Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (5) : 590-601     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00590
|
Does irrelevant long-term memory representation guide the deployment of visual attention?
HU Cenlou; ZHANG Bao; HUANG Sai
(Department of Psychology / The Key Laboratory for Juveniles Mental Health and Educational Neuroscience in Guangdong Province, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China)
Download: PDF(829 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The capacity of information processing system for human being is severely limited, but humans are proficient in searching for target information in the familiar visual scenes, in part because the task-relevant long-term memory (LTM) representations can efficiently guide attentional deployment to optimize the selection to the target and the escapement from the distractors. Hence, LTM-guided attention is key to our high level of visual performance, serving to direct our limited attentional resources efficiently. However, the issue whether irrelevant LTM representations can guide the deployment of visual attention as well as the irrelevant working memory (WM) representation is elusive yet. Therefore, we attempted to explore this issue here via three experiments. In experiment 1, participants were asked to maintain an object in LTM before the experiment initialized until to the end. During the experiment, participants were required to perform a visual search task while holding another object in WM online. In the visual search task, one of the distractor might share common features with either the representation of LTM or the representation of WM occasionally. Both the results of the response time and the first fixation proportion showed that the visual attention would bias to the distractor when sharing common features with the WM representation, displaying an classical WM-driven attentional guidance effect; however, non-guidance effect was found when the distractor shared common features with LTM representation. More importantly, the magnitude of guidance from WM representation was not affected by the simultaneously- emerged LTM representation which was regarded as a directly competitor for the attentional resources in the visual search display. In experiment 2, we manipulated the repetition times of the remembering object as the task used by Carlisle, Arita, Pardo & Woodman (2011), and aimed to test the attentional guidance from the memory representation while it was transferred from WM to LTM. The results observed an obvious attentional guidance effect from the memory representation when it was regarded as being maintained in WM (i.e., when the remembering object repeated less than three times) and this guidance effect disappeared when the memory representation was turned into LTM representation (i.e., when the remembering object repeated more than three times). In experiment 3, we required participants only keeping the LTM representation in memory system as to eliminate the possible interference from WM representation, and remain did not found any attentional guidance effect from the irrelevant LTM representation. In conclusion, the results of the present study observed a robust attentional guidance from the WM representation even when it not severing as search target template and sharing features with distractor in visual search task, in contrast, none such effect was found from the LTM representation under the same situation. These results indicated that the irrelevant LTM representation could not guide visual attention as well as irrelevant WM representation, and illustrated that the guiding process of visual attention from the representations of WM and LTM were two of distinct cognitive processes.

Keywords long-term memory      selective attention      attentional guidance      cognitive control     
Corresponding Authors: HUANG Sai, E-mail: sai.huang@139.com, ZHANG Bao, E-mail: bao.zhang@139.com   
Issue Date: 25 May 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
HU Cenlou; ZHANG Bao; HUANG Sai. Does irrelevant long-term memory representation guide the deployment of visual attention?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017, 49(5): 590-601.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00590     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2017/V49/I5/590
[1] ZHANG Yin, LIANG Tengfei, YE Chaoxiong, LIU Qiang. The inhibitory effect of long-term associative representation on working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 562-571.
[2] Xiaoyu TANG,Jiaying SUN,Xing PENG. The effect of bimodal divided attention on inhibition of return with audiovisual targets[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 257-268.
[3] LI Shouxin, CHE Xiaowei, LI Yanjiao, WANG Li, CHEN Kaisheng. The effects of capacity load and resolution load on visual selective attention during visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 527-542.
[4] CUI Yichen, WANG Pei, CUI Yajuan. Cognitive control strategies from the perspective of perceptual conflict: An example of stereotyped information and counterstereotyped information[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(10): 1157-1170.
[5] WANG Yanqing,CHEN Antao,HU Xueping,YIN Shouhang. Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 48-57.
[6] LIU Zhiying, KU Yixuan.  Perceiving better, inhibiting better: Effects of perceptual precision on distractor-inhibition processes during working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1247-1255.
[7] ZHANG Bao; HU Cenlou; Huang Sai. What do eye movements reveal about the role of cognitive control in attention guidance from working memory representation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[8] LIU Cong; JIAO Lu; SUN Xun; WANG Ruiming. Immediate effect of language switch on non-proficient bilinguals’ cognitive control components[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 472-481.
[9] LI Xiujun; SHI Wendian. Influence of selective attention on implicit learning with auditory stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 221-229.
[10] WANG Jiaying; JIAO Runkai; ZHANG Ming. The mechanism of the effect of task setting on negative compatibility effect: The effect of top-down cognition control on subliminal prime processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1370-1378.
[11] ZHANG Bao1,2; SHAO Jiaying1; HU Cenlou1; Huang Sai1. Attentional Guidance from Activated and Inhibitory States of  Working Memory Representations[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1089-1100.
[12] LIU Xiaoyu; HE Chaodan; CHEN Jun; DENG Qinli. The Bilingual Cognitive Control Mechanism of Highly Proficient Cantonese-Mandarin Speakers: Evidence from A Dual-task Switching Paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 439-454.
[13] BAO Xuhui;JI Ming;HUANG Jie;HE Liguo;YOU Xuqun. The Effects of Activation Levels of Visual Long-Term Memory on Visual Short-Term Memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1086-1093.
[14] DOU Weiwei;ZHENG Xifu;YANG Huifang;WANG Junfang;LI Yue;E Xiaotian;Chen Qianqian. The Effect of Cognitive Distraction’s Intensity on the Process of Trauma-related Information: Evidence from ERP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(5): 656-665.
[15] XU Lei;WANG Lijun;ZHAO Yuanfang;TAN Jinfeng;CHEN Antao. Subliminal Reward Modulates the Tradeoff between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 459-466.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech