Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2015, Vol. 47 Issue (9) : 1162-1171     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.01162
Mr. Right & Superman: Effect of Implicit Followership on Employee’s Behaviors
KONG Ming, QIAN Xiaojun
(School of Economics and Management, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(455 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Leaders’ Implicit Followership Theories (LIFTs) are defined as “leaders’ personal assumptions about the traits and behaviors that characterize followers”. It is an extension of implicit leadership theories (ILTs) supported by the social cognitive theory and cognitive information processing theory. From the “followers-centered” perspective, this paper analyzed the leadership process of “how leaders and followers perceive, decide, and act”.

This paper mainly discussed the influence factors on employee’s behaviors from the perspective of implicit followership. The social exchange theory provides a theoretical framework for understanding how employee’s beneficial social exchange with their organizations lead to their positive attitude and behaviors. The study also tests the mediating effect of leader-member exchange (LMX) and the moderating effect of psychological empowerment. It aims to address the following three research questions: (1) Can positive LIFTs affect employee’s behaviors, especially for the In-Role Behavior (IRB) and Organizational Citizenship Behavior (OCB), and how? (2) Can “Mr. Right” be “Superman”? Why and how? (3) Can and how LMX influence the relationship between “Mr. Right” and “Superman”?
Questionnaire surveys of both employees and their leaders in 19 large and medium-sized enterprises located in Beijing, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou were conducted. A total of 480 questionnaires were collected and among which 278 were valid (the efficiency is 57.9%). In order to reduce the common method variance, 2 questionnaire surveys with an interval of two months were conducted. After the CFA, we examined the reliability of the scale and tested the correlation between the variables. Multiple linear regression analyses were carried out based on the data from 278 employees in 19 companies.
The conclusion is that positive LIFTs are positively correlated with employee’s IRB and OCB. Moreover, the results of HRM show that LMX mediated the relationships between positive LIFTs and IRB/OCB. And the moderating effect of psychological empowerment is significant. The results of this study not only extends the application of implicit theory and cognitive theory in the studies on leadership, but also enriched the content of social exchange theory.
Keywords implicit followership      employee’s behavior      leader-member exchange      psychological empowerment     
Corresponding Authors: KONG Ming, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 September 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
KONG Ming, QIAN Xiaojun. Mr. Right & Superman: Effect of Implicit Followership on Employee’s Behaviors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2015, 47(9): 1162-1171.
URL:     OR
[1] HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668.
[2] PENG Jian, WANG Zhen.  Being a prototypic follower: Burdening or enabling? The paradoxical effect of followership prototype-trait match[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(2): 216-225.
[3] PENG Jian; WANG Xiao. I will perform effectively if you are with me: Leader-follower congruence in followership prototype, job engagement and job performance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1151-1162.
[4] ZHENG Xiaoming; LIU Xin. The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 693-709.
[5] LU Xinxin; SUN Jiaqing. When leader-member exchange increases emotional exhaustion? The role of belief in reciprocity and power distance orientation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.
[6] REN Zhen; YANG Anbo; WANG Dengfeng; LIN Ying. Structure Models of Leader-Member Relationship (LMR) from the Perspectives of Cultural Differences between China and the West[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(9): 1355-1377.
[7] LI Yan-Ping,TU Yi-Dong. Does High LMX Quality Benefit Subordinate’s Career Success? A Moderated Mediation Study[J]. , 2011, 43(08): 941-952 .
[8] WANG Zhong-Jun,LONG Li-Rong,LIU Li-Dan. Operation Mechanism and Effects of Supervisor-Subordinate Guanxi in Chinese Organizations[J]. , 2011, 43(07): 798-809.
[9] YANG Ying,LONG Li-Rong,CHOU Li-Fang. Risk Considerations and Delegation Behavior: The Role of Leader-Member Exchange and Centralization[J]. , 2010, 42(08): 875-885.
[10] YU Qiong,YUAN Deng-Hua. The Impact of the Emotional Intelligence of Employees and
Their Manager on the Job Performance of Employees
[J]. , 2008, 40(01): 74-83.
[11] She-Yimo. Antecedents and Consequences of Organizational Identification:
A Social Exchange Perspective
[J]. , 2007, 39(05): 918-925.
[12] Shen-Yimo,Yuan-Denghua. The Impact of Psychological Contract Breach on the Work-Related Attitude and Behavior of Employees[J]. , 2007, 39(01): 155-162.
[13] Zhou Mingjian,Bao Gongmin. SOCIAL EXCHANGES IN ORGANIZATIONS: FROM DIRECT TO INDIRECT EXCHANGES[J]. , 2005, 37(04): 535-541.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech