Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2018, Vol. 50 Issue (1) : 1-8     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2018.00001
 The influence of Chinese and English background pop music to the memory of Chinese and English words in Chinese undergraduates
 GAO Qi; BAI Xuejun
 (Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education; Academy of Psychology and Behaviour, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
Download: PDF(366 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract   It was generally found that pop music would do harm to the efficiency and accuracy of visual activity when it was as a kind of background music. This is called irrelevant sound effect, which means that the presence of irrelevant sound significantly impairs people’s performance on main visual task. Some researchers believe that the reason of this phenomenon is because the lyrics of the background pop music add extra workload to the working memory, which interferes with the visual task. Moreover, it was shown that the first language lyrics impaired participants’ performance more seriously than a strange language. To participants, the second language is less familiar than the first language but more than a strange language. So how about the irrelevant sound effect when lyrics are participants’ second language? And how about it when the visual task contains the second language? This study aimed to investigate the influence of different language lyrics to the visual memory task, the familiarity of whose materials was different in two experiments. It was hypothesized that there would be significant irrelevant sound effects in different language background musics with different language materials, and languages of the lyrics and materials would have reciprocal actions in both experiments. 180 participants from a university (90 for each experiment)who have passed CET6 (College English Test 6) attended this study to research the effect of lyrics in background pop music on short-term memory for familiar and unfamiliar Chinese and English words. There were three kinds of background sounds: no background sound, Chinese background pop music and English background pop music. In order to control effects caused by instruments, this research used Let it go sung by Yao Beina (Chinese) and Demi Lovato (English) as the background music in both two experiments. Only the refrain was used as music materials. In the first experiment, participants should remember 32 Chinese and 32 English familiar nouns and finish an instant recall task. In the second experiment, participants should remember 10 unfamiliar Chinese and 10 unfamiliar English nouns and finish an instant recognition task. Memory materials were displayed by Eprime 1.0 randomly. In the first experiment, the main effect of music types was significant, F(2,87) = 15.67, p < 0.00, ηp² = 0.15. The scores in the condition of no background music (M = 14.12) were significantly higher than the other two conditions. Participants’ scores in English background pop music (M = 12.50) were significantly higher than that in Chinese background pop music (M = 10.30). In the second experiment, the results showed that the scores in the condition of no background sound (M = 6.87) were still significantly higher than the other two conditions (M = 6.03 for Chinese music, M = 5.83 for English music). F(2,87) = 4.69, p < 0.05, ηp² = 0.05. The difference between two experiments was a significant reciprocal action in the second experiment, F(2,87) = 19.23, p < 0.01, ηp² = 0.20. The scores in the condition of Chinese background pop music were higher when the materials were Chinese words (M = 7.03), and the scores in the condition of English background pop music were higher when the materials were English words (M = 6.93). The conclusion was that lyrics in background music would effect the main visual task no mater what kind of lyrics’ language was, but different familiarity of languages indeed had different influences on the efficiency and accuracy of the main task. When memory words were familiar, the familiar language of lyrics would do more harm to the memory. While the words were unfamiliar, which means the task was more difficult, lyrics would do more harm to the memory of words that with the same language. The level of difficulty of the task and the familiarity of lyrics’ language both can effect the memory, while the former is more important.
Keywords Chinese and English pop music      Chinese and English words      memory      irrelevant sound effect     
Corresponding Authors: BAI Xuejun, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 28 November 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
BAI Xuejun
Cite this article:   
GAO Qi,BAI Xuejun.  The influence of Chinese and English background pop music to the memory of Chinese and English words in Chinese undergraduates[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 1-8.
URL:     OR
[1] WANG Jing, XUE Chengbo, LIU Qiang.  Storage mechanism of same-dimension features in visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 176-185.
[2] LIU Tuanli, BAI Xuejun.  The effect of part-list cues on memory retrieval: The role of inhibition ability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1158-1171.
[3] ZHU Zude, DUAN Yixing, WANG Suiping.  The baseline fluid intelligence modulated the transfer effect from working memory to fluid intelligence[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1022-1030.
[4] ZHANG Bao, HU Cenlou, CHEN Yanzhang, MIAO Sumei, HUANG Sai.  The modulation of working memory load and perceptual load on attentional guidance from representations of working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[5] LIN Wuji, MENG Yingfang, LIN Jingyuan.  Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 897-908.
[6] DING Xiao, LV Na, YANG Yalin, SI Jiwei.  Age-related differences of different components of working memory: The predictive effect on strategy utilization in arithmetic[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 759-770.
[7] HU Cenlou; ZHANG Bao; HUANG Sai. Does irrelevant long-term memory representation guide the deployment of visual attention?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 590-601.
[8] LI Songze; HU Jinsheng; LI Chengshi; WANG Qi; HE Jianqing; WANG Yan; YANG Cuiping. Chunking processing of spatial working memory in autism preschool children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 631-642.
[9] LIU Zhiying, KU Yixuan.  Perceiving better, inhibiting better: Effects of perceptual precision on distractor-inhibition processes during working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1247-1255.
[10] YIN Huazhan; LI Dan; CHEN Yingyu; Huang Xiting. The characteristic of 1~6 s duration cognition segmentation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1119-1129.
[11] CHEN Shuai; WANG Duanxu. Way different, never work together? A moderated model of informational faultlines, overlapping team tenure, transactive memory system, and team learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 867-879.
[12] CUI Yichen; WANG Pei; TAN Chenhao. The influence of implicit theories of personality on processing strategy of person impressions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1538-1550.
[13] JIANG Yingjie; WANG Zhiwei; ZHENG Mingling; JIN Xuelian. How value-based agendas affect study time allocation: An eye tracking study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1229-1238.
[14] MAO Weibin; ZHAO Haoyuan; DONG Liyun; BAI Lu. The emotional memory trade-off effect in retrieval-induced forgetting[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1219-1228.
[15] HU Yanmei; ZHANG Ming. Electrophysiological evidence for memory-based attentional capture and memory-based attentional rejection effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 12-21.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech