Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1142-1150     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01142
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Will the deficit in inhibition increase the rates of tip-of-the-tongue among the elderly?
Huamao PENG1,Xiaofei MAO2,1()
1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
2 Department of Psychology, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
Download: PDF(421 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

The tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) refers to when a speaker seems to have accessed a word’s meaning adequately but is unable to complete the sound form or phonological label of the word. Both diary studies that document TOT episodes and experimental methods designed to generate TOT have demonstrated that older adults experience more TOT than young or middle-aged adults. With regard to the aging mechanism, the inhibition deficit theory supposed that older adults are more likely than young adults to fail to retrieve the words due to the activation the irrelevant information, which interfere with the retrieval of the target name. The contents of inhibition include limiting access to irrelevant information (access), deleting information that is no longer relevant (deletion), and restraining the production of dominant responses (restrain). This study consisted of two experimental tasks, which were designed to explore the roles of access and deletion functions respectively in TOT among the elderly.

In experiment 1, a 2 (age group: old and young) × 2 (interferential condition: with/without interference) mixed design was adopted to examine the role of access function in TOT among the old adults. In order to investigate the impact of deletion function, 30 young people (aged 18 to 33 years) and 30 older adults (aged 60 to 79 years) were recruited. Participants in interference condition were asked to not pay attention to the interferential stimuli when performing the TOT task. To examine the role of deletion function in TOT among the elderly, a 2 (age group: old and young) × 2 (activating condition: activate interferential stimuli or not) mixed design was adopted in experiment 2. Thirty young people (aged 19 to 27 years) and 30 older adults (aged 61 to 78 years) were recruited for experiment 2 and they were presented the interferential stimuli before the TOT task in the condition of activating interferential stimuli.

A two-way repeated measures ANOVA was used to analyze the data. In experiment 1, the interaction between age and interference condition were significant. Only the old group had significantly higher rates of TOT in the condition with interference than that of those without interference. In order to analyze the role of access function further, we compared the age difference between the 2 conditions, and the age difference in the interference condition was significantly larger. This result indicated that the access function influences the rates of TOT among the old people. In experiment 2, the interaction between age and activating condition was significant. The old group had higher rates of TOT in the condition of activating interferential stimuli, rather than the young group.

The results demonstrated that the deficits in access and deletion functions of older adults may be responsible for the higher rates of TOT, which provided supportive evidence for the inhibition deficit theory. The study implied that intervention on inhibition may be useful in improving the TOT of old adults.

Keywords tip-of-the-tongue      the elderly      inhibition      access      deletion     
ZTFLH:  B844  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Huamao PENG
Xiaofei MAO
Cite this article:   
Huamao PENG,Xiaofei MAO. Will the deficit in inhibition increase the rates of tip-of-the-tongue among the elderly?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1142-1150.
URL:     OR
年龄组 有干扰 无干扰 激活干扰 不激活干扰
年轻组 0.092 ± 0.059 0.079 ± 0.067 0.118 ± 0.055 0.120 ± 0.053
老年组 0.183 ± 0.087 0.133 ± 0.075 0.174 ± 0.010 0.140 ± 0.079
[1] Abrams L., Trunk D. L., & Merrill L. A . ( 2007). Why a superman cannot help a tsunami: Activation of grammatical class influences resolution of young and older adults' tip- of-the-tongue states. Psychology and Aging, 22( 4), 835-845.
[2] Anderson M. C., & Bjork R. A .( 1994) . Mechanisms of inhibition in long-term memory: A new taxonomy. In D. Dagenbach & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory and language (pp.265-325) . San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[3] Arbuckle T.Y., &Gold D.P .( 1993). Aging, inhibition and verbosity. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 48( 5), 225-232.
[4] Aron A. R., Robbins T. W., & Poldrack R. A . ( 2004). Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8( 4), 170-177.
[5] Ayasse N., & Wingfield A . ( 2017). The impact of context and competition on speech comprehension in younger and older adults revealed using eye-tracking and pupillometry. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141( 5), 3747-3747.
[6] Borella E., Ghisletta P., & De Ribaupierre A . ( 2011). Age differences in text processing: The role of working memory, inhibition, and processing speed. Journals of Gerontology Series B Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 66( 3), 311-320.
[7] Brown A.S .( 1991). A review of the tip-of-the-tongue experience. Psychological Bulletin, 109( 2), 204-223.
pmid: 2034750 url:
[8] Brown R., & McNeill D . ( 1966). The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 5( 4), 325-337.
[9] Burke D. M., MacKay D. G., Worthley J. S., & Wade E . ( 1991). On the tip of the tongue: What causes word finding failures in young and older adults? Journal of Memory and Language, 30( 5), 542-579.
[10] Chen X. Q., Zhang J. J., & Zhu Y X . ( 2015). The Research of inhibition deficit hypothesis in the aging of speech production: Evidence from different speech level. Acta Psychologica Sinica,47 ( 3), 329-343.
[10] [ 陈栩茜, 张积家, 朱云霞 . ( 2015). 言语产生老化中的抑制损伤: 来自不同任务的证据. 心理学报, 47 ( 3), 329-343.]
[11] Choi H., & Smith S.M . ( 2005). Incubation and the resolution of tip-of-the-tongue states. The Journal of General Psychology, 132( 4), 365-376.
[12] Cohen G., & Faulkner D .( 1986). Memory for proper names: Age differences in retrieval. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 4( 2), 187-197.
[13] Cohen J., & Gordon-Salant S . ( 2017). The effect of visual distraction on auditory-visual speech perception by younger and older listeners. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141( 5), 470-476.
[14] Cross E.S., &Burke D.M . ( 2004). Do alternative names block young and older adults’ retrieval of proper names? Brain and Language, 89( 1), 174-181.
pmid: 15010248 url:
[15] Dahlgren D.J . ( 1998). Impact of knowledge and age on tip-of-the-tongue rates. Experimental Aging Research, 24( 2), 139-153.
pmid: 9555567 url:
[16] Dempster F.N . ( 1992). The rise and fall of the inhibitory mechanism: Toward a unified theory of cognitive development and aging. Developmental Review, 12( 1), 45-75.
[17] Fang Y.H., &Zhang J.J . ( 2013). Roles of semantic similarity and category size on semantic effect in picture-word interference paradigm. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45( 5), 523-537.
[17] [ 方燕红, 张积家 . ( 2013). 语义相似性与类别大小对图-词干扰范式下语义效应的影响. 心理学报, 45( 5), 523-537.]
[18] Gao Y .( 2013). The role of visual perceptual Stress in inhibition aging. ( Unpublished master thesis). Beijing Normal University.
[18] [ 高悦 . ( 2013). 视知觉压力在抑制老化中的作用 (硕士学位论文). 北京师范大学.]
[19] Gollan T.H., &Brown A.S .( 2006). From tip-of-the-tongue (TOT) data to theoretical implications in two steps: When more TOTs means better retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135( 3), 462-483.
[20] Gong Y. X .( 1992). Manual of wechsler adult intelligence scale - Chinese version. Hunan: Hunan Map Press.
[20] [ 龚耀先 . ( 1992). 韦氏成人智力量表手册. 湖南: 湖南地图出版社.]
[21] Hartley A.A . ( 1993). Evidence for the selective preservation of spatial selective attention in old age. Psychology and Aging, 8( 3), 371-379.
pmid: 8216957 url:
[22] Hasher L., &Zacks R. T .( 1988) . Working memory, comprehension,and aging: A review and a new view. In Bower, G. H. (Eds). The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in research and theory, Vol. 22 (pp.193-225). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[23] Huang. Y. F., Wang D. H., Xiao H. X., & Jiang W . ( 2014). Effects of aging on false memory within DRM paradigm: A study based on fuzzy-trace theory. Psychological Development and Education. 30( 1), 24-30.
[23] [ 黄一帆, 王大华, 肖红蕊, 姜薇 . ( 2014). DRM范式中错误记忆的年龄差异及其机制. 心理发展与教育, 30( 1), 24-30.]
[24] James L.E., & Burke D.M . ( 2000). Phonological priming effects on word retrieval and tip-of-the-tongue experiences in young and older adults. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26( 6), 1378-1391.
[25] Jones G.V . ( 1989). Back to Woodworth: Role of interlopers in the tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon. Memory and Cognition, 17( 1), 69-76.
[26] Jones G.V., &Langford S .( 1987). Phonological blocking in the tip of the tongue state. Cognition, 26( 2), 115-122.
pmid: 3652647 url:
[27] Lustig C., Hasher L., & Zacks R . ( 2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a “new view”. Inhibition in Cognition, 17, 145-162.
[28] Meyer A.S., &Bock K . ( 1992). The tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon: Blocking or partial activation? Memory and Cognition, 20( 6), 715-726.
pmid: 1435274 url:
[29] Nelson T.O., &Narens L ( 1980). Norms of 300 general- information questions: Accuracy of recall, latency of recall, and feeling-of-knowing ratings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19( 3), 338-368.
[30] Pushkar D., Basevitz P., Arbuckle T., Nohara-LeClair M., Lapidus S., & Peled M . ( 2000). Social behavior and off-target verbosity in elderly people. Psychology and Aging, 15( 2), 361-374.
pmid: 10879589 url:
[31] Rastle K.G., &Burke D.M . ( 1996). Priming the tip of the tongue: Effects of prior processing on word retrieval in young and older adults. Journal of Memory and Language, 35( 4), 586-605.
[32] Reason J.T., &Lucas D . ( 1984). Using cognitive diaries to investigate naturally occurring memory blocks. Everyday Memory, Actions, and Absent Mindedness, 53-70.
[33] Roediger H.L . ( 1974). Inhibiting effects of recall. Memory and Cognition, 2( 2), 261-269.
[34] Ryan E. B., Meneer W. B., & Trovato D . ( 1994). Age-based perceptions of conversational skills among younger and older adults. Sage Focus Editions, 173, 15-15.
[35] Samanez-Larkin G. R., Robertson E. R., Mikels J. A., Carstensen L. L., & Gotlib I. H . ( 2009). Selective attention to emotion in the aging brain. Psychology and aging, 24( 3), 519-529.
pmid: 19739908 url:
[36] Schacter D.L .( 1999). The seven sins of memory: Insights from psychology and cognitive neuroscience. American Psychologist, 54( 3), 182-203
pmid: 10199218 url:
[37] Schwartz B.L .( 2010). The effects of emotion on tip-of- the-tongue states. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 17( 1), 82-87.
pmid: 20081165 url:
[38] Shafto M.A., &Tyler L.K .( 2014). Language in the aging brain: The network dynamics of cognitive decline and preservation. Science, 346( 6209), 583-587.
pmid: 25359966 url:
[39] Shafto M. A., Stamatakis E. A., Tam P. P., & Tyler L. K . ( 2010). Word retrieval failures in old age: the relationship between structure and function. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22( 7), 1530-1540.
pmid: 19642890 url:
[40] Sunderland A., Watts K., Baddeley A. D., & Harris J. E . ( 1986). Subjective memory assessment and test performance in the elderly. Journal of Gerontology,41( 3), 376-384.
pmid: 3700988 url:
[41] Woodworth R.S .( 1938). Experimental psychology . New York: Holt.
[42] Yin S.F, &Peng H.M . ( 2016). The role of inhibition in age-related off-topic verbosity: Not access but deletion and restraint functions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7( 65), 1-11.
[43] Zacks R. T., &Hasher L . (1994). Directed ignoring: Inhibitory regulation of working memory. In: D. Dagenbach,., & T. H. Carr (Eds.), Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language (pp. 241-264). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[44] Zacks R., &Hasher L . ( 1997). Cognitive gerontology and attentional inhibition: A reply to Burke and McDowd. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences,52( 6), 274-283.
pmid: 9403516 url:
[45] Zhang H.Y . ( 2013). The condition of questions that used in TOT research and the effect of emotion on TOT. ( Unpublished master thesis). Henan University, China.
[45] [ 张红亚 . ( 2013). 舌尖现象研究的选题条件和情绪对舌尖现象的影响(硕士学位论文). 河南大学.]
[1] Hui Hui WANG, Yu Dan LUO, Bing SHI, Feng Qiong YU, Kai WANG. Excitation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex with transcranial direct current stimulation influences response inhibition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 647-654.
[2] BAI Xuejun, YAO Haijuan. Differences in cognitive inhibition between persons with high and low creativity: Evidences from behavioral and physiological studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1197-1211.
[3] Ruosong YAO,Mengshi GUO,Haosheng YE. The mediating effects of hope and loneliness on the relationship between social support and social well-being in the elderly[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1151-1158.
[4] LI Yangzhuo, QIAN Haoyue, ZHU Ming, GAO Xiangping.  Self association facilitates attentional inhibition in human visual search[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 28-35.
[5] LIU Tuanli, BAI Xuejun.  The effect of part-list cues on memory retrieval: The role of inhibition ability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[6] KE Chunchun, NIE Aiqing, ZHANG Ruiqing.  The modulation of recall task on collaborative inhibition and error pruning: The influence of emotional valence and level of processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 733-744.
[7] WANG Aijun, LIU Xiaole, TANG Xiaoyu, ZHANG Ming.  Inhibition of return at different eccentricities in visual field under three-dimensional (3D) world[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 723-732.
[8] SUN Yueliang; ZHENG Weiyi; HE Xianyou. The processing of pure decimal numbers: Selective access or parallel access?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 611-621.
[9] XU Ju; HU Yuanyan; WANG Shuang; LI Aisu; ZHANG Ming; ZHANG Yang. Cognitive neural mechanism of training effect on inhibition of return: Evidence from an ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 658-670.
[10] LI Heng; CAO Yu. Impact of bilingual experiences on language inhibition ability: Evidence from English-Chinese unimodal and English-American sign language bimodal bilinguals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 343-351.
[11] LI Li; ZHANG Yang; LI Xuan; GUO Hongting; WU Limei; WANG Ruiming. Cross-language repetition priming effect of semantic access for trilinguals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1401-1409.
[12] ZHANG Bao1,2; SHAO Jiaying1; HU Cenlou1; Huang Sai1. Attentional Guidance from Activated and Inhibitory States of  Working Memory Representations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1089-1100.
[13] XU Ju; MA Fangyuan; ZHANG Ming; ZHANG Yang. Dissociation of Inhibitory Tagging from Inhibition of Return by Long-term Training[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 981-991.
[14] WANG Aijun; LI Biqin; ZHANG Ming. Location-based Inhibition of Return along Depth Plane in Three-dimensional Space[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 859-868.
[15] CHEN Xuqian; ZHANG Jijia; ZHU Yunxia. The Research of Inhibition Deficit Hypothesis in the Aging of Speech Production: Evidence from Different Speech Level[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 329-343.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech