Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
How Power Influences Moral Judgement: The Effect of Situational Involvement
ZHENG Mufan;ZHAO Junhua
(Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
Download: PDF(368 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Previous studies found that when subjects were given a moral dilemma to resolve, high-power participants prefer Rule-based Judgment, while low-power participants prefer Outcome-based Judgement. Lammers and Stapel (2009)attributed this to the benefits attained or retained from the type of judgment, but they did not conduct further research to explain why power-holders felt their benefits were threatened. According to the Evolution of Moral Mechanisms (Krebs 2005), situational involvement connects the power-holders with the moral dilemma story, and compels them to choose the moral judgment that would be advantageous for themselves. Four studies were conducted to explore the relationship between a power-holders’ moral dilemma judgment and situational involvement. Experiment 1 used a disorder sentence task to prime power feelings, and the results showed that the factor of protagonist was not significant as a main effect (F(1,107)=0.38, p=0.54), nor did it interact significantly with the factor of power (F(1,107)=2.27, p=0.14), and no main effect of power (F(1,107)=0.07, p=0.79). In light of moral evolutionary perspectives, we speculate that participants may need more situational priming to elicit their feeling of power, so this paper strengthened the relationship between the moral event and self-experience, and made the priming task more situationalized in experiment 2. Therefore, the differences of moral judgment styles between high and low-power participants disappeared (t(58)=0.56, p=0.58). Furthermore, in experiment 3 and 4, the different situation exposure to moral events can bring different moral judgments among high power participants (t(60)=-4.30, p<0.001), even in natural power conditions without artificial power priming task before presenting moral events. In brief, situational involvement considerably influences the power holders’ moral judgments. When the power holders were presented with a moral dilemma event in which they had personally experienced it, they would shift their moral judgment style from rule-based to outcome-based, which demonstrates that moral judgment is a biological adaptive strategy to a person’s environment.

Keywords power      moral judgements      situational involvement      rule-based      outcome-based     
Corresponding Authors: ZHAO Junhua   
Issue Date: 25 November 2013
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
ZHAO Junhua
Cite this article:   
ZHENG Mufan,ZHAO Junhua. How Power Influences Moral Judgement: The Effect of Situational Involvement[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01274
URL:     OR
[1] . The effects of power on human behavior: The perspective of regulatory focus[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 404-415.
[2] JIN Fei; ZHU Huawei. Consumers’ power states and impulsive buying[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 880-890.
[3] ZHENG Xiaoming; LIU Xin. The effect of interactional justice on employee well-being: The mediating role of psychological empowerment and the moderating role of power distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(6): 693-709.
[4] LU Xinxin; SUN Jiaqing. When leader-member exchange increases emotional exhaustion? The role of belief in reciprocity and power distance orientation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(5): 566-577.
[5] CHEN Huan; BI Sheng; PANG Jun. The effect of power on consumers’ nostalgia preferences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(12): 1589-1599.
[6] RONG Yan; SUI Yang; YANG Baiyin. The Effect of Leader Emotional Intelligence on Group Performance and #br# Employee Attitude: Mediating Effect of Justice Climate and Moderating Effect of Group Power Distance[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1152-1161.
[7] KONG Ming, QIAN Xiaojun. Mr. Right & Superman: Effect of Implicit Followership on Employee’s Behaviors[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(9): 1162-1171.
[8] YANG Huilan; HE Xiayou; ZHAO Xueru; ZHANG Wei. Multiple Metaphorical Representations of Power: Evidence from Size and Color[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 939-949.
[9] TANG Peipei; YE Haosheng; DU Jianzheng. The Spatial Size Metaphor of Power Concepts: A Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(4): 514-521.
[10] TONG Luqiong. The Influence of Power State on the Consumers’ Preference for Consumption Boundaries[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1371-1378.
[11] LIANG Jian. Ethical Leadership and Employee Voice: Examining a Moderated-Mediation Model[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(2): 252-264.
[12] DUAN Jinyun;Huang Caiyun. The Mechanism of Employee’s Sense of Power on Speaking-up: A Power Cognition Perspective[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(2): 217-230.
[13] RU Taotao;MO Lei;Zhang Ting;JIAO Honghao;HUANG Yulan. The Construction of Verbal Label and Response Label in Rule-Based Category Learning[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2013, 45(12): 1334-1344.
[14] LI Xiao-Ping,YANG Sheng-Yu, LI Meng-Yao. The Effects of Authoritarian Personality and Power on Moral Thinking[J]. , 2012, 44(7): 964-971.
[15] YIN Jun;WANG Hui;HUANG Ming-Peng. Empowering Leadership Behavior and Perceived Insider Status: The Moderating Role of Organization-based Self-esteem[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2012, 44(10): 1371-1382.
Full text



Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech