Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (9) : 975-984     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00975
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The influence of different status of the observer’s responding hands on observational learning in the joint task
Xiaolei SONG1(),Yangyang LI2,Qian YANG1,Xuqun YOU1()
1 School of Psychology, Shaanxi Normal University; Shaanxi Key Laboratory of Behavior and Cognitive Neuroscience, Xi’an 710062, China;
2 Henan Police College, Zhengzhou 450046, China
Download: PDF(761 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Observational learning, which refers to improving performance by observation without physical practice, is one of the most important human capacities. Although a large amount of studies have shown that observational and physical practice can both acquire a comparable motor learning in individual context, and the status of the responding hands play a crucial role in this process, few researches focused on observational learning in joint context. Hence we presented three experiments that adopted a joint Simon task to explore the conditions under which observational learning occurred by assessing whether it is affected by the status of the observer’s responding hands.
By adopting a modified version of the social transfer of learning paradigm, three behavioral experiments were conducted to explore the emergence of observational learning under joint task and the influence of status of body-parts (response hands) on observational learning. The aim of experiment 1 was to investigate whether observational learning took place in joint context. In Experiment 2, the status of the observer’s hands were changed in observational learning. It should be noted that during practice phase, observers positioned their hands constrained on the knee in front of them. In Experiment 3, the possible influence of view range furtherly on observational learning was clarified by manipulating the view range and status of the observer’s hands. Specifically, the observer was asked to constrain his hands behind the back in practice phase.
The results above demonstrated that either the observer or the actor in switch condition showed a significant joint Simon effect, while both of them didn’t show this effect in non-switch condition. Contrast to the condition in which the observer’s hands were free, the joint Simon effect increased in constrained condition when the observer’s hands were within his sight. Meanwhile, the same effect was also present when the observer’s hands constrained behind the back as compared to in front of them.
It can be concluded that both observational learning and physical keypress practice in joint context could transfer into comparable motor learning which has an effect on the subsequent joint task. Moreover, the occurrence of observational learning depends on the potential motor abilities of the observer, which suggests that changes in body status affect the observer’s cognitive performance in subsequent joint task whether in or out of his sight. All of above provide empirical research for embodied cognition.

Keywords joint Simon task      observational learning      social transfer of learning effect      embodied cognition     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Fund: 
Issue Date: 27 July 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Xiaolei SONG
Yangyang LI
Qian YANG
Xuqun YOU
Cite this article:   
Xiaolei SONG,Yangyang LI,Qian YANG, et al. The influence of different status of the observer’s responding hands on observational learning in the joint task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00975     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I9/975
  
实验 实验条件 观察者 行动者
一致 不一致 JSE 一致 不一致 JSE
1 非转换组 反应时 388.68 (52.11) 399.44 (52.74) 10.77 383.48 (54.93) 387.10 (54.57) 3.62
正确率 98.50 (2.71) 98.67 (2.18) -0.17 99.50 (1.20) 98.17 (2.00) 1.33*
转换组 反应时 388.39 (21.55) 416.63 (25.87) 28.24 *** 393.87 (39.70) 438.30 (47.98) 44.44***
正确率 99.50 (1.27) 96.75 (3.04) 2.75* 98.58 (1.82) 98.58 (1.80) 0.09
2 双手缚于身前 反应时 366.51 (29.25) 395.04 (31.28) 28.53 *** 387.02 (40.41) 398.58 (39.75) 11.56
正确率 99.08 (1.66) 98.83 (1.72) 0.25 99.42 (1.66) 98.67 (1.60) 0.75
3 双手缚于身后 反应时 374.30 (48.80) 400.89 (54.56) 26.60*** 395.35 (48.04) 396.18 (55.37) 0.83
正确率 98.67 (1.97) 96.75 (2.35) 1.92* 99.25 (1.30) 98.00 (2.12) 1.25
  
  
1 Ambrosini E., Sinigaglia C., & Costantini M . ( 2012). Tie my hands, tie my eyes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38( 2), 263-266.
pmid: 22201461 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0026570
2 Baess, P., &Prinz, W. ( 2015). My partner is also on my mind: Social context modulates the N1 response. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 1), 105-113.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-014-4092-9
3 Bandura, A. ( 1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
4 Brass M., Bekkering H., Wohlschl?ger A., & Prinz W . ( 2000). Compatibility between observed and executed finger movements: Comparing symbolic, spatial, and imitative cues. Brain and Cognition, 44( 2), 124-143.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0278262600912259
5 Chen Y. M., Guo T. Y., He L. G., & Yan L. S . ( 2014). A Review on the Research on Embodied Cognitive. Psychological Exploration, 34 ( 6), 483-487.
url: http://www.en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTotal-XLXT201406001.htm
6 [ 陈玉明, 郭田友, 何立国, 燕良轼 . ( 2014). 具身认知研究述评. 心理学探新, 34( 6), 483-487.]
7 Cousineau, D. ( 2005). Confidence intervals in within-subject designs: A simpler solution to Loftus and Masson’s method. Tutorials in Quantitative Methods for Psychology, 1( 1), 42-45.
url: http://www.tqmp.org/RegularArticles/vol01-1/p042
8 Cross E. S., Kraemer D. J. M., de C Hamilton, A. F., Kelley W. M., & Grafton S. T . ( 2009). Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. Cerebral Cortex, 19( 2), 315-326.
pmid: 2638791 url: https://academic.oup.com/cercor/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/cercor/bhn083
9 Dolk T., Hommel B., Colzato L. S., Schütz-bosbach S., Prinz W., & Liepelt R . ( 2014). The joint simon effect: a review and theoretical integration. Frontiers in Psychology, 5( 974), 1-10.
pmid: 4155780 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4155780/
10 Ferraro L., Iani C., Mariani M., Nicoletti R., Gallese V., & Rubichi S . ( 2012). Look what I am doing: does observational learning take place in evocative task-sharing situations? PlosOne, 7( 8), e43311.
11 Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P . ( 2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9( 3), 558-565.
12 Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., & Prinz W . ( 2001). The theory of event coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24( 5), 849-937.
url: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0140525X01000103
13 Iani C., Rubichi S., Ferraro L., Nicoletti R., & Gallese V . ( 2013). Observational learning without a model is influenced by the observer’s possibility to act: Evidence from the Simon task. Cognition, 128(1), 26-34.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027713000565
14 Liepelt, R. ( 2014). Interacting hands: The role of attention for the joint Simon effect. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1462.
pmid: 4269294 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25566140
15 Lugli L., Iani C., Milanese N., Sebanz N., & Rubichi S . ( 2015). Spatial parameters at the basis of social transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance, 41( 3), 840-849.
pmid: 25867503 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2015-15253-001/
16 Milanese N., Iani C., & Rubichi S . ( 2010). Shared learning shapes human performance: transfer effects in task sharing. Cognition, 116( 1), 15-22.
pmid: 20381024 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027710000740
17 Milanese N., Iani C., Sebanz N., & Rubichi S . ( 2011). Contextual determinants of the social-transfer- of-learning- effect. Experimental Brain Research, 211( 3-4), 415-422.
pmid: 21512798 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-011-2679-y
18 Neumann, R., &Strack, F. ( 2000). Approach and avoidance: The influence of proprioceptive and exteroceptive cues on encoding of affective information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79( 1), 39-48.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.39
19 Paulus M., van Dam W., Hunnius S., Lindemann O., & Bekkering H . ( 2011). Action-effect binding by observational learning. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 18( 5), 1022-1028.
pmid: 21779944 url: http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13423-011-0136-3
20 Prinz, W. ( 1997). Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 9( 2), 129-154.
21 Sartori L., Cavallo A., Bucchioni G., & Castiello U . ( 2012). From simulation to reciprocity: The case of complementary actions. Social Neuroscience, 7( 2), 146-158.
pmid: 21777110 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/17470919.2011.586579
22 Sebanz N., Knoblich G., & Prinz W . ( 2003). Representing others' actions: Just like one's own? Cognition, 88( 3), B11-B21.
pmid: 12804818 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S001002770300043X
23 Sellaro R., Treccani B., Rubichi S., & Cubelli R . ( 2013). When co-action eliminates the Simon effect: Disentangling the impact of co-actor's presence and task sharing on joint-task performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 844.
24 Stenzel A., Dolk T., Colzato L. S., Sellaro R., Hommel B., & Liepelt R . ( 2014). The joint simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 595.
25 Thura D., Hadj-Bouziane F., Meunier M., & Boussaoud D . ( 2008). Hand position modulates saccadic activity in the frontal-eye field. Behavioural Brain Research, 186( 1), 148-153.
pmid: 17881066 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0166432807003968
26 Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E . ( 1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: compatibility and incompatibility of Responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1( 3), 219-230.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2
27 Wen, T., &Hsieh, S. ( 2015). Neuroimaging of the joint Simon effect with believed biological and non-biological co-actors. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 483.
pmid: 4555067 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4555067/
28 Witt J. K., Kemmerer D., Linkenauger S. A., & Culham J . ( 2010). A functional role for motor simulation in identifying tools. Psychological Science, 21( 9), 1215-1219.
pmid: 20639402 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797610378307
29 Yamaguchi M., Wall H. J., & Hommel B . ( 2016). Sharing tasks or sharing actions? Evidence from the joint Simon task. Psychological Research, 82( 2), 385-3.
pmid: 27826655 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27826655/
30 Ye, H. S . ( 2010). Embodied cognition: A new approach in cognitive psychology. Advances in Psychological Science, 18( 5), 705-710.
url: http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-XLXD201005001.htm
31 [ 叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知:认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18( 5), 705-710.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/71135X/201107/33670466.html
[1] Zhongyi YI,Wendeng YANG,Haosheng YE. Influence of soft and hard tactical experiences on gender role cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[2] YE Haosheng, MA Yankun, YANG Wendeng.  Body and cognitive representation: Understandings and divergences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 462-472.
[3] LIU Wenjuan; SHEN Manqiong; LI Ying; WANG Ruiming. The interaction between emotional concept processing and emotional face perception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 163-173.
[4] LIU Siyun; ZHOU Zongkui; LI Na. The Impact of Cyber-Experience on Action Verb Processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 992-1003.
[5] LI Xiaodan; YE Haosheng. Embodied Cognition in Ancient Chinese Confucianism and Taoism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 702-710.
[6] TANG Peipei; YE Haosheng; DU Jianzheng. The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
[7] YE Haosheng. Theoretical Analysis of the Meaning of Embodiment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(7): 1032-1042.
[8] LI Huijuan;ZHANG Jijia;ZHANG Ruixin. The Vertically Spatial Metaphors of Kinship words of Qiang Nationality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 481-491.
[9] WU Xiangci; WANG Enguo. Power Shifts Attention on A Vertical Dimension: An ERP Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1871-1879.
[10] SHEN Manqiong; XIE Jiushu; ZHANG Kun; Li Ying; ZENG Chuxuan; WANG Ruiming. The Spatial Metaphor of Bilingual Affective Concepts Processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1671-1681.
[11] WANG Zeng;LU Zhongyi. The Vertical Spatial Metaphor of Moral Concepts and Its Influence on Cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 538-545.
[12] YE Haosheng. Cognition and Body: A Perspective from Theoretical Psychology[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 481-488.
[13] ZHANG Pan;LU Zhongyi. The Mental Representation of Color Information in Sentence Comprehension[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(4): 406-415.
[14] SU Dequan;ZHONG Yuan;ZENG Hong;YE Haosheng. Embodied Semantic Processing of Chinese Action Idioms: Evidence from fMRI Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1187-1199.
[15] LU Zhong-Yi,BA Xiao-Na,LI Xing-Fen. Dynamic Simulation of Emotion in Language Comprehension[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(8): 995-1003.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech