Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (9) : 1206-1218     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01206
|
 Should I sacrifice my profit before his eyes? Partner’s ability and social distance affecting the tendency of reputation-profit game
TAN Chenhao1;  WANG Pei1; CUI Yichen1,2
 (1 Department of Psychology, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China) (2 Institute of Ideological and Political Education, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)
Download: PDF(614 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   Previous studies have shown that when individuals must make a choice between reputation and profit (reputation-profit game), individuals usually tend to get a reputation from the sacrifice of profit. According to competitive altruism theory, the reason why people cooperate to get a reputation at the cost of profit is to compete against others to get some valuable opportunities in the future with the help of the reputation. Based on this perspective, ability and social distance of the game partner (only receives information about reputation) which decide the upper limit of profit and the belief of whether the partner would afford such a chance would affect the tendency of reputation-profit game. To demonstrate these two factors and reveal the nature of reputation obtaining behavior, in this research, we hypothesized that ability and social distance of the partner would affect the preference between reputation and profit, when faced with a partner whose ability is strong or social distance is close, individual would prefer reputation than profit, and there would be an interaction between ability and social distance. A condition about contribution was set up in Experiment 1. 40 undergraduate students participated in this experiment. They were told that they would attend in an online activity. First, participants took part in a series of dummy prisoner dilemma game and won some money (100 tokens). Second, they were told that they would play a game (trust game) with another student in the future, and the importance of reputation was introduced (all participants were trustee). After that, participants were told that there were some public accounts which need their contribution, and they could make virtual contribution to each account and only one would be chosen as the real. Before the contribution, they were told that the contribution would be seen by a student who would be the trustee. Ability (truster’s principal: high/low) and social distance (schoolmate/students from other schools) were manipulated as independent variables, and contribution was used as dependent variable. A condition about bargain was set up in Experiment 2. 55 undergraduate students participated in this experiment. The background was just like experiment 1. First, participants were told that they will perform as suppliers in an online task whose task was pricing the materials they sold. They were told their profit would be calculated respectively in each zone, and only one would be selected as the final result. Second, participants were told if the price they set was higher than the “real value”, there would be 50% chance of being confiscated half of earnings in this turn. Then they were learned that there would be two times of bargain in each zone, and buyers would chat about each supplier soon after the first bargain. Before the pricing tasks, participants were informed that the number of suppliers was greater than the number of players in each zone; each player had the right to choose a supplier to buy material in the second bargain. Ability (player’s demand: high/low/none) and social distance (schoolmate/ students from other schools) were manipulated as independent variables, and participant’s pricing result was used as dependent variable. The results of Experiment 1 showed that participants donated more money when his donation was seen by a student whose ability was high. This finding demonstrated that the higher the ability is the more reputation individual wants. And the results of Experiment 2 showed that there was an interaction between ability and social distance. Only when partner’s ability of the future mission was low, participants preferred to propose a lower price before the partner whose social distance is close in order to gain reputation from the sacrifice of profit. This finding showed only when ability is low, then individuals would take social distance into account, and they tend to acquire a good reputation before a partner whose social distance is close. All the findings supported our hypothesis that ability and social distance are the core factors which affect the tendency of reputation-profit game. These results verified the tactical of individual’s choice in reputation- profit game.
Keywords  reputation-profit game      ability      social distance      social identity     
ZTFLH:     
  B849:C91  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: WANG Pei, E-mail: wangpei1970@163.com     E-mail: E-mail: wangpei1970@163.com
Issue Date: 16 July 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Pei
TAN Chenhao
CUI Yichen
Cite this article:   
WANG Pei,TAN Chenhao,CUI Yichen.  Should I sacrifice my profit before his eyes? Partner’s ability and social distance affecting the tendency of reputation-profit game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1206-1218.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.01206     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2017/V49/I9/1206
[1] LIU Baogen, LI Feifei, LI Ruiqin, JIANG Hui .  Trust and subsequent use of oral and print information for 4~6 year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1053-1062.
[2] HE Guibing, YANG Xinwei, JIANG Duo.  The effect of altruism on social discounting of environmental gain and loss[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1334-1343.
[3] KANG Chunhua; REN Ping; ZENG Pingfei. The influence factors of grade response cluster diagnostic method[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 891-902.
[4] FAN Wei; ZHONG Yiping; LI Huiyun; MENG Chuyi; YOU Chang; FU Xiaolan. The influence of self-control in the perceived of deception and deception[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 845-856.
[5] SU Heng; LIU Zhifang; CAO Liren. The effects of word frequency and word predictability in preview and their implications for word segmentation in Chinese reading: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 625-636.
[6] WEN Hongbo; LIANG Kaili; LIU Xianwei. Effect of family environment on reading ability: The mediating effects of reading engagement and reading interest among junior high school students[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 248-257.
[7] WANG Wenyi;SONG Lihong;DING Shuliang. Classification accuracy and consistency indices for complex decision rules in multidimensional item response theory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1612-1624.
[8] PENG Yafeng; LUO Zhaosheng; YU Xiaofeng; GAO Chunlei; LI Yujun. The optimization of test design in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1600-1611.
[9] DING Ying; GONG Xiushuang. he influence of social exclusion on consumer preference for products with different textures and its underlying process[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1302-1313.
[10] XU Fuming; JIANG Duo; ZHANG Hui; LI Ou; KONG Shixiao; SHI Yanwei. The effect of psychological distance on the base-rate neglect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1292-1301.
[11] GUO Jianpeng; YANG Lingyan. Learning from Comparison: The Effects of Example Variability and Prior Knowledge[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1013-1027.
[12] HU Qiongjing; XIE Xiaoyun. Group Members’ Status and Knowledge Sharing Behavior: A Motivational Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 545-554.
[13] YAN Bihua; YOU Xuqun. Pilots’ Dissociation of Object Properties and Motion Properties in Relative Arrival Time Tasks[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 212-223.
[14] WU Yan; WANG Xieshun; CHEN Hsuan-chih. ERP effects of Radical Combinability in Chinese Character Recognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 157-166.
[15] MAO Xiaofei; PENG Huamao. The Role of Visual Perceptual Stress in Primary Mental Ability Aging[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 29-38.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech