Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (9) : 965-974     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00965
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Is implicit knowledge abstract? Evidence from implicit sequence learning transfer
Hui DAI1,Chuanlin ZHU2,Dianzhi LIU2()
1 Student Affairs Office, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 210000, China
2 School of Education, Soochow University, Suzhou 215000, China
Download: PDF(1610 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Studies have shown that whether implicit knowledge is abstract is still under dispute, and transfer is an effective way to test this. The present study was designed to investigate transfer of implicit sequence knowledge under five different RSI conditions, to explore the status of consciousness underlying transfer, and then to prove the abstractness of implicit knowledge.
Ninety volunteers (college students) were randomly assigned to five experimental groups. Twelve randomly selected college students were assigned to the control group. A classic implicit sequence learning task was adopted. Participants were required to press a key corresponding to the spatial location of the dark dot as quickly and accurately as possible. Each experimental group completed this task under one of five RSI conditions (0 ms, 250 ms, 500 ms, 750 ms, and 1000 ms). The task included a training and a transfer phase. In both phases, the spatial location arrangement for the sequence of dots followed the second-order conditional rule, but differed slightly. The control group did not undergo the training phase and were tested directly during the transfer phase, with the procedure being similar to that of its matched experimental group. Pure and novelty-influenced learning magnitude, two different indexes of implicit learning magnitude, were adopted. Similarly, two different indexes of implicit transfer magnitude, pure and novelty-influenced, were adopted.
The results showed: (1) By using a transfer design changed first-order structure, we found that the migration occurs with the increase of RSI, which proves that the implicit knowledge is abstract. (2) Implicit sequence learning is a necessary condition for migration learning. The novelty stimulus promotes implicit learning and transfer, and the effect is more obvious when RSI is small. (3) Moreover, in this study, a special type of fringe consciousness was found (RSI = 500 ms, 750 ms, 1000 ms), in which people can transfer knowledge that has cognitive flexibility and availability, but they cannot orally report the specific rules.
By using a transfer design changed first-order structure, this study proves that implicit knowledge is abstract under the fringe consciousness. Additionally, the effects of RSI、implicit sequence learning, and stimulus novelty on implicit learning and transfer were proved. This study provides abundant first-hand information to the field of implicit learning.

Keywords implicit knowledge      implicit sequence learning      transfer      RSI      fringe consciousness     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Fund: 
Issue Date: 27 July 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Hui DAI
Chuanlin ZHU
Dianzhi LIU
Cite this article:   
Hui DAI,Chuanlin ZHU,Dianzhi LIU. Is implicit knowledge abstract? Evidence from implicit sequence learning transfer[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 965-974.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00965     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I9/965
组别 0 ms 250 ms 500 ms 750 ms 1000 ms 共计
实验组 26 22 26 24 26 124
控制组 25 24 26 75
  
  
  
  
RSI Block contrast t df p Cohen’s d
RSI = 500 ms B5-B4 0.91 24 0.37 0.18
B5-B6 1.94 24 0.66 0.36
RSI = 750 ms B5-B4 0.20 23 0.84 0.04
B5-B6 1.67 23 0.11 0.32
RSI = 1000 ms B5-B4 0.09 25 0.93 0.02
B5-B6 1.12 25 0.27 0.22
  
学习量和迁移量 RSI
0 ms 250 ms 500 ms 750 ms 1000 ms
纯粹学习量(RT8-RT7) 21.95 (5.12) 19.90 (5.05) 11.37 (3.94) 11.74 (2.11) 14.60 (3.83)
受新异刺激影响的学习量(RT8-RT9) 37.93 (5.71) 14.36 (5.11) 16.57 (3.03) 16.02 (2.74) 16.43 (3.70)
纯粹迁移量(RT15-RT14) 5.63 (8.91) 12.42 (6.29) 13.23 (4.40) 10.01 (4.81) 12.83 (2.45)
受新异刺激影响的迁移量(RT15-RT16) 5.29 (3.01) 16.63 (5.81) 16.52 (5.31) 19.35 (4.35) 19.84 (3.72)
  
  
1 Abrahamse, E, L., & Verwey, W, B. ( 2008). Context dependent learning in the serial RT task. Psychological Research, 72( 4), 397-404.
pmid: 2367391 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-007-0123-5
2 Chen H., Yang Z. L., Han Y. C., & Zeng Y. J . ( 2009). A review of researches on the consciousness of implicit learning. Psychological Science, 32(4), 891-893.
3 [ 陈寒, 杨治良, 韩玉昌, 曾玉君 . ( 2009). 内隐学习的意识性研究述评. 心理科学, 32( 4), 891-893.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/Main/Detail.aspx?id=31224088
4 D'Angelo, M C., Milliken B., Jiménez L., & Lupiá?ez J . ( 2013). Implementing flexibility in automaticity: Evidence from context-specific implicit sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22( 1), 64-81.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810012002115
5 Destrebecqz, A., & Cleeremans, A. ( 2001). Can sequence learning be implicit? New evidence with the process dissociation procedure. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8( 2), 343-350.
6 Dienes Z., Kuhn G., Guo X., & Jones, C.( 2011). Communicating structure, affect, and movement. In P. Rebuschat, M. Rohmeier, J. A. Hawkins, & I. Cross(Eds.), Language and music as cognitive systems (pp. 156-169). Oxford University Press.
7 Dienes, Z., & Longuet-Higgins, C. ( 2004). Can musical transformations be implicitly learned? Cognitive Science, 28( 4), 531-558.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1207/s15516709cog2804_2
8 French R. M., & Cleeremans, A.,( 2002) .Implicit learning and consciousness: An empirical, philosophical, and computational consensus in the making (pp160-170) Psychology Press An empirical, philosophical, and computational consensus in the making (pp.160-170). Psychology Press.
9 Frensch, P. A., & Miner, C. S . ( 1994). Effects of presentation rate and individual differences in short-term memory capacity on an indirect measure of serial learning. Memory & Cognition, 22( 1), 95-110.
10 Fu Q., Bin G., Dienes Z., Fu X., & Gao X . ( 2013). Learning without consciously knowing: Evidence from event-related potentials in sequence learning. Consciousness and Cognition, 22( 1), 22-34.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810012002231
11 Fu Q., Dienes Z., & Fu X . ( 2010). Can unconscious knowledge allow control in sequence learning? Consciousness and Cognition, 19( 1), 462-474.
pmid: 19910211 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810009001536
12 Guo, X. Y., & Yang, Z. L . ( 2002). The research history of implicit learning. Psychological Development and Education, 18( 3), 85-90.
13 [ 郭秀艳, 杨治良 . ( 2002). 内隐学习的研究历程. 心理发展与教育, 18( 3), 85-90.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlfzyjy200203016
14 Huang J., Dai H., Ye J., Zhu C., Li Y., & Liu D . ( 2017). Impact of response stimulus interval on transfer of non-local dependent rules in implicit learning: An ERP investigation. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2107.
url: http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02107/full
15 Huang J. P., Zhang J. X., & Liu D Z . ( 2015). The inlfuence of transfer chuck number and position on implicit sequence learning. Journal of Psychological Science, 38( 6), 1326-1333.
16 [ 黄建平, 张剑心, 刘电芝 . ( 2015). 内隐序列学习中转移组块的数量和位置效应. 心理科学, 38( 6), 1326-1333.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201506/666658001.html
17 James, W. ( 2010). The principles of psychology, Vol I. In Dover books on philosophy & psychology. Mineola, New York: Dover Publications.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2004-16192-000
18 Jiménez L., Vaquero J. M., & Lupiá?ez J . ( 2006). Qualitative differences between implicit and explicit sequence learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 32( 3), 475-490.
pmid: 16719660 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.32.3.475
19 Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R . ( 1996). Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn, 22( 1), 169-181.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.22.1.169
20 Kuhn, G., & Dienes, Z. ( 2005). Implicit learning of nonlocal musical rules: Implicitly learning more than chunks. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn., 31( 6), 1417-1432.
pmid: 16393055 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.31.6.1417
21 Kuhn, G., & Dienes, Z. ( 2006). Differences in the types of musical regularity learnt in incidental- and intentional- learning conditions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59( 10), 1725-1744.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470210500438361
22 Mathews R. C., Buss R. R., Stanley W. B., Blanchardfields F., Cho J. Ryeul., & Druhan B . ( 1989). Role of implicit and explicit processes in learning from examples: A synergistic effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 15( 6), 1083-1100.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1083
23 Norman, E. ( 2010). “The Unconscious” in current psychology. European Psychologist, 15( 3), 193-201.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/epp/15/3/193/
24 Norman E., Price M. C., & Duff S. C . ( 2006). Fringe consciousness in sequence learning: The influence of individual differences. Consciousness and Cognition, 15( 4), 723-760.
pmid: 16154763 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S105381000500084X
25 Norman E., Price M. C., Duff S. C., & Mentzoni R. A . ( 2007). Gradations of awareness in a modified sequence learning task. Consciousness and Cognition, 16( 4), 809-837.
pmid: 17433717 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053810007000153
26 Reber, A. S . ( 1976). Implicit learning of artifical grammars. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 6( 6), 855-863.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/222438973_Implicit_learning_of_artificial_grammars
27 Pothos, E. M . (2007). Theories of artificial grammar learning. Psychological Bulletin, 133( 2), 227-244.
pmid: 17338598 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0033-2909.133.2.227
28 Price, M. C . ( 2002). Measuring the fringes of experience. Psyche, 7( 7), 8-16.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2002-04943-001
29 Rünger, D. ( 2012). How sequence learning creates explicit knowledge: The role of response-stimulus interval. Psychological Research, 76( 5), 579-590.
pmid: 21786123 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-011-0367-y
30 Rünger, D., &Frensch, P. A . ( 2008). How incidental sequence learning creates reportable knowledge: The role of unexpected events. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 34( 5), 1011-1026.
pmid: 18763888 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0012942
31 Rünger, D., &Frensch, P. A . ( 2010). Defining consciousness in the context of incidental sequence learning: Theoretical considerations and empirical implications. Psychological Research PRPF, 74( 2), 121-137.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-008-0225-8
32 Sanchez D. J., Yarnik E. N., & Reber P. J . ( 2015). Quantifying transfer after perceptual-motor sequence learning: How inflexible is implicit learning? Psychological Research, 79( 2), 327-343.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-014-0561-9
33 Schwarb, H., & Schumacher, E. H . ( 2010). Implicit sequence learning is represented by stimulus—response rules. Memory & Cognition, 38( 6), 677-688.
pmid: 20852232 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20852232
34 Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. ( 2014). Implicit transfer of reversed temporal structure in visuomotor sequence learning. Cognitive Science, 38( 3), 565-579.
pmid: 24215394 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cogs.2014.38.issue-3
35 Tanaka, K., & Watanabe, K. ( 2015). Effects of learning duration on implicit transfer. Experimental Brain Research, 233( 10), 2767-2776.
pmid: 26070899 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00221-015-4348-z
36 Weiermann, B. Cock, J., & Meier, B. ( 2010). What matters in implicit task sequence learning: Perceptual stimulus features, task sets, or correlated streams of information?. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition, 36( 6), 1492-1509.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0021038
37 Zhang, R. L., Liu, D. Z . ( 2014). The development of graded consciousness in artificial grammar learning. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46( 11), 1649-1660.
url: http://pub.chinasciencejournal.com/article/getArticleRedirect.action?doiCode=10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01649
38 [ 张润来, 刘电芝 . ( 2014). 人工语法学习中意识加工的渐进发展. 心理学报, 46( 11), 1649-1660.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201411005
39 Zhang J. X., Wu Y., Chen X. Y., & Liu D. Z . ( 2014). Probabilistic implict sequence learning differences between individuals with high vs. low openness /feeling. Acta Psychologica Sinica,46( 12), 1793-1804.
40 [ 张剑心, 武燕, 陈心韵, 刘电芝 . ( 2014). 高低情感开放性者概率内隐序列学习进程差异. 心理学报, 46( 12), 1793-1804.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201412001
[1] Xiaolei SONG, Yangyang LI, Qian YANG, Xuqun YOU. The influence of different status of the observer’s responding hands on observational learning in the joint task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 975-984.
[2] Wumei LIU,Liang LEI,Zhiyuan LI,Yun SU,Xiaozhi HUANG. Touch or not touch? Prior touch facilitates consumers’ adoption of new products[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 782-792.
[3] LI Meijia, ZHUANG Danqi, PENG Huamao. The role of surface and structural similarity in analogical reasoning aging: Based on the problem-solving paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1282-1291.
[4] Dong-ni PAN,Daotuan WANG,Xue-bing LI. Cognitive and emotional benefits of emotional dual dimension n-back training based on an APP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1105-1119.
[5] Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168.
[6] ZHU Zude, DUAN Yixing, WANG Suiping.  The baseline fluid intelligence modulated the transfer effect from working memory to fluid intelligence[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1022-1030.
[7] CHEN Leni; WANG Zhen; LUO Ben Nanfeng; LUO Zhengxue. Leader-subordinate extraversion fit and subordinate work engagement: Based on dominance complementarity theory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 710-721.
[8] ZHU Jingyuan; HE Guibing. Risk source matters much in decision-making: Betrayal aversion and the role of need for affiliation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 733-745.
[9] NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[10] YANG Haibo; LIU Dianzhi. Validity and sensitivity analysis of segment recognition task on implicit sequence learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 230-237.
[11] ZHANG Jinghuan; LIU Xin; REN Feifei; SUN Xiangwei; YU Qi. The effects of group diversity and organizational support on group creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1551-1560.
[12] LUO Li; HUANG Min-Er. The age differences of the mediation effect of emotion regulation between traits and emotion[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1455-1466.
[13] WEI Xuhua; LIU Yongmei; CHEN Sixuan. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Team Demographic Diversity and Team Performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1172-1187.
[14] ZHANG Jianxin; WU Yan; CHEN Xinyun; LIU Dianzhi. Probabilistic Implict Sequence Learning Differences between Individuals with High vs. Low Openness /Feeling[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1793-1804 .
[15] ZHANG Quancheng; LIU Yang. The Influence of Information Processing Mode and Information Presentation Pattern on Attraction Effect in Area Comparison Judgments[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1639-1648.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech