Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (12) : 1504-1512     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01504
 Fairness cognition-behavior gap in 4~8 year-old children: The role of social comparison
 LIU Wen1,2; ZHANG Xue1; ZHANG Yu1,3; YU Ruiwei1,4
 (1 College of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China) (2 Liaoning Collaborative Innovation Center of Children and Adolescents Healthy Personality Assessment and Cultivation, Dalian 116029, China) (3 Healthcare Centre, Shenzhen Arcadia Grammar School, Shenzhen 518126, China) (4 Educational School, Huzhou Teacher College, Huzhou 313000, China)
Download: PDF(361 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract   Fairness is a comprehensive strategy that takes into consideration of self-interest and other people's interests. The development of fairness norms, that is, using certain rules to distribute resources among different agents, includes two levels: the cognitive level, understanding fairness norms, and the behavioral level, applying fairness rules. Young children endorse fairness norms related to resource distribution, but often act in contradiction to those norms when given a chance to distribute. While currently most research focuses on children's fairness cognition or behavior, the phenomenon of children’s fairness cognition-behavior gap and its influence factors have rarely been explored in the context of a single study. Using a novel approach, the present study aims to investigate the gap of fairness cognition and behavior among 4- to 8- year-old children. The research presented here offers clear evidence of this discrepancy and goes on to examine possible explanations for its diminution with age, as well as the impact of social comparison on such resource distribution behavior. Study 1 adopted the Dictator game to examine the equity principle among 105 4~8-year-old children’s fairness cognition and behavior, and compared the cognition-behavior gap. The justifications/motivations of children’s distribution behavior were also coded and analyzed. In Study 2, We replicated the findings in Study 1, that children will take a cost to avoid being at a relative disadvantage, but also found that 5-to 6-year-olds would spitefully take a cost to ensure that another welfare falls below their own. We tested 80 6-year-old children, and analyzed the influence of social comparison on children’s distribution behavior, both upward and downward social comparisons considered. A variant of the Dictator Game, were used to investigate children’s behavior in different conditions. In Study 1, we found that children at this age already have developed fairness understanding, their fair distributive behavior increased with age, and the gap between cognition and behavior decreased with age. Nevertheless, they failed to engage in equal distribution until age 8. Children’s interpretations of their behavior showed a significant age-related difference from 4 to 8. As children grew older, their interpretations transitioned from focusing on desire to principle. Study 2 found that the degree of unfairness and the cost had a significant impact on the choice of distribution behavior in both the upward social comparison and downward social comparison. Under the no-cost situation, children were more inclined to avoid their own disadvantage and to favor their own favorable results. In the highly unfair situation, it was necessary to avoid being inferior to others, even if the cost was too high. The present study of children’ fairness cognition-behavior gap in a single environment contributes to the literature on moral development. The results provide some support for traditional accounts of moral development by showing that, in the course of development, children’s distribution behavior is increasingly consistent with the norm of fairness that they endorse from an early age. These results also suggest that social comparison influences children’s distribution behavior, and that the development of fairness includes overcoming an initial social comparison preference for self-advantage/disadvantaging others.
Keywords children      fairness cognition      fairness behavior      social comparison     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Wen, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 October 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
LIU Wen, ZHANG Xue, ZHANG Yu, YU Ruiwei.  Fairness cognition-behavior gap in 4~8 year-old children: The role of social comparison[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017, 49(12): 1504-1512.
URL:     OR
[1] YANG Wanqing, XIAO Rong, LIANG Dandan. Lexical tone perception mechanism in 2- to 4-year-old Mandarin-speaking children in the pre-attention stage[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 730-741.
[2] GONG Xiushuang,ZHANG Honghong. Outstanding others vs. mediocre me: The effect of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 645-658.
[3] YAO Yao,CHEN Xiaoxiang. The effects of music training on categorical perception of Mandarin tones in 4- to 5-year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 456-468.
[4] ZHAO Xin,LI Hongli,JIN Ge,LI Shifeng,ZHOU Aibao,LIANG Wenjia,GUO Hongxia,CAI Yaya. Effects of phonological memory and central executive function on decoding, language comprehension of children in different grades[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.
[5] HE Xiaoling,CHEN Jun. Cognitive development of multiple metaphors of power concepts in 3~5 year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 149-161.
[6] JIN Xinyi,ZHOU Bingxin,MENG Fei. Level 2 visual perspective-taking at age 3 and the corresponding effect of cooperation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1028-1039.
[7] HUANG Xiaoxiao,ZHANG Baoshan,ZHANG Yuan,MA Yuting. Effects of meta-stereotype on aggressive behavior among migrant children and the mediating effect of frustration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 484-496.
[8] LI Quan,SONG Yanan,LIAN Bin,FENG Tingyong. Mindfulness training can improve 3-and 4-year-old children’s attention and executive function[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
[9] Mingliang ZHANG, Jiwei SI, Weixing YANG, Shufen XING, Hongxia LI, Jiajia ZHANG. Interaction effects between BDNF gene rs6265 polymorphism and parent-involved education on basic mathematical ability in primary school children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1007-1017.
[10] Xinghua FAN, Xiaoyi FANG, Yuesheng HUANG, Fengju CHEN, Si YU. The influence mechanism of parental care on depression among left-behind rural children in China: A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1029-1040.
[11] CHENG Yahua, WANG Jian, WU Xinchun.  The role of morphological awareness in Chinese children’s reading comprehension: The mediating effect of word reading fluency[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 413-425.
[12] WANG Yan, QIAN Xiaoyun, TIAN Qian, GAO Jun, LI Xiaoxu.  Parent-child relationship and the comparison between parents and their children on their children’s mate preference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 91-100.
[13] LIAN Shuailei, SUN Xiaojun, NIU Gengfeng, ZHOU Zongkui.  Upward social comparison on SNS and depression: A moderated mediation model and gender difference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 941-952.
[14] LIANG Feifei; WANG Yongsheng; YANG Wen; BAI Xuejun. The modulation of reading level on the development of children’s eye movement characteristics: Evidence from 9- to 11-year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 450-459.
[15] GUO Haiying; CHEN Lihua; YE Zhi; PAN Jin; LIN Danhua. Characteristics of peer victimization and the bidirectional relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems among rural-to-urban migrant children in China: A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 336-348.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech