Zhe,WANG You,DING Yu-Long. Diagonal Mirror-Transfer in Perceptual Learning of Orientation Discrimination[J]. , 2008, 40(09): 969-974.
[9] MA Xiao-Qing,FENG Ting-Yong,LI Yu,LI Hong. Children’s Development of Analogical Reasoning from the Perspective of Perceptual Distraction Task[J]. , 2008, 40(09): 987-993.
[10] ZHANG Qi,ZHAO Hong. Transfer Effects of Learning through Two Varied Worked Examples on Word-problem Solving[J]. , 2008, 40(04): 409-417.

Li Xinwang,Xu Aihong,Yu Bin,Wang Jia,Guo Chunyan

. Effects of Scopolamine on Behavioral Sensitization Induced by Morphine in Rats[J]. , 2007, 39(02): 299-305.
[12] Xuan Yuming, Fu Xiaolan. DIMENSIONAL TRANSFER EFFECT IN SAME-DIFFERENT JUDGMENTS[J]. , 2003, 35(01): 37-43.
[13] Li Hong, Feng Tingyong (Department of Psychology, Southwest China Normal University, Chongqing 400715). ANALOGICAL REASONING MAKING OF CHILDREN AGED 4 TO 5 YEARS ON ONE AND TWO DIMENSIONS[J]. , 2002, 34(04): 65-69.
[14] Zhang Chunli (Institute for Education Research, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875). EFFECTS OF WORKED EXAMPLES AND EXERCISE TIME ON PROBLEM-SOLVING TRANSFER[J]. , 2001, 33(02): 170-175.
[15] Mo Lei Tang Xuefeng (South China Normal University Guangzhou 510631). THE EFFECTS OF STORY LINES ON THE USE OF PRINCIPLES[J]. , 2000, 32(04): 399-408.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech