Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2016, Vol. 48 Issue (9) : 1163-1174     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.01163
Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-Being
HUANG Tingting1; LIU Liqian2; WANG Dahua1; ZHANG Wenhai3
(1 Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China) (2 Beijing Industry and Trade Technicians College, Beijing 100089, China) (3 Centre for Mental Health Education, Yancheng Institute of Technology, Yancheng 400715, China)
Download: PDF(536 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Social status refers to the position of an individual in the society, generally indicated by socioeconomic status (SES) or sociometric status (SMS). Despite growing research interest in examining relationships between SMS and SWB, only a few studies so far have directly compared the two types of social status with regard to their influences on SWB. Available work in the US has generally reported that SMS not SES has a positive impact on SWB among American samples. Given the economic and cultural differences between China and US, we proposed in the present study that both SES and SMS could be closely associated with an individual’s SWB among Chinese people. Furthermore, we proposed that SES might have stronger effects on young adults’ SWB, whereas SMS have stronger effects on older adults. This age-related hypothesis was grounded in the paradox of SWB with aging and the Social Selectivity Theory (SST). The paradox of SWB assumes that despite of deterioration with aging, older people report higher SWB compared with younger people. To interpret this paradox, SST maintains that individuals’ social motivation will gradually shift from knowledge acquirement to emotion regulation with age. Overall, the main purpose of this paper was to examine the impacts of the two types of social status on individuals’ SWB in a Chinese sample, while also testing age differences in this relationship. Participants were 120 young (aged 27.26 ± 4.80 years) and 120 older adults (aged 65.12 ± 6.49 years) from Beijing, China. Participants were firstly tested for baseline SWB and some covariates including neuroticism and extraversion. After a 3~7 day interval, participants were then allocated into one of the four conditions of social comparison, namely upward SES, downward SES, upward SMS, and downward SMS based on the MacArthur Ladder priming technique. Participants were asked to a) think of their important social networks and single out someone who has the highest or lowest SES (or SMS) among them; b) imagine this person at the very top/bottom rung of the ladder; c) place their own SES (or SMS) on one of the ladder rungs in comparison with the target person. After completing this grading on the ladder, their SWB were measured once again. An independent sampled t-test showed that there is no difference between young and older adults on the overall scores of baseline SWB (t (237) = 1.55, p = 0.12) while older adults reported higher life satisfaction than young adults (t (237) = 3.43, p < 0.01, Cohen’s d = 0.44), which is consistent with the assumption of the paradox of SWB. A three-way ANOVA (comparison direction × status type × age) showed that comparison direction had a significant main effect (F (1,229) = 133.01, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.37), whereas there was no interaction effect between comparison direction and status type, F (1, 229) = 0.20, p = 0.66. In other words, both SES and SMS have significant impacts on SWB. Most importantly, there existed a significant interaction between comparison direction, status type and age, F (1, 229) = 6.92, p < 0.01, η2p = 0.03. Post-hoc analysis indicated that SES had a stronger effect on younger people’s SWB under the downward comparison, whereas SMS had a stronger effect on older people’s SWB under the upward comparison. However, participants’ ladder grades under different comparison directions did not show differences (F (1,231) = 0.05, p = 0.82), which failed to validate the priming effect of the McArthur Ladder techniques. We attribute the failing validation to the insensitivity of the Ladder’s grading mode. In the supplementary experiment, we used a 10 cm-long-rectangle without any grading marks instead of the original graded ladder in order to eliminate the anchoring effects. The results showed a significant difference between upward and downward comparison, which proves that the modified grading mode is effective to identify the priming effects of McArthur Ladder, t (57) = -2.06, p < 0.05, Cohen’s d = 0.54. In conclusion, consistent with our hypotheses, we found that SWB can be affected by SES and SMS simultaneously, which suggests a cultural specificity in terms of the effects of social status on SWB. It is noteworthy that the present study confirmed the aging paradox of SWB, and shed a new light on the age-related differences in the impacts of social status on SWB. The findings demonstrate that SES has stronger effects on young adults, whereas SMS has stronger effects on older adults, which provides a reasonable interpretation for the paradox of SWB with aging from the perspective of social comparison. In addition, we have modified the grading mode of MacArthur Ladder so as to make it applicable among Chinese samples.

Keywords socioeconomic status      sociometric status      subjective well-being      social comparison      aging     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Dahua, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 25 September 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
HUANG Tingting; LIU Liqian; WANG Dahua; ZHANG Wenhai. Socioeconomic status and sociometric status: Age differences on the effects of social comparison on subjective well-Being[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016, 48(9): 1163-1174.
URL:     OR
[1] ZHOU Heng, HE Hua, YU Wei, WANG Aijun, ZHANG Ming. Sound-induced flash illusion in elderly adults: Evidence from low-frequency fluctuation amplitudes in resting-state fMRI[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(7): 823-834.
[2] WU Hanlin, YU Zhou, WANG Xuejiao, ZHANG Qingfang. Language processing in normal aging: Contributions of information-universal and information-specific factors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 541-561.
[3] GONG Xiushuang,ZHANG Honghong. Outstanding others vs. mediocre me: The effect of social comparison on uniqueness-seeking behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 645-658.
[4] XIAO Rong,LIANG Dandan,LI Shanpeng. Effects of aging on the Mandarin lexical tone perception: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 1-11.
[5] ZHAO Ruiying,LOU Hao,OUYANG Mingkun,ZHANG Qingfang. Aging of the tip of the tongue in daily life: A diary study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 598-611.
[6] YANG Qun, ZHANG Qingfang. Aging effect of picture naming in Chinese: The influence of the non-selective inhibition ability[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(10): 1079-1090.
[7] ZHOU Chu, SU Man, ZHOU Chong, YANG Yan, XI Yaqi, DONG Qun. Imagination inflation effect in older adults[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(12): 1369-1380.
[8] GU Honglei, LIU Jun, XIA Tiansheng.  Effect of family socioeconomic status on reading autonomy among elementary school students: The mediating effects of parents' encouragement and reading motivation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(8): 1063-1071.
[9] LIAN Shuailei, SUN Xiaojun, NIU Gengfeng, ZHOU Zongkui.  Upward social comparison on SNS and depression: A moderated mediation model and gender difference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(7): 941-952.
[10] ZHANG Lanlan; SHEN Cheng; ZHU Hua; LI Xuepei; DAI Wen;WU Yin; ZHANG Jian. The effects of motor skill level and somatosensory input on motor imagery: An fMRI study on basketball free shot[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 307-316.
[11] LIU Wen, ZHANG Xue, ZHANG Yu, YU Ruiwei.  Fairness cognition-behavior gap in 4~8 year-old children: The role of social comparison[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(12): 1504-1512.
[12] WU Weijiong.  Resolving “Commuting Paradox”: How commute time influences subjective well-being[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(11): 1449-1459.
[13] REN Zhihong, RUAN Yijun, ZHAO Qingbai, ZHANG Wei, LAI Lizu, JIANG Guangrong.  The neuropsychological mechanism of therapy in depression and anxiety disorder: A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1302-1321.
[14] LIU Qingqi; NIU Gengfeng; Fan Cuiying; ZHOU Zongkui. Passive use of social network site and its relationships with self-esteem and self-concept clarity: A moderated mediation analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 60-71.
[15] LUO Li; HUANG Min-Er. The age differences of the mediation effect of emotion regulation between traits and emotion[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1455-1466.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech