Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1180-1196     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01180
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Situational evolution of the relationship between warmth and competence in intergroup evaluation: Impact of evaluating intention and behavioral outcomes
Bin ZUO1,2,Fangfang WEN1,2(),Yang WU3,Taotao DAI1
1 School of Psychology, Center for Studies of Social Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
2 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior, Ministry of Education, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China
3 School of Marxism, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan 430074, China
Download: PDF(513 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Two critical dimensions, warmth and competence, feature prominently in people’s social cognitive processes, and there is a great deal of research examining the nature of these two dimensions and their relationships. Recently, researchers have become increasingly interested in the situational dependency that may characterize people’s perceptions of these two dimensions. However, past research has only considered the effect of simple and repeated interactions, leaving the nature and outcomes of the interactions unexamined. According to social interdependence theory, the competitive or cooperative interactions between groups may elicit disparate downstream effects on perceptions of group members. Various theoretical perspectives converged on the notion that the outcomes of previous interaction sessions may exercise a crucial but differential impact on the warmth and competence rating of outgroup members. The current work aimed to investigate the joint effect of the competitive/collaborative context and the interaction outcomes on people’s warmth and competence ratings as well as the relationship between the two dimensions.

The current research explored this problem in two studies. We investigated how the result of success or failure affects intergroup evaluation in different situations of competition and cooperation. A total of 496 undergraduates were recruited. In all four of our experiments, we used the Distant Planetary Paradigm and imagined a four-stage encounter with an alien prospecting team, with the characteristics and outcomes of each session manipulated according to experimental design. After each stage of the encounter, participants rated their perceptions of the warmth and competence of the alien groups.

The results showed that: (1) a positive relationship between warmth and competence ratings was observed when participants inferred competence from warmth-related information, and when they inferred warmth from competence-related information, the relationship reversed; (2) during the first stage of interaction, knowing the coaction intention of the outgroup exerted an overarching “centralizing” effect over people’s perception of the member of that outgroup, with the ratings on both dimensions showing a compensatory tendency; and (3) the effect of interaction outcome was contingent on the coaction contexts, such that in a competition context, ratings of warmth and competence exhibited an anti-parallel tendency as the four-stage interactions unfolded, such that a successful outcome may cause a rising-warmth-falling-competence tendency and a failure outcome may cause a warmth-falling-competence rising tendency, whereas in a cooperation context, ratings on the two dimensions evolved in a parallel fashion, such that a successful cooperation may cause an overall increase in ratings on both dimensions and a failed cooperation may cause overall falling ratings on both dimensions.

In conclusion, the current research is the first to explore the situational evolution of the relationship between warmth and competence ratings in intergroup evaluations, and has important implications for the future inter-group relationship research. This line of inquiry makes a novel contribution to the field by examining how social relationships within joint activities could influence behavior and intentions toward members of an outgroup.

Keywords stereotype content      warmth      competence      situational evolution      success-failure      intergroup evaluation     
ZTFLH:  B849:C91  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Bin ZUO
Fangfang WEN
Yang WU
Taotao DAI
Cite this article:   
Bin ZUO,Fangfang WEN,Yang WU, et al. Situational evolution of the relationship between warmth and competence in intergroup evaluation: Impact of evaluating intention and behavioral outcomes[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1180-1196.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01180     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I10/1180
情境 高热情 低热情 高能力 低能力
热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力
初次接触 5.98 (0.97) 5.27 (1.02) 2.27 (1.31) 3.85 (1.36) 4.25 (1.23) 6.02 (1.00) 4.17 (1.31) 2.73 (1.25)
得知意图 5.06 (1.22) 5.33 (1.07) 2.37 (1.35) 4.00 (1.40) 3.80 (1.36) 5.83 (1.05) 3.75 (1.34) 3.12 (1.35)
任务成功 5.11 (1.23) 4.85 (1.17) 2.67 (1.54) 3.45 (1.44) 4.08 (1.34) 5.10 (1.14) 3.74 (1.33) 2.64 (1.31)
任务失败 4.73 (1.34) 5.78 (1.04) 2.54 (1.50) 4.66 (1.26) 3.67 (1.37) 5.92 (1.12) 3.53 (1.42) 4.43 (1.27)
  
  
情境 高热情 低热情 高能力 低能力
热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力
初次接触 5.83 (1.13) 5.22 (1.04) 2.40 (1.37) 4.15 (1.39) 4.31 (1.22) 5.82 (1.10) 4.62 (1.33) 3.07 (1.31)
得知意图 5.66 (1.14) 5.42 (.97) 3.05 (1.36) 4.48 (1.37) 4.61 (1.16) 5.42 (.97) 3.05 (1.36) 3.89 (1.34)
任务成功 5.96 (1.11) 5.75 (1.04) 3.89 (1.38) 4.92 (1.25) 5.22 (1.13) 5.94 (1.07) 5.12 (1.18) 4.47 (1.21)
任务失败 5.08 (1.25) 4.68 (1.09) 2.63 (1.47) 3.92 (1.48) 3.95 (1.30) 5.23 (1.14) 3.97 (1.48) 3.29 (1.44)
  
  
情境 高热情-高能力 低热情-高能力 高热情-低能力 低热情-低能力
热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力
初次接触 5.50 (1.35) 6.04 (1.12) 2.32 (1.29) 5.69 (1.27) 5.78 (1.20) 3.29 (1.46) 2.62 (1.59) 2.86 (1.54)
得知意图 4.86 (1.61) 5.89 (1.11) 2.54 (1.34) 5.58 (1.32) 5.17 (1.37) 3.55 (1.38) 2.73 (1.51) 3.22 (1.59)
任务成功 5.10 (1.46) 5.09 (1.52) 2.78 (1.41) 4.56 (1.50) 5.07 (1.42) 2.67 (1.54) 2.77 (1.61) 2.67 (1.54)
任务失败 4.61 (1.75) 5.91 (1.28) 2.46 (1.41) 5.53 (1.58) 4.61 (1.69) 4.42 (1.55) 2.64 (1.60) 4.12 (1.67)
  
  
情境 高热情-高能力 低热情-高能力 高热情-低能力 低热情-低能力
热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力 热情 能力
初次接触 5.53 (1.48) 5.85 (1.30) 2.51 (1.47) 5.51 (1.29) 5.68 (1.19) 3.36 (1.46) 2.82 (1.59) 2.83 (1.45)
得知意图 5.45 (1.46) 5.88 (1.15) 3.16 (1.47) 5.52 (1.22) 5.46 (1.34) 3.86 (1.46) 3.29 (1.48) 3.41 (1.37)
任务成功 5.72 (1.43) 6.01 (1.26) 3.86 (1.53) 5.80 (1.23) 5.76 (1.24) 4.41 (1.32) 3.90 (1.52) 4.06 (1.44)
任务失败 4.73 (1.57) 5.13 (1.34) 2.78 (1.59) 4.75 (1.42) 5.00 (1.55) 3.33 (1.53) 2.70 (1.59) 2.84 (1.60)
  
  
情境 高热情 高热情-高能力 低热情 低热情-低能力 高能力 高能力-低热情 低能力 低能力-高热情
W/C W/C W/C W/C W/C W/C W/C W/C
评价
意图
竞争 ˉ- ˉˉ -- -- ˉˉ ˉ- ˉ-
合作 ˉ- ˉ- -- -- -- ˉ- ˉ-
评价
结果
竞争成功 ˉˉ
竞争失败 ˉ- ˉ- ˉ- ˉ- ˉ- ˉ- ˉ- ˉ-
合作成功 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --
合作失败 ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ ˉˉ
  
[1] Abele A. E., Bruckmüller S., & Wojciszke B . ( 2014). You are so kind-and I am kind and smart: Actor-observer differences in the interpretation of on-going behavior. Polish Psychological Bulletin, 45( 4), 394-401.
[2] Abele A. E., Hauke N., Peters K., Louvet E., Szymkow A., & Duan Y . ( 2016). Facets of the fundamental content dimensions: agency with competence and assertiveness— communion with warmth and morality. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1810.
[3] Asch S.E . ( 1946). Forming impression of personality. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 41( 3), 258-290.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/h0055756
[4] Bakan D .( 1966). The duality of human existence: an essay on psychology and religion. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
[5] Bettelheim B., & Janowitz M . ( 1950). Dynamics of prejudice. New York: Harper
[6] Bye H.H., &Herrebrøden H .( 2017). Emotions as mediators of the stereotype-discrimination relationship: A bias map replication. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 136843021769437.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/315979810_Emotions_as_mediators_of_the_stereotype-discrimination_relationship_A_BIAS_map_replication
[7] Cacault M. P., Goette L., Lalive R., & Thoenig M . ( 2015). Do we harm others even if we don't need to? Frontiers in Psychology, 6( 729), 1-9.
pmid: 26082737 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4451738
[8] Capozza D., Bernardo G. A. D., & Falvo R . ( 2017). Intergroup contact and outgroup humanization: Is the causal relationship uni- or bidirectional? Plos One, 12( 1), e0170554.
pmid: 5261613 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0170554
[9] Chen Y., & Li S.X . ( 2009). Group identity and social preferences. American Economic Review, 99( 1), 431-457.
url: http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.99.1.431
[10] Cislak A., & Wojciszke B .( 2008). Agency and communion are inferred from actions serving interests of self or others. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38( 7), 1103-1110.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2008-18205-006
[11] Clough P.D., & Bates J . ( 2017). Competent men and warm women: Gender stereotypes and backlash in image search results. Computer and Human Interaction, 5, 6620-6631.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/313565050_Competent_Men_and_Warm_Women_Gender_Stereotypes_and_Backlash_in_Image_Search_Results
[12] Cuddy A. J. C., Fiske S. T., & Glick P . ( 2007). The BIAS map: behaviors from intergroup affect and stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,92( 4), 631-648.
pmid: 17469949 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.631
[13] Dai T., Zuo B., & Wen F. F . ( 2014). The compensation effect between warmth and competence in social cognition. Advance in Psychological Science,22( 3), 502-511.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xlxdt201403013.aspx
[13] [ 代涛涛, 佐斌, 温芳芳 . ( 2014). 社会认知中热情与能力的补偿效应. 心理科学进展,22( 3), 502-511.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xlxdt201403013.aspx
[14] Dorrough A. R., Glöckner A., Hellmann D. M., & Ebert I . ( 2015). The development of ingroup favoritism in repeated social dilemmas. Frontiers in Psychology , 6: 476.
pmid: 4411968 url: http://old.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/viewHTMLEn/PeriodicalPaper_PM25972821.aspx
[15] Dovidio J. F., Love A., Schellhaas F. M. H., & Hewstone M . ( 2017). Reducing intergroup bias through intergroup contact: twenty years of progress and future directions. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20( 5), 136843021771205.
[16] Durrheim K., Quayle M., Tredoux C. G., Titlestad K., & Tooke L . ( 2016). Investigating the evolution of ingroup favoritism using a minimal group interaction paradigm: The effects of inter-and intragroup interdependence. Plos One,11( 11), e0165974.
url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0165974
[17] Fiske S.T . ( 1993). Controlling other people: The impact of power on stereotyping. American Psychologist, 48( 6), 621-628
pmid: 8328729 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.48.6.621
[18] Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., & Glick P . ( 2007). Universal dimensions of social cognition: Warmth and competence. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 2), 77-83.
pmid: 17188552 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661306003299
[19] Fiske S. T., Cuddy A. J. C., Glick P., & Xu J . ( 2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82( 6), 878-902.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878
[20] Fiske S.T . ( 2018). Stereotype content: Warmth and competence endure. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 27( 2), 67-73.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963721417738825
[21] Hayward L. E., Tropp L. R., Hornsey M. J., & Barlow F. K . ( 2017). Toward a comprehensive understanding of intergroup contact descriptions and mediators of positive and negative contact among majority and minority groups. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43( 3), 347-364.
[22] Hoffman C., & Hurst N .( 1990). Gender stereotypes: perception or rationalization? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58( 2), 197-208.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/58/2/197/
[23] Holoien D.S., & Fiske S.T . ( 2013). Downplaying positive impressions: Compensation between warmth and competence in impression management. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 1), 33-41.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103112001813
[24] Johnson D.W .( 2003). Social interdependence: interrelationships among theory, research, and practice. American Psychologist, 58( 11), 934-945.
pmid: 14609388 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.58.11.934
[25] Judd C. M., James-Hawkins L., Yzerbyt V., & Kashima Y . ( 2005). Fundamental dimensions of social judgment: Understanding the relations between judgments of competence and warmth. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89( 6), 899-913.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.899
[26] Kanas A., Scheepers P., & Sterkens C . ( 2017). Positive and negative contact and attitudes towards the religious out-group: testing the contact hypothesis in conflict and non-conflict regions of Indonesia and the Philippines. Social Science Research, 63, 95-110.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0049089X15300478
[27] Kervyn N., Bergsieker H. B., & Fiske S. T . ( 2012). The innuendo effect: hearing the positive but inferring the negative. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 77-85.
pmid: 26023243 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0022103111002010
[28] Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V. Y., & Judd C. M . ( 2011). When compensation guides inferences: indirect and implicit measures of the compensation effect. European Journal of Social Psychology, 41( 2), 144-150.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ejsp.v41.2
[29] Kervyn N., Yzerbyt V. Y., Judd C. M., & Nunes A . ( 2009). A question of compensation: The social life of the fundamental dimensions of social perception. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96( 4), 828-842.
pmid: 19309205 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0013320
[30] Meeusen C., Barlow F. K., & Sibley C. G . ( 2017). Generalized and specific components of prejudice: The decomposition of intergroup context effects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47( 4), 443-456.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ejsp.v47.4
[31] Rast III D. E., Gaffney A. M., & Yang F. G . ( 2017). The effect of stereotype content on intergroup uncertainty and interactions. The Journal of Social Psychology, 22, 1-10.
pmid: 29166218 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00224545.2017.1407285
[32] Schaller M., Park J. H., & Faulkner J . ( 2003). Prehistoric dangers and contemporary prejudices. European Review of Social Psychology, 14( 1), 105-137.
url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/10463280340000036
[33] Sherif M., Harvey O. J., White B. J., Hood W. R., & Sherif C. W . ( 1961). Intergroup cooperation and conflict: The robbers cave experiment. Norman, OK: University ofOklahoma Book Exchange.
[34] Ufkes E. G., Otten S., van der Zee K. I., Giebels E., & Dovidio J. F . ( 2011). The effect of stereotype content on anger versus contempt in “day-to-day” conflicts. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15( 1), 57-74.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/236279366_The_effect_of_stereotype_content_on_anger_versus_contempt_in_day-to-day_conflicts
[35] Uskul A., & Over H . ( 2017). Culture, social interdependence, and ostracism. Current Directions in Psychological Science,26( 4), 371-376.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0963721417699300
[36] Vezzali L., Turner R., Capozza D., & Trifiletti E . ( 2018). Does intergroup contact affect personality? a longitudinal study on the bidirectional relationship between intergroup contact and personality traits. European Journal of Social Psychology, 48( 2), 159-173.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/ejsp.2018.48.issue-2
[37] Wen F., Zuo B., Wu Y., Dong X., & Wang W . ( 2016). Reducing the effect of stereotype threat: The role of coaction contexts and regulatory fit. Social Psychology of Education, 19( 3), 607-626.
url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11218-016-9344-z?view=classic
[38] Wolgast A., & Fischer N .( 2017). You are not alone: Colleague support and goal-oriented cooperation as resources to reduce teachers’ stress. Social Psychology of Education, 20( 1), 97-114.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11218-017-9366-1
[39] Yzerbyt V. Y., Kervyn N., & Judd C. M . ( 2008). Compensation versus halo: The unique relations between the fundamental dimensions of social judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 8), 1110-1123.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0146167208318602
[40] Zuo B., Dai T. T., Wen F. F., & Suo Y.X . ( 2015). The big two model in social cognition. Journal of Psychological Science, 38( 4), 1019-1023.
[40] [ 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 索玉贤 . ( 2015). 社会认知内容的“大二”模型. 心理科学, 38( 4), 1019-1023.]
[41] Zuo B., Dai T. T., Wen F. F., & Teng T. T . ( 2014). The relationship between warmth and competence in social cognition. Advances in Psychological Science, 22( 9), 1467-1474.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201409011
[41] [ 佐斌, 代涛涛, 温芳芳, 滕婷婷 . ( 2014). 热情与能力的关系及影响因素. 心理科学进展, 22( 9), 1467-1474.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201409011
[42] Zuo B., Zhang Y. Y., Zhao J., & Wang J . ( 2006). The stereotype content model and its researches. Advances in Psychological Science, 14( 1), 138-145.
[42] [ 佐斌, 张阳阳, 赵菊, 王娟 . ( 2006). 刻板印象内容模型:理论假设及研究. 心理科学进展, 14( 1), 138-145.]
[1] WEI Qingwang, LI Muzi, CHEN Xiaochen.  Social class and social perception: Is warmth or competence more important?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 243-252.
[2] WEI Hua; WANG Tao; ZHOU Zongkui; FENG Wenting; DING Qian. The effect of repeated two-syllable brand name on consumer’s perception and preference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1479-1488.
[3] JIANG Hongyan; WANG Haizhong; HE Yun; ZHU Li. The synergistic effect between corporate image and product’s superior benefits: A stereotype content model approach[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 95-105.
[4] PANG Jun; BI Sheng. Effects of Congruency between Advertising Appeal and Country-of-Origin Stereotype on Brand Attitude[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 406-416.
[5] LIANG Zong-Bao,ZHANG Guang-Zhen,CHEN Hui-Chang,ZHANG Ping. Relations among Parental Meta-Emotion Philosophy, Parental Emotion Expressivity, and Children’s Social Competence[J]. , 2012, 44(2): 199-210.
[6] ZHANG Xiao. The Development of Social Competence during Early Childhood: A Latent Growth Model [J]. , 2011, 43(12): 1388-1397.
[7] XI Ju-Zhe,ZUO Zhi-Hong,SANG Biao. Perceived Social Competence of Resilient Children[J]. , 2011, 43(09): 1026-1037.
[8] ZHANG Xiao,CHEN Hui-Chang,ZHANG Yin-Na,SUN Bing-Hai. Family Income and Social Competence in Early Childhood: Examining Mediation and Moderation Effects[J]. , 2009, 41(07): 613-623.
[9] Yang Lizhu,Wang Jiangyang. A Follow-up Study of Self-imposed Delay of Gratification at Age 4 as a Predictor of Children’s School-based Social Competences at Age 9[J]. , 2007, 39(04): 668-678.
[10] Zhou-Zongkui,Sun-Xiaojun,Zhao-Dongmei,Hsueh-Yeh. The Test of the Mediator Variable between Peer Relationship and Loneliness in Middle Childhood[J]. , 2005, 37(06): 776-783.
[11] Liu Yan,Zou Hong. THE STRUCTURE OF SOCIAL COMPETENCE AND THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPING THE SOCIAL COMPETENCE QUESTIONNAIRE FOR UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS[J]. , 2005, 37(04): 502-510.
[12] Lin Guobin (Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences). ESTIMATION FOR NUMEROUSNESS OF LESS THAN 50 IN RHESUS MONKEYS(macaca mulatta)[J]. , 1994, 26(01): 77-84.
[13] Ling Wenquan,Fang Liluo,Gao Jing,Alka Kanna Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing Georgc Washington Univ. U. S. A.. THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENT SOCIAL GROUPS TO IMPLICIT LEADERSHIP FACTORS[J]. , 1992, 24(01): 45-51.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech