Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2015, Vol. 47 Issue (1) : 39-49     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2015.00039
Impact of Reward/punishment Conditions on Behavioral Inhibition and Automatic Physiological Responses in the Stages
GU Li; BAI Xuejun; WANG Qin
(Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjing Normal University; Center of Cooperative Innovation for Assessment and Promotion of National Mental Health, Tianjing 300074, China)
Download: PDF(950 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Though the revised reinforcement sensitivity theory (RST) provides a biological interpretation for the relationship between emotions and behavioral inhibition aroused by reward/punishment, it is still somewhat limited when attempting to explain specific phenomena. This may be attributed to factors such as the type, degree, and duration of reward/punishment stimuli, which have differed across studies. For instance, in many studies reward/punishment is a within-subjects factor, however, in clinical situations a cumulative and constant reward/punishment model is more commonly encountered, such as persistent praise or criticism of a certain individual. Furthermore, the emotion triggered by cumulative reward/punishment could manifest at any stage of the task completing process. Accordingly, this research investigated the impact of cumulative reward/punishment conditions on inhibition and automatic physiological responses during different time stages. Forty-five college students were allocated to a reward group, punishment group, or control group at random. The experiment used the Super Lab system to present stimuli and record the response time and rate of error inhibition shown by the subjects during the stop-signal task. Automatic physiological responses were collected continuously throughout the whole procedure (preparatory stage, working stage, feedback stage and reward/punishment stage) by a 16-channel physiological recording system. The results showed that: (1) in the absence of the stop-signal task, the response time of the reward group and punishment group was significantly longer than that of control group, and during the stop-signal task, the error inhibition rate of the reward group and punishment group was significantly lower than that of control group. However, there were no difference between the reward group and punishment group; (2) Heart rates within the reward group were much higher than those in the punishment group and control group, and finger temperatures were much higher than those in the control group; however, skin conductance responses in the reward group weremuch lower than those in the punishment and control groups;(3) Compared with other stages, the variation of these physical signals was much lower at the feedback stage; (4) The three groups differed in heart rate, finger temperature, and finger pulse rate at all stages, but skin conductance responses did not show significant differences across the groups. The results reveal that behavioral arousal is not synchronized with physiological arousal during reward and punishment conditions. Both the reward and punishment conditions showed inhibition to the behavioral measures, but they showed significant differences in physical arousal.

Keywords reward      punishment      behavioral inhibition      stop signal task      automatic physiological responses     
Corresponding Authors: BAI Xuejun, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 26 January 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
GU Li; BAI Xuejun; WANG Qin. Impact of Reward/punishment Conditions on Behavioral Inhibition and Automatic Physiological Responses in the Stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2015, 47(1): 39-49.
URL:     OR
[1] HOU Lulu, CHEN Lirong, ZHOU Renlai. Altered reward processing in women with premenstrual syndrome: Evidence from ERPs and time-frequency analysis[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 742-757.
[2] LI Jin, SUN Yu, YANG Zilu, ZHONG Yiping. Social value orientation modulates the processing of social rewards for self: Evidence from ERPs study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 786-800.
[3] DONG Niannian, WANG Xueli. Where there's a will, there's a way: Intrinsic motivational orientation, idea quality, and idea implementation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 801-810.
[4] ZHANG Ruqian,LIU Jieqiong,LI Xianchun. Neural mechanisms of fairness formation in the perspective of social interactions[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1007-1017.
[5] YIN Xile,LI Jianbiao,CHEN Siyu,LIU Xiaoli,HAO Jie. Neural mechanisms of third-party punishment: Evidence from transcranial direct current stimulation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 571-583.
[6] YANG Ling,WANG Binqiang,GEN Yinfeng,YAO Dongwei,CAO Hua,ZHANG Jianxun,XU Qiongying. The influence of hypothetical and real money rewards on the risky decision-making of the abstinent heroin user[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 507-516.
[7] ZHANG Kuo,ZHAO Ying,WANG Jingxin, . Optimization and asymmetry effects of reward and punishment on control attention: Evidence from eye movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(11): 1207-1219.
[8] WANG Yanqing,CHEN Antao,HU Xueping,YIN Shouhang. Reward improves cognitive control by enhancing signal monitoring[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(1): 48-57.
[9] ZHANG Yan, CAO Huimin, ZHENG Yuanjie, REN Yanju.  Top-down goals modulate attentional orienting to and disengagement from rewarded distractors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 377-389.
[10] YANG Ruijuan, YOU Xuqun.  Advancing the Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: Economic rewards influence on teachers’ mental health[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(9): 1184-1194.
[11] LIU Yu; CHEN Hong; LI Shuhui; LUO Nian. Reducing unsuccessful restrained eaters’ unhealthy food choice: An internet-based inhibition control training[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(2): 219-227.
[12] CUI Liying, HE Xing, LUO Junlong, HUANG Xiaojiao, CAO Weijia, CHEN Xiaomei.  The effects of moral punishment and relationship punishment on junior middle school students’ cooperation behaviors in public goods dilemma[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(10): 1322-1333.
[13] ZENG Hong; SU Dequan; JIANG Xing; CHEN Qi; YE Haosheng. Activations of Sensory-motor Brain Regions in Response to Different Types of Drug-associated Cues[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 890-902.
[14] CHEN Sijing; HE Quan; MA Jianhong. The Influence of Third-party Punishment on Cooperation: An Explanation of Social Norm Activation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 389-405.
[15] XU Lei;WANG Lijun;ZHAO Yuanfang;TAN Jinfeng;CHEN Antao. Subliminal Reward Modulates the Tradeoff between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 459-466.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech