Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2016, Vol. 48 Issue (12) : 1589-1599     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01589
The effect of power on consumers’ nostalgia preferences
CHEN Huan; BI Sheng; PANG Jun
(School of Business, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
Download: PDF(459 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Power is defined as a capacity to influence others or as immunity to the influence of others. The experience of low power is an aversive state of being, motivating consumers to regain perceived power by purchasing status-related products. Nostalgic consumption refers to consumers’ preferences for nostalgic products, brands, or advertisements. Prior research suggests that anxiety, insecurity, stress, and social exclusion would increase nostalgic consumption as nostalgia can bring out positive emotions and social belongingness. Yet, little has been done to examine the relationship between power and nostalgic consumption. In this study, we propose nostalgic consumption as a new strategy to cope with a low power state. Specifically, we argue that low power makes consumers feel that their lives are meaningless, which would activate a need to search for meaning. Nostalgic products can help consumers attain meaning in life by activating memories of personally significant events and boosting perceptions of social connectedness. Therefore, consumers in a state of low power are more likely to prefer nostalgic products than those in the state of high power and motivation to search for meaning in life mediates this effect. We conducted three studies to test these hypotheses. Study 1 explored the relationship between power and consumers’ nostalgia preferences. One hundred and five participants took part in the experiment and were randomly assigned to the nostalgic or non-nostalgic condition. They first completed a Life Style and Personality Survey, which measured their chronic sense of power. After that, they read a nostalgic or non-nostalgic ad and then reported their preferences for the brand in the ad. Study 2 examined the causal effect of power on consumers’ nostalgia preferences. One hundred and forty-six participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: high power, low power, and a control. The experiment consisted of a priming task used to manipulate power and a choice task asking participants to choose between a nostalgic-themed concert and a non-nostalgic-themed concert. Study 3 was intended to replicate the previous findings and test the mediating effect of the motivation to search for meaning. Forty-eight participants were randomly assigned to the high-power or low-power condition. We manipulated power using a recall task, followed by a measure asking participants to what extent they wanted to search for meaning in life. Following that, participants were asked to choose their favorite brand among four alternatives: two nostalgic brands and two non-nostalgic brands. The results of Study 1 showed that power was negatively associated with participants’ preferences for the nostalgic brand (b = –0.44, t(45) = –2.08, p = 0.044), and this relationship was not significant for the non-nostalgic brand. In Study 2, participants primed with low power were more likely to choose the nostalgic- themed concert (χ2(2) = 23.32, p < 0.001, φ = 0.40) and indicated more favorable attitudes toward it (F(2,143) = 23.84, p < 0.001, η2 = 0.25) than those primed with low power and those in the control condition. In Study 3, we replicated the effect of power on nostalgia preference (χ2(1) = 3.46, p = 0.06, φ = 0.27) and found evidence for a full mediating process of the motivation to search for meaning in life (95% CI = –3.29 ~ –0.10). Our research is the first to demonstrate the relationship between consumers' state of power and their preferences for nostalgic consumption. Furthermore, the results suggest that nostalgic consumption is a particular strategy for consumers to cope with the negative experience caused by low power. In addition, we identify the concept of motivation to search for meaning in life as the underlying mechanism, which is also novel to the literature. Beyond the theoretical contributions, our findings provide important implications for people on how to cope with the negative state of low power, as well as for firms on how to improve the effectiveness of nostalgia marketing.

Keywords power      nostalgia      nostalgic consumption      meaning in life      coping strategy. Note      We appreciate Atanas Nik Nikolov’s help with this abstract.     
Corresponding Authors: PANG Jun, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 24 December 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
CHEN Huan; BI Sheng; PANG Jun. The effect of power on consumers’ nostalgia preferences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016, 48(12): 1589-1599.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHANG Yin, LIANG Tengfei, YE Chaoxiong, LIU Qiang. The inhibitory effect of long-term associative representation on working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 562-571.
[2] HE Xiaoling,CHEN Jun. Cognitive development of multiple metaphors of power concepts in 3~5 year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 149-161.
[3] WANG Jianfeng, DAI Bing. The pursuit of fame at the expense of profit: The influence of power motive and social presence on prosocial behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 55-65.
[4] FU Anguo,ZHANG Zaisheng,ZHENG Jianhong,YUE Tong,LIN Zhaohong,WU Na,HUANG Xiting. Qualitative research on the endogenous power mechanism for poverty elimination[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 66-80.
[5] SUN Qian,LONG Changquan,WANG Xiuxin,LIU Yongfang. Fairness or benefit? The effect of power on distributive fairness[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(8): 958-968.
[6] ZHU Yue,XIE Jiangpei,JIN Yanghua,SHI Junqi. Power disparity and team conflict: The roles of procedural Justice and legitimacy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 829-840.
[7] LI Ting, WEI Xiaoping, ZHENG Zixin, YI Xiangjie, ZHAO Xueru, HE Xianyou. The effects of different power relations on negation bias of negative descriptions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 714-723.
[8] JI Hao,XIE Xiao-Yun,XIAO Yong-Ping,GAN Xiao-Le,FENG Wen. Does power hierarchy benefit or hurt team performance? The roles of hierarchical consistency and power struggle[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 366-382.
[9] LI Xiao-dan,DING Dao-qun,YE Hao-sheng. The influence of embodied implicit power on fair decision making[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 106-116.
[10] . The effects of power on human behavior: The perspective of regulatory focus[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 404-415.
[11] YANG Ying; ZHU Yi. Effects of online pictorial versus verbal reviews of experience product on consumer’s judgment[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 1026-1036.
[12] JIN Fei; ZHU Huawei. Consumers’ power states and impulsive buying[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 880-890.
[13] ZHENG Xiaoming; LIU Xin. The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 693-709.
[14] LU Xinxin; SUN Jiaqing. When leader-member exchange increases emotional exhaustion? The role of belief in reciprocity and power distance orientation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.
[15] RONG Yan; SUI Yang; YANG Baiyin. The Effect of Leader Emotional Intelligence on Group Performance and #br# Employee Attitude: Mediating Effect of Justice Climate and Moderating Effect of Group Power Distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1152-1161.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech