Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2015, Vol. 47 Issue (1) : 79-92     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00079
A Cross-level Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientation and Performance Control on Team Member’s Creativity
MA Jun; ZHANG Haomin; YANG Tao
(School of Management, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China)
Download: PDF(676 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

In the critical period of innovation-driven development and transformation, employee creativity is regarded as an important source of competitive advantage, and organizations are increasingly seeking innovative ways to foster individual creativity. Against this background, managers are facing the dual challenges, not only to identify employees with creativity potential, but also managing team context to render it more conducive to individual employee creativity. Hence, organizational researchers had devoted great attention to uncovering variables that influence employee creativity both on individual level and on team level. Previous researches have revealed strong links between achievement goal orientation and employee creativity, however the empirical studies show mixed results and this relationship has remained ambiguous and contested. For example, it is uncertain whether there is always a positive relationship between mastery goal orientation and creativity in different team contexts, and whether there is always a negative relationship between performance goal orientation and creativity under any circumstances. The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework about the cross-level influences of individual goal orientation and the team context on team member’s creativity. Adopting a cross-level approach, we examined how achievement goal orientation may relate to individual creativity in different team contexts. Multi-source data were collected from 540 members within 54 R&D teams. Although both individual differences in dispositions and team context play important roles in the creative process, person-in-situation approaches that account for their interactive influences are still in development. Our study also enriches and extends the nonlinear cross-level approach in organizational behavior research, providing further evidence for the promise of this approach. The results are as follows: firstly, mastery goal orientation is positively related to creativity, and low performance control strengthens this positive relationship; but in the high-performance control context, mastery goal orientation has an “S-type” effect on creativity, which means excessive learning and exploratory behaviors suppress team member’s creativity, thereby supporting the learning overload theory. Secondly, performance- approach goal orientation has a significant positive effect on creativity in the low-performance control context. Thirdly, performance-avoidance goal orientation is negatively related to creativity in the low performance control context, but the relationship is positive in the high-performance control context. The findings support the performance contingency theory and trait activation theory. Performance control practices are a more complex issue. Our study shows that team performance control practices may regulate and influence individuals’ goal-directed behavior to activate or inhibit the creative expression of goal orientations. This inspired that we should shift the focus from employees’ goal-orientations trait differences to constructing performance control system that matched with them when managing employee creativity. Specifically, considering that in the high-performance control context, learning behaviors beyond a certain point (i.e., at high levels of mastery goal orientation) may diminish creativity, we need to control the learning and exploratory behaviors in a reasonable range for efficiently investing in practices that promote creativity. At the same time, vertical control should be adopted for the avoid-oriented team members, while the horizontal control is suitable for the approach-oriented individuals.

Keywords goal orientation      team performance control      creativity      cross-level analysis     
Corresponding Authors: MA Jun, E-mail:; YANG Tao, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 26 January 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
MA Jun; ZHANG Haomin; YANG Tao. A Cross-level Analysis of Achievement Goal Orientation and Performance Control on Team Member’s Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2015, 47(1): 79-92.
URL:     OR
[1] HU Qiaoting,WANG Haijiang,LONG Lirong. Will newcomer job crafting bring positive outcomes? The role of leader-member exchange and traditionality[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(5): 659-668.
[2] LUO Ping,SHI Junqi,ZHU Yanni,FANG Yanran. The influence of idiosyncratic deals on employee proactive career behavior and creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(1): 81-92.
[3] WEI Lihua,LIU Zhiqiang,LIAO Shudi,LONG Lirong,LIAO Jianqiao. Collective psychological ownership, status conferral criteria and team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(6): 677-687.
[4] SHEN Yimo,MA Chenlu,BAI Xinwen,ZHU Yanhan,LU Yunlin,ZHANG Qinglin,LIU Jun. Linking abusive supervision with employee creativity: The roles of psychological contract breach and Zhongyong thinking style[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(2): 238-247.
[5] Weiguo LIU, Yanran FANG, Junqi SHI, Shenjiang MO. The impact of supervisor’s creativity expectation on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 667-677.
[6] ZHANG Yong, LIU Haiquan, WANG Mingxuan, QING Ping.  The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 450-461.
[7] YANG Wenjing, JIN Yule, QIU Jiang, ZHANG Qinglin.  The effect of prototype difficulty and semantic similarity on the prototype activation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(3): 260-269.
[8] Shengming LIU,Lifan CHEN,Simai WANG. Modesty brings gains: The effect of humble leader behavior on team creativity from a team communication perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(10): 1159-1168.
[9] LIU Min, ZHANG Qinlin, YU Wei, ZHANG Hua.  Preliminary study on creative thinking mechanism of market information integration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(1): 82-90.
[10] NI Xudong; XIANG Xiaoxia; YAO Chunxu. Balance of team diversity’ effects on team creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 556-565.
[11] LI WenFu; TONG DanDan; QIU Jiang; ZHANG QingLin. The neural basis of scientific innovation problems solving[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(4): 331-342.
[12] ZHANG Jinghuan; LIU Xin; REN Feifei; SUN Xiangwei; YU Qi. The effects of group diversity and organizational support on group creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1551-1560.
[13] GU Chuanhua; WANG Yali; WU Caifu; XIE Xianglong; CUI Chengzhu; WANG Yaxian; WANG Wanzhen; HU Biying; ZHOU Zongkui. Brain Correlates underlying Social Creative Thinking: EEG Alpha Activity in Trait vs. State Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 765-773.
[14] LV Jie; ZHANG Gang. The Mechanisms of Knowledge Heterogeneity on Creativity of Knowledge Teams: An Interactive Cognition Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 533-544.
[15] ZHANG Yong; LONG Lirong; HE Wei. The Effect of Pay for Performance on Radical Creativity and Incremental Creativity[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1880-1896.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech