Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (10) : 1071-1082     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01071
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Attentional capture is contingent on attentional control setting for semantic meaning: Evidence from modified spatial cueing paradigm
Hui-Yuan WANG1,Jie SUI2,3(),Ming ZHANG4()
1 Department of Psychology, Changchun Normal University, Changchun 130032, China
2 Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
3 Department of Psychology, University of Bath, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK
4 Department of Psychology, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
Download: PDF(1214 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Abstract It has been well documented that attentional capture is contingent on the features of attentional control settings; however, whether and how the semantic contingency between cue and target stimuli modulates spatial attention is poorly understood. Here, we tested this question with strict experiment designs by focusing on pure contingent attentional capture for the semantic meaning of feature attributes or semantic concept cues, and we then examined the nature of attentional control in human visual spatial performance.

A modified spatial cuing paradigm was employed in the current study. In Experiment 1, cues presented in red or green and targets were white Chinese characters “红” (meaning red) or “绿” (meaning green). We had participants discriminate the location of the gap of the target square in different cue-target blocks. Experiments 2 and 3 were identical to Experiment 1, except that in Experiment 2, cue property and target character were randomized, and the task was to discriminate the target as “红” or “绿”; Experiment 3 swapped the cue and target stimuli, where cues were Chinese characters in white and targets were presented in red or green.

The results showed that semantically congruent color cues exclusively captured attention when participants searched for a specific semantic meaning in Experiment 1. In contrast, cuing effects were observed in Experiment 2 in the two-color cue conditions when participants discriminated two Chinese characters, and the effects were independent of the semantic congruency of cue and target. Experiment 3 replicated the results in Experiment 1; cues with semantically congruent Chinese characters captured attention only when participants were required to search for a specific color.

It is concluded that (1) the effects of semantic attentional capture were modulated by attentional control setting, consistent with a contingent attentional orienting hypothesis; (2) the perceptional representation of stimuli activated by semantic concept modulated the processing of stimuli on the location of spatial attention, but the magnitude of the effect decreased; (3) the congruent semantic representation was activated by attentional control setting for perceptional feature and subsequently modulated the allocation of attention; and (4) activation of semantic concept and perceptional representation may be bidirectional and resemble each other in traits of attention shift guidance.

Keywords semantic contingency      attentional capture      attentional control setting      modified spatial cuing paradigm      semantic activation     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Issue Date: 23 August 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hui-Yuan WANG
Jie SUI
Ming ZHANG
Cite this article:   
Hui-Yuan WANG,Jie SUI,Ming ZHANG. Attentional capture is contingent on attentional control setting for semantic meaning: Evidence from modified spatial cueing paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1071-1082.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.01071     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I10/1071
  
因变量指标/线索有效性 “红”字靶子 “绿”字靶子
语义一致 语义不一致 语义一致 语义不一致
反应时(ms) 线索无效 816.5 (83.9) 784.6 (86.7) 840.3 (80.2) 827.9 (73.7)
线索有效 768.3 (83.8) 772.2 (69.3) 806.5 (70.1) 822.8 (84.2)
错误率(%) 线索无效 6.5 (4.9) 5.6 (4.2) 8.1 (7.3) 8.6 (9.1)
线索有效 5.3 (5.7) 5.4 (4.7) 5.7 (4.9) 7.1 (5.7)
  
  
因变量指标/线索有效性 “红”字靶子 “绿”字靶子
语义一致 语义不一致 语义一致 语义不一致
反应时(ms) 线索无效 665.8 (106.2) 662.1 (102.8) 718.9 (120.6) 723.1 (123.0)
线索有效 636.7 (104.1) 641.6 (99.9) 692.4 (119.1) 698.4 (115.2)
错误率(%) 线索无效 8.5 (4.5) 6.9 (5.2) 5.9 (5.5) 6.4 (6.3)
线索有效 4.3 (4.3) 5.9 (6.3) 5.3 (6.2) 5.1 (6.2)
  
  
因变量指标/线索有效性 红色靶子 绿色靶子
线索有效 线索无效 线索有效 线索无效
反应时(ms) 语义一致 509.0 (38.1) 484.0 (41.7) 534.7 (40.7) 511.9( 44.2)
语义不一致 500.5 (44.1) 498.1 (47.0) 526.1 (37.5) 528.1 (39.0)
语义无关 499.8 (42.9) 495.8 (51.4) 516.7 (33.0) 515.8 (35.4)
错误率(%) 语义一致 4.0 (2.8) 2.1 (2.8) 8.0 (6.3) 5.7 (7.5)
语义不一致 4.8 (4.7) 4.0 (4.4) 5.6 (4.5) 5.7 (5.8)
语义无关 4.1 (3.1) 5.0 (4.7) 5.8 (4.8) 7.1 (7.6)
  
  
[1] Arexis M., Maquestiaux F., Gaspelin N., Ruthruff E., & Didierjean A . ( 2017). Attentional capture in driving displays. British Journal of Psychology, 108( 2), 259-275.
pmid: 28369841 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/bjop.2017.108.issue-2
[2] Barratt D., & Bundesen. C . ( 2012). Attentional capture by emotional faces is contingent on attentional control settings. Cognition and Emotion, 26( 7), 1223-1237.
pmid: 22416914 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699931.2011.645279
[3] Binder J. R., Conant L. L., Humphries C. J., Fernandino L., Simons S. B., & Aguilar M., & Desai R. H . ( 2016). Toward a brain-based componential semantic representation. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 33( 3-4), 130-174.
pmid: 27310469 url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02643294.2016.1147426
[4] Bottini R., Bucur M., & Crepaldi D . ( 2016). The nature of semantic priming by subliminal spatial words: Embodied or disembodied? Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 145( 9), 1160-1176.
pmid: 27359130 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xge0000197
[5] Broadbent D. E. ( 1958). Perception and communication. Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.
[6] Burra N., Barras C., Coll S. Y., & Kerzel D . ( 2016). Electrophysiological evidence for attentional capture by irrelevant angry facial expressions. Biological Psychology, 120, 69-80.
pmid: 27568328 url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0301051116302745
[7] Chee M. W. L., Weekes B., Lee K. M., Soon C. S., Schreiber A., & Hoon J. J., & Chee M . ( 2000). Overlap and dissociation of semantic processing of Chinese characters, English words, and pictures: Evidence from fMRI. Neuroimage, 12( 4), 392-403.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053811900906311
[8] Eimer M. &Kiss M. . ( 2008). Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20( 8), 1423-1433.
url: http://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/10.1162/jocn.2008.20099
[9] Eimer M., & Kiss M. , ( 2010). Top-down search strategies determine attentional capture in visual search: Behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72( 4), 951-962.
[10] Folk C. L., Remington R. W., & Johnston J. C . ( 1992). Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18( 4), 1030-1044.
pmid: 1431742 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-1523.18.4.1030
[11] Folk C. L., Remington R. W., & Wright J. H . ( 1994). The structure of attentional control: Contingent attentional capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 20( 2), 317-329.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-1523.20.2.317
[12] Folk C.L., &Remington R. ,( 1998). Selectivity in distraction by irrelevant featural singletons: Evidence for two forms of attentional capture. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 24( 3), 847-858.
[13] Folk, C. L., &Remington R.W, . ( 2008). Bottom-up priming of top-down attentional control settings. Visual Cognition, 16( 2-3), 215-231.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506280701458804
[14] Folk C.L., &Anderson B.A . ( 2010). Target-uncertainty effects in attentional capture: Color-singleton set or multiple attentional control settings? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17( 3), 421-426.
[15] Gallese V., &Lakoff G. , ( 2005). The brain's concepts: The role of the sensory-motor system in conceptual knowledge. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22( 3-4), 455-479.
pmid: 21038261 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02643290442000310
[16] Giammarco M., Paoletti A., Guild E. B., &Al-Aidroos N . ( 2014). Contingent attentional capture by stimuli that match long-term memory representations. Journal of Vision, 14( 10), 645.
url: http://jov.arvojournals.org/Article.aspx?doi=10.1167/14.10.645
[17] Giammarco M., Paoletti A., Guild E. B., &Al-Aidroos N . ( 2016). Attentional capture by items that match episodic long-term memory representations. Visual Cognition, 24( 1), 78-101
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ref/10.1080/13506285.2016.1195470
[18] Glickman M., &Lamy D. ,( 2018). Attentional capture by irrelevant emotional distractor faces is contingent on implicit attentional settings. Cognition and Emotion, 32( 2), 303-314
[19] Gluckman M., &Johnson S.P, . ( 2013). Attentional capture by social stimuli in young infants. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 527.
pmid: 3744870 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23966966
[20] Goodhew S. C., Kendall W., Ferber S., & Pratt J . ( 2014). Setting semantics: Conceptual set can determine the physical properties that capture attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76( 6), 1577-1589.
pmid: 24824982 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-014-0686-3
[21] Guo Y. N., You X. Q., & Li Y . ( 2016). The role of stimulus type and semantic category-level attentional set in sustained inattentional blindness. Japanese Psychological Research, 58( 4), 332-341.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/jpr.2016.58.issue-4
[22] Hill R.A., & Barton R.A . ( 2005). Psychology: Red enhances human performance in contests. Nature, 435, 293.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/435293a
[23] Huang W. Y., Su Y. L., Zhen Y. F., & Zhe Q . ( 2016). The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture. Psychophysiology,53( 5), 650-662.
pmid: 26879628 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.12615
[24] Huang X. T., Huang W., & Li X. R . ( 1991). The symbolic implication of colors to the Chinese. Journal of Psychological Science, ( 6), 1-7.
[24] [ 黄希庭, 黄巍, 李小融 . ( 1991). 关于中国人颜色情调的研究. 心理科学, ( 6), 1-7.]
[25] Huang Y. M., Baddeley A., & Young A. W . ( 2008). Attentional capture by emotional stimuli is modulated by semantic processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception and Performance, 34( 2), 328-339.
pmid: 18377174 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.328
[26] Institute of Language Teaching and Research. ( 1986). A frequency dictionary of Modern Chinese. Beijing, China: Beijing Language Institute Press.
[26] [ 北京语言学院语言教学研究所. ( 1986). 现代汉语频率词典. 北京: 北京语言学院出版社.]
[27] Inukai T., &Kawahara J.I . ( 2012). Sex differences in attentional capture (summary of awarded presentation at the 30th annual meeting). The Japanese Journal of Psychonomic Science, 31( 1), 89-90.
[28] Kiss M., &Eimer M. , ( 2011). Attentional capture by size singletons is determined by top-down search goals. Psychophysiology, 48( 6), 784-787.
pmid: 21539576 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/psyp.2011.48.issue-6
[29] Koivisto M. &Revonsuo A. , ( 2007). How meaning shapes seeing. Psychological Science, 18( 10), 845-849.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01989.x
[30] Li X. M., He P., & Liu L. Y . ( 2016). Red graphical effect in risk avoidance behavior. Advances in Psychological Science, 24( 3), 351-355.
[30] [ 李晓明, 和平, 刘林英 . ( 2016). 风险回避行为中的“红色图形效应”. 心理科学进展, 24( 3), 351-355.]
[31] Liu L., & Bai X.J . ( 2016). The effects of attentional control setting and types of cues on attentional capture. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 9), 1093-1104.
url: 研究点分析
[31] [ 刘丽, 白学军 . ( 2016). 注意控制定势和线索类型在注意捕获中的作用. 心理学报, 48( 9), 1093-1104.]
url: 研究点分析
[32] Malcolm G. L., Rattinger M., & Shomstein S . ( 2016). Intrusive effects of semantic information on visual selective attention. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78( 7), 2066-2078.
pmid: 5013139 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5013139/
[33] Preston S.D., &Stansfield R.B . ( 2008). I know how you feel: Task-irrelevant facial expressions are spontaneously processed at a semantic level. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8( 1), 54-64.
[34] Reeder R. R., van Zoest W., & Peelen M. V . ( 2015). Involuntary attentional capture by task-irrelevant objects that match the search template for category detection in natural scenes. Attention Perception & Psychophysics, 77( 4), 1070-1080.
[35] Remington R. W., Folk C. L., & McLean J. P . ( 2001). Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention? Perception & Psychophysics, 63( 2), 298-307.
pmid: 11281104 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03194470
[36] Schmidt J.R . ( 2014). Contingencies and attentional capture: The importance of matching stimulus informativeness in the item-specific proportion congruent task. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 540.
[37] Schmidt L. J., Belopolsky A. V., & Theeuwes J . ( 2015). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition and Emotion, 29( 4), 687-694.
pmid: 24899117 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/02699931.2014.924484
[38] Su L., Bowman H., & Barnard P . ( 2007) Attentional capture by meaning: A multi-level modelling study. Proceedings of the 29th Meeting of the Annual Cognitive Science Society. Nashville Tennesse, 1521-1526.
[39] Sun S. Z., Shen J., Shaw M., Cant J. S., & Ferber S . ( 2015). Automatic capture of attention by conceptually generated working memory templates. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,77( 6), 1841-1847.
pmid: 25944451 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/s13414-015-0918-1
[40] Theeuwes J . ( 1991). Cross-dimensional perceptual selectivity. Perception & Psychophysics, 50( 2), 184-193.
[41] Theeuwes J .( 2004). Top-down search strategies cannot override attentional capture. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11( 1), 65-70.
[42] Wang H.Y . ( 2009). The influence of semantic relevancy on attentional capture (Unpublished Master’s Thesis). China:Northeast Normal University.
[42] [ 王慧媛 . ( 2009). 语义关联对注意捕获的影响(硕士学位论文). 东北师范大学.]
[43] Wang H. Y., Zhang M., & Sui J . ( 2014). The Effect of Cue-Target Relevance and Search Strategies on Attentional Capture. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 2), 185-195.
[43] [ 王慧媛, 张明, 隋洁 . ( 2014). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用. 心理学报, 46( 2), 185-195.]
[44] Wang H. Y., Sui J., & Zhang M . ( 2016). The effect of cue-target relevance and search strategies on attentional capture: Evidence from meaning cues. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 48( 7), 783-793.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201607003
[44] [ 王慧媛, 隋洁, 张明 . ( 2016). 线索靶子关联和搜索策略对注意捕获的作用——来自意义线索的证据. 心理学报, 48( 7), 783-793.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201607003
[45] Ye C. X., Lu J. C., Zhang J. F., Wang J., Tian L. L., & Liu Q . ( 2017). Strategic inhibition of distractors with visual working memory contents after involuntary attention capture. Scientific Reports.
[46] Zhang T.X., & Han B.X . ( 2017). Red is more sexy: Factors and evolutional process. Advances in Psychological Science, 25( 6), 1069-1076.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201706016
[46] [ 张腾霄, 韩布新 . ( 2017). 红色更性感:影响因素与进化基础. 心理科学进展, 25( 6), 1069-1076.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201706016
[1] LIU Li; BAI Xuejun. The effects of attentional control setting and types of cues on attentional capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1093-1104.
[2] WANG Huiyuan; SUI Jie; ZHANG Ming. The effect of cue-target relevance and search strategies on attentional capture: Evidence from meaning cues[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 783-793.
[3] BAI Xuejun; LIU Li; SONG Juan; GUO Zhiying. The role of feature and spatial location in value-driven attentional capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1357-1369.
[4] HU Yanmei; ZHANG Ming. Electrophysiological evidence for memory-based attentional capture and memory-based attentional rejection effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 12-21.
[5] ZHANG Wei; ZHOU Bingping; ZANG Ling; MO Shuliang. The Attentional Capture of Internet Addicts under the Guidance of Visual Working Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1223-1234.
[6] WANG Huiyuan;ZHANG Ming;SUI Jie. The Effect of Cue-Target Relevance and Search Strategies on Attentional Capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 185-195.
[7] LIU Li; LI Yun; LI Lihong; BAI Xuejun. The Effect of Top-down Attentional Control Setting on Attentional Capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(10): 1442-1453.
[8] MA Lijun;ZHANG Jijia;DU Kai. Effect of Semantic Decomposability on Understanding of Chinese Three-Character Idioms[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 391-405.
[9] WEI Ping;KANG Guan-Lan. The Interaction between Perceptual Load and the Target-Distractor Distance in Regulating Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(11): 1454-1462.
[10] Chen Xuqian,Zhang Jijia. Time Course of Phonological and Semantic Activation: Perceiving Chinese Words without Initial syllable in Sentence Context(Ⅰ)[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 575-581.
[11] Zhang Jijia,Chen Xuqian. TIME COURSE OF PHONOLOGICAL AND SEMANTIC ACTIVATION: PERCEIVING CHINESE WORDS WITHOUT INITIAL SYLLABLE IN SENTENCE CONTEXT (Ⅱ)[J]. , 2005, 37(05): 582-589.
[12] Zhou Xiaolin, Qu Yanxuan, Shu Hua, Gareth Gaskell, William Marslen-Wilson. Constraints of Lexical Tone on Semantic Activation in Chinese Spoken Word Recognition[J]. , 2004, 36(04): 379-392.
[13] Liang Hua, Chen Xiangchuan, Zhang Daren. STIMULUS-DRIVEN ATTENTIONAL CAPTURE UNDER DIFFERENT ATTENTION LOAD[J]. , 2004, 36(01): 31-36.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech