Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (10) : 1334-1343     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01334
|
 The effect of altruism on social discounting of environmental gain and loss
 HE Guibing1; YANG Xinwei1; JIANG Duo2,1
 (1 Department of Psychology and Behavioral Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310028, China) (2 College of Psychology and Sociology, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China)
Download: PDF(759 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   After decades of rapid economic growth, societies around the world are facing severe challenges with environmental pollution. In some developing countries, environmental issues are threatening their sustainable development and people’s health. In economic and psychological literatures, environmental problems are usually recognized as social dilemmas because natural resources are public goods, which imply conflicts between individual and collective benefits. Empirical studies found that social distance had an effect on cooperative behavior in social dilemmas. Meanwhile, the phenomenon of social discounting on monetary outcomes was also revealed by many studies. However, the impact of social distance on environmental decisions remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to explore the phenomenon of social discounting of environmental outcomes, fit the behavioral data of social discounting, and investigate the effect of altruism on social discounting under gain and loss frames. The experiment was designed as a 4 (social distance level: a family member, friend, mere acquaintance, and stranger) × 2 (task frame: environmental gain, environmental loss) study in which social distance was manipulated within the subject, but task frames were assigned between subjects. The choice titration procedure was used to measure the social discounting rate of environmental outcomes. Participants were asked to make a series of choices between “I live in high (or poor in environmental loss frame) quality air for X days” and “Another person (in different social distances) lives in high (or poor) quality air for 110 days.” The value of “X” in the choice series varied from 10 days to 100 days with an interval of 10 days. In addition, participants’ altruism was measured by the Self-report Altruism Scale. The results showed that: (1) in both environmental gain and loss frames, exponential models could fit social discounting of environmental outcomes better than hyperbolic model; (2) the interaction between social distance and task frame could influence the social discounting rate. As social distance increased, the discounting rate increased more rapidly for environmental gain than for environmental loss; (3) altruism had moderate effect on the relationship between social distance and social discounting. For participants with high level of altruism, social distance had less impact on social discounting. In conclusion, this study suggests that social distance, altruism, and task frame may play important roles in people's environmental decision-making. These findings enlighten us that decision makers may become more pro-environmental if some measures are taken to enhance their altruistic tendencies and reduce their psychological distance with others.
Keywords  environmental outcome      social distance      social discounting      task frame      altruism     
:     
  B849:C91  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: YANG Xinwei, E-mail: psy_yxw@zju.edu.cn; JIANG Duo, E-mail: duo12322@szu.edu.cn     E-mail: E-mail: psy_yxw@zju.edu.cn; E-mail: duo12322@szu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 13 August 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
HE Guibing, YANG Xinwei, JIANG Duo.  The effect of altruism on social discounting of environmental gain and loss[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017, 49(10): 1334-1343.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01334     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2017/V49/I10/1334
[1] GAO Juan,WANG Peng,Xiao Tian WANG,SUN Qian,LIU Yongfang. Effects of others’ reference points and psychological distance on self-other welfare tradeoff in gain and loss situations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 633-644.
[2] WANG Pei, TAN Chenhao, CUI Yichen.  Should I sacrifice my profit before his eyes? Partner’s ability and social distance affecting the tendency of reputation-profit game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1206-1218.
[3] HE Ning; ZHU Yunli. Self-love and other-love: Research on the relationships among narcissism, empathy and implicit altruism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(2): 199-210.
[4] XU Fuming; JIANG Duo; ZHANG Hui; LI Ou; KONG Shixiao; SHI Yanwei. The effect of psychological distance on the base-rate neglect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1292-1301.
[5] XIN Ziqiang;XIN Sufei. The Influence of Trustees’ Social Identity Complexity on Their Trustworthiness[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 415-426.
[6] ZHAO Delei. Effects of Stigmatized Identities on Interpersonal Influence and Social Distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(11): 1283-1294.
[7] HE Guibing;JIANG Duo. The Effect of Task Frames and Altruism on Social Discounting[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(10): 1131-1146.
[8] DUAN Jing,LIU Yong-Fang,HE Qi. The Effects of Decision Makers’ Roles and Related Variables on Risk Preferences[J]. , 2012, 44(3): 369-376.
[9] LIU Yong-Fang,BI Yu-Fang,WANG Huai-Yong. The Effects of Emotions and Task Frames on Risk Preferences in Self Decision Making and Anticipating Others’ Decisions[J]. , 2010, 42(03): 317-324.
[10] Lei-Chang. Some of the Whats, Whos, and Whens Related to Evolutionary Psychology[J]. , 2007, 39(03): 556-570.
[11] Ling-Wenquan,Yang-Huijun,Fang-Liluo. Perceived Organizational Support(POS) of the Employees[J]. , 2006, 38(02): 281-287.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech