Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (6) : 829-840     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00829
|
 How employee’s unethical behavior leads to coworker-initiated aggression: The perspective of deontic justice
 WANG Duanxu; ZENG Kai; ZHENG Xianwei
 (School of Management, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058 China)
Download: PDF(464 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   Organizational behavior researchers have paid close attention to employee’s unethical behaviors and suggest that the third parties’ reactions will determine the follow-up development of these misconducts to a large extent. Coworkers’ tolerance will probably lead to the spread of unethical behavior, while coworkers’ punishment can effectively prevent the recurrence of such behavior. Drawing from deontic model of justice, this study proposed that coworker’s deontic injustice mediated the relationship between employee’s unethical behavior and employee’s victimization, and ethical leadership moderated the impact of employee’s unethical behavior on coworker’s deontic injustice while task interdependence moderated the influence of coworker’s deontic injustice on employee’s victimization. In order to test these hypotheses, data for the current study were collected from 265 employees through questionnaires from a large manufacturing company located in Zhejiang Province of China. All the questionnaires were distributed in envelopes and answered by respondents themselves, to further ensure the reliability and validity, back translation procedure was used. We conducted two-wave surveys with one month interval to minimize the common method bias (CMB). Employee’s unethical behavior, ethical leadership and task interdependence were gathered at the first wave; coworker’s deontic injustice and employees’ victimization were collected at the second wave; demographic information served as control variables. Finally, 265 valid and paired samples were obtained. The main hypotheses were tested by hierarchical regression and, the bootstrap method was also used to examine the moderated mediation model. The results showed that: (1) employee’s unethical behavior positively related to employee’s victimization; (2) coworker’s deontic injustice mediated the relationship between employee’s unethical behavior and employee’s victimization; (3) ethical leadership moderated the relationship between employee’s unethical behavior and coworker’s deontic injustice; (4) task interdependence moderated the relationship between coworker’s deontic injustice and employee’s victimization. The results of this study further confirmed the moderated mediation hypotheses of ethical leadership and task interdependence, that was, the mediating effects would be exacerbated by ethical leadership, yet mitigated by task interdependence. Moreover, a joint moderated mediation model of ethical leadership and task interdependence have also been proved by the results of this study. Therefore, based on the deontic model of justice, this study explained why and when employee’s unethical behavior leads to employee’s victimization. Overall, this study contributes to the organizational behavior literature in several ways. First, we complement the deficiency of the linkage between employee’s unethical behavior and employee’s victimization by introducing the deontic model of justice. Second, we integrate the research of rational judgments and deontic model of justice by emphasizing that the process of deontic response includes not only deontic judgments but also rational judgments. Third, we provide support for the argument of the positive role of task interdependence in workplace aggression by demonstrating the buffer effect of task interdependence in this study. Finally, we bring a new perspective for the study of aggression behavior by emphasizing the dynamic conversion among the attacker, the victim and the third party.
Keywords  unethical behavior      workplace victimization      coworker      deontic justice      rational judgment     
ZTFLH:     
  B849: C93  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: ZENG Kai, E-mail: zengkai5838063@163.com     E-mail: E-mail: zengkai5838063@163.com
Just Accepted Date: 27 April 2017  
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Duanxu
ZENG Kai
ZHENG Xianwei
Cite this article:   
WANG Duanxu,ZENG Kai,ZHENG Xianwei.  How employee’s unethical behavior leads to coworker-initiated aggression: The perspective of deontic justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 829-840.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00829     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2017/V49/I6/829
[1] ZHANG Bao, HU Cenlou, CHEN Yanzhang, MIAO Sumei, HUANG Sai.  The modulation of working memory load and perceptual load on attentional guidance from representations of working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1009-1021.
[2] WANG Pei, CHEN Qingwei, TANG Xiaochen, LUO Junlong, TAN Chenhao, GAO Fan.  The situational primacy of Chinese individual self, relational self, collective self: Evidence from ERP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1072-1079.
[3] SHEN Yimo, CHOU Wanju, WEI Lihua, ZHANG Qinglin.  Benevolent leadership and subordinate innovative behavior: The mediating role of perceived insider status and the moderating role of leader-member exchange differentiation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1100-1112.
[4] WANG Haizhong, FAN Xiaowen, OUYANG Jianying.  Consumer self-construal, need of uniqueness and preference of brand logo shape[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1113-1124.
[5] HAN Meng, MAO Xinrui, CAI Mengtong, JIA Xi, GUO Chunyan.  The effect of positive and negative signs on the SNARC effect in the magnitude judgment task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 995-1008.
[6] FU Yilei, LUO Yuejia, CUI Fang.  Consistency of choice modulates outcome evaluation: Evidence from ERP studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1089-1099.
[7] ZHANG Yuzhi, ZHANG Jijia.  The effects of neighborhood size and category consistency of the semantic radical on semantic radical’s semantic activation under radical priming paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1041-1052.
[8] SONG Xiaolei, ZHANG Junting, SHI Jie, YOU Xuqun.  Influence of emotional valence on the spatial simon effect under the vocal response mode[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1031-1040.
[9] WANG Yiwen, FU Chao, REN Xiangfeng, LIN Yuzhong, GUO Fengbo.  Narcissistic personality modulates outcome evaluation in the trust game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1080-1088.
[10] YANG Linchuan, MA Hongyu, JIANG Hai, LIANG Juan, QI Ling.  When do procedural justice and outcome justice interact to influence legitimacy of authorities? The moderating effect of social class[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 980-994.
[11] PENG Ming, JING Wenying, CAI Mengfei, ZHOU Zongkui.  Perceptual difference between internet words and real-world words: temporal perception, distance perception, and perceptual scope[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 866-874.
[12] ZHANG Jianxin, LU Li, YIN Ming, ZHU Chuanlin, HUANG Chunlu, LIU Dianzhi.  The establishment of ecological microexpressions recognition test (EMERT): An improvement on JACBART microexpressions recognition test[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 886-896.
[13] LIN Wuji, MENG Yingfang, LIN Jingyuan.  Effects of interference on retrieval process in implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 897-908.
[14] LIU Chao, LIU Jun, ZHU Li, WU Shouqiang.  The causes of abusive supervision from the perspective of rule-adaptation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 966-979.
[15] LIN Lin.  Integratin the theory of planned behavior and implementation intention to overcome procrastination[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 953-965.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech