Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (6) : 592-605     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00592
Reports of Empirical Studies |
The influence of perceptual load on gaze perceptual adaptation aftereffect
Yajun ZHAO1,Zhijun ZHANG2(),Zhifang LIU3,Wei LIU4,Linlin YAN5,Yi TANG6
1 School of Sociology and Psychology, Southwest Minzu University, Chengdu 610041, China
2 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China
3 Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China
4 School of Education, Yunnan Minzu University, Kunming 650504, China
5 Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China
6 Party School of the Chongqing municipal Party committee, Chongqing 400041, China
Download: PDF(1343 KB)   HTML Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

During social communication, eyes gaze indicates the focus of people's attention. There are two types of gaze cue: direct gaze (straight) and averted gaze (left or right), which have different social functions. Previous researchers assume that gaze perception involves two different processing stages. The first stage refers to earlier visual feature analysis of eyes such as luminance contrast and geometry of white sclera and iris. The second stage involves the perceptual integration of eyes’ features and the extraction of gaze direction. However, this assumption ignores the differences in processing mechanism between direct gaze and averted gaze. Other researchers hypothesize that perception of direct gaze is mediated by a fast-track pathway via subcortical face processing route. Direct gaze perception has characteristics of automatic process, such as capturing attention and being processed unconsciously. Its automaticity shows that direct gaze has a processing advantage over averted gaze. We inferred that direct gaze perception was independent of attentional resources, while averted gaze perception required more attentional resources. The present study aimed at investigating how attentional resources affect perception of averted and direct gaze.

We combined Lavie’s perceptual load task and a short-term gaze adaptation paradigm to investigate how attentional resources influence the gaze adaptation aftereffect of direct gaze and averted gaze. Participants attended to a letter string superimposed on gaze adaptor (200 ms), and identified the target letter (X or N) embedded in the letter string of either 6 identical letters (low load) or 6 different letters (high load). Subsequently, a gaze probe was presented for 200 ms. Participants had to make judgements concerning the direction of probe (i.e. leftward, straight, or rightward). Sixteen na?ve participants (8 females) were tested in Experiment 1, which measured the modulation of averted gaze adaptation effect by perceptual loads. And twenty-two na?ve observers (11 females) participated in Experiment 2, which explored the effects of perceptual loads on direct gaze adaptation effect.

The results of Experiment 1 revealed that a significant aftereffect of averted gaze directed toward the adapted side in the low load condition. However, such gaze adaptation effect was eliminated under high load condition. Crucially, the gaze adaptation effect in low load condition was significantly greater than that in high load condition. It was suggested that the extraction of averted gaze direction (leftward or rightward) was modulated by attentional resources (perceptual load). When a demanding competing task has exhausted all available processing capacity, the direction of averted gaze could not be extracted. While the load was low, “spill over” capacity was available to the processing of task-irrelevant gaze direction. Results of Experiment 2 showed a significant direct gaze adaptation effect both under low and high load conditions, which were not significantly different from each other. These results indicated that the perceptual adaptation of direct gaze was not influenced by attentional resources. Although limited processing capacity was fully consumed by a high load task, direct gaze could be processed as well. Compared with averted gaze, processing of direct gaze required fewer attentional resources. Therefore, requirements to attentional resources were different between processing of averted and direct gaze.

In conclusion, the current study demonstrates that the processing of averted gaze direction is not mandatory automatic and it requires some degree of attentional resources. But gaze perception does not require attentional resources for direct gaze. Our findings indicated that processing of averted and direct gaze may be mediated by different underlying mechanisms, although distinct gaze directions are coded by a similar multichannel system with separate channels coding left, direct, and right gaze. Our results replicate and extend recent findings of different processing mechanisms between averted and direct gaze. Moreover, it may promote integration between different gaze perception models, such as multichannel system and fast-track modulator model.

Keywords direct gaze      averted gaze      gaze perception      gaze perceptual adaptation aftereffect      perceptual load     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: Zhijun ZHANG     E-mail: zjzhang@zju.edu.cn
Issue Date: 28 April 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Yajun ZHAO
Zhijun ZHANG
Zhifang LIU
Wei LIU
Linlin YAN
Yi TANG
Cite this article:   
Yajun ZHAO,Zhijun ZHANG,Zhifang LIU, et al. The influence of perceptual load on gaze perceptual adaptation aftereffect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 592-605.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00592     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I6/592
  
  
实验条件与反应 注视方向
L10 L5 D0 R5 R10
适应前基线
向左 0.93 (0.08) 0.58 (0.18) 0.10 (0.08) 0.01 (0.02) 0.01 (0.02)
直视 0.06 (0.07) 0.40 (0.18) 0.78 (0.14) 0.31 (0.17) 0.04 (0.04)
向右 0.01 (0.01) 0.02 (0.04) 0.12 (0.11) 0.68 (0.17) 0.95 (0.05)
低负载-适应L25
向左 0.85 (0.12) 0.42 (0.18) 0.08 (0.09) 0.03 (0.04) 0.00 (0.00)
直视 0.12 (0.10) 0.53 (0.18) 0.73 (0.19) 0.22 (0.13) 0.02 (0.03)
向右 0.03 (0.05) 0.05 (0.07) 0.19 (0.16) 0.75 (0.13) 0.98 (0.03)
低负载-适应R25
向左 0.95 (0.09) 0.68 (0.20) 0.18 (0.11) 0.08 (0.08) 0.02 (0.03)
直视 0.04 (0.08) 0.30 (0.20) 0.75 (0.18) 0.50 (0.20) 0.07 (0.06)
向右 0.01 (0.02) 0.02 (0.04) 0.07 (0.12) 0.42 (0.18) 0.91 (0.07)
高负载-适应L25
向左 0.91 (0.16) 0.51 (0.17) 0.08 (0.06) 0.02 (0.03) 0.00 (0.01)
直视 0.07 (0.13) 0.44 (0.17) 0.73 (0.18) 0.21 (0.12) 0.02 (0.02)
向右 0.02 (0.06) 0.05 (0.10) 0.19 (0.17) 0.77 (0.11) 0.98 (0.02)
高负载-适应R25
向左 0.94 (0.08) 0.64 (0.23) 0.15 (0.16) 0.06 (0.06) 0.01 (0.02)
直视 0.05 (0.07) 0.32 (0.22) 0.73 (0.25) 0.36 (0.22) 0.05 (0.77)
向右 0.01 (0.02) 0.04 (0.08) 0.12 (0.14) 0.58 (0.20) 0.94 (0.76)
  
  
  
实验条件与反应 注视方向
L10 L5 D0 R5 R10
适应前基线
向左 0.94 (0.11) 0.65 (0.18) 0.14 (0.10) 0.04 (0.06) 0.00 (0.01)
直视 0.06 (0.10) 0.33 (0.16) 0.75 (0.16) 0.39 (0.16) 0.06 (0.06)
向右 0.00 (0.01) 0.02 (0.04) 0.11 (0.12) 0.57 (0.18) 0.94 (0.07)
低负载-适应D0
向左 0.98 (0.04) 0.78 (0.14) 0.19 (0.10) 0.05 (0.05) 0.00 (0.01)
直视 0.02 (0.04) 0.21 (0.14) 0.70 (0.18) 0.28 (0.18) 0.05 (0.08)
向右 0.00 (0.01) 0.01 (0.02) 0.11 (0.12) 0.67 (0.20) 0.95 (0.08)
高负载-适应D0
向左 0.97 (0.06) 0.78 (0.18) 0.13 (0.06) 0.04 (0.04) 0.00 (0.01)
直视 0.02 (0.04) 0.20 (0.16) 0.73 (0.18) 0.31 (0.23) 0.04 (0.05)
向右 0.01 (0.05) 0.02 (0.05) 0.14 (0.19) 0.65 (0.24) 0.96 (0.06)
  
  
  
  
[1] Al-Janabi S., & Finkbeiner M . ( 2014). Responding to the direction of the eyes: In search of the masked gaze-cueing effect. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 76, 148-161.
[2] Bayliss A. P., Bartlett J., Naughtin C. K., & Kritikos A . ( 2011). A direct link between gaze perception and social attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 634-644.
pmid: 21038995 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/37/3/634/
[3] Burra N., Hervais-Adelman A., Kerzel D., Tamietto M., de Gelder B., & Pegna A. J . ( 2013). Amygdala activation for eye contact despite complete cortical blindness. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(25), 10483-10489.
pmid: 23785160 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23785160
[4] Burton A. M., Bindemann M., Langton S. R. H., Schweinberger S. R., & Jenkins R . ( 2009). Gaze perception requires focused attention: Evidence from an interference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 108-118.
pmid: 19170474 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xhp/35/1/108/
[5] Calder A. J., Jenkins R., Cassel A., & Clifford C. W. G . ( 2008). Visual representation of eye gaze is coded by a nonopponent multichannel system. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137(2), 244-261.
pmid: 18473657 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/xge/137/2/244/
[6] Cave K. R., & Chen Z . ( 2016). Identifying visual targets amongst interfering distractors: Sorting out the roles of perceptual load, dilution, and attentional zoom. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 78(7), 1822-1838.
pmid: 27250363 url: http://link.springer.com/10.3758/s13414-016-1149-9
[7] Chen A. R., Dong B., Fang Y., Yu C. Y., & Zhang M . ( 2014). The role of cue type in the subliminal gaze-cueing effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 46, 1281-1288.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201409/662258711.html
[7] [ 陈艾睿, 董波, 方颖, 于长宇, 张明 . ( 2014). 线索类型对阈下注视线索效应的影响. 心理学报, 46, 1281-1288.]
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201409/662258711.html
[8] Chen Y. C., & Yeh S. L . ( 2012). Look into my eyes and I will see you: Unconscious processing of human gaze. Consciousness and Cognition, 21(4), 1703-1710.
pmid: 23117220 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23117220
[9] Doherty, M. J . ( 2006). The development of mentalistic gaze understanding. Infant and Child Development, 15, 179-186.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/icd.434/full
[10] Doherty M. J., McIntyre A. H., & Langton S. R. H . ( 2015). Developmentally distinct gaze processing systems: Luminance versus geometric cues. Cognition, 137, 72-80.
pmid: 25618009 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25618009
[11] Duchaine B., Jenkins R., Germine L., & Calder A. J . ( 2009). Normal gaze discrimination and adaptation in seven prosopagnosics. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2029-2036.
pmid: 19467353 url: http://new.med.wanfangdata.com.cn/Paper/Detail?id=PeriodicalPaper_JJ0218109180
[12] Fang F., Murray S. O., & He S . ( 2007). Duration-dependent fMRI adaptation and distributed viewer-centered face representation in human visual cortex. Cerebral Cortex, 17(6), 1402-1411.
pmid: 16905593 url: http://cercor.oxfordjournals.org/content/17/6/1402.full
[13] Frischen A., Bayliss A. P., & Tipper S. P . ( 2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694-724.
pmid: 17592962 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/pmid/17592962
[14] Hu Z. H., Liu Q., Zhao G., & Li H . ( 2013). The measurement of detection superiority of direct gaze affected by stimuli component information. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 45, 1217-1227.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201311003
[14] [ 胡中华, 刘强, 赵光, 李红 . ( 2013). 刺激特征信息影响直视探测优势测量. 心理学报, 45, 1217-1227.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201311003
[15] Hu Z. H., Zhao G., Liu Q., & Li H . ( 2012). The detection superiority of perceived direct gaze in visual search task: Evidence from eye movements. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 44(4), 435-445.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201204002
[15] [ 胡中华, 赵光, 刘强, 李红 . ( 2012). 视觉搜索任务中直视探测优势的眼动研究. 心理学报, 44(4), 435-445.]
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201204002
[16] Insch P. M., Slessor G., Warrington J., & Phillips L. H . ( 2017). Gaze detection and gaze cuing in Alzheimer’s disease. Brain and Cognition, 116, 47-53.
pmid: 28365061 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278262616301944
[17] Jenkins R., Beaver J. D., & Calder A. J . ( 2006). I thought you were looking at me: Direction-specific aftereffects in gaze perception. Psychological Science, 17, 506-513.
pmid: 16771801 url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40064401
[18] Jenkins R., Lavie N., & Driver J . ( 2005). Recognition memory for distractor faces depends on attentional load at exposure. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 12, 314-320.
pmid: 16082812 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03196378
[19] Johnson M. H., Senju A., & Tomalski P . ( 2015). The two-process theory of face processing: Modifications based on two decades of data from infants and adults. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 50, 169-179.
pmid: 25454353 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/25454353
[20] Kloth N., & Rhodes G . ( 2016). Gaze direction aftereffects are surprisingly long-lasting. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(9), 1311-1319.
pmid: 26962845 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26962845
[21] Kloth N., Rhodes G., & Schweinberger S. R . ( 2015). Absence of sex-contingent gaze direction aftereffects suggests a limit to contingencies in face aftereffects. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1829.
pmid: 4664652 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4664652/
[22] Lavie, N. ( 2005). Distracted and confused?: Selective attention under load. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9(2), 75-82.
pmid: 15668100 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S136466130400316X
[23] Lavie N., & de Fockert J. W . ( 2003). Contrasting effects of sensory limits and capacity limits in visual selective attention. Perception & Psychophysics, 65, 202-212.
pmid: 12713239 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2003-02910-003
[24] Luo Y., Feng L. H., Ren M., Gu Q. Y., Zhao S. Y., & Zhang Y . ( 2017). The effect of perceptual load on processing and memorizing negative facial distractor. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 49(10), 1256-1266.
[24] [ 罗禹, 丰丽红, 任敏, 顾秋瑀, 赵守盈, 张禹 . ( 2017). 知觉负载对负性分心面孔的知觉加工和记忆的影响. 心理学报, 49(10), 1256-1266.]
[25] Materna S., Dicke P. W., & Their P . ( 2008). Dissociable roles of the superior temporal sulcus and the intraparietal sulcus in joint attention: A functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20(1), 108-119.
pmid: 18095789 url: http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1331225
[26] Murphy G., Groeger J. A., & Greene C. M . ( 2016). Twenty years of load theory—Where are we now, and where should we go next?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1316-1340.
pmid: 26728138 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26728138
[27] Neumann M. F., & Schweinberger S. R . ( 2008). N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load. Brain Research, 1239, 181-190.
pmid: 18793621 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18793621
[28] Nummenmaa L., & Hietanen J. K . ( 2009). How attentional systems process conflicting cues: The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 35, 1738-1754.
pmid: 19968432 url: http://test.europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19968432
[29] Ricciardelli P., & Turatto M . ( 2011). Is attention necessary for perceiving gaze direction? It depends on how you look at it: Evidence from the locus-of-slack method. Visual Cognition, 19, 154-170.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13506285.2010.514140
[30] Rorden C., Guerrini C., Swainson R., Lazzeri M., & Baylis G. C . ( 2008). Event related potentials reveal that increasing perceptual load leads to increased responses for target stimuli and decreased responses for irrelevant stimuli. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 2, 4.
pmid: 18958205 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC2525969/
[31] Rothkirch M., Madipakkam A. R., Rehn E., & Sterzer P . ( 2015). Making eye contact without awareness. Cognition, 143, 108-114.
pmid: 26133642 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26133642
[32] Sato W., Kochiyama T., Uono S., & Toichi M . ( 2016). Neural mechanisms underlying conscious and unconscious attentional shifts triggered by eye gaze. NeuroImage, 124, 118-126.
pmid: 26343316 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26343316
[33] Sato W., Okada T., & Toichi M . ( 2007). Attentional shift by gaze is triggered without awareness. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 87-94.
pmid: 17624520 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17624520
[34] Senju A., & Johnson M. H . ( 2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13, 127-134.
pmid: 19217822 url: http://www.cell.com/trends/cognitive-sciences/comments/S1364-6613(09)00019-9
[35] Shepherd, S. V . ( 2010). Following gaze: Gaze-following behavior as a window into social cognition. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 4, 5.
pmid: 2859805 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC2859805/
[36] Spezio M. L., Huang P. Y., Castelli F., & Adolphs R . ( 2007). Amygdala damage impairs eye contact during conversations with real people. Journal of Neuroscience, 27(15), 3994-3997.
pmid: 17428974 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/17428974
[37] Stein T., Peelen M. V., & Sterzer P . ( 2012). Eye gaze adaptation under interocular suppression. Journal of Vision, 12, 1-17.
pmid: 22753441 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/22753441
[38] Stein T., Senju A., Peelen M. V., & Sterzer P . ( 2011). Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression. Cognition, 119, 307-311.
pmid: 3796336 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21316650
[39] Teufel C., Fletcher P. C., & Davis G . ( 2010). Seeing other minds: Attributed mental states influence perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(8), 376-382.
[40] Von Grünau M., & Anston C . ( 1995). The detection of gaze direction: A stare-in-the-crown effect. Perception, 24, 1297-1313.
pmid: 8643334 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8643334
[41] Xu S., Zhang S., & Geng H. Y . ( 2011). Gaze-induced joint attention persists under high perceptual load and does not depend on awareness. Vision Research, 51(18), 2048-2056.
pmid: 21840332 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21840332
[42] Yeshurun Y., & Marciano H . ( 2013). Degraded stimulus visibility and the effects of perceptual load on distractor interference. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 289.
pmid: 3665929 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3665929/
[43] Yokoyama T., Noguchi Y., & Kita S . ( 2013). Unconscious processing of direct gaze: Evidence from an ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 51(7), 1161-1168.
pmid: 23603242 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/23603242
[44] Yokoyama T., Sakai H., Noguchi Y., & Kita S . ( 2014). Perception of direct gaze does not require focus of attention. Scientific Reports, 4, 3858.
pmid: 24618808 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3901061
[45] Zhang M. C., Wei P., & Zhang Q . ( 2015). The impact of supra- and sub-liminal facial expressions on the gaze-cueing effect. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 47(11), 1309-1317.
[45] [ 张美晨, 魏萍, 张钦 . ( 2015). 阈上阈下不同面孔表情下的注视线索提示效应. 心理学报, 47(11), 1309-1317.]
[1] Jinsheng HU, Chengshi LI, Qi WANG, Songze LI, Taotao LI, Shuqing LIU. The deficiency of attention bias to emotional prosody in the teenagers with autism spectrum disorders: A perceptual mode of low efficiency[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 637-646.
[2] WANG Guan, ZHOU Pei, ZHANG Kaili, WANG Pei.  The effect of perceptual load on the multiple social categories processing of faces[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 270-282.
[3] ZHANG Bao, HU Cenlou, CHEN Yanzhang, MIAO Sumei, HUANG Sai.  The modulation of working memory load and perceptual load on attentional guidance from representations of working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[4] LUO Yu, FENG Lihong, REN Min, GU Qiuyu, ZHAO Shouying, ZHANG Yu.  The effect of perceptual load on processing and memorizing negative facial distractor[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1256-1266.
[5] LIU Yingjie; GUO Chunyan; WEI Ping. The Sequential Effect of Perceptual Load on Attentional Selection and Conflict Resolution[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1271-1280.
[6] HU Zhonghua;LIU Qiang;ZHAO Guang;LI Hong. The Measurement of Detection Superiority of Direct Gaze Affected by Stimuli Component Information[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1217-1227.
[7] WEI Ping;KANG Guan-Lan. The Interaction between Perceptual Load and the Target-Distractor Distance in Regulating Stimulus-Driven Attentional Capture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(11): 1454-1462.
[8] ZHANG Qing,ZHANG Jie-Dong,HU Si-Yuan,LIU Jia. Ecological Stimuli Are Processed Automatically[J]. , 2011, 43(11): 1229-1238.
[9] ZHANG Zhi-Jun,ZHAO Ya-Jun,Zhan Qi-Tao. Effects of Gaze Direction Perception on Gaze Following Behavior[J]. , 2011, 43(07): 726-738.
[10] YE Rong,YU Feng-Qiong,JIANG Yu-Bao,WANG Kai. The Impact of Perceptual Load on Emotional Face Processing in Attentional Blink Paradigm[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 483-493.
[11] Zhang Daren Zhang Pengyuan Chen Xiangchuan (Department of Biology & Cognitive Science Laboratory,Center for Brain Science, University of Science $ Technology of China,Hefei,Anhui,230026,P.R.China). THE EFFECT OF PERCEPTUAL LOAD ON INTERFERENCE AND NEGATIVE PRIMING[J]. , 1998, 30(01): 7-13.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech