Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (7) : 782-792     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00782
|
 Touch or not touch? Prior touch facilitates consumers’ adoption of new products
LIU Wumei1; LEI Liang1; LI Zhiyuan1; SU Yun1; HUANG Xiaozhi2
 (1 School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China) (2 Business School, Guangxi University, Nanning 530000, China)
Download: PDF(402 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   Previous touch literature cannot answer whether prior touching of a new product (i.e. a new watch) can facilitate consumers’ evaluation of another extremely incongruent product (i.e. a new camera). The present research posits that asking consumers to previously touch (versus not touch) an extremely new product (i.e. a new computer mouse) can offer them an opportunity to transfer their learning of the touched new product to understanding another target product’s extremely incongruity, which consequently leads to incongruity resolution and increased evaluation of the target product (H1-H2). This research further posits that the prior-touch strategy will be ineffective when the prior-touched product is conceptually different from the target product (i.e., it is common) (H3), as conceptual disparity inhibits the occurrence of near transfer of learning. We conduct four lab experiments to test these hypotheses. Experiment 1 examined H1-H2 and further tested other alternative explanations including arousal and moods which might affect consumers’ new product evaluation. College students completed a randomly-assigned 3 (form incongruity: congruent vs. moderate vs. extreme) × 2 (prior-touch: touch vs. no touch) two-way between-subjects design, with product evaluation as the DV. This experiment found that prior-touch (versus no such touch) only increased evaluations of the extremely incongruent camera, supporting H1. A bootstrap analysis showed that incongruity resolution rather than arousal or positive mood mediated the effect demonstrated in H1, supporting H2. Experiment 2 examined consumers’ real choices, finding that compared to no prior touching, prior touching an extremely incongruent mug can increase consumers’ subsequent choices of an extremely incongruent computer mouse. Experiment 3 adopted a 2 (prior-evaluated product’s form incongruity: extremely common vs. extremely new) × 2 (prior-touch) × 2 (target product’s form incongruity: congruent vs. extremely incongruent) three-way between-subjects design, using similar procedures of previous experiments. As expected, prior touching an extremely common computer mouse did not change participants’ ability in resolving the extreme incongruity of and did not increase evaluations of the subsequent target watch, supporting H3. In Experiment 4, participants were randomly assigned to one of four type of senses (both touch and see vs. just touch with eyes closed vs. just see without touch vs. no-see, no-touch) conditions to evaluate the target soft drink. This experiment found that it was prior-touching the mouse rather than prior-seeing the mouse that drove the effect observed across Experiments 1-3. Theoretically, this research observes for the first time the carry-over effect of product touch, thus extending existing research on product touch. This research further enriches existing new product research, showing that prior touching an extremely incongruent product can enhance consumers’ evaluations of the subsequent extremely incongruent target product. Managerially, this research has rich implications to new product’s launch and promotion.
Keywords visually new products      prior touch      transfer of learning      incongruity resolution     
ZTFLH:     
  B849: F713.55  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: LIU Wumei, E-mail: wumeijiayou@163.com     E-mail: E-mail: wumeijiayou@163.com
Issue Date: 29 May 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Wumei
LEI Liang
LI Zhiyuan
SU Yun
HUANG Xiaozhi
Cite this article:   
LIU Wumei,LEI Liang,LI Zhiyuan, et al.  Touch or not touch? Prior touch facilitates consumers’ adoption of new products[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 782-792.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00782     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I7/782
[1] LIU Lu, YAN Guoli.  Effect of parafoveal visual attention enhancement in deaf reading: Evidence from disappearing text[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 715-726.
[2] YAN Bihua, LIU Xiaomin, LIU Haozhe.  Landmark attraction effect and landmark repulsion effect on representational momentum in airplane movement scene[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 703-714.
[3] CHEN Wei, LI Junjiao, CAOYANG Jingwen, YANG Yong, Hu Yanjian, ZHENG Xifu.  Effects of prediction error on post-retrieval extinction of fear to compound stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 739-749.
[4] SUN Xin, LI Jian, FU Zhiyu.  Using game log-file to predict students' reasoning ability and mathematical achievement: An application of machine learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 761-770.
[5] XIE Qili, LI Chongjing, QUAN Xiaoshan, HE Fei, JIANG Guangrong.  Couples when young and companions when aged: The relationship between marital attachment and loneliness of left behind elderly[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 771-781.
[6] YI Zhongyi, YANG Wendeng, YE Haosheng.  Influence of soft and hard tactical experiences on gender role cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 793-802.
[7] SHANG Junchen, LIU Zhihui, CHEN Wenfeng, FU Xiaolan.  Influence of aesthetics on unconscious processing of western paintings[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(7): 693-702.
[8] YIN Rong.  When will bystanders support collective actions? The roles of claim legitimacy, protest tactic and expectations of achieving goals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 558-571.
[9] YANG Weixing, ZHANG Tangzheng, LI Hongxia, ZHANG Jiajia, SI Jiwei.  The effect of central executive load on strategy utilization of computational estimation in children with mathematics learning difficulties[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 504-516.
[10] WANG Fengyan.  Questioning the Rice Theory: Also on the internal and external causes of Chinese preference for holistic thinking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 572-582.
[11] LI Biqin, LI Ling, WANG Aijun, ZHANG Ming.  Visual and auditory verbal working memory affects visual attention in the semantic matching[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
[12] WU Meng, CHEN Xinyin, ZHANG Ying, LU Shan, WANG Zhengyan.  Maternal control strategies and children’s compliance among urban and rural-to-urban migrant families[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 517-527.
[13] HU Yue, WANG Bin, MA Hongyu, LI Gai.  Fate control and problem lottery playing: The perspective of meaning maintenance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 549-557.
[14] LU Jiamei, LIU Wei, HE Wen, WANG Junshan, CHEN Nianqu, XIE Dengfen, LEI Kaichun.  Affective diathesis of Chinese contemporary graduate students[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 528-538.
[15] LUO Ting, QIU Ruyi, CHEN Bin, FU Shimin.  The stimulus representation of unconscious information and its temporal characteristics[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 473-482.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech