Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (6) : 622-636     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00622
Reports of Empirical Studies |
Attentional bias towards threatening visual stimuli in a virtual reality-based visual search task
Xiaojun YUAN,Xiaoxia CUI,Zhengcao CAO,Hong KAN,Xiao WANG,Yamin WANG()
Beijing Key Laboratory of “Learning & Cognition”, School of Psychology, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China
Download: PDF(5374 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

Ever since ?hman, Flykt and Esteves published their classic study in 2001, many researchers have replicated their findings regarding attentional bias to threatening stimuli in visual perception research. Based on these findings, psychologists proposed a promising theory called predatory fear, in which the attentional bias to threatening animals is interpreted as evolutionarily adaptive behavior of early mammals and the ancestors of modern humans. However, from an evolutionary perspective, the lack of ecological validity of existing experiments inevitably attenuated the interpretation. The present study aimed to fill the gaps by repeating the classic work in a virtual reality environment.

A virtual reality grove was created with the Virtools virtual reality engine, in which jungles, trees, flowers, and weeds were arranged in the form of a wild grass field. The virtual reality grove was presented with an Oculus Rift DK 2 helmet. Forty participants were instructed to navigate along a path in the grove and search for threatening or non-threatening target stimuli. 3D models of a snake, a spider, a flower, a mushroom, a cicada, and a squirrel were used as stimuli in the search task, among which snake and spider were considered threatening stimuli. All the stimuli were shown in yellow and were assessed by twenty participants not included in the forty participants in search task to ensure they were of similar salience.

To examine attentional bias to threatening stimuli, two experiments were conducted in the same visual search task as reported by ?hman et al. In Experiment 1, as in ?hman et al., the snake or the spider was selected as a target stimulus, and thirteen copies of the flower or the mushroom were used as distracting stimuli, or other combinations of these. Twenty participants were individually presented with the virtual grove and instructed to passively wander along the path in the jungle to search for target stimuli. A fixed camera was set at a uniform speed to simulate the navigation in visual search task. Given that searching for animals took less time than searching for plants ( Soares et al, 2009), flowers and mushrooms were replaced with cicadas and squirrels in Experiment 2. The other twenty participants repeated the experiment procedure. In addition to response time (RT), response distance (RD) was also computed as a compensatory index.

In Experiment 1, the results of RTs revealed that the searching for threatening stimuli (snake and spider) is faster than searching for non-threatening stimuli (mushroom, flower). The RD values showed that participants found the threatening stimuli when they were farther away than the non-threatening stimuli. In Experiment 2, the same results were found even when the distracting stimuli were all animals. The RTs and RDs both confirmed that participants were better at finding snakes and spiders than finding flowers, mushrooms, cicadas, and squirrels.

The total results supported the hypothesis of predatory fear was relatively soundly and the attentional bias to threatening animals, especially snake and spider, was found to be likely to be caused by predatory fear as part of human cognition. These findings provide new evidence for the hypothesis of predatory fear from an evolutionary perspective. In addition, virtual reality was proven to be a suitable technique for assessing the ecological validity of psychological experiments.

Keywords threatening stimuli      attentional bias      visual search      virtual reality      ecological validity     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Yamin WANG     E-mail:
Issue Date: 28 April 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Xiaojun YUAN
Xiaoxia CUI
Zhengcao CAO
Hong KAN
Yamin WANG
Cite this article:   
Xiaojun YUAN,Xiaoxia CUI,Zhengcao CAO, et al. Attentional bias towards threatening visual stimuli in a virtual reality-based visual search task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 622-636.
URL:     OR
因子 丛林搜索场景 Tomb Raider Half Life
存在感 3.83 3.00 3.93
空间存在感 3.83 3.06 3.99
沉浸感 3.31 2.40 3.26
真实感体验 3.04 1.92 2.34
位置 平均数(ms) 标准误
位置5 5306.80 122.41
位置6 5997.55 138.11
位置7 6912.65 119.33
位置15 4935.95 109.64
位置16 5983.80 101.94
位置17 6612.70 141.75
实验 蜘蛛 蘑菇 松鼠
实验1 0.605 (0.002) 0.606 (0.002) 0.605 (0.002) 0.602 (0.002)
实验2 0.605 (0.002) 0.606 (0.002) 0.611 (0.002) 0.605 (0.002)
[1] Buss, D. M . ( 1999). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
[2] Cisler J. M., Bacon A. K., & Williams N. L . ( 2009). Phenomenological characteristics of attentional biases towards threat: A critical review. Cognitive Therapy & Research, 33(2), 221-234.
pmid: 2901130 url:
[3] Cisler J. M., & Koster E. H. W . ( 2010). Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review. Clinical Psychology Review, 30(2), 203-216.
pmid: 2814889 url:
[4] Dudeney J., Sharpe L., & Hunt C . ( 2015). Attentional bias towards threatening stimuli in children with anxiety: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 66-75.
pmid: 26071667 url:
[5] Felnhofer A., Kothgassner O. D., Schmidt M., Heinzle A. K., Beutl L., Hlavacs H., & Kryspin-Exner I . ( 2015). Is virtual reality emotionally arousing? Investigating five emotion inducing virtual park scenarios. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 82, 48-56.
[6] Gibson, J. J . ( 1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
[7] Hansen C. H., & Hansen R. D . ( 1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 54(6), 917-924.
pmid: 3397866 url:
[8] Itti L., & Koch C . ( 2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40(10-12), 1489-1506.
pmid: 1078865422 url:
[9] Janczyk M., Augst S., & Kunde W . ( 2014). The locus of the emotional Stroop effect: A study with the PRP paradigm. Acta Psychologica, 151, 8-15.
pmid: 24904999 url:
[10] Juth P., Lundqvist D., Karlsson A., & ?hman A . ( 2005). Looking for foes and friends: Perceptual and emotional factors when finding a face in the crowd. Emotion, 5(4), 379-395.
pmid: 16366743 url:
[11] Ledoux, J. E . ( 2000). Emotion circuits in the brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 23, 155-184.
[12] Lee D. N., & Kalmus H . ( 1980). The optic flow field: The foundation of vision [and discussion]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 290(1038), 169-179.
[13] Lindsay P. H. , & Norman, D. A.( 1977) . Human information processing: An introduction to psychology New York: Academic Press An introduction to psychology. New York: Academic Press.
[14] LoBue, V. ( 2010). And along came a spider: An attentional bias for the detection of spiders in young children and adults. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107(1), 59-66.
pmid: 20529694 url:
[15] LoBue V., & Rakison D. H . ( 2013). What we fear most: A developmental advantage for threat-relevant stimuli. Developmental Review, 33(4), 285-303.
[16] Matsumoto, E. ( 2010). Bias in attending to emotional facial expressions: Anxiety and visual search efficiency. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 24(3), 414-424.
[17] Mogg K., & Bradley B. P . ( 2006). Time course of attentional bias for fear-relevant pictures in spider-fearful individuals. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 44(9), 1241-1250.
pmid: 16870133 url:
[18] Mogg K., Bradley B. P., & Hallowell N . ( 1994). Attentional bias to threat: Roles of trait anxiety, stressful events, and awareness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A: Human Experimental Psychology, 47(4), 841-864.
pmid: 7809399 url:
[19] ?hman, A. ( 2009). Of snakes and faces: An evolutionary perspective on the psychology of fear. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 50(6), 543-552.?hman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466-478.
[20] ?hman A., Lundqvist D., & Esteves F . ( 2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 80(3), 381-396.
[21] ?hman A., & Mineka S . ( 2001). Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychological Review, 108, 483-522.
[22] ?hman A., Soares S. C., Juth P., Lindstr?m B., & Esteves F . ( 2012). Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: Serpents and hostile humans. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 24(1), 17-32.
[23] Peira N., Golkar A., ?hman A., Anders S., & Wiens S . ( 2012). Emotional responses in spider fear are closely related to picture awareness. Cognition and Emotion, 26(2), 252-260.
pmid: 21973031 url:
[24] Peng D. L. ( 2012). General psychology (4th ed.) . Beijing, China: Beijing Normal University Press.
[24] [ 彭聃龄 . ( 2012). 普通心理学 (第4版). 北京: 北京师范大学出版社.]
[25] Savage R. A., Lipp O. V., Craig B. M., Becker S. I., & Horstmann G . ( 2013). In search of the emotional face: Anger versus happiness superiority in visual search. Emotion, 13(4), 758-768.
pmid: 23527503 url:
[26] Schubert T., Friedmann F., & Regenbrecht H . ( 2001). The experience of presence: Factor analytic insights. Presence, 10(3), 266-281.
[27] Soares, S. C . ( 2012). The lurking snake in the grass: Interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions. Evolutionary Psychology, 10(2), 187-197.
pmid: 22947633 url:
[28] Soares S. C., Esteves F., Lundqvist D., & ?hman A . ( 2009). Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Behaviour Research & Therapy, 47(12), 1032-1042.
pmid: 19695561 url:
[29] Soares S. C., Lindstr?m B., Esteves F., & ?hman A . ( 2014). The hidden snake in the grass: Superior detection of snakes in challenging attentional conditions. PLoS One, 9(12), e114724.
pmid: 4262429 url:
[30] Stormark K. M., & Hugdahl K . ( 1996). Peripheral cuing of covert spatial attention before and after emotional conditioning of the cue. International Journal of Neuroscience, 86(3-4), 225-240.
pmid: 8884393 url:
[31] Stormark K. M., Nordby H., & Hugdahl K . ( 1995). Attentional shifts to emotionally charged cues: Behavioural and ERP data. Cognition & Emotion, 9(5), 507-523.
[32] Sun H. J., Carey D. P., & Goodale M. A . ( 1992). A mammalian model of optic-flow utilization in the control of locomotion. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1), 171-175.
pmid: 1301371 url:
[33] Theeuwes, J. ( 2010). Top-down and bottom-up control of visual selection. Acta Psychologica, 135(2), 77-99.
pmid: 20507828 url:
[34] Thrasher C., & LoBue V . ( 2016). Do infants find snakes aversive? Infants' physiological responses to "fear-relevant" stimuli. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 142, 382-389.
pmid: 26483161 url:
[35] Tooby J., & Cosmides L . ( 1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology & Sociobiology, 11(4-5), 375-424.
[36] Torralba A., Oliva A., Castelhano M. S., & Henderson J. M . ( 2006). Contextual guidance of eye movements and attention in real-world scenes: The role of global features in object search. Psychological Review, 113(4), 766-786.
[37] Tsotsos J. K., Culhane S. M., Kei W. W. Y., Lai Y. Z., Davis N., & Nuflo F . ( 1995). Modeling visual attention via selective tuning. Artificial Intelligence, 78(1-2), 507-545.
[38] Urech A., Krieger T., Chesham A., Mast F. W., & Berger T . ( 2015). Virtual reality-based attention bias modification training for social anxiety: A feasibility and proof of concept study. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 6, 154.
pmid: 4623392 url:
[39] van Le Q., Isbell L. A., Matsumoto J., Nguyen M., Hori E., Maior R. S., … Nishijo H . ( 2013). Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 110(47), 19000-19005.
pmid: 24167268 url:
[40] Vuilleumier P., Armony J. L., Driver J., & Dolan R. J . ( 2003). Distinct spatial frequency sensitivities for processing faces and emotional expressions. Nature Neuroscience, 6(6), 624-631.
pmid: 12740580 url:
[41] Wang F. X., Li W. J., Yan Z. Q., Duan Z. H., & Li H . ( 2015). Children's attention detection to snakes: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(6), 774-786.
[41] [ 王福兴, 李文静, 颜志强, 段朝辉, 李卉 . ( 2015). 幼儿对威胁性刺激蛇的注意觉察: 来自眼动证据. 心理学报, 47(6), 774-786.]
[42] Yiend, J. ( 2010). The effects of emotion on attention: A review of attentional processing of emotional information. Cognition & Emotion, 24(1), 3-47.
[43] Zhang Y., Luo Y., Zhao S. Y., Chen W., & Li H . ( 2014). Attentional bias towards threat: Facilitated attentional orienting or impaired attentional disengagement. Advances in Psychological Science, 22(7), 1129-1138.
[43] [ 张禹, 罗禹, 赵守盈, 陈维, 李红 . ( 2014). 对威胁刺激的注意偏向: 注意定向加速还是注意解除困难?. 心理科学进展, 22(7), 1129-1138.]
[1] LI Biqin, LI Ling, WANG Aijun, ZHANG Ming.  Visual and auditory verbal working memory affects visual attention in the semantic matching[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(5): 483-493.
[2] Qun TAN,Yueyang YIN,Shen LIU,Shangfeng HAN,Qiang XU,Lin ZHANG. The processing advantage of self-positive expression: Evidence from an ERPs study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1120-1130.
[3] LI Yangzhuo, QIAN Haoyue, ZHU Ming, GAO Xiangping.  Self association facilitates attentional inhibition in human visual search[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 28-35.
[4] SUN Juncai; SHI Rong. Attentional bias to crying facial expressions: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 155-163.
[5] ZHANG Bao; HU Cenlou; Huang Sai. What do eye movements reveal about the role of cognitive control in attention guidance from working memory representation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[6] ZHOU Xi; WAN Xiaoang; DU Dikang; XIONG Yilei; HUANG Weixin. Reorientation in uncontinuous virtual reality space[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 924-932.
[7] GUO Jichengsi; WAN Xiaoang. The Effect of Learning in Virtual Path Integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 711-720.
[8] KOU Hui; SU Yanhua; LUO Xiaochun; CHEN Hong. Attentional Bias Toward Face-related Words Among Females with Facial Negative Physical Self: Evidence from An Eye-movement Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(10): 1213-1222.
[9] REN Yanju; SUN Qi. Effects of Visuo-spatial Working Memory Loads on the Real-World Scene Search Performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1613-1627.
[10] MU Bingbing; WAN Xiaoang. The Emotional Distractor Previewing Effect in Visual Search[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(11): 1603-1612.
[11] LIN Ou;WANG Zhengke;MENG Xiangzhi. Visual Perceptual Learning in Chinese Developmental Dyslexia[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(7): 762-772.
[12] ZHANG Bao;HUANG Sai;QI Lu. Working Memory Representation Does Guide Visual Attention: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 139-148.
[13] WENG Chun-Yan,CHEN Hong,ZHU Lan. Attentional Biases Toward Food-Related Information Among Restrained Eaters Based on the Goal Conflict Model of Eating[J]. , 2012, 44(5): 680-689.
[14] LI Hai-Jiang,YANG Juan,JIA Lei,ZHANG Qing-Lin. Attentional Bias in Individuals with Different Level of Self-Esteem[J]. , 2011, 43(08): 907-916.
[15] LI Fu-Hong,CAO Bi-Hua,XIAO Feng,LI Hong. The Role of Inhibit Control in the Process of Rare Target Detection[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 509-518.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech