Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2016, Vol. 48 Issue (4) : 331-342     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2016.00331
The neural basis of scientific innovation problems solving
LI WenFu1; TONG DanDan2; QIU Jiang2; ZHANG QingLin2
(1 Department of Mental Health, Jining Medical University, Jining 272067, China)
Department of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
Download: PDF(2835 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Creativity involved every aspect of social life. Numerous brain imaging researchers had explored the activation in the brain using a myriad of creative tasks, such as divergent thinking tasks, verbal and figural creative tasks, mental imagery, the generation of creative stories and paintings. Scientific innovation was one of the most important forms of creative thinking. The cases of creation and innovation happened in the real world had been used to study the mechanism behind creativity. However, the functions of implicated brain regions remained poorly understood. The present study employed resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) to investigate the neural substrates for the process of the scientific innovation problem solving.

In the present study, 65 scientific innovation problems were selected from the real world and divided into novel scientific innovation (NSI) problems and old scientific innovation (OSI) problems (36 NSI problems and 29 OSI problems). Each problem consisted of two parts: heuristic prototype and the corresponding question. Numerous studies showed that the heuristic prototype inspired the solution of insightful problems. The modified “learning-test two-phase” paradigm was used. Specifically, we asked the subjects to learn all the heuristic prototypes one day before the experiment, and then resolve the corresponding problems randomly in the test phase of the experiment. 16 undergraduates (mean age = 21.19 ± 1.76) were enrolled in the experiment. The rs-fMRI data was acquired using Echo Planar Imaging (EPI) sequence from a 3-T Siemens Magnetom Trio scanner (Siemens Medical, Erlangen, Germany) with a 12-channel phased-array head coil housed at MRI center of Southwest University. This scanning acquired 242 volumes in 8 min and 8 sec. Brain imaging data was processed and analyzed using the REST (Resting-State fMRI Data Analysis Toolkit) toolbox to calculate ReHo (Regional Homogeneity) and ALFF (Amplitude of Low Frequency Fluctuation). We used both ReHo and ALFF to measure the local properties of rs-fMRI signals, and then investigated the relationship between ReHo/ALFF and individual differences in creativity, as measured by the NSI problem solving. The multiple comparisons correction was calculated using the AlphaSim program in REST software.

After controlling for the age, gender and the accuracy rate of OSI problem solving, the results of multiple regression analysis showed that the ReHo of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) was positively correlated with creativity as measured by the accuracy rate of NSI problem solving. The results of the analysis of ALFF were consistent with that of ReHo.

The result of both ReHo and ALFF implied that the ACC was played an important role in the process of scientific innovation problem solving. We discussed the role of the ACC from two aspects: one involved in breaking the thinking set and forming the novel association, another involved in the demand of information processing.

Keywords creativity      scientific innovation problem solving      resting-state fMRI      anterior cingulate cortex     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG QingLin, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 April 2016
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
LI WenFu; TONG DanDan; QIU Jiang; ZHANG QingLin. The neural basis of scientific innovation problems solving[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2016, 48(4): 331-342.
URL:     OR
[1] HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668.
[2] LUO Ping,SHI Junqi,ZHU Yanni,FANG Yanran. The influence of idiosyncratic deals on employee proactive career behavior and creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 81-92.
[3] WEI Lihua,LIU Zhiqiang,LIAO Shudi,LONG Lirong,LIAO Jianqiao. Collective psychological ownership, status conferral criteria and team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 677-687.
[4] SHEN Yimo,MA Chenlu,BAI Xinwen,ZHU Yanhan,LU Yunlin,ZHANG Qinglin,LIU Jun. Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity: The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 238-247.
[5] Qi JIANG,Lulu HOU,Jiang QIU,Changran LI,Huanzhen WANG. The relationship between the caudate nucleus-orbitomedial prefrontal cortex connectivity and reactive aggression: A resting-state fMRI study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 655-666.
[6] Weiguo LIU, Yanran FANG, Junqi SHI, Shenjiang MO. The impact of supervisor’s creativity expectation on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 667-677.
[7] ZHANG Yong, LIU Haiquan, WANG Mingxuan, QING Ping.  The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 450-461.
[8] YANG Wenjing, JIN Yule, QIU Jiang, ZHANG Qinglin.  The effect of prototype difficulty and semantic similarity on the prototype activation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 260-269.
[9] Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168.
[10] LIU Min, ZHANG Qinlin, YU Wei, ZHANG Hua.  Preliminary study on creative thinking mechanism of market information integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 82-90.
[11] NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[12] ZHANG Jinghuan; LIU Xin; REN Feifei; SUN Xiangwei; YU Qi. The effects of group diversity and organizational support on group creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1551-1560.
[13] GU Chuanhua; WANG Yali; WU Caifu; XIE Xianglong; CUI Chengzhu; WANG Yaxian; WANG Wanzhen; HU Biying; ZHOU Zongkui. Brain Correlates underlying Social Creative Thinking: EEG Alpha Activity in Trait vs. State Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 765-773.
[14] LV Jie; ZHANG Gang. The Mechanisms of Knowledge Heterogeneity on Creativity of Knowledge Teams: An Interactive Cognition Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 533-544.
[15] MA Jun; ZHANG Haomin; YANG Tao. A Cross-level Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientation and Performance Control on Team Member’s Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 79-92.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech