Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2017, Vol. 49 Issue (1) : 17-27     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2017.00017
4~6 year-old children’s trust in economic game and its influencing factors
LI Tingyu1,2; LIU Li1,2; ZHU Liqi1
(1 CAS Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Beijing 100101, China) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Download: PDF(536 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Trust is essential to personal well-being and economic success. Trust is a kind of rational behavior, and it is also a kind of social behavior, which may be influenced by the development of individual cognitive ability (perspective taking) and the environment (negative feedback and intergenerational transmission). Research on children’s trust can help us understand the development of trust, and help us establish better informed education programs. To measure trust, prior work has used the Trust Game, a game that requires children to decide how many tokens to invest to other players. However, research on the development of preschoolers’ trust using economic trust game is rare. The current work explores young children’s trust in economic trust game and its influencing factors. To explore these factors, we tested 189 4~6-year-old preschoolers on multiple tasks employed to investigate preschooler’s development of trust. In study 1, the revised version of Evans’ (2013) Trust Game (Surprise Bag Task) was used to explore the preschoolers’ trust. Each game began with introducing the potential trustee. The strange child (trustee) was referred to as “a boy (or girl) the same age as you who attend a different kindergarten.” Then children were given a “surprise bag” (the opaque plastic bag contained toys). After giving the bag to the children, children were told that they could keep the bag or give it to the trustee. Children were told that if they give it to the trustee, the trustee would receive four bags and children were asked if they believed trustee and were willing to give “surprise bag” to trustee (willingness to give as a trust behavior).If they trusted, children were asked how many surprise bags would return from trustee. In study 2, we explored how negative feedback (trustee refused to return supervise bag to the child) affected whether children still chose to trust strangers in later “surprise bag” games. We also explored the role of perspective taking ability (Unexpected location task) in children’s trust decisions. Finally, we investigated the relationship between children’s trust (“Surprise bag” Task) and their parents’ trust. Parents’ trust were measured by trust game questionnaire, they were given 100 tokens. Parents were told that they could keep the tokens or give all of the tokens to the trustee. If parents were willing to give tokens to trustee, the trustee would get 400 tokens. This would demonstrate a willingness to give tokens to trustee as a trust behavior. In study 1, the results showed that more than half of the children gave surprise bags to trustee in anonymous interactions, and there was no significant difference between the three age groups. But there was a significant difference in the number of bags that were expected to return from trustee among the three age groups. Four-year-old children expected significantly more bags would return from trustee than the older children. Young children demonstrated more trust than older children. In study 2 we also found that trust decreased in all age groups after the betrayal (children were told that the trustee refused to return any of the surprise bags to them),. Although some of children still gave their “surprise bag” to the trustee again, most of children did not trust trustee at the second time. The difference between the number of bags expected to return from trustee in the two times was significant, all of the children expected less bags would be returned after betrayal. Specifically, the elder children mistrusted trustee after negative feedback was given, while 4-year-old children still expected more bags to be returned to them by the trustee than 6-year-old children. At age 6 children’s willingness to trust was positively related with children's perspective taking ability. Also, at age 6 children’s trust was related with their parents’ trust, and parents’ trust significantly predicted children’s trust. In sum, children have an early tendency to trust, and younger children have stronger trust tendency than elder children. After negative feedback (a stranger does not return “surprise bag” to the child), children's trust declines, and older children trust less than the younger children. Children’s perspective taking ability is positively correlated with elder children’s trust. In addition, parents’ values influences children’s trust at the age of 6.

Keywords 4~6 year-old preschoolers      trust      trust game      parental transmission      perspective taking      negative feedback     
Corresponding Authors: ZHU Liqi, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 January 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
LI Tingyu; LIU Li; ZHU Liqi. 4~6 year-old children’s trust in economic game and its influencing factors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2017, 49(1): 17-27.
URL:     OR
[1] Chen CHEN,Xin ZHANG,Liping SUN,Xin QIN,Huiru DENG. Trust is valued in proportion to its rarity? Investigating how and when feeling trusted leads to counterproductive work behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(3): 329-344.
[2] ZHANG Shuwei,SHEN Yiren,ZHOU Jie. Social license of public decision from the behavioral public administration perspective: Transparency effect and its moderation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 240-256.
[3] LYU Xiaokang, FU Chunye, WANG Xinjian. Effect and underlying mechanism of refutation texts on the trust and moral judgment of patients[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(10): 1171-1186.
[4] TANG Weihai,ZHONG Rubo,XU Xiaoxu,LIU Xiping. Effects of facial attractiveness and information accuracy on preschoolers’ selective trust[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 71-84.
[5] FU Chao, ZHANG Zhen, HE Jinzhou, HUANG Silin, QIU Jianyin, WANG Yiwen.  Brain dynamics of decision-making in the generalized trust game: Evidence from ERPs and EEG time-frequency analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 317-326.
[6] LI Tingyu, LIU Li, LI Yilin, ZHU Liqi. Preschoolers' selective trust and belief revision in conflicting situation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1390-1399.
[7] Xiujuan WANG,Na WANG,Shangfeng HAN,Shen LIU,Lin ZHANG. The influence of facial trustworthiness on helping behavior: The role of attachment type[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(11): 1292-1302.
[8] LIU Baogen, LI Feifei, LI Ruiqin, JIANG Hui .  Trust and subsequent use of oral and print information for 4~6 year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1053-1062.
[9] WANG Yiwen, FU Chao, REN Xiangfeng, LIN Yuzhong, GUO Fengbo.  Narcissistic personality modulates outcome evaluation in the trust game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1080-1088.
[10] ZHANG Shuwei.  Social justice, institutional trust and public cooperation intention[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 794-813.
[11] LIU Shixiong, BI Xiaopei, HE Kaibin.  The impact of internet language copy on consumers’ attention and perceptions of the advertisement[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(12): 1590-1603.
[12] ZHANG Lin; LIU Shen; XU Qiang; WU Xiaoyan; YANG Mengyuan. Long-term effect of violence exposure in real-life on aggressive behaviors: A moderated mediation model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 50-59.
[13] TU Xingyong; ZHANG Qi; WANG Zeyin; HE Xin. Trust climate, perceived insider status and employee’ in-role performance: A mediated moderator model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 83-93.
[14] LI Caina; SUN Ying; TUO Rui; LIU Jia. The effects of attachment security on interpersonal trust: The moderating role of attachment anxiety[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 989-1001.
[15] ZHONG Yiping; YANG Zilu; FAN Wei. The Effects of Self-other Overlap on Helping Behavior: Moderating of Perspective Taking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1050-1057.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech