Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (11) : 1222-1234     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01222
Effect of spatial position based configuration on visual working memory performance
Yushang HUANG,Liren CAO()
Department of Psychology and Behavioral Science, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
Download: PDF(879 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

It has been widely acknowledged that visual working memory (VWM) only maintains and manipulates a limited amount of visual information (e.g. 3~4 objects). Studies on how VWM stores and processes objects have been effective and have yielded useful results. Previous studies in this field are focused on the processing mechanisms of individual objects. However, the mechanisms for grouping and organization of visual objects have received an increasing amount of attention recently. Among numerous types of organizations, configuration, i.e. the spatial formation of visual objects, plays a vital role in understanding the flexibility of human VWM. Many studies have shown that configuration had significant influence on VWM performance. However, configuration was usually employed as an approach to explore the effect of other factors on the memory system. Only a few studies have directly addressed the mechanism of the configuration VWM. In this study, we attempt to determine the critical factor of the information contained in a given configuration that influences VWM. We then attempt to outline the underlying mechanism of the processing in memory system for a given configuration.

In experiments 1 and 2, we separately controlled the variation of two aspects for a given configuration: the spatial position (i.e. relative position of an object described in left, right, and up/down, will be changed when configuration rotates), and the geometric shape (i.e., shape of the polygon with the objects as its vertexes, irrelevant to rotation). These two factors might vary independently or simultaneously. If the spatial position is the dominant factor in the influence of configuration on VWM, the performance will improve when the spatial position is kept constant. Consequently, broken or rotated geometric shapes will not affect memory performance. If geometric shape is the critical factor, the effects would be in reverse, wherein the performance would improve if the geometric shape is kept constant. The results from our experiments indicate that spatial position is the dominant factor. There was no significant difference on VWM performance between same-position-different- shape conditions (geometric shape varied while spatial position preserved) and the baseline condition (configuration were completely identical). The memory performance declined significantly against the baseline level when spatial position changed, regardless of the geometric shape.

In experiment 3, we systematically considered the rotation of a given configuration. A rotation clue was provided such that mental rotation can be conducted on the previewed configuration. The paradigms were identical to experiments 1 and 2; however, the controlled factor of experiment 3 was the consistency between the rotation clue and the spatial position/geometric shape in test phase. When spatial position is consistent with the rotation clue, the memory performance was better. Once again, the geometric shape showed no significant effect.

These findings suggest the following: First, when a given configuration boost the efficiency of VWM, the primary factor is the spatial position of the object. Second, the overall geometric shape has no significant influence on VWM performance. Third, the role of these two factors maintains the same under mental rotation of a given configuration.

Keywords visual working memory      objects      configuration     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Liren CAO     E-mail:
Issue Date: 25 September 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Yushang HUANG
Liren CAO
Cite this article:   
Yushang HUANG,Liren CAO. Effect of spatial position based configuration on visual working memory performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1222-1234.
URL:     OR
[1] Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh , P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15( 2), 106-111.
[2] Baddeley, A. (2012). Working memory: Theories, models, and controversies. Annual review of psychology, 63, 1-29.
[3] Bays, P. M., & Husain , M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321( 5890), 851-854.
[4] Brainard, D. H . (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10( 4), 433-436.
[5] Christophel T. B., Klink P. C., Spitzer B., Roelfsema P. R., & Haynes J. D . (2017). The distributed nature of working memory. Trends in cognitive sciences, 21( 2), 111-124.
pmid: 28063661 url:
[6] Chun, M. M., & Jiang, Y. H . (1998). Contextual cueing: Implicit learning and memory of visual context guides spatial attention. Cognitive Psychology, 36( 1), 28-71.
[7] Cooper L. A. , & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of the rotation of mental images. In: Chase, W.G. (Ed.), Visual Information Processing. Academic Press, New York
[8] Cover, T. M., & Thomas, J. A . (1991). Elements of information theory. New York: Wiley.
[9] Cowan, N. (2015). George Miller’s magical number of immediate memory in retrospect: Observations on the faltering progression of science. Psychological Review, 122( 3), 536-541.
[10] Gao T., Gao Z. F., Li J. S., Sun Z. Q., & Shen M. W . (2011). The perceptual root of object-based storage: An interactive model of perception and visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37( 6), 1803-1823.
[11] Gmeindl L., Nelson J. K., Wiggin T., & Reuter-Lorenz P. A . (2011). Configural representations in spatial working memory: Modulation by perceptual segregation and voluntary attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73( 7), 2130-2142.
[12] Gordon, R. D . (2004). Attentional allocation during the perception of scenes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30( 4), 760-777.
[13] Gordon, R. D., & Irwin, D. E . (1996). What’s in an object file? Evidence from priming studies. Perception & Psychophysics, 58( 8), 1260-1277.
[14] Hollingworth, A. (2007). Object-position binding in visual memory for natural scenes and object arrays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33( 1), 31-47.
[15] Hollingworth A., Richard A. M., & Luck S. J . (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137( 1), 163-181.
[16] Hollingworth, A., &Rasmussen, I.P . (2010). Binding objects to locations: The relationship between object files and visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36( 3), 543-564.
[17] Jiang Y. H., Chun M. M., & Olson I. R . (2004). Perceptual grouping in change detection. Perception & Psychophysics, 66( 3), 446-453.
[18] Jiang Y., Olson I. R., & Chun M. M . (2000). Organization of visual short-term memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26( 3), 683-702.
[19] Kahneman D., Treisman A., & Gibbs B. J . (1992). The reviewing of object files: Object-specific integration of information. Cognitive Psychology, 24( 2), 175-219.
[20] Li C. H., He X., & Guo C. Y . ( 2015). The storage mechanism of multi-feature objects in visual working memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica. 47( 6), 734-745.
[20] [ 黎翠红, 何旭, 郭春彦 . ( 2015). 多特征刺激在视觉工作记忆中的存储模式. 心理学报, 47( 6), 734-745.]
[21] Liu Z. Y., & Ku Y. X . ( 2017). Perceiving better, inhibiting better: Effects of perceptual precision on distractor-inhibition processes during working memory. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49( 10), 1247-1255.
[21] [ 刘志英, 库逸轩 . ( 2017). 知觉表征精度对工作记忆中抑制干扰能力的影响. 心理学报, 49( 10), 1247-1255.]
[22] Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K . (1997). The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature, 390( 6657), 279-281.
[23] Luck, S. J., & Vogel, E. K . (2013). Visual working memory capacity: From psychophysics and neurobiology to individual differences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17( 8), 391-400.
[24] Ma W. J., Husain M., & Bays P. M . (2014). Changing concepts of working memory. Nature Neuroscience, 17( 3), 347-356.
[25] Metzler, J., & Shepard, R. N . (1974). Transformational studies of the internal representation of three-dimensional objects. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Theories in cognitive psychology: The Loyola Symposium. Oxford, England: Lawrence Erlbaum.
[26] Mitroff S. R., Scholl B. J., & Noles N. S . (2007). Object files can be purely episodic. Perception, 36( 12), 1730-1735.
[27] Mitroff S. R., Scholl B. J., & Wynn K . (2004). Divide and conquer how object files adapt when a persisting object splits into two. Psychological Science, 15( 6), 420-425.
[28] Oberauer K., Awh E., & Sutterer D. W . (2017). The role of long-term memory in a test of visual working memory: Proactive facilitation but no proactive interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43( 1), 1-22.
[29] Oberauer K., Farrell S., Jarrold C., & Lewandowsky S . (2016). What limits working memory capacity? Psychological Bulletin, 142( 7), 758-799.
[30] Olson, I. R., & Marshuetz , C. (2005). Remembering “what” brings along “where” in visual working memory. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 67( 2), 185-194.
[31] Olson I. R., Zhang J. X., Mitchell K. J., Johnson M. K., Bloise S. M., & Higgins J. A . (2004). Preserved spatial memory over brief intervals in older adults. Psychology and Aging, 19(2), 310-317.
[32] Shan, X. J., & Li, S. X . ( 2010). The new development of mechanism of visual working memory capacity based on new models. Advances in Psychological Science, 18( 11), 1684-1691.
[32] [ 单西娇, 李寿欣 . ( 2010). 由两个模型看视觉工作记忆容量机制的研究. 心理科学进展, 18( 11), 1684-1691.]
[33] Shepard, R. N., & Hurwitz, S. (1984). Upward direction, mental rotation, and discrimination of left and right turns in maps. Cognition, 18( 1-3), 161-193.
[34] Shepard, S., & Metzler, D (1988). Mental rotation: Effects of dimensionality of objects and type of task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14( 1), 3-11.
[35] Sun Z. Q., Huang Y., Yu W. J., Zhang M., Shui R. D., & Gao T . (2015). How to break the configuration of moving objects? Geometric invariance in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41( 5), 1247-1259.
pmid: 26076172 url:
[36] Treisman, A. (1996). The binding problem. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 6( 2), 171-178.
[37] Treisman, A. (1998). Feature binding, attention and object perception. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 353( 1373), 1295-1306.
pmid: 9770223 url:
[38] Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80( 5), 352-373.
[39] Vogel E. K., Woodman G. F., & Luck S. J . (2001). Storage of features, conjunctions, and objects in visual working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27( 1), 92-114.
[40] Wheeler, M. E., & Treisman, A. M . (2002). Binding in short-term visual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131( 1), 48-64.
pmid: 11900102 url:
[41] Wickelgren, I. (1997). Getting a grasp on working memory. Science, 275( 5306), 1580-1582.
[42] Wilken, P., & Ma, W. J. (2004). A detection theory account of change detection. Journal of Vision, 4( 12), 1-11.
[43] Woodman G. F., Vecera S. P., & Luck S. J . (2003). Perceptual organization influences visual working memory. Psychonomic bulletin & review, 10( 1), 80-87.
pmid: 12747493 url:
[44] Xu, Y. D., & Chun, M. M . (2007). Visual grouping in human parietal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104( 47), 18766-18771.
[45] Zelinsky, G. J., & Loschky, L. C . (2005). Eye movements serialize memory for objects in scenes. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 67( 4), 676-690.
[46] Zhang, W. W., & Luck, S. J . (2008). Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory. Nature, 453( 7192), 233-235.
[47] Zhao L., Gao Q. Y., Ye Y., Zhou J. F., Shui R. D., & Shen M . (2014). The role of spatial configuration in multiple identity tracking. PLoS ONE, 9( 4), e93835.
pmid: 3981724 url:
[1] Sisi WANG,Yixuan KU. The causal role of right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 727-738.
[2] WANG Jing, XUE Chengbo, LIU Qiang.  Storage mechanism of same-dimension features in visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 176-185.
[3] XUE ChengBo; YE ChaoXiong; ZHANG Yin; LIU Qiang. Memory Mechanism of Feature Binding in Visual Working Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 851-858.
[4] LI Cuihong; HE Xu; GUO Chunyan. The Storage Mechanism of Multi-feature Objects in Visual Working Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 734-745.
[5] ZHANG Wei; ZHOU Bingping; ZANG Ling; MO Shuliang. The Attentional Capture of Internet Addicts under the Guidance of Visual Working Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1223-1234.
[6] BAI Xue-Jun,YIN Sha-Sha,YANG Hai-Bo,LV Yong,HU Wei,LUO Yue-Jia. The Influence of Visual Working Memory Contents on Top-down Attentional Control: An ERP Study[J]. , 2011, 43(10): 1103-1113.
[7] CHEN Si-Yi,ZHOU Ren-Lai. Prospective Memory Needs Strategic Control Processing: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. , 2010, 42(12): 1128-1136.
[8] CAO Wen,CHEN Hong,GAO Xiao,Todd Jackson. Choice, Self-Expression and the Spreading Alternatives Effect[J]. , 2009, 41(08): 753-762.
[9] ZHANG Bao,JIN Zhi-Cheng,CHEN Cai-Qi. Visual Working Memory Modulates Attentional Orienting at Preattention Stage[J]. , 2008, 40(05): 552-561.

Shen Mowei,Li Jie,Lang Xueming,Gao Tao,Gao Zaifeng,Shui Rende

. The Storage Mechanism of Objects in Visual Working Memory[J]. , 2007, 39(05): 761-767.
[13] Liu-Xiaoping,Wang-Zhaoxin,Chen-Xiangchuan,Zhang-Daren. SUBSYSTEMS IN VISUAL WORKING MEMORY[J]. , 2003, 35(05): 598-603.
[14] Yu Tiecheng (Quanzhou College of Education ,Quanzhou ,Fujian,China). VIEWS OF ANCIENT PEOPLE ON THE RELATION BETWEENLITERARY LANGUAGE AND IMAGES[J]. , 1997, 29(04): 428-432.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech