violent offenders,empathy for pain,ERP,N110,P2,P300," /> violent offenders,empathy for pain,ERP,N110,P2,P300,"/> violent offenders,empathy for pain,ERP,N110,P2,P300,"/> Dose Violent Offenders Have Lower Capacity of Empathy for Pain: Evidence from ERPs
Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
Dose Violent Offenders Have Lower Capacity of Empathy for Pain: Evidence from ERPs
GAO Xuemei; WENG Lei; ZHOU Qun; ZHAO Cai; LI Fang
(Faculty of Psychology, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China)
Download: PDF(994 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

As a typical form of empathy, empathy for pain refers to the perception, judgment of others’ pain, as well as corresponding affective responses. Deficit in empathy for pain may lead to withdrawal, indifference to other’s pain or aggressive behavior.Some contextual factors, especially the observers’ traits, may have an influence on empathy for pain. Previous studies have focused on empathy for pain of special groups like physicians and offenders, but most of these studies are questionnaire surveys and there is little research on the cognitive neural mechanisms.Moreover, observing stimuli in different perspectives also affects empathy for pain, and whether this effect exists in special groups remains unknown. Investigating the capacity of empathy in violent offenders can deepen our understanding about the mechanisms of empathy and provide some supports for their training program. Using a picture-priming paradigm, the present studypresented painful and non-painful stimuli toviolent offenders and ordinary (control) participants and simultaneously recorded their ERP data. The experiment consisted of two blocks and the participants were asked to view stimuli in first-person and other-person perspectives, respectively. Painful or non-painful pictures were presented for 1000ms, which werefollowed by a fixationlasting randomly for 1500-1700ms. In order to make sure that the participants viewed the pictures carefully, only 10% pictures were randomly chosen and needed participants’ responses. These pictures were accompanied by a response screen showing that “Painful picture: F; Non-painful picture: J”. The screen disappeared after a button pressing.For the remained trials, the participants just needed to view pictures carefully. The results showedthat the latencies and amplitudes of N110, P2 and P300 were different between violent offenders and control group. When viewing painful pictures, violent offenders had longer latency of N110 and P2 than what, and the amplitude of P2 was larger than what. When they viewed pictures under other-person perspective they also had longer latency of N110 than what?. Furthermore, for the amplitude of P300, control grouphad smaller amplitude when viewing painful pictures in both perspectives, while for violent offenders this effect only existed under other-person perspective. Our results indicated that violent offenders might have lower capacity of empathy for pain than control group. The present study supports the Communications Model of empathy for pain and expands previous studies to some extent. This may also provide some empirical support for the training program of offenders. However, we also have some limitations that need further investigations in the future.

Keywords font-family: "Times New Roman"      color: black      mso-bidi-font-size: 10.5pt      mso-font-width: 102%      mso-font-kerning: 1.0pt      mso-ansi-language: EN-US      mso-fareast-language: ZH-CN      mso-bidi-language: AR-SA      violent offenders')" href="#">mso-fareast-font-family: 方正书宋_GBK">violent offenders      empathy for pain      ERP      N110      P2      P300     
Corresponding Authors: WENG Lei, E-mail:; GAO Xuemei, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 April 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
GAO Xuemei
LI Fang
Cite this article:   
GAO Xuemei,WENG Lei,ZHOU Qun, et al. Dose Violent Offenders Have Lower Capacity of Empathy for Pain: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00478
URL:     OR
[1] CHENG Jiaping; LUO Yuejia; CUI Fang. Empathy for pain influenced by cognitive load: Evidence from an ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 622-630.
[2] DUAN Jinyun; SHI Jiayi; LING Bin. The influence of high commitment organization on employee voice behavior: A dual-process model examination[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 539-553.
[3] YANG Zhaoning; GU Zibei; WANG Dujuan; TAN Xuyun; WANG Xiaoming. The effect of anger and sadness on prosocial decision making: The role of the interpersonal attribution of responsibility[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 393-403.
[4] ZHAO Simin; WU Yan; LI Tianhong; GUO Qingtong. Morpho-semantic processing in Chinese word recognition: An ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 296-306.
[5] ZHANG Lin; LIU Shen; XU Qiang; WU Xiaoyan; YANG Mengyuan. Long-term effect of violence exposure in real-life on aggressive behaviors: A moderated mediation model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(1): 50-59.
[6] LI Caina; SUN Ying; TUO Rui; LIU Jia. The effects of attachment security on interpersonal trust: The moderating role of attachment anxiety[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 989-1001.
[7] SONG Juan; GUO Fengbo; ZHANG Zhen; YUAN Sheng; JIN Hua; WANG Yiwen. Interpersonal distance influences on pain empathy: Friends priming effect[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 833-844.
[8] LIU Fang; DING Jinhong; ZHANG Qin. Positive affect and selective attention: Approach-motivation intensity influences the early and late attention processing stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 794-803.
[9] XU Ju; HU Yuanyan; WANG Shuang; LI Aisu; ZHANG Ming; ZHANG Yang. Cognitive neural mechanism of training effect on inhibition of return: Evidence from an ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 658-670.
[10] WU Yan; MO Deyuan; WANG Haiying; YU Yiyang; CHEN Hsuan-Chih; ZHANG Ming. ERP effects of position-specific radicals in Chinese character recognition: Evidence from semantic categorization[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 599-606.
[11] HUANG SiLin; HAN MingYue; ZHANG Mei. The impact of interpersonal relationship on social responsibility[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 578-587.
[12] LIU Yun; LI Yanping; TU Yidong. Why employees help colleagues: A multilevel study on leader-member exchange and helping behavior[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 385-397.
[13] DUAN Jinyun; GU Xiaohua; SUN Luying. The influence of explicit self-esteem, implicit self-esteem and the discrepancies between them on advice taking[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 371-384.
[14] . An elaboration on the underlying mechanisms through which consumers’ desire for product touch forms: A cognitive experiential perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 410-422.
[15] WANG Tao; FENG Wenting; WEI Hua; ZHOU Nan. Loneliness makes me fall in love with you: The influence of product display on lonely individual’s product preference[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 398-409.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech