Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (2) : 186-196     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00186
|
 The processing of negative sentences in different semantic context
 CHEN Guangyao; HE Xianyou; LIU Tao
 (1 Journalism and Communication College/Media State-level Experimental Teaching Demonstration Center, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China) (2 School of Psychology, South China Normal University/Centre for Studies of Psychological Application, Guangzhou 510631, China)
Download: PDF(483 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   Affirmation and negation are two main semantic and grammatical categories in any language. The propositional theory and experiential-simulations view were proposed to explain the processing mechanism of negative sentences. Both of their supporters have supplied plenty of empirical evidence, but neither of them can beat each other. Thus, the comprehensive theories, such as dual coding theory, LASS and symbolic interdependency hypothesis have been proposed to fill the gap. In the present study, we design two eye-tracking experiments to lend further support to comprehensive theories. In the two experiments, eye-tracking technical was adopted to explore the processing mechanism of negative sentences in different semantic contexts. In Experiment 1, the alternative choices (e.g., outspread arm) presented to the participants have close semantic connection with the negated events of the sentences (e.g., the arm isn’t crooked); In Experiment 2, the alternative choices (e.g., black skirt) presented to the participants have relatively weak semantic connection with the depicted negative events (e.g., the skirt isn’t blue). In summary, ‘blue-black’ has relatively weaker semantic connection than that of ‘outspread-crook’. In these two eye-tracking experiments, voice was used to present the negative sentence, and the corresponding pictures were presented at the moment of reading the words depicting the negated state (e.g., crook/blue). And the participants’ task was to choose which picture matched the sentence. The results demonstrated that, at the early stage of processing, there was no difference between the fixation probabilities to pictures depicting the negated state of affairs (crooked arm) and their alternative (outspread arm) in experiment 1 at time window 201~600 ms. In contrast, participants had higher fixation probabilities to pictures depicting the negated state of affairs (blue skirt) than that to pictures depicting the alternatives in experiment 2 at time window 401~600 ms. Then at the later stage, participants showed higher fixation probabilities to the pictures depicting alternatives to the pictures depicting the negated state of affairs from 601 ms in experiment 1 and 801ms in the experiment 2. Besides, the fixation probabilities to the pictures depicting the negated states were lower than the random level after 1001 ms in both of the two experiments. The results from the two experiments showed that, both propositional process and simulating process are necessary when processing negative sentences. Compared with processing negative sentence in weak semantic context, it’s easier for participants to get the actual state of event with the help of strong semantic context. In addition, participants will not keep the simulation of the negated state of event in his mind, which supports suppression hypothesis. In summary, the results support the symbolic interdependency hypothesis as well as suppression hypothesis.
Keywords  negation      context      symbolic interdependency hypothesis      two-step simulation hypothesis      anchor-based activation and satisfaction constrained mode     
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: HE Xianyou, E-mail: xianyouhe@163.com; CHEN Guangyao, E-mail: ccggyy86@163.com   
Issue Date: 26 December 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Guangyao
HE Xianyou
LIU Tao
Cite this article:   
CHEN Guangyao,HE Xianyou,LIU Tao.  The processing of negative sentences in different semantic context[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 186-196.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00186     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2018/V50/I2/186
[1] MA Jie, DOU Haoran, ZHUANG Qian, YIN Dongxue, LEI Ming, GAO Chao, ZHANG Yin, LIU Qiang, ZHAO Guang.  The mechanisms of contextual cuing effect based on objects’ topological properties[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 143-157.
[2] BAI Lu, MAO Weibin, WANG Rui, Zhang Wenhai.  The effect of emotional scene and body expression on facial expression recognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1172-1183.
[3] KE Chunchun, NIE Aiqing, ZHANG Ruiqing.  The modulation of recall task on collaborative inhibition and error pruning: The influence of emotional valence and level of processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 733-744.
[4] SUN Yusheng; ZHANG Zhijun; WU Binxing. The impact of contextual expectation on rapid natural scene recognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 577-589.
[5] PENG Jian; WANG Xiao. I will perform effectively if you are with me: Leader-follower congruence in followership prototype, job engagement and job performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1151-1162.
[6] LIU Wenli; ZHOU Xiang; ZHANG Mingliang. Exploring the mechanisms of context effects in Chinese stop-vowel-stop sequences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1057-1069.
[7] CUI Ruxia; GAO Zhihua; TANG Yilin; HE Haofan; LU Zhongyi. The two-steps mental simulation process of Chinese definite unbounded negative sentences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 607-616.
[8] LIU Cong; JIAO Lu; SUN Xun; WANG Ruiming. Immediate effect of language switch on non-proficient bilinguals’ cognitive control components[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 472-481.
[9] CHEN Shuang; CHEN Lijing; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Role of Discourse Context on Semantic Integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 167-175.
[10] JIN Yan; ZHENG Xifu. Influence of Female Menstrual Cycle on the Acquisition and Extinction of Conditioned Fear[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(12): 1465-1471.
[11] SUN Nan;ZhENG Xifu. Conditioned Acquisition and Extinction Modulates in Men and Women: Event-related Potential Research[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 507-515.
[12] ZHANG Qin;XU Xiaohong;LIU Xingyi;DONG Fangni;YANG Yanling;ZHANG Guangxia. The Effects of Long-term Exposure to Bisphenol-A on Fear Memory of Adult Mice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 500-506.
[13] CHEN Guangyao;WU Mingyi;WEI Xiaoping;ZHOU Miao;HE Xianyou;MO Lei. The Processing of Isolated Negative Sentences with Uncertain States[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 204-215.
[14] ZHANG Zhixue;JU Dong;MA Li. Organizational Behavior Research in 2008 ~ 2011: A Brief Review and Future Direction for Chinese Research[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 265-284.
[15] HU Zhe;ZHANG Qin;LIANG Jiuqing;GUO Chunyan. Source Memory Under Different Emotional Contexts: An ERPs Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(7): 725-739.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech