Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
|
Both the Property of Resource and Medium of Exchange Matter: What’s Fair for Goods is Unfair for Money
ZHONG Luojin1; FAN Meng2; CHEN Lin3; WANG Jing1; MO Lei1; ANG Chen1; LIN Junxian1; PANG Huiran1
(1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application / School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China) (2 School of Automation, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou 510006, China) (3 School of Chinese as A Second Language, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
Download: PDF(337 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

One fundamental problem of organized groups is how to distribute resources fairly. Fairness and equitable distribution can increase working enthusiasm of the organization’s members and make them feel worthy to finish their jobs. Previous research found that people do not feel allocating money equally is as fair as distributing specific goods evenly. Previous studies hold the opinion that this kind of result can be attributed to the fact that money as a medium of exchange is compared with other specific goods rather than other essential properties of money. Based on previous studies, another hypothesis put forward that the relevance of the allocated resource and salary (the property of resource) is another reason for less sense of fairness to distribute resources equally. In order to test the possibility, three experiments were carried out. Experiment 1 tested the possibility that the allocated resource money is more likely to be regarded as a part of salary, compared with specific goods. Experiment 2 was designed to test whether exchange value resulted in less sense of fairness to distribute resources equally when the allocated resource is money rather than specific goods. Experiment 3 examined both factors (the property of resource and medium of exchange) which may influence the fairness of distributing resource equally. The results of experiment 1 indicated that people are more likely to treat extra money as a part of salary than extra specific goods. The results of experiment 2 replicated the results of previous studies, suggesting that the differences in the perceived fairness of allocating different resources lie in the medium of exchange of resources. The results of experiment 3 demonstrated that the property of the resource and the exchange value affect the allocated fairness respectively. These three experiments of the present study provide support for the hypothesis that not only the property but also the relevance of the allocated resource and salary have a major impact on this important psychological phenomenon, sense of fairness. These findings suggest that egalitarian outcomes have a greater likelihood of being accepted as unfair, when the resources being distributed represent wages rather than welfare. This new discovery has important guiding significance for the organization to better allocate resources in the future.

Keywords money      distribution of resource      fairness      property of resource      medium of exchange     
Corresponding Authors: MO Lei, E-mail: molei@scnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 25 September 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHONG Luojin
FAN Meng
CHEN Lin
WANG Jing
MO Lei
ANG Chen
LIN Junxian
PANG Huiran
Cite this article:   
ZHONG Luojin,FAN Meng,CHEN Lin, et al. Both the Property of Resource and Medium of Exchange Matter: What’s Fair for Goods is Unfair for Money[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01392
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.01392     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2014/V46/I9/1392
[1] HU Xiaoyong; GUO Yongyu; LI Jing; YANG Shenlong. Perceived societal fairness and goal attainment: The differnet effects of social class and their mechanism[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(3): 271-289.
[2] LIANG Fucheng; WANG Xinyi; TANG Weihai. The Effect of Proposer’s Intention, Comparative Payoffs and Absolute Payoffs on the Fairness in Responders with Different Ages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 353-362.
[3] PAN Lu; QIAN Xiuying. Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risk-Preference in Dynamic Repeated Decision-Making[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1860-1870.
[4] WANG Yiwen; ZHANG Zhen; ZHANG Wei; HUANG Liang; GUO Fengbo; Yuan Sheng. Group Membership Modulates The Recipient’s Fairness Consideration in Ultimatum Game[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(12): 1850-1859.
[5] WU Yan,ZHOU Xiao-Lin. The Context-Dependency of Fairness Processing: Evidence from ERP Study[J]. , 2012, 44(6): 797-806.
[6] ZHU Li-Qi,HUANGFU Gang,Monika KELLER ,MOU Yi,CHEN Dan-Zhi. The Development of Chinese Children’s Decision Making in Ultimatum and Dictator Games[J]. , 2008, 40(04): 402-408.
[7] Fang Fuxi,Wang Wenzhong(Institute of Psychology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing,100012). THE DEVELOPMENT OF COGNITION ON FAIRNESS AND JUSTICE IN ALLOCATION OF REWARDS IN THE CHILDREN OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL[J]. , 1994, 26(04): 354-361.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech