Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1131-1141     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01131
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The regulation effect of the antecedent negative emotion on emotional contagion: Counter and threshold-descent
Qiyong ZHANG1(),Zhiying YAN2
1 The College of Educational Science, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225002, China
2 Psychology School, Yunnan Normal University, Yunnan 650092, China
Download: PDF(569 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

According to the previous studies, emotional contagion can be regulated by the subsequent cognition which can be retrieved by unconsciousness or consciousness. Can emotional contagion be regulated by people’s antecedent emotion or not? That is, the receiver’s antecedent emotion, which has existed before the sender’s emotional display, regulates the final effect of emotional contagion. If true, there might be two possibilities in the regulation: counter and threshold-descent. Our goal is to explore the regulation effect of the antecedent negative emotion on emotional contagion with two possibilities.

We designed two experiments in this study to verify two mental phenomena, viz., counter and threshold-descent emotional contagion respectively. In these two experiments, a within-subject design was employed, and the biofeedback technology was used to measure the participants’ emotional state in them. All participants should accept the baseline measurement after they took psycho-relaxation exercises at the beginning of the experiment. Firstly, we implemented the experiment of counter emotional contagion. Taking hostility as a case of the antecedent emotion, we aroused Chinese participants’ hostility by playing video of The Nanjing Massacre to them, and then let them watch two funny videos about Chinese and Japanese lives. Meanwhile, the participants’ physiological indices were collected. The aim of the experiment was to compare the participants’ emotional experience when they watched the above two funny videos. Secondly, in the experiment of threshold-descent emotional contagion, the restless experience, as the antecedent emotion, was aroused by undergoing repeated several “unsuccessful” experiments. The participants’ physiological indices were collected and compared too when they watched funny video before and after the restless experience elicited which corresponded to the episodes 1 and 2 respectively. The experiments aimed to explore whether the participants’ antecedent emotional state would affect their emotional contagion via different experimental treatment.

In the first experiment, the results indicated that the funny Japanese video did not infect the Chinese participants after they watched The Nanjing Massacre. Actually, the two funny videos are being earmarked as “Chinese” or “Japanese” at random. The participants’ negative emotion was successfully elicited by watching The Nanjing Massacre. BVP amplitude significantly descended, whereas BVP frequency ascended drastically in comparison with the baseline level. After the experiment, we asked the participants what emotion they experienced while watching The Nanjing Massacre, and their answer was hostility and anger. We compared the participants’ physiological changes when watching the funny Japanese video and The Nanjing Massacre with those of the baseline level respectively. As the results revealed, the participants’ physiological changes when watching the above two videos obtained the same changed trend relative to the baseline level, which proved that the funny Japanese video did not induce the participants’ positive emotional experience successfully. Meanwhile, we compared further the participants’ physiological changes during the process of watching the funny Japanese video with those when watching The Nanjing Massacre. The results showed that their physiological changing tendency in watching the funny Japanese video was the same as that in watching The Nanjing Massacre, and the former’s level of psychological arousal was greater than the latter’s, which further confirmed that the funny Japanese video amplified the participants’ anger rather than the positive emotional experience. We gather, therefore, that the counter emotional contagion appeared in this experiment. Rather, the participants’ positive emotion was aroused when they watched the funny Chinese video, for their physiological changing trend of BVP amplitude and frequency was completely opposite to that when watching the funny Japanese video.

The repeated measures ANOVA were employed to analyze the data from the experiment of threshold-descent emotional contagion. In the episode 1, the results showed that the participants’ positive emotion was aroused successfully by watching funny video 1, in which BVP amplitude significantly descended, whereas BVP frequency ascended in comparison with the baseline level. Statistical analysis of data suggested that the participants’ emotion was more negative when they were feeling down by the repeated “unsuccessful” experience, but more positive when watching another funny video after the restless experience (episode 2), in which BVP amplitude and SC significantly ascended, whereas BVP frequency descended in comparison with watching funny video 1 (episode 1). That indicated the participants’ negative emotion (restlessness) facilitated the positive emotional contagion by lowering the threshold value of the positive emotion perception, so we call it “threshold-descent regulation”. Subjective ratings of funniness of these two videos were obtained, and the scores were compared by using the t test. The result demonstrated that the score of funniness of video 1, which participants evaluated, was significantly higher than that of video 2.

In the experiment of counter emotional contagion, the findings suggested that, the antecedent negative emotion not only prevented the subsequent positive emotional contagion, but also intensified the participants’ antecedent negative emotion experience. So we conclude that the result that “the observer gets ‘infected’ by the emotion he or she perceives” is not always attained as people think. In the experiment of threshold-descent emotional contagion, the antecedent negative emotion could intensify the positive emotional contagion. Hence, the participants’ antecedent emotion did not weaken the effect of emotional contagion, but magnified their subsequent positive emotional experience, instead.

Keywords counter emotional contagion      threshold-descent emotional contagion      the antecedent emotion      the subsequent emotion      teaching situation     
ZTFLH:  B849:G44  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Qiyong ZHANG
Zhiying YAN
Cite this article:   
Qiyong ZHANG,Zhiying YAN. The regulation effect of the antecedent negative emotion on emotional contagion: Counter and threshold-descent[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1131-1141.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01131     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I10/1131
  
  
生理指标 F p Partial η2 Observed Power
α波 4.48* 0.03 0.09 0.65
SMR 17.96** 0.00 0.29 1.00
β波 58.97** 0.00 0.57 1.00
BVP幅度 36.93** 0.00 0.45 1.00
BVP频率 11.01** 0.00 0.20 0.94
SC 27.09** 0.00 0.38 1.00
脸颊EMG 13.02** 0.00 0.22 0.97
  
生理指标 Ⅱ-Ⅰ Ⅲ-Ⅰ Ⅲ-Ⅱ
MD p MD p MD p
α波 1.14** 0.00 1.02 0.05 -0.12 0.79
SMR 1.32** 0.00 1.51** 0.00 0.19 0.56
β波 3.51** 0.00 2.67** 0.00 -0.85* 0.04
BVP幅度 -1.82** 0.00 -3.37** 0.00 -1.55** 0.00
BVP频率 1.08** 0.00 3.10** 0.00 2.01* 0.02
SC 0.88** 0.00 1.83** 0.00 0.95** 0.00
脸颊EMG 1.19** 0.00 1.08** 0.00 -0.11 0.72
  
生理指标 F p Partial η2 Observed Power
α波 8.36** 0.00 0.16 0.93
SMR 14.93** 0.00 0.25 0.99
β波 43.52** 0.00 0.49 1.00
BVP幅度 91.29** 0.00 0.67 1.00
BVP频率 22.55** 0.00 0.33 1.00
SC 4.74* 0.02 0.10 0.71
脸颊EMG 43.36** 0.00 0.49 1.00
  
生理指标 Ⅱ-Ⅰ Ⅳ-Ⅰ Ⅳ-Ⅱ
MD p MD p MD p
α波 1.14** 0.00 1.01** 0.00 -0.12 0.74
SMR 1.32** 0.00 1.08** 0.00 -0.24 0.46
β波 3.51** 0.00 2.11** 0.00 -1.41** 0.01
BVP幅度 -1.82** 0.00 2.38** 0.00 4.20** 0.00
BVP频率 1.08** 0.00 -1.30** 0.00 -2.38** 0.00
SC 0.88** 0.00 0.34 0.24 -0.55 0.13
脸颊EMG 1.19** 0.00 2.28* 0.04 1.09** 0.00
  
  
  
生理指标 F p Partial η2 Observed Power
α波 9.75** 0.00 0.17 0.95
SMR 6.59** 0.01 0.12 0.82
β波 17.32** 0.00 0.26 1.00
BVP幅度 88.74** 0.00 0.64 1.00
BVP频率 26.37** 0.00 0.35 1.00
SC 95.25** 0.00 0.66 1.00
脸颊EMG 24.70** 0.00 0.34 1.00
  
生理指标 Ⅱ-Ⅰ Ⅲ-Ⅰ Ⅲ-Ⅱ
MD p MD p MD p
α波 0.43** 0.00 0.01 0.86 -0.42** 0.01
SMR 0.43** 0.00 0.11 0.17 -0.32* 0.04
β波 0.80** 0.00 0.02 0.79 -0.77** 0.04
BVP幅度 1.14** 0.00 -1.13** 0.00 -2.27** 0.00
BVP频率 -0.99** 0.00 0.77** 0.01 1.76** 0.00
SC -0.04 0.42 0.97** 0.00 1.02** 0.00
脸颊EMG 1.07** 0.00 0.15 0.09 -0.92** 0.00
  
生理指标 F p Partial η2 Observed Power
α波 42.65** 0.00 0.47 1.00
SMR 9.74** 0.00 0.17 0.97
β波 25.77** 0.00 0.35 1.00
BVP幅度 103.82** 0.00 0.68 1.00
BVP频率 43.18** 0.00 0.47 1.00
SC 1.71 0.19 0.03 0.34
脸颊EMG 32.51** 0.00 0.40 1.00
  
生理指标 Ⅱ-Ⅰ Ⅳ-Ⅰ Ⅳ-Ⅱ
MD p MD p MD p
α波 0.43** 0.00 1.33** 0.00 0.90** 0.00
SMR 0.43** 0.00 0.65** 0.00 0.22 0.19
β波 0.80** 0.00 1.18** 0.00 0.38* 0.03
BVP幅度 1.14** 0.00 2.75** 0.00 1.61** 0.00
BVP频率 -0.99** 0.00 -1.76** 0.00 -0.77** 0.00
SC -0.04 0.42 0.07 0.26 0.11 0.11
脸颊EMG 1.07** 0.00 1.53** 0.00 0.46* 0.03
  
[1] Balconi M., &Bortolotti A . ( 2012). Empathy in cooperative versus non-cooperative situations: The contribution of self-Report measures and autonomic responses. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 37, 161-169.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10484-012-9188-z
[2] Balconi M., &Canavesio Y .( 2013). Emotional contagion and trait empathy in prosocial behavior in young people: The contribution of autonomic (facial feedback) and Balanced Emotional Empathy Scale (BEES) measures. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35( 1), 41-48.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13803395.2012.742492
[3] Bhullar N .( 2012). Relationship between mood and susceptibility to emotional contagion: Is positive mood more contagious? North American Journal of Psychology, 14( 3), 517-529.
[4] Caravita S. C. S., Colombo B., Stefanelli S., & Zigliani R . ( 2016). Emotional, psychophysiological and behavioral responses elicited by the exposition to cyberbullying situations: Two experimental studies. Psicologia Educativa, 22( 1), 49-59.
url: http://journals.copmadrid.org/psed/articulo.php?id=299570476c6f0309545110c592b6a63b
[5] Cheshin A., Rafaeli A., & Bos N . ( 2011). Anger and happiness in virtual teams: Emotional influences of text and behavior on others’ affect in the absence of non-verbal cues. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 116, 2-16.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597811000756
[6] Connelly S., & Gooty J . ( 2015). Leading with emotion: An overview of the special issue on leadership and emotions. Leadership Quarterly, 26( 4), 485-488.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984315000764
[7] Dezecache G., Conty L., Chadwick M., Philip L., Soussignan R., Sperber D., … Tsakiris M . ( 2013). Evidence for unintentional emotional contagion beyond dyads. PLoS One, 8( 6), e67371.
pmid: 3696100 url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0067371
[8] Dimberg U., & Thunberg M .( 2012). Empathy, emotional contagion, and rapid facial reactions to angry and happy facial expressions. Psychology Journal, 1( 2), 118-127.
pmid: 26272762 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26272762
[9] Dimberg U., Andréasson P., & Thunberg M . ( 2011). Emotional empathy and facial reactions to facial expressions. Journal of Psychophysiology, 25( 1), 26-31.
url: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/0269-8803/a000029
[10] Dzokoto V., Wallace D. S., Peters L., & Bentsi-Enchill E . ( 2014). Attention to emotion and non-western faces: Revisiting the facial feedback hypothesis. The Journal of General Psychology, 141( 2), 151-168.
pmid: 24846789 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00221309.2014.884052
[11] Ekman P .( 2009). Telling lies: Clues to deceit in the marketplace, politics, and marriage. New York: W. W. Norton Press.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/1987-98711-000
[12] Falkenberg I., Bartels M., & Wild B . ( 2008). Keep smiling! Facial reactions to emotional stimuli and their relationship to emotional contagion in patients with schizophrenia. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience,258, 245-253.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00406-007-0792-5
[13] Fink E., Heathers J. A. J., & de Rosnay M . ( 2015). Young children’s affective responses to another’s distress: Dynamic and physiological features. PLoS One, 10( 4), e0121735.
url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0121735
[14] Gouizi K., Reguig B. F., & Maaoui C . ( 2011). Emotion recognition from physiological signals. Journal of Medical Engineering & Technology, 35( 6-7), 300-307.
pmid: 21936746 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21936746
[15] Hirvikoski T., Olsson E. M. G., Nordenström A., Lindholm T., Nordström A. L., & Lajic S . ( 2011). Deficient cardiovascular stress reactivity predicts poor executive functions in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 33( 1), 63-73.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13803395.2010.493145
[16] Knott L.M., & Thorley C .( 2014). Mood-congruent false memories persist over time. Cognition and Emotion, 28( 5), 903-912.
pmid: 24294987 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699931.2013.860016
[17] Lai H. L., Li Y. M., & Lee L. H . ( 2012). Effects of music intervention with nursing presence and recorded music on psycho-physiological indices of cancer patient caregivers. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 21( 5-6), 745-756.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jcn.2012.21.issue-5-6
[18] Magnée M. J. C. M., de Gelder B., van Engeland H., & Kemner C . ( 2007). Facial electromyographic responses to emotional information from faces and voices in individuals with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,48( 11), 1122-1130.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/jcpp/48/11
[19] Ooishi Y., & Kashino M ., ( 2012). Habituation of rapid sympathetic response to aversive timbre eliminated by change in basal sympathovagal balance. Psychophysiology, 49( 8), 1059-1071.
[20] Park M. S., Lee K. H., Sohn S., Eom J. S., & Sohn J. H . ( 2014). Degree of extraversion and physiological responses to physical pain and sadness. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 55( 5), 483-488.
pmid: 25040459 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/sjop.2014.55.issue-5
[21] Peper E., Harvey R., Lin I. M., Tyiova H., & Moss D . ( 2007). Is there more to blood volume pulse than heart rate variability, Respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and cardiorespiratory synchrony? Biofeedback, 35( 2), 54-61.
[22] Tee E. Y.J .( 2015). The emotional link: Leadership and the role of implicit and explicit emotional contagion processes across multiple organizational levels. Leadership Quarterly, 26( 4), 654-670.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984315000661
[23] Torrente P., Salanova M., & Llorens S . ( 2013). Spreading engagement: On the role of similarity in the positive contagion of team work engagement. Revista de Psicología del Trabajo y de las Organizaciones, 29( 3), 153-159.
url: http://journals.copmadrid.org/jwop/article.php?id=731c83db8d2ff01bdc000083fd3c3740
[24] Urry H.L .( 2009). Using reappraisal to regulate unpleasant emotional episodes: Goals and timing matter. Emotion, 9, 782-797.
pmid: 20001122 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0017109
[25] Vijayalakshmi V., & Bhattacharyya S .( 2012). Emotional contagion and its relevance to individual behavior and organizational processes: A position paper. Journal Business Psychology, 27( 3), 363-374.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10869-011-9243-4
[26] Zebrowitz L. A., Boshyan J., Ward N., Gutchess A., & Hadjikhani N . ( 2017). The older adult positivity effect in evaluations of trustworthiness: Emotion regulation or cognitive capacity? PLoS One, 12( 1), e0169823.
url: http://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0169823
[27] Zhang Q.Y., & Lu J.M .( 2013). What is emotional contagion? The concept and mechanism of emotional contagion. Advances in Psychological Science,21( 9), 1596-1604.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201309009
[27] [ 张奇勇, 卢家楣 . ( 2013). 情绪感染的概念与发生机制. 心理科学进展, 21( 9), 1596-1604.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201309009
[28] Zhang Q.Y., & Lu J.M .( 2015). The regulation effect of antecedent view on emotional contagion: With examples of teaching activities. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47( 6), 797-806.
[28] [ 张奇勇, 卢家楣 . ( 2015). 先入观念对情绪感染力的调节——以教学活动为例. 心理学报, 47( 6), 797-806.]
[29] Zhang Q. Y., Lu J. M., Yan Z. Y., & Chen C. H . ( 2016). The mechanism of emotional contagion. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 11), 1423-1433.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201611007
[29] [ 张奇勇, 卢家楣, 闫志英, 陈成辉 . ( 2016). 情绪感染的发生机制. 心理学报, 48( 11), 1423-1433.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201611007
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech