Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (7) : 897-908     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00897
|
 Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory
 LIN Wuji; MENG Yingfang; LIN Jingyuan
 (College of Education, Fujian Normal University, Fuzhou 350117, China)
Download: PDF(382 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   A wide range of studies have shown that executing the other secondary task during encoding has little influence on implicit memory (repetition priming). Somewhat surprisingly, relatively few studies discussed the effects of interference on implicit memory during retrieval, which was confirmed as a process distinct from encoding, but also important in memory. Furthermore, an open question remains as to whether the retrieval interference could affect implicit memory? The effect of interference during retrieval was assessed by comparing a divide-attention (DA) condition, on which participants carried out a memory task (lexical decision) and an interference task (even-odd decision) simultaneously or successively, with a full-attention (FA) condition, on which participants performed only the memory task or interference task. Each experiment consisted of five parts: a study phase, a distraction phase, twice FA interference phases, and a retrieval phase, which included above two types attention conditions. Thirty-five undergraduate students participated in Experiment 1, which investigated whether synchronous interference task during retrieval could affect implicit memory. Experiment 2 further examined whether asynchronous interference could also change the priming of implicit retrieval. Thirty participants took part in Experiment 3, which was designed to examine whether such interference could affect explicit memory retrieval. Therefore, it replaced the lexical decision with recognition task based on Experiment 1. Participants were instructed to make response to corresponding items by pressing keyboard, and were told that the memory and interference task were equally important. They were asked to perform both tasks as quickly and accurately as possible. The Reaction Time (RT) and Accuracy data in retrieval phase were recorded, in order to assess priming effects, the effect of interference and interference task costs. The results showed that, first, the repetition priming results (the facilitation or bias in processing of studied items) were quite consistent across Experiment 1 and 2 both on RT and Accuracy. It reflected that priming would be impacted by interference task, whatever the distraction and memory stimulus presented synchronously or asynchronously. Second, In Experiment 3, there was non-significant difference across attention conditions in recognition Accuracy. Third, we followed Lozito and Mulligan’s (2010) method for examining interference task costs. They proposed two measures to obtain distracting task costs for verifying the effects of interference. One of them would work out global costs, which was assessed by comparing performance on the interference task when performed under DA to FA. We found global costs occurred among three experiments, indicating that attention resource competition happened across dual tasks. But significant specific costs, which comparing performance on interference among DA, was only found in Experiment 3, indicating that explicit retrieval would break secondary task performance, whereas, implicit retrieval seemingly has little impact on interference task, but easily influenced by interference task. In conclusion, results from the current study revealed that implicit memory priming could not be regarded as an automatic form of retrieval with ease. And it's necessary for memory retrieval to catch enough cognitive resources. If limited resource was occupied by the other task, implicit retrieval processing would be impacted.
Keywords  implicit memory      explicit memory      interference in retrieval      dual tasks      task switching     
ZTFLH:     
  B842  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: MENG Yingfang, E-mail: mengyf1978@126.com     E-mail: E-mail: mengyf1978@126.com
Issue Date: 26 May 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIN Wuji
MENG Yingfang
LIN Jingyuan
Cite this article:   
LIN Wuji,MENG Yingfang,LIN Jingyuan.  Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 897-908.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00897     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2017/V49/I7/897
[1] YE Xiaohong; CHEN Youzhen; MENG Yingfang. Neural Processing of Recollection, Familiarity and Priming at Encoding[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1101-1110.
[2] LIU Yingjie;WEI Ping;DING Jinhong;GUO Chunyan. Age Differences in the Repetition Effect for Studied or New Objects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 321-330.
[3] WANG Zhenhong;LIU Ya;JIANG Changhao. The Effect of Low versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 546-555.
[4] MENG Ying-Fang. ERP Dissociation and Connection between Implicit and Explicit Memory at Encoding[J]. , 2012, 44(1): 30-39.
[5] WANG Juan,ZHANG Ji-Jia,XIE Shu-Shu,YUAN Ai-Ling. Influence of Chinese Character Learning Combined with Dongba Pictograph on Children’s Chinese Orthographic Acquisition[J]. , 2011, 43(05): 519-533.
[6] HUANG Si-Lin,LIN Chong-De. The Effects of Delay Time and Foreknowledge on Task Switching[J]. , 2011, 43(04): 396-402.
[7] LI Yue -Ting,LI Qi,GUO Chun-Yan. Differences of Emotional Words in Implicit and Explicit Memory Tests: An ERP Study[J]. , 2010, 42(07): 735-742.
[8]

HUANG Si-Lin,LIN Chong-De,HU Qing-Fen,LUO Liang,CHEN Guang

. The Effect of Foreknowledge and Preparation Time on Task Switching[J]. , 2010, 42(03): 367-376.
[9] Soledad Ballesteros and Julia Mayas. Preserved Cross-modal Priming and Aging: A Summary of Current Thoughts[J]. , 2009, 41(11): 1063-1074.
[10] MENG Ying-Fang,GUO Chun-Yan. The Asymmetric Relationship Between Encoding and Retrieval in Implicit and Explicit Memory[J]. , 2009, 41(08): 694-705.
[11] HUANG Si-Lin,HU Qing-Fen,LIN Chong-De,LUO Liang,CHEN Guang. Effects of Preparation Time and Foreknowledge on Task Switching[J]. , 2008, 40(08): 873-882.
[12] SUN Tian-Yi,XIAO Xin,GUO Chun-Yan. Endogenous Preparation and Exogenous Adjustment in Task Switching Under Foreknowledge[J]. , 2008, 40(05): 562-570.
[13] Wang Yanmei,Guo Dejun. The Effects of Positive Emotions on Task Switchin[J]. , 2008, 40(03): 301-306.
[14] ZHANG Xue-Min,YAO Lin,LU Xue-Ming. The Role of Location and Trajectory Information in the Recovery of Moving Objects[J]. , 2008, 40(01): 1-7.
[15] Meng Yingfang,Guo Chunyan. The Asymmetric Effect of Interference at Encoding or Retrieval on Implicit and Explicit Memory[J]. , 2007, 39(04): 579-588.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech