Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
|
Information Amount and Obviousness Influence Hypothesis Generation
LIU Zhiya; ZHENG Chen
(Center for Studies of Psychological Application/School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
Download: PDF(508 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

 This study focuses on the availability of rule learning. Cherubini, Castelvecchio & Cherubini (2005); Cherubini, Rusconi, Russo, Di Bari, & Sacchi (2010) confirmed that the availability of rule learning was influenced by the information amount of the rule. Information amount was explained by how many examples could be covered by a rule. For a rule, the more number of examples could be converted, the less information amount would have. For example, in 2-4-6 task, the information amount in the rule of “even number increase” is 1/n and in the rule of “the third number is the sum of other two” is 1/n2. The information amount theory suggests that a rule with higher information amount is generated more easily than a lower one. However, Some researches (Barsalou,1982; Rips,1989; Medin, Lynch, Coley, & Atran,1997; Shafto, Coley, & Baldwin,2007; Guhe, Pease, & Smail,2011) showed that rule learning would be impacted by the information background of participants.

In this paper, information background was defined as the obviousness of the rule. Inspired by dual process model of deductive reasoning (Evans, 2003, 2010; Sloman, 1996; Barrouillet, 2011), This study assumed that the cognitive process of rule learning might be impacted by the information amount and obviousness both. Dual process model suggested that there were two independent cognitive systems, system 1 was usually described as unconscious and automatic; the system 2 was inherently conscious and controlled. This paper assumed that there might be two independent cognitive systems that manipulating rule learning process. This hypothesis was tested by experiment 1. Additionally, Ashby (1998) also suggested that there were two kinds of category learning. One was the rule-base category learning, the other was information integration. In the case of rule-based learning, participants could abstract a linguistic and explicit rule from materials, while they cannot discover an explicit rule but still can classify materials when doing information integration tasks, which seems to be implicit. This article assume that rule learning process may also conducted by both explicit and implicit systems and which system would be adopted may related to the information amount and obviousness of rules. Experiment 2 was designed to test this hypothesis. With 70 college students' participated, a revised 2-4-6 task was used to examine our hypothesis. Both experiments were presented by Psychtoolbox 3.0 on MATLAB.

Experiment 1 found that there were two independent factors, the information amount and the obviousness of the rule, significantly influence availability of rule learning. Experiment 2 is the same as experiment 1 except a rule description between every block of learning. The result of experiment 2 indicated that rules with high information amount and obviousness are more easier to be learned and expressed, while rules of low information amount combine with less obvious could be learned either but hardly be expressed clearly. These results consist with the dual process model in deductive reasoning and reveal that the rules with high amount information and obviousness are processing by an explicit rule system, and with lower amount information and less obviousness are processing by an implicit rule system.

Keywords learning      hypothesis generation      reasoning      implicit learning     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Zhiya, E-mail: zhiyaliu@scnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 25 December 2015
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Zhiya
ZHENG Chen
Cite this article:   
LIU Zhiya,ZHENG Chen. Information Amount and Obviousness Influence Hypothesis Generation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01445
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01445     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2015/V47/I12/1445
[1] GONG Shaoying, SHANGGUAN Chenyu, ZHAI Kuihu, GUO Yawei.  The effects of emotional design on multimedia learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 771-782.
[2] JIANG Ronghuan, LI Xiaodong.  The overuse of proportional reasoning and its cognitive mechanism: A developmental negative priming study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 745-758.
[3] ZHANG Hengchao. The influence of shared factors on the learning of the two sides of the referential communication[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 197-205.
[4] ZHANG Lijin; BI Yuan; LIANG Yi; LIU Minhong. Early screening and dynamic intervention of children with insufficient number sense[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 804-817.
[5] CHEN Shuai; WANG Duanxu. Way different, never work together? A moderated model of informational faultlines, overlapping team tenure, transactive memory system, and team learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 867-879.
[6] XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; ZHOU Zongkui; WU Peng. Cueing effect in multimedia learning: A meta-analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 540-555.
[7] WANG Qiong; WANG Weiwen; LI Man; DU Wei; SHAO Feng. The effects of TrkB inhibition in the mPFC on cognitive function and BDNF expression in the hippocampus of rats[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 509-517.
[8] YANG Haibo; LIU Dianzhi. Validity and sensitivity analysis of segment recognition task on implicit sequence learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 230-237.
[9] LI Xiujun; SHI Wendian. Influence of selective attention on implicit learning with auditory stimuli[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 221-229.
[10] DU Xuejiao; ZHANG Qi. The positive impact of worked-example design method and presentation mode on pupils’ learning for algebraic operation rules[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1445-1454.
[11] ZHOU Aibao; YANG Tiancheng; CHENG Chen; MA Xiaofeng; ZHAO Jing. Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning in Multiple-list Tests with Higher-Order Skills[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 928-938.
[12] TANG Yi; ZHANG Zhijun; ZENG Meimei; HUANG Ke; LIU Wei; ZHAO Yajun. Visual Statistical Learning Based on the Visual Feature and Semantic Information of Famous Faces[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 837-850.
[13] LIU Xiping; CHEN Liqing; TANG Weihai; BAI Xuejun. Experience with Proactive Interference Diminishes Its Memory #br# Monitoring and Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1328-1340.
[14] WU Peng;LIU Huashan. Association between Moral Reasoning and Moral Behavior: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1192-1207.
[15] WANG Ruiming;LIN Zheting;LIU Zhiya. The Representation of Partial Exemplars in Classification Learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1052-1061.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech