Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (11) : 1197-1211     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01197
|
Differences in cognitive inhibition between persons with high and low creativity: Evidences from behavioral and physiological studies
Xuejun BAI1(),Haijuan YAO2()
1 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China
2 Department of Psychology, School of Law, Tianjin University of Commerce, Tianjin 300134, China
Download: PDF(803 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Creativity has been previously defined as a behavior or product that is both novel and appropriately useful. It is a complex concept with many different processes, indicating that some of these processes require heavy executive processing. Executive function is the basic ability of cognitive processes to control one’s thoughts and behaviors, which is related to the prefrontal cortex, and it is mainly composed of three components: mental set transformation, inhibitory control, and working memory updating. Previous studies examining the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking have obtained inconsistent results. The following three hypotheses can be formulated regarding the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking. Creative thought has been variably associated with focused attention and effective inhibition control, disinhibition, and defocused attention or a flexible adaption of inhibition control.

The aim of present study was to investigate the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking using behavioral and physiological indexes, and the effects of time pressure on the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking. In this study, undergraduate students with different divergent thinking levels were asked to perform the Stroop task. In Experiment 1, a Stroop color naming task was carried out to test participants’ cognitive inhibitory ability. In Experiment 2, a more flexible Stroop word-color naming task was adopted and the physiological data was recorded to further investigate the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking, and time pressure situation was applied concerning reaction time. When participants responded after more than 550 ms, feedback of “too late” appeared on the display.

The results found that in Experiment 1, the highly creative persons showed smaller interference effect than did less creative persons; in Experiment 2, there was a significant time pressure condition × group × stimulus congruence interaction. The interference effect between the condition of time pressure and no time pressure of the highly creative persons was smaller than that of the less creative persons. Moreover, the time pressure condition × group interaction reached significance; the less creative persons showed significantly greater increases in skin conductance responses (SCRs) under the time pressure condition than in the no time pressure condition, but there was no significant difference for SCRs between the condition of time pressure and no time pressure of the highly creative persons. Furthermore, the highly creative persons exhibited significantly greater increases in SCRs under the incongruent condition in color naming task than in the congruent condition; however, they showed no significance between the congruent and incongruent conditions in the word naming task. There was no significant difference in SCRs between the congruent and incongruent in word and color naming tasks of the less creative persons.

The above results indicated that highly creative persons showed stronger cognitive inhibitory ability than did less creative persons; they could effectively suppress dominant but irrelevant response tendencies. Moreover, time pressure played a moderate role in the relationship between cognitive inhibition and creative thinking. Highly creative persons could focus on task-related information and inhibit task-unrelated information, adjust their attention to adapt to different time pressure task situations, and inhibit the interference characteristics. The highly creative persons showed variability in autonomic arousal levels in different conditions; the less creative were essentially fixed in a state of cognitive inhibition. The results agree with the hypothesis of adaptive cognitive inhibition of creative thinking.

Keywords creative thinking      cognitive inhibition      time pressure      skin conductance responses     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Xuejun BAI,Haijuan YAO     E-mail: bxuejun@126.com;yhjrenfei@163.com
Issue Date: 25 September 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xuejun BAI
Haijuan YAO
Cite this article:   
Xuejun BAI,Haijuan YAO. Differences in cognitive inhibition between persons with high and low creativity: Evidences from behavioral and physiological studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1197-1211.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01197     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I11/1197
  
  
创造性组别 字色一致 字色不一致
高创组 97.60(3.55) 96.98 (2.39)
低创组 98.64(2.55) 95.73(4.14)
  
  
  
时间压力
情境
创造性组别 字义命名 颜色命名
一致 不一致 一致 不一致
有时间压力 高创组 92.36 (7.29) 82.29 (14.56) 91.32 (6.52) 83.33 (7.95)
低创组 89.93 (6.76) 80.21 (14.56) 92.71 (7.13) 80.21 (10.22)
无时间压力 高创组 96.88 (5.06) 96.53 (3.91) 99.31 (2.41) 95.49 (5.46)
低创组 98.61 (2.71) 95.83 (4.35) 98.96 (2.59) 90.97 (7.07)
  
  
[1] Ansburg, P. I., & Hill , K. (2003). Creative and analytic thinkers differ in their use of attentional resources. Personality and Individual Differences, 34( 7), 1141-1152.
[2] Amabile T. M., Hadley C. N., & Kramer S. J . (2002). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, 80( 8), 52-61.
[3] Bach, D. R., & Friston, K. J . (2013). Model-based analysis of skin conductance responses: Towards causal models in psychophysiology. Psychophysiology, 50( 1), 15-22.
pmid: 23094650 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2013.50.issue-1
[4] Bai X. J., Gong Y. B., Hu W. P., Han Q., & Yao H. J . ( 2014). The inhibitory mechanism of individuals with different scientific creativity. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 12( 2), 151-155.
[4] [ 白学军, 巩彦斌, 胡卫平, 韩琴, 姚海娟 . ( 2014). 不同科学创造力个体干扰抑制机制的比较. 心理与行为研究, 12( 2), 151-155.]
[5] Beaty R. E., Silvia P. J., Nusbaum E. C., Jauk E., & Benedek M . (2014). The role of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition, 42( 7), 1186-1197.
[6] Benedek M., Franz F., Heene M., & Neubauer A. C . (2012). Differential effects of cognitive inhibition and intelligence on creativity. Personality and Individual Differences, 53( 4), 480-485.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886912001791
[7] Benedek M., Jauk E., Fink A., Koschutnig K., Reishofer G., Ebner F., & Neubauer A. C . (2014 a). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88, 125-133.
[8] Benedek M., Jauk E., Sommer M., Arendasy M., & Neubauer A. C . (2014 b). Intelligence, creativity, and cognitive control: The common and differential involvement of executive functions in intelligence and creativity. Intelligence, 46, 73-83.
[9] Boucsein W., Fowles D. C., Grimnes S., Ben-Shakhar G., Roth W. T., Dawson M. E., & Filion D. L . (2012). Publication recommendations for electrodermal measurements. Society for psychophysiological research Ad Hoc committee on electrodermal measures. Psychophysiology, 49( 8), 1017-1034.
pmid: 7291438 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2012.49.issue-8
[10] Burch G. S. J., Hemsley D. R., Pavelis C., & Corr P. J . (2006). Personality, Creativity and Latent inhibition. European Journal of Personality, 20( 2), 107-122.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-0984
[11] Carson S. H., Peterson J. B., & Higgins D. M . (2003). Decreased latent inhibition is associated with increased achievement in high-functioning individuals. J ournal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85( 3), 499-506.
[12] Cheng L. F., Hu W. P., & Jia X. J . ( 2015). Cognitive inhibition and artistic creativity: The moderating effect of cognitive style. Psychological Development and Education, 31( 3), 287-295.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlfzyjy201503005
[12] [ 程丽芳, 胡卫平, 贾小娟 . ( 2015). 认知抑制对艺术创造力的影响: 认知风格的调节作用. 心理发展与教育, 31( 3), 287-295.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlfzyjy201503005
[13] Cheng L. F., Hu W. P., Jia X. J., & Runco M. A . (2016). The different role of cognitive inhibition in early versus late creative problem finding. Psychological of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 10( 1), 32-41.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/aca0000036
[14] Chirila, C., & Feldman , A. (2012). Study of latent inhibition at high-level creative personality: The link between creativity and psychopathology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 33, 353-357.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042812001504
[15] Colombo B., Bartesaghi N., Simonelli L., & Antonietti A . (2015). The combined effects of neurostimulation and priming on creative thinking. A preliminary tDCS study on dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 403-414.
[16] Darini M., Pazhouhesh H., & Moshiri F . (2011). Relationship between employee’s innovation (creativity) and time management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 25, 201-213.
pmid: 17054907 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1877042811023688
[17] Dawson M. E., Schell A.M., & Courtney C.G . (2011). The skin conductance response, anticipation, and decision-making. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 4( 2), 111-116.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0022619
[18] Demaree H. A., Schmeichel B. J., Robinson J. L., Pu J., Everhart D. E., & Berntson G. G . (2006). Up- and down regulating facial disgust: Affective, vagal, sympathetic, and respiratory consequences. Biological Psychology, 71( 1), 90-99.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S030105110500058X
[19] Dorfman L., Martindale C., Gassimova V., & Vartanian O . (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44( 6), 1382-1390.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886907004485
[20] Edl S., Benedek M., Papousek I., Weiss E. M., & Fink A . (2014). Creativity and the Stroop interference effect. Personality and Individual Differences, 69, 38-42.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886914002931
[21] Eysenck H. J. (1995). Problems in the behavioural sciences, 12 Genius: The natural history of creativity. New York, NY, US: Cambridge University Press.
[22] Fink, A., & Benedek, M . (2014). EEG alpha power and creative ideation. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 44, 111-123.
[23] Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. (2004). The relations among inhibition and interference control functions: A latent-variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133( 1), 101-135.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.101
[24] Galang A. J. R., Castelo V. L. C., Santos L. C., Perlas C. M. C ., & Angeles, M. A. B. (2016). Investigating the prosocial psychopath model of the creative personality: Evidence from traits and psychophysiology. Personality and Individual Differences, 100, 28-36.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886916302355
[25] Gendolla G. H. E., Wright, R. A., & Richter, M.(2012) . Effort intensity: Some insights from the cardiovascular system. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 420-438). New York: Oxford University Press.
[26] Groborz, M., & Necka, E. (2003). Creativity and cognitive control: explorations of generation and evaluation skills. Creativity Research Journal, 15( 2-3), 183-197.
url: http://www.informaworld.com/openurl?genre=article&doi=10.1207/S15326934CRJ152&3_09&magic=crossref||D404A21C5BB053405B1A640AFFD44AE3
[27] Gu C. H., Wang Y. L., Wu C. F., Xie X. L., Cui C. Z., Wang Y. X., … Zhou Z. K . ( 2015). Brain correlates underlying social creative thinking: EEG Alpha activity in trait vs. state creativity. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 6), 765-773.
[27] [ 谷传华, 王亚丽, 吴财付, 谢祥龙, 崔承珠, 王亚娴 , … 周宗奎. ( 2015). 社会创造性的脑机制: 状态与特质的EEG α波活动特点. 心理学报, 47( 6), 765-773.]
[28] Harnishfeger K. K. (1995). The development of cognitive inhibition: Theories, definitions, and research evidence. In F. N. Dempster & C. J. Brainerd (Eds.), Interference and inhibition in cognition (pp.175-204). San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780122089305500076
[29] Hu W. P., Cheng L. F., Jia X. J., Han M., & Chen Y. H . ( 2015). The influence of cognitive inhibition to creative scientific problem finding: Mediating effect of field cognitive style. Studies of Psychology and Behavior, 13( 6), 721-728.
[29] [ 胡卫平, 程丽芳, 贾小娟, 韩蒙, 陈英和 . ( 2015). 认知抑制对创造性科学问题提出的影响:认知风格的中介作用. 心理与行为研究, 13( 6), 721-728.]
[30] Huang P. H., Qiu L. H., Shen L., Zhang Y., Song Z., Qi Z. Q., … Xie P . (2013). Evidence for a left-over-right inhibitory mechanism during figural creative thinking in healthy nonartists. Human Brain Mapping, 34( 10), 2724-2732.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hbm.v34.10
[31] Jauk E., Benedek M., Dunst B., & Neubauer A. C . (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41( 4), 212-221.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S016028961300024X
[32] Jauk E., Benedek M., & Neubauer A. C . (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28( 1), 95-105.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/per.v28.1
[33] Karau, S. J., & Kelly, J. R . (1992). The effects of time scarcity and time abundance on group performance quality and interaction process. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28( 6), 542-571.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/002210319290045L
[34] Kobayashi N., Yoshino A., Takahashi Y., & Nomura S . (2007). Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution. Autonomic Neuroscience, 132( 1-2), 70-75.
pmid: 17067858 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1566070206002645
[35] Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic exploration in art. New York: International Universities Press.
[36] Kwiatkowski, J. (2002). Individual differences in the neurophysiology of creativity (Unpublished doctorial dissertation). The University of Maine.
[37] Lemche E., Sierra-Siegert M., David A. S., Phillips M. L., Gasston D., Williams S. C. R., & Giampietro V. P . (2016). Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization-derealization disorder. European Journal of Neuroscience, 43( 7), 971-978.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ejn.13183
[38] MacDonald A. W., Cohen J. D., Stenger V. A., & Carter C. S . (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288( 5472), 1835-1838.
url: http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/doi/10.1126/science.288.5472.1835
[39] Martindale, C. (1999). Biological basis of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 137-152). New York: Cambridge University Press.
[40] Martindale, C. (2007). Creativity, primordial cognition, and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 43( 7), 1777-1785.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-14850-016
[41] Mayseless, N., & Shamay-Tsoory, S. G . (2015). Enhancing verbal creativity: Modulating creativity by altering the balance between right and left inferior frontal gyrus with tDCS. Neuroscience, 291, 167-176.
[42] Patterson J. C., Ungerleider L. G., & Bandettini P. A . (2002). Task-independent functional brain activity correlation with skin conductance changes: An fMRI study. Neurolmage, 17( 4), 1797-1806.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811902913066
[43] Pennebaker, J. W., & Chew, C. H . (1985). Behavioral inhibition and electrodermal activity during deception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49( 5), 1427-1433.
pmid: 4078683 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.49.5.1427
[44] Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. H . (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences, 28( 2), 323-332.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886999001014
[45] Peterson J. B., Smith K. W., & Carson S . (2002). Openness and extraversion are associated with reduced latent inhibition: Replication and commentary. Personality and Individual Differences, 33( 7), 1137-1147.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886902000041
[46] Posada-Quintero H. F., Florian J. P., Orjuela-Ca?ón A. D., Aljama-Corrales T., Charleston-Villalobos S., & Chon K. H . (2016). Power spectral density analysis of electrodermal activity for sympathetic function assessment. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 44( 10), 3124-3135.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10439-016-1606-6
[47] Radel R., Davranche K., Fournier M., & Dietrich A . (2015). The role of (dis)inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation. Cognition, 134, 110-120.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027714001826
[48] Rominger C., Fink A., Weiss E. M., Bosch J., & Papousek I . (2017). Allusive thinking (remote associations) and auditory top-down inhibition skills differentially predict creativity and positive schizotypy. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, 22( 2), 108-121.
url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13546805.2016.1278361
[49] Silvia P. J., Beaty R. E., Nusbaum E. C., Eddington K. M., & Kwapil T. R . (2014). Creative motivation: Creative achievement predicts cardiac autonomic markers of effort during divergent thinking. Biological Psychology, 102, 30-37.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301051114001574
[50] Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I . (1996). Investigating in creativity. American Psychologist, 51( 7), 677-688.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677
[51] Storm, B. C., & Patel, T. N . (2014). Forgetting as a consequence and enabler of creative thinking. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40( 6), 1594-1609.
[52] Stroop, J. R . (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18( 6), 643-662.
url: http://content.apa.org/journals/xge/18/6/643
[53] Szollos, A. (2009). Toward a psychology of chronic time pressure: Conceptual and methodological review. Time & Society, 18( 2-3), 332-350.
[54] Vartanian, O. A . (2002). Cognitive disinhibition and creativity. ( Unpublished doctorial dissertation), The University of Maine, Orono, The United States of America.
[55] Vartanian, O. (2009). Variable attention facilitates creative problem solving. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3( 1), 57-59.
[56] Vartanian O., Martindale C., & Kwiatkowski J . (2007). Creative potential, attention, and speed of information processing. Personality and Individual Differences, 43( 6), 1470-1480.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0191886907001559
[57] Wo J. Z., Chen W. R., Liu Y., & Lin C. D . ( 2010). The eye movements differences during category learning process between high and low creativity students. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42( 2), 251-261.
[57] [ 沃建中, 陈婉茹, 刘杨, 林崇德 .( 2010). 创造能力不同学生的分类加工过程差异的眼动特点. 心理学报, 42( 2), 251-261.]
[58] Yao, H. J., & Bai, X. J . ( 2014). The relationship between creative thinking and cognitive inhibition. Journal of Psychological Science, 37( 2), 316-321.
[58] [ 姚海娟, 白学军 . ( 2014). 创造性思维与认知抑制的关系. 心理科学, 37( 2), 316-321.]
[59] Ye R. M., Hong D. H., & Torrance P. E . ( 1988). Cross cultural comparison of creative thinking between Chinese and American students using Torrance Test. Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology, 3( 3), 22-29.
[59] [ 叶仁敏, 洪德厚 , 保尔·托兰斯. ( 1988). 《托兰斯创造性思维测验》(TTCT)的测试和中美学生的跨文化比较. 应用心理学, 3( 3), 22-29.]
[60] Zabelina, D. L., & Robinson, M. D . (2010). Creativity as flexible cognitive control. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4( 3), 136-143.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0017379
[61] Zabelina D. L., Robinson M. D., Council J. R., & Bresin K . (2012). Patterning and nonpatterning in creative cognition: Insights from performance in a random number generation task. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6( 2), 137-145
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0025452
[62] Zabelina, D. L., & Beeman , M. (2013). Short-term attentional perseveration associated with real-life creative achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4( 191), 1-8.
pmid: 3635848 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3635848/
[63] Zhang K., Du X. M., Tong Y. G . ( 2017). The Differences between High Creative Persons and Low Creative Persons in Directing Forgetting Effects. Journal of Psychological Science, 40( 3), 514-519.
[63] [ 张克, 杜秀敏, 仝宇光 . ( 2017). 高低创造性思维水平者定向遗忘效应的差异研究. 心理科学, 40( 3), 514-519.]
[64] Zhang L. J., Qiao L., Chen Q. L., Yang W. J., Xu M. S., Yao X. N., … Yang D . (2016). Gray matter volume of the lingual gyrus mediates the relationship between inhibition function and divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1532-1541.
[65] Zhang, H-C., & Wang, X-P . ( 1989). Standardization research on RAVEN’s standard progressive matrices in China. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2, 113-121.
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1989-XLXB198902000.htm
[65] [ 张厚粲, 王晓平 . ( 1989). 瑞文标准推理测验在我国的修订. 心理学报, 2, 113-121.]
url: http://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFD1989-XLXB198902000.htm
[66] Zhang J. H., Wang Y. N., Chu Y. X., & Xu X. Z . ( 2011). The effects of three pressures and creative self-efficacy on creativity. Journal of Psychological Science, 34( 4), 993-998.
[66] [ 张景焕, 王亚男, 初玉霞, 徐希铮 . ( 2011). 三种压力与创意自我效能感对创造力的影响. 心理科学, 34( 4), 993-998.]
[67] Zhou, Y . (2013). The effects of emotional states on executive functioning. Advances in Psychological Science, 21( 7), 1186-1199.
[67] [ 周雅 . (2013). 情绪唤起对执行功能的作用. 心理科学进展, 21( 7), 1186-1199.]
[68] Zmigrod S., Zmigrod L., & Hommel B . (2015). Zooming into creativity: Individual differences in attentional global- local biases are linked to creative thinking. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1647-1654.
[69] Zvi L., Nachson I., & Elaad E . (2012). Effects of coping and cooperative instructions on guilty and informed innocents’ physiological responses to concealed information. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 84( 2), 140-148.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0167876012000335
[1] Yiping ZHONG, Wenjie ZHANG, Yalei LI, Wei FAN. Influence of time stress on mood-congruent false memories[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 929-939.
[2] ZHAO Qingbai; KE Wei; TONG Biao; ZHOU Zhijin; ZHOU Zongkui. Creative processing of internet language: Novel N400 and LPC[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 143-154.
[3] ZHOU Yuanyuan, HU Yangli, ZHAO Yancheng.  What do you listen to under the pressure of time? The moderator effects of reference group on impulsive buying[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(11): 1439-1448.
[4] ZHAO Qingbai, WEI Linlin, LI Ying, ZHOU Zhijin, ZHAO Lili, TANG Lei.  Right hemispheric dominance in forming novel semantic associations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(11): 1370-1382.
[5] FAN Liangyan;FAN Xiaofang;LUO Weichao;WU Gonghang;YAN Xu;YIN Dazhi;LV Yue;ZHU Mingjun;XU Dongrong. An Explorative fMRI Study of Human Creative Thinking Using A Specially Designed iCAD System[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 427-436 .
[6] ZHANG Jing-Huan,LIU Gui-Rong,SHI Wei-Wei,FU Xiu-Jun. On the Relationship between Motivating Style and Elementary Students’ Creative Thinking: The Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation[J]. , 2011, 43(10): 1138-1150.
[7] CUI Ya-Fei,LI Hong,LI Fu-Hong. The Principle of Extracting Background Relations in Property Effect of Inductive Reasoning[J]. , 2010, 42(12): 1148-1155.
[8] Liu Rude, Chen Qi (Department of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875). THE MEDIATED INFLUENCE OF ON-LINE SELF-REGULATED LEARNING ACTIVITIES ON THE LEARNING OUTCOMES IN DIFFERENT LEARNING SITUATIONS[J]. , 2000, 32(02): 197-202.
[9] Shi Jiannong Xu Fan (Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing100012). INTEREST, MOTIVATION AND CREATIVE THINKING OFSUPERNORMAL AND NORMAL CHILDREN[J]. , 1997, 29(03): 271-277.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech