Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2016, Vol. 48 Issue (10) : 1229-1238     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01229
How value-based agendas affect study time allocation: An eye tracking study
JIANG Yingjie1; WANG Zhiwei1; ZHENG Mingling2; JIN Xuelian1,3
(1 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China) (2 The Open University of Daqing, Daqing 163000, China) (3 Jilin Medical University, Jilin 132013, China)
Download: PDF(459 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Allocation of study time is generally considered as one of the most important indicators to show how learners adjust and control their learning processes efficiently, and it is influenced by habitual responding or an agenda-based process. In the agenda-based regulation (ABR) framework, agenda is a type of plans which can help learners finish their study in some situation. Generally, multiple factors, such as item difficulty and value, have effects on agenda-based regulation. Under the condition of limited study time and equal rewards for each item, learners often choose the item at their reading habit preferred position (left for Chinese) first to remember and then shift to another position (right for Chinese) when they feel they can fully recall the first one in the later test. However, if the rewards are unequal, especially when the item at opposite preferred position has higher rewards than those at the preferred position, habit-oriented learning may become counter-productive and learners tend to adopt a value-based agenda in item selection and study time allocation. The present study controlled the item difficulty in moderate level to observe whether the item value can influence the study decision shifting from habitual bias to value-based agendas by using the eye tracking technique. Three experiments were conducted with a paradigm devised by Metcalfe and her colleagues. Experiment 1 evaluated the habitual responding of native Chinese readers (mainly select items in a left-to-right fashion) in Chinese and provided a baseline to compare to Experiments 2 and 3. Participants were asked to learn the associations of 24 pairs of nouns. Two pairs of nouns were presented on a computer display for a total 3 s, one pair to the left and the other one to the right of the fixation. With the observation of clear bias of study time allocation to items on the left side, Experiments 2 and 3 were carried out to clarify if this habit oriented strategy was modulated by rewards, and if so, could rewards override such habit-oriented strategy and encourage the adaptation of a value-based strategy? The task procedures were the same across Experiments 2 and 3, and were similar to that of Experiment 1, only with the following two exceptions. First, the two pairs of nouns were associated with different rewards (1 vs. 5 points in Experiment 2; 1 vs. 10 points in Experiment 3). Second, participants need to complete two experimental blocks. In one block, the pairs of nouns with high rewards were presented on the left. In the other block, the pairs of nouns with high rewards were presented on the right. The results showed that: a) without rewards, participants tended to process items on the left side first, which give them more study time (Experiment 1); b) this left side bias remained when items of high rewards were presented on the left side of the display (Experiments 2 & 3); and c) when high rewards items were presented on the right side, the left side bias was disappeared if the reward contrast between left and right side items was moderate (Experiment 2), and was reversed if the reward contrast is high (Experiment 3). These observations suggest that value-based agenda can counteract or even override habitual processes in self-paced learning. The eye movements data of Experiments 2 and 3 further showed that the magnitude of reward contrast between items modulates the time course of learning decisions. High reward contrast triggers immediate selection of items associated with higher rewards, whereas the selection of higher rewards items takes a bit long time to resolve, when the reward contrast was moderate. The findings are in general consistent with the ABR framework. Study time allocation in self-paced learning is dynamic and context-specific. Item selection and study time are modulated by both habitual and value-based agendas, and the strength of value-based agenda is contingent on reward contrast.

Keywords study time allocation      agenda-based regulation      metamemory      metacognition      memory     
Corresponding Authors: JIANG Yingjie, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 25 October 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
JIANG Yingjie; WANG Zhiwei; ZHENG Mingling; JIN Xuelian. How value-based agendas affect study time allocation: An eye tracking study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016, 48(10): 1229-1238.
URL:     OR
[1] HUANG Yanqing, MENG Yingfang. Effects of target detection on memory retrieval[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 706-715.
[2] ZHANG Huan, HOU Shuang, WANG Haiman, LIAN Yuxuan, YANG Haibo. Socially shared retrieval-induced forgetting in a naturalistic collaborative retrieval situation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 716-729.
[3] ZHANG Yin, LIANG Tengfei, YE Chaoxiong, LIU Qiang. The inhibitory effect of long-term associative representation on working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 562-571.
[4] HUANG Fajie,MENG Yingfang,YAN Ying. The effects of retrieval interference on different types of implicit memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 572-583.
[5] YE Chaoxiong,HU Zhonghua,LIANG Tengfei,ZHANG Jiafeng,XU Qianru,LIU Qiang. The mechanism of retro-cue effect in visual working memory: Cognitive phase separation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 399-413.
[6] ZHAO Xin,LI Hongli,JIN Ge,LI Shifeng,ZHOU Aibao,LIANG Wenjia,GUO Hongxia,CAI Yaya. Effects of phonological memory and central executive function on decoding, language comprehension of children in different grades[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.
[7] HU Jingjing,XU Haokui,CAO Liren. Visual representation of items with semantic information in sensory memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 982-991.
[8] ZHANG Di,HAO Renning,LIU Qiang. The effects of the attention resource allocation on visual working memory consolidation process[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 772-780.
[9] PENG Wanqing,LUO Wei,ZHOU Renlai. HRV evidence for the improvement of emotion regulation in university students with depression tendency by working memory training[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 648-661.
[10] LI Shouxin, CHE Xiaowei, LI Yanjiao, WANG Li, CHEN Kaisheng. The effects of capacity load and resolution load on visual selective attention during visual working memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 527-542.
[11] REN Xiaoyun,LI Yuting,MAO Weibin,GENG Qiuchen. The effect of emotion on directed forgetting for continuous events[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 269-279.
[12] ZHANG Lei,LU Chengrou,LIN Junfeng,MEI Leilei. Impacts of chunking strategy on memorising similar words[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 280-292.
[13] HU Jingchu,ZHANG Weixin,CHEN Xiaoting,WANG Wenqing,WANG Zijie,ZHUANG Chuqun,FENG Biao,ZHENG Xifu. Cue specificity of reconsolidation update mechanism in remote fear memories[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 316-323.
[14] GONG Huoliang,YANG Di,ZHANG Fangyi. The influence of questioning type on the generalization of autobiographical memory[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(12): 1318-1329.
[15] ZHANG Dandan,LIN Yiqin,LIU Yunzhe,LUO Yuejia,JIANG Donghong. Memory encoding, retention and retrieval of disgusting and fearful faces[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 36-47.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech