Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica
|
From Understanding to Utilizing: Theory of Mind and Children’s Distributive Justice in Different Contexts
WANG Si;SU Yanjie
(Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
Download: PDF(356 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Distributive justice is the core content of children’s moral development. Its development describes a child’s progressive understanding and application of what constitutes fairness during resource distribution. Previous work has suggested that younger children often allocate rewards in a self-interest centered manner as a result of limited cognitive abilities. However, recent studies have indicated that 3- to 5-year-old children could perform fair distribution, even infants hold the expectation of resource allocation according to one's effort. Incidentally, the dual-process theory emphasized that there are two different underlying processes of children’s distributive justice: the automatic emotional process and the controlled cognitive process. Given that children should first attribute others’ beliefs and intents, and hereafter take account of each person’s contributions through understanding and making use of high-level distributive justice principles, Theory of Mind (ToM) may participate an important role during this procedure. Based on current understandings, in order to get a clear overview of distributive justice development and its underlying mechanisms, this study aims in investigating how children’s Theory of Mind affect the two aspects of distributive justice (distributive justice judgment and distributive justice behavior) in the involved and uninvolved contexts. Experiment 1 focused on the relationship between Theory of Mind and children’s distributive justice judgment in two different contexts (involved and uninvolved). 61 preschool participants aged from 4- to 5- participated in the Giving Game and 40 adult participants completed the Giving Game Context Questionnaire. The results from the uninvolved context indicated that judgments made by children who passed the Theory of Mind tasks were similar to the judgments by the adults’, and both Theory of Mind and uninvolved context promoted children’s distributive justice judgment. Experiment 2 explored the question of how Theory of Mind affected children’s resource distributing behavior using distributive justice principles. This study compared the influence of Theory of Mind of 61 4- to 5-year-old children’s distributive justice behavior in the involved context, with the impact under uninvolved context. The results showed that there was an interaction between Theory of Mind and the involvement of distribution context. Under involved context, children who passed Theory of Mind tasks performed much more fairly than the children who didn't pass; whereas in uninvolved context there were no group differences. Together, these two experiments associated a link of how children would understand distributive justice principles, and how they could use in allocating resources. On the basis of the whole structure, Theory of Mind may have stable and context-sensitive impact on children’s distributive justice. This brought support to the dual-process theory, where automatic emotional process is dominant under involved context, while controlled cognitive process is guiding the uninvolved context. These results provided enriched evidence for current researches and brought new perspectives for future studies. Meanwhile, we can improve children’s development of distributive justice by strengthening their Theory of Mind abilities over training, which is valuable for educational purposes.

Keywords children      distributive justice      theory of mind      involvement     
Corresponding Authors: SU Yanjie   
Issue Date: 25 November 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Si
SU Yanjie
Cite this article:   
WANG Si,SU Yanjie. From Understanding to Utilizing: Theory of Mind and Children’s Distributive Justice in Different Contexts[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01242
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01242     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2013/V45/I11/1242
[1] ZHANG Shuwei.  Social justice, institutional trust and public cooperation intention[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(6): 794-813.
[2] LIANG Feifei; WANG Yongsheng; YANG Wen; BAI Xuejun. The modulation of reading level on the development of children’s eye movement characteristics: Evidence from 9- to 11-year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(4): 450-459.
[3] GUO Haiying; CHEN Lihua; YE Zhi; PAN Jin; LIN Danhua. Characteristics of peer victimization and the bidirectional relationship between peer victimization and internalizing problems among rural-to-urban migrant children in China: A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2017, 49(3): 336-348.
[4] HU Qingfen; LU Jing. The combination of self-position and self-orientation in children’s map task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(9): 1143-1150.
[5] ZHANG Lijin; BI Yuan; LIANG Yi; LIU Minhong. Early screening and dynamic intervention of children with insufficient number sense[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(7): 804-817.
[6] ZHAO Ying; CHENG Yahua; WU Xinchun; NGUYEN Thi Phuong. The reciprocal relationship between morphological awareness and vocabulary knowledge among Chinese children: A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(11): 1434-1444.
[7] LI Liping; WU Xinchun; ZHOU Ningning; CHENG Yahua; NGUYEN Thi Phuong. The cognitive characteristics and influential factors of Chinese word callers in primary school[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2016, 48(10): 1270-1281.
[8] WANG Yuqing; YOU Xuqun; JIAO Jian; CHEN Pengfei. Perspective Taking: Making Inferences Based on Oneself and Related Individual Differences[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(8): 1039-1049.
[9] LI Yanfang; LIU Lijun; LV Ying; LUO Fang; WANG Yun. The Influence of Parent-child Relationship and Teacher-child Relational #br# Climate on Rural Migrant Children’s Early Behavior Problems[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(7): 914-927.
[10] WANG Fuxing; LI Wenjing; YAN Zhiqiang; DUAN Zhaohui; LI Hui. Children’s Attention Detection to Snakes: Evidence from Eye Movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(6): 774-786.
[11] YAN Guoli; LIU Nina; LIANG Feifei; LIU Zhifang; BAI Xuejun. The Comparison of Eye Movements between Chinese Children and Adults When Reading Disappearing Text[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(3): 300-318.
[12] LU Jing; HU Qingfen. The Development of Self-Position Representation and Self-Orientation Representation in Children’s Map Task[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(2): 234-242.
[13] LIU Wen; ZHU Lin; ZHANG Xue; ZHANG Yu; LIU Ying. Equity Sensitivity of 2~3 Years Old Children in Distribution Condition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1341-1348.
[14] SUN Yawen; HE Wen; LUO Junlong. Meta-Stereotype Threat Effects on Working Memory Among Migrant Children: Mediating Effects of Intergroup Anxiety[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2015, 47(11): 1349-1359.
[15] ZHANG Lijin;ZHANG Zhenfeng. The Contribution of Dynamic Assessment to Screening Children with Mathematics Learning Disabilities[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2014, 46(8): 1112-1123.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech