Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
|
The Effect of Cognitive Distraction’s Intensity on the Process of Trauma-related Information: Evidence from ERP
DOU Weiwei;ZHENG Xifu;YANG Huifang;WANG Junfang;LI Yue;E Xiaotian;Chen Qianqian
(1 Center for Studies of Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China) (2 Guangzheng Preparatory School, Dongguan 523378, China) (3 Zhanjiang Normal University, Zhanjiang 524048, China)
Download: PDF(532 KB)   Review File (1 KB) 
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The visual-spatial resource competition theory suggests that the frequency of flashback could be reduced, when a visual task competes with trauma-related negative pictures for the limited space resources. However, the cognitive control theory hold the view that the central executive control system, as the core of the working memory system, compete with trauma-related negative images for the cognitive control ability. And this ability can be reflected by intense cognitive distraction tasks, indexed by N2 and the late positive potential (LPP) at the neural level. However, it is unclear how the intensity of cognitive distraction modulates the neural processing of the trauma-related information. The present event-related potentials (ERP) study used the traumatic film paradigm and improved working memory paradigm to investigate the effect of cognitive distraction’s intensity on the process of trauma-related information. Two parts consisted of the experiment: watching the traumatic film and completing working memory task. Before and after watching the traumatic film, 22 Participants completed PANAS, but the STAI scale was used only before the film. During the working memory task, participants were told to perform a task which requiring to memorize letters at the beginning. Each trial began with a two- or six-letter string presented on a black background for 5, 000 ms. Next, a white fixation cross appeared for 500~1, 000 ms, followed by a trauma-related picture or a unrelated neutral picture in random order for 2,000 ms. Then, the words ‘what were the letters?’ were presented on the screen. In the following, participants pressed the key of ‘Enter’ and typed the letters in the black empty screen in the order they had memorized them. Participants could use the backspace key to correct mistakes. The trial ended when participants pressed the enter key again when they finished typing letters. The trial interval varied randomly from 2,000 to 2,500 ms, during which a white fixation cross was presented on a black background. The EEG was recorded while the picture appeared. Participants then completed PANAS again after the working memory task. The results showed that: (1) the amplitudes of N2 to the high-load task were significantly larger than those of low-load task; (2) the amplitudes of LPP for trauma-related negative pictures were larger than trauma-related neutral and unrelated neutral pictures in the low-load task, whereas there were no significant differences among the three kinds of pictures in the high-load task; (3) for the trauma-related negative pictures, LPP activity was significantly greater to the high-load task than the low-load task. The results of the present study indicated that the cognitive distraction of the high-load task had a stronger modulation to trauma-related information. This provided support for the cognitive control theory.

Keywords cognitive distraction      Late positive potential (LPP)      DLPFC      N2      cognitive control     
Corresponding Authors: ZHENG Xifu   
Issue Date: 24 May 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
DOU Weiwei
ZHENG Xifu
YANG Huifang
WANG Junfang
LI Yue
E Xiaotian
Chen Qianqian
Cite this article:   
DOU Weiwei,ZHENG Xifu,YANG Huifang, et al. The Effect of Cognitive Distraction’s Intensity on the Process of Trauma-related Information: Evidence from ERP[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00656
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2014.00656     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2014/V46/I5/656
[1] CHENG Jiaping; LUO Yuejia; CUI Fang. Empathy for pain influenced by cognitive load: Evidence from an ERP study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 622-630.
[2] HU Cenlou; ZHANG Bao; HUANG Sai. Does irrelevant long-term memory representation guide the deployment of visual attention?[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(5): 590-601.
[3] ZHANG Bao; HU Cenlou; Huang Sai. What do eye movements reveal about the role of cognitive control in attention guidance from working memory representation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1105-1118.
[4] FAN Wei; ZHONG Yiping; YANG Zilu; LI Jin; OUYANG Yi. The degree of self-reference effect of extroversion individuals[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(8): 1002-1012.
[5] LIU Cong; JIAO Lu; SUN Xun; WANG Ruiming. Immediate effect of language switch on non-proficient bilinguals’ cognitive control components[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 472-481.
[6] WANG Jiaying; JIAO Runkai; ZHANG Ming. The mechanism of the effect of task setting on negative compatibility effect: The effect of top-down cognition control on subliminal prime processing[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1370-1378.
[7] HU Yanmei; ZHANG Ming. Electrophysiological evidence for memory-based attentional capture and memory-based attentional rejection effects[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(1): 12-21.
[8] LIU Xiaoyu; HE Chaodan; CHEN Jun; DENG Qinli. The Bilingual Cognitive Control Mechanism of Highly Proficient Cantonese-Mandarin Speakers: Evidence from A Dual-task Switching Paradigm[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 439-454.
[9] XU Lei;WANG Lijun;ZHAO Yuanfang;TAN Jinfeng;CHEN Antao. Subliminal Reward Modulates the Tradeoff between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(4): 459-466.
[10] ZHONG Yiping;FAN Wei;CAI Ronghua;TAN Qianbao;XIAO Lihui;ZHAN Youlong;LUO Xi;QIN Minhui. The Influence of Positive Emotion on the Degree Effect in Self-referential Processes: Evidence from ERPs[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(3): 341-352 .
[11] LIU Huanhuan;FAN Ning;SHEN Xiangying;JI Jiangye. Effect of Cognitive Flexibility on Language Switching in Non-proficient Bilinguals: An ERPs Study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(6): 636-648.
[12] WANG Zhenhong;LIU Ya;JIANG Changhao. The Effect of Low versus High Approach-Motivated Positive Affect on Cognitive Control[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(5): 546-555.
[13] YU Lixia;LING Xiao;JIANG Guangrong. Impulsivity in Non-Suicidal Self-Injurious Adolescents in China[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(3): 320-335.
[14] PENF Jiaxin;YANG Qiwei;LUO Yuejia. Selected Attentional Bias in Different Level of Trait Anxiety[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(10): 1085-1093.
[15] LIU Zhi-Fang,ZHANG Zhi-Jun,ZHAO Ya-Jun. The Units Saccade Targeting Based on and Words Procession Style in Chinese Reading: Evidences from Disappearing Text[J]. , 2011, 43(06): 608-618.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech