Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Team Demographic Diversity and Team Performance
WEI Xuhua1; LIU Yongmei2; CHEN Sixuan2
(1 School of Management, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China)
(2 Business School, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China)
Download: PDF(512 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Over the past decades, team demographic diversity has become a topic of considerable interest to industrial and organizational psychology scholars and organizational managers. However, there is little consistent evidence regarding the relations between team demographic diversity and team performance. There are at least two potential reasons to explain these inconsistencies. First, there are different forms of team demographic diversity and the specific type of diversity should have different effects on team performance. For example, team demographic diversity can be categorized as separation, variety and disparity based on the statistical distribution of team members' characteristics. Second, past researchers suggest considering contextual issues in team demographic diversity research. Rather than test the direct relationship between team demographic diversity and team performance, they have pointed out that contextual factors (e.g., cultural context) should play an important moderating role in the relationship between team demographic diversity and team performance.

In order to explain the inconsistencies in past research examining the link between team demographic diversity and team performance, we conducted a meta-analysis to examine the effects of different types of team demographic diversity on team performance. Our meta-analysis was based on 345 effect sizes from 137 Eastern and Western empirical studies with 79,639 teams. Each author independently coded the data and resolved discrepancies through discussion. In our coding system, we coded diversity as separation, variety, or disparity based on the measures of diversity used in each empirical paper. Further, we collected contextual data to examine the potential moderating effects of contextual factors, such as performance types, cultural context and team types.
Results of main effects showed that team demographic variety had significantly positive effects on team performance, whereas team demographic separation and disparity were unrelated to team performance. Further, moderation analyses showed that the relations between team separation, variety, disparity and team performance were moderated by performance types, cultural context and team types. Specifically, considering performance type as a moderator, variety and disparity were more positively correlated with innovation performance compared to general task performance. With respect to cultural context, team demographic variety in eastern countries was more positively correlated with team performance compared to variety in western countries, whereas team demographic disparity in western countries was more negatively correlated with team performance compared to disparity in eastern countries. Regarding team types, team demographic variety was more positively correlated with performance in top management teams (TMTs) and research and development (R&D) teams compared to general work teams.

Our results showed that different demographic diversity had distinct effects on team performance, depending on the specific diversity type and context (e.g., performance types, culture and team types). However, many researchers rarely distinguish between different types of demographic diversity. Thus, we suggest that future studies should pay more attention on this issue by specifying the demographic diversity types. Further, teams in Eastern countries should increase diversity as variety to improve their performance, whereas teams in Western countries should not only pay attention to team demographic variety, but also need to decrease team demographic disparity to avoid its negative effects on team performance. Overall, our findings have specific implications for companies to improve their performance through team demographic diversity management.

Keywords team diversity      separation      variety      disparity      performance     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Yongmei, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 September 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
WEI Xuhua
LIU Yongmei
CHEN Sixuan
Cite this article:   
WEI Xuhua,LIU Yongmei,CHEN Sixuan. A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship between Team Demographic Diversity and Team Performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01172
URL:     OR
[1] CHEN Qing; HE Quan; CHEN Guangyao; GUO Yuezhi; ZHANG Hejing; HE Xianyou. The perspective-distance effect hypothesis: Different perspectives and thinking modes lead to different decision-making performance in complex condition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 383-392.
[2] CHEN Mo; LIANG Jian. High performance expectation and unethical pro-organizational behavior: Social cognitive perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 94-105.
[3] TU Xingyong; ZHANG Qi; WANG Zeyin; HE Xin. Trust climate, perceived insider status and employee’ in-role performance: A mediated moderator model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 83-93.
[4] PENG Jian; WANG Xiao. I will perform effectively if you are with me: Leader-follower congruence in followership prototype, job engagement and job performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1151-1162.
[5] NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[6] CHEN Shuai.
The influence of team faultlines on team performance: Mediating effect of team transactive memory system
[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 84-94.
[7] LI Ye; ZHANG Wenhui; LONG Lirong. How Self-sacrificial Leadership Influences Subordinates’ Work Performance: The Mediating Roles of Strategic Orientation and Supervisor Identification[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(5): 653-662.
[8] YAN Bihua; JI Ming; ZHAO Xiaojun; TU Jinlu; YOU Xuqun. Predictive Effect of Implicit Safety Attitudes on Safety Performance in Aviation Safety Culture[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 119-128.
[9] LIU Lei; ZHENG Yuhuang; CHEN Rui. Better with More Choices? Impact of Choice Set Size on Variety Seeking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 66-78.
[10] MA Jun; ZHANG Haomin; YANG Tao. A Cross-level Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientation and Performance Control on Team Member’s Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(1): 79-92.
[11] TU Yidong; LU Xinxin; GUO Wei; WANG Zhen. What Benefits Do Ethical Leaders Gain? Ethical Leadership, LMX Mean and Leaders’ Benefits[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1378-1391.
[12] GAO Zhonghua;ZHAO Chen. Does Organizational Politics at the Workplace Harm Employees’ Job Performance? A Person-Organization Fit Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1124-1143.
[13] LIU Songbo;LI Yuhui. A Longitudinal Study on the Impact Mechanism of Employees’ Boundary Spanning Behavior: Roles of Centrality and Collectivism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(6): 852-863.
[14] HOU Xuanfang;LI Yanping;TU Yidong. Work Values of Chinese Millennial Generation: Structure, Measurement and Effects on Employee Performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(6): 823-840.
[15] ZHANG Yong; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. The Effect of Pay for Performance on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1880-1896.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech