Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1083-1093     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01083
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The influence of temporal focus on implicit space-time mappings on the front-back axis: Evidence from Han and Qiang Chinese
Heng LI1(),Yu CAO2
1 College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, China
2 School of Foreign Languages, Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, Wuhan 430073, China
Download: PDF(401 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

According to the Conceptual Metaphor Theory (CMT), metaphors allow people to rely on concrete, familiar knowledge such as spatial experience to understand abstract concepts such as time. For example, many languages throughout the world tend to associate the front side of space with the future and the back side with the past. Abundant evidence has shown that people think about time according to the space-time mappings in their speech. However, recent lines of research have suggested that people may not spatialize time as their language suggests. According to the Temporal Focus Hypothesis, people’s implicit space-time mappings are shaped by their cultural attitudes toward time. Compared to Han Chinese, Qiang Chinese tend to focus more on past times and older generations and place more values on their tradition and culture. Thus, it can be hypothesized that Qiang Chinese, who focus more on the past, should be more likely to conceptualize the past as in front of them than Han Chinese.

In Experiment 1, we administered a “time diagram task” in which participants were presented with a sheet depicting a cartoon character seen from above with a box ahead of him and another behind him. Participants were told that the character visited a friend who loved plants yesterday, and tomorrow he would be going to visit a friend who loves animals (or vice versa, as event-to-space assignment was counterbalanced). Participants were asked to place “plant” and “animal” in the boxes. In Experiment 2, we used a Temporal Focus Scale to quantify the proposed difference in temporal focus between Han and Qiang Chinese. It consisted of 8 assertions denoting opinions about past- and future-related topics. In Experiment 3, Han and Qiang Chinese participants were asked to complete a time classification task. In this task, they categorized the words denoting past or future events by pressing a corresponding response key placed ahead or behind a starting point.

Results from Experiments 1 and 2 showed that Qiang participants, who tend to be more past-focused, were also more likely to place the future event in the box behind the character and the past event in the box ahead of him. By contrast, Han Chinese showed no preferences for past-in-front mapping or future-in-front mapping, as predicted by their equally high agreement with past focus and future focus items. Experiment 3 showed that Qiang Chinese showed a response facilitation when processing temporal words in a direction compatible to their implicit space-time mappings as shown in Experiment 1 (i.e., past is front and future is back). However, Han Chinese did not show a response facilitation because they may have the same preference for both past-in-front and future-in-front mappings.

There are two contrasting views on how people implicitly associate the past and future with the front and back. Metaphor Structure View posits that people think about time the way they talk about in their spoken metaphors. However, we found no evidence in current studies for supporting this view since the directions of implicit space-time mappings in Han and Qiang Chinese were different despite both using the same spoken metaphors; thus, it suggests a striking dissociation between temporal language and temporal thought. Our results appear to support the Temporal Focus Hypothesis, which suggests that people’s implicit space-time mappings are shaped by their cultural attitudes. Taken together, this research contributes to the exiting literature that within-cultural differences (e.g., ethnicity) should be considered when studying the relationship between temporal focus and implicit space-time mappings.

Keywords Han      Qiang      implicit space-time mappings      temporal focus      conceptual metaphor     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Heng LI
Cite this article:   
Heng LI,Yu CAO. The influence of temporal focus on implicit space-time mappings on the front-back axis: Evidence from Han and Qiang Chinese[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1083-1093.
URL:     OR
被试类型 过去在前 未来在前
汉族 45 (44.1%) 57 (55.9%)
羌族 79 (79.8%) 20 (20.2%)
被试类型 过去 未来
汉族 4.95 (1.06) 5.19 (1.09)
羌族 5.45 (1.05) 4.48 (1.00)
反应类型 汉族 羌族
一致 1209 (216) 1003 (171)
不一致 1220 (242) 1401 (227)
[1] Barsalou L.W . ( 1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-660.
[2] Barsalou L.W . ( 2016). On staying grounded and avoiding Quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23( 4), 1122-1142.
pmid: 27112560 url:
[3] Binder J. R., Westbury C. F., McKiernan K. A., Possing E. T., & Medler D. A . ( 2005). Distinct brain systems for processing concrete and abstract concepts. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17( 6), 905-917.
[4] Boroditsky L .( 2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75( 1), 1-28.
pmid: 10815775 url:
[5] Boroditsky L .( 2001). Does language shape thought? Mandarin and English speakers’ conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43( 1), 1-22.
pmid: 11487292 url:
[6] Casasanto D .( 2016). Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in hand. In B. Lewandowska- Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time( pp. 169-186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[7] Casasanto D .( 2017). Relationships between language and cognition. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 19-37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[8] Casasanto D & Jasmin K .( 2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics,23( 4), 643-674.
[9] Chen J.J . ( 2016). The present situation of filial piety and its education in contemporary college students (Unpublished master’s thesis). Hebei University of Science & Technology, Shijiazhuang,China.
[9] [ 陈娇娇 . ( 2016). 当代大学生孝道现状及其教育研究(硕士学位论文). 河北科技大学, 石家庄.]
[10] Chen S. Y. ( 2015). Qiang culture. Chengdu: Southwest Jiaotong University Press.
[10] [ 陈蜀玉 . ( 2015). 羌族文化. 成都: 西南交通大学出版社.]
[11] de La Fuente J., Santiago J., Román A., Dumitrache C., & Casasanto D . ( 2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science,25( 9), 1682-1690.
[12] Dong C.B., &Wang L.M, . ( 2012). A discussion on standards of filial piety in Qiang’s funeral. Collected Papers of Local Cultural Research, 5, 165-170.
url: 研究点分析
[12] [ 董常保, 王利明 . ( 2012). 羌族丧葬释比中的孝道观略论. 地方文化研究辑刊, 5, 165-170.]
url: 研究点分析
[13] Fan F. H., Wang H., Huang X. T., Shi H. Y., & Xia L. X . ( 2009). The cognitive structure of filial piety in Contemporary Chinese. Psychological Science Sinica,32( 3), 751-754.
[13] [ 范丰慧, 汪宏, 黄希庭, 史慧颖, 夏凌翔 . ( 2009). 当代中国人的孝道认知结构. 心理科学, 32( 3), 751-754.]
[14] Fuhrman O., McCormick K., Chen E., Jiang H., Shu D. F., Mao S., & Boroditsky L . ( 2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35( 7), 1305-1328.
pmid: 21884222 url:
[15] Gibson C. B., Waller M. J., Carpenter M. A., & Conte J. M . ( 2007). Antecedents, consequences, and moderators of time perspective heterogeneity for knowledge management in MNO teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 28( 8), 1005-1034.
[16] Gijssels T. &Casasanto D. ( 2017) . Conceptualizing time in terms of space: Experimental evidence In B Dancygier (Ed), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp 651-668) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Experimental evidence. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 651-668). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[17] Gu Y., Zheng Y. Q., & Swerts M . ( 2016). Which is in front of Chinese people: Past or Future?: A study on Chinese people’s space-time mapping. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the cognitive science society( pp. 2603-2608). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
[18] Han Y. J. ( 2014). The heritage and education of Qiang culture. Beijing: The Ethical Publishing House.
[18] [ 韩云洁 . ( 2014). 羌族文化传承与教育. 北京: 民族出版社.]
[19] Hendricks R.K., &Boroditsky L . ( 2017). New space-time metaphors foster new nonlinguistic representations. Topics in Cognitive Science,9( 3), 800-818.
pmid: 28635107 url:
[20] Huy Q.N . ( 2001). Time, temporal capability, and planned change. Academy of Management Review,26( 4), 601-623.
[21] Ji L. J., Guo T. Y., Zhang Z. Y., & Messervey D . ( 2009). Looking into the past: Cultural differences in perception and representation of past information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96( 4), 761-769.
[22] Kövecses Z .( 2015). Where metaphors come from: Reconsidering context in metaphor.Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
[23] Lakoff G., &Johnson M .( 1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. New York: Basic Books.
[24] Lakoff G. &Johnson M .( 2003) . Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[25] Landau M. J., Robinson M. D., & Meier B. P . (Eds.). ( 2013). The power of metaphor: Examining its influence on social life. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
[26] Li A. M., Peng Y., & Xiong G. X . ( 2015). Are pregnant women more foresighted? The effect of pregnancy on intertemporal choice. Psychological Science Sinica,47( 11), 1360-1370.
[26] [ 李爱梅, 彭元, 熊冠星 . ( 2015). 孕妇更长计远虑?——怀孕对女性跨期决策偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47( 11), 1360-1370.]
[27] Li H . ( 2016). The psychological reality of spatial metaphors for time—Evidence form gesture and sign language. Psychological Science Sinica, 39( 5), 1080-1085.
url: 研究点分析
[27] [ 李恒 . ( 2016). 时空隐喻的心理现实性: 手势和手语的视角. 心理科学,39( 5), 1080-1085.]
url: 研究点分析
[28] Li, H. ( 2017). Time on hands: Deliberate and spontaneous temporal gestures by speakers of Mandarin. Gesture, 16( 3), 396-415.
[29] Li H. &Cao Y .( 2017). Personal attitudes toward time: The relationship between temporal focus, space-time mappings and real life experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58( 3), 193-198.
[30] Li H. &Cao Y .( 2018). The hope of the future: The experience of pregnancy influences women’s implicit space-time mappings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158( 2):152-156.
[31] Li H., Wu L., & Wugen Z. G . ( 2013). A cognitive study of metaphor and metonymy of time in Tibetan Gesture Language. Journal of the Minzu University of China (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 40( 6), 160-165.
[31] [ 李恒, 吴铃, 吾根卓嘎 . ( 2013). 西藏手语时间隐喻和转喻的认知研究. 中央民族大学学报(哲学社会科学版), 40( 6), 160-165.]
[32] Li H. J., Zhang J. J., & Zhang R. X . ( 2014). The vertically spatial metaphors of kinship words of Qiang nationality. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 4), 481-491.
[32] [ 李惠娟, 张积家, 张瑞芯 . ( 2014). 上下意象图式对羌族亲属词认知的影响. 心理学报,46( 4), 481-491.]
[33] Liu X.Y., &Zhang Z.J . ( 2016). The modulation of temporal focus on the effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes. Psychological Science Sinica, 39( 2), 279-284.
[33] [ 刘馨元, 张志杰 . ( 2016). 不同时间关注点下的空间-时间联合编码效应. 心理科学, 39( 2), 279-284.]
[34] Moore K.E . ( 2014). The spatial language of time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins press.
[35] Núñez R.E., &Sweetser E .( 2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30( 3), 401-450.
[36] Paivio A .( 1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart &Winston.
[37] Paivio A .( 1990).Mental representations: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
[38] Rinaldi L., Vecchi T., Fantino M., Merabet L. B., & Cattaneo Z . ( 2018). The ego-moving metaphor of time relies on visual experience: No representation of time along the sagittal space in the blind. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,147( 3), 444-450.
[39] Shipp A. J., Edwards J. R., & Lambert L. S . ( 2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110( 1), 1-22.
[40] Song Y.Q., &Zhang J.J . ( 2016 -6-15). Ethnic differences in time metaphor cognition. Chinese Social Science Newspaper, 006.
[40] [ 宋宜琪, 张积家 . ( 2016 -6-15). 时间隐喻认知具有民族差异性. 中国社会科学报, 006.]
[41] Sullivan K., &Bui L.T . ( 2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that Time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive linguistics, 27( 2), 205-233.
[42] Walker E., &Cooperrider K . ( 2016). The continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science, 40( 2), 481-495.
pmid: 26059310 url:
[43] Xu P . ( 2006). Cultural adaptation and change: Sichuan Qiang survey. Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House.
[43] [ 徐平 . ( 2006). 文化的适应和变迁: 四川羌村调查. 上海: 上海人民出版社.]
[44] Ye H.S . ( 2011). Embodied cognition: A consideration from theoretical psychology. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 43( 5), 589-598.
[44] [ 叶浩生 . ( 2011). 有关具身认知思潮的理论心理学思考. 心理学报, 43( 5), 589-598.]
[1] LI Weijun, LIU Meng, ZHANG Zhenghua, DENG Nali, XING Yushan. Neural processing of ambiguous Chinese phrases of stutters[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1323-1335.
[2] WANG Yongsheng, ZHAO Bingjie, CHEN Mingjing, LI Xin, YAN Guoli, BAI Xuejun. Influence of the frequency of fixated words and the number of strokes of parafoveal words on saccadic target selection in Chinese reading[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1336-1345.
[3] ZHANG Weixia1, WANG Wanqi2, ZHOU Linshu3, JIANG Cunmei3. Effects of lyrics on the processing of musical emotion: Behavioural and ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1346-1355.
[4] GAO Hong1, LI Yangzhuo1, HU Die1, ZHU Ming2,3, GAO Xiangping1, HU Tianyi1. Cognitive advantage for self-information: Evidence from the orienting network of attention[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1356-1368.
[5] ZHOU Chu1, SU Man1, ZHOU Chong1, YANG Yan1, XI Yaqi1, DONG Qun2. Imagination inflation effect in older adults[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1369-1380.
[6] WANG Zhidan1, ZHOU Aibao2, ZHANG Ronghua2, BU Mengjin1, LI Yuwen1, WANG Haijing1, WILLIAMSON Rebecca3. The development of preschool children’s inductive reasoning about weight: A cross-cultural comparison of Sino-US[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1381-1389.
[7] LI Tingyu1,2, LIU Li1,2, LI Yilin1,2, ZHU Liqi1. Preschoolers' selective trust and belief revision in conflicting situation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1390-1399.
[8] SONG Chao1, LI Wanjun2, MENG Xiaohui1, XING Yilun1, FU Zhongfang1, WANG Jinping1. Assessing the symptom structure, characteristics, and predictive factors of posttraumatic stress disorder among Shidu parents[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1400-1412.
[9] SUN Shasha1, LI Xiaobing2, LI Baoshan1, LIU Chengyi3, HUANG Miner1. Physiological mechanisms of mindfulness: Preliminary evidence from self-similarity of heart rate variability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1413-1427.
[10] SHAO Jianping, HAN Xue, LIU Wumei. The influence and mechanism of external environment resource scarcity on employees remuneration preference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1428-1437.
[11] NIE Chunyan1, WANG Tao2, ZHAO Peng2, CUI Nan2. The influence of interpretation frame on the evaluation of culturally mixed products: The moderating effect of comparison focus and interpretation strategy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1438-1448.
[12] SUN Yachen1, ZHANG Hanqi2,3, LI Yonghui4, XUE Gui2, HE Qinghua1,4. To switch or not to switch?Cognitive and neural mechanisms of card switching behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1449-1459.
[13] BAI Xuejun, YAO Haijuan. Differences in cognitive inhibition between persons with high and low creativity: Evidences from behavioral and physiological studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1197-1211.
[14] ZHANG Ming, TANG Xiaoyu, YU Wei, NING Bo, WANG Zhinan, WANG Aijun. The Effects of modal-based endogenous attention on sound-induced flash illusion[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1212-1221.
[15] HUANG Yushang, CAO Liren. Effect of spatial position based configuration on visual working memory performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1222-1234.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech