Please wait a minute...
Acta Psychologica Sinica    2013, Vol. 45 Issue (11) : 1242-1250     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01242
|
From Understanding to Utilizing: Theory of Mind and Children’s Distributive Justice in Different Contexts
WANG Si;SU Yanjie
(Department of Psychology, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
Download: PDF(356 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Distributive justice is the core content of children’s moral development. Its development describes a child’s progressive understanding and application of what constitutes fairness during resource distribution. Previous work has suggested that younger children often allocate rewards in a self-interest centered manner as a result of limited cognitive abilities. However, recent studies have indicated that 3- to 5-year-old children could perform fair distribution, even infants hold the expectation of resource allocation according to one's effort. Incidentally, the dual-process theory emphasized that there are two different underlying processes of children’s distributive justice: the automatic emotional process and the controlled cognitive process. Given that children should first attribute others’ beliefs and intents, and hereafter take account of each person’s contributions through understanding and making use of high-level distributive justice principles, Theory of Mind (ToM) may participate an important role during this procedure. Based on current understandings, in order to get a clear overview of distributive justice development and its underlying mechanisms, this study aims in investigating how children’s Theory of Mind affect the two aspects of distributive justice (distributive justice judgment and distributive justice behavior) in the involved and uninvolved contexts. Experiment 1 focused on the relationship between Theory of Mind and children’s distributive justice judgment in two different contexts (involved and uninvolved). 61 preschool participants aged from 4- to 5- participated in the Giving Game and 40 adult participants completed the Giving Game Context Questionnaire. The results from the uninvolved context indicated that judgments made by children who passed the Theory of Mind tasks were similar to the judgments by the adults’, and both Theory of Mind and uninvolved context promoted children’s distributive justice judgment. Experiment 2 explored the question of how Theory of Mind affected children’s resource distributing behavior using distributive justice principles. This study compared the influence of Theory of Mind of 61 4- to 5-year-old children’s distributive justice behavior in the involved context, with the impact under uninvolved context. The results showed that there was an interaction between Theory of Mind and the involvement of distribution context. Under involved context, children who passed Theory of Mind tasks performed much more fairly than the children who didn't pass; whereas in uninvolved context there were no group differences. Together, these two experiments associated a link of how children would understand distributive justice principles, and how they could use in allocating resources. On the basis of the whole structure, Theory of Mind may have stable and context-sensitive impact on children’s distributive justice. This brought support to the dual-process theory, where automatic emotional process is dominant under involved context, while controlled cognitive process is guiding the uninvolved context. These results provided enriched evidence for current researches and brought new perspectives for future studies. Meanwhile, we can improve children’s development of distributive justice by strengthening their Theory of Mind abilities over training, which is valuable for educational purposes.

Keywords children      distributive justice      theory of mind      involvement     
Corresponding Authors: SU Yanjie   
Issue Date: 25 November 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Cite this article:   
WANG Si;SU Yanjie. From Understanding to Utilizing: Theory of Mind and Children’s Distributive Justice in Different Contexts[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica,2013, 45(11): 1242-1250.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2013.01242     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlxb/EN/Y2013/V45/I11/1242
[1] YANG Wanqing, XIAO Rong, LIANG Dandan. Lexical tone perception mechanism in 2- to 4-year-old Mandarin-speaking children in the pre-attention stage[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(6): 730-741.
[2] YAO Yao,CHEN Xiaoxiang. The effects of music training on categorical perception of Mandarin tones in 4- to 5-year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 456-468.
[3] ZHAO Xin,LI Hongli,JIN Ge,LI Shifeng,ZHOU Aibao,LIANG Wenjia,GUO Hongxia,CAI Yaya. Effects of phonological memory and central executive function on decoding, language comprehension of children in different grades[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(4): 469-484.
[4] HE Xiaoling,CHEN Jun. Cognitive development of multiple metaphors of power concepts in 3~5 year-old children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2020, 52(2): 149-161.
[5] JIN Xinyi,ZHOU Bingxin,MENG Fei. Level 2 visual perspective-taking at age 3 and the corresponding effect of cooperation[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(9): 1028-1039.
[6] ZOU Shengqi,WU Xinchun,HUANG Binbin,LIU Chang. Maternal gatekeeping behavior, mother involvement and mother-adolescent attachment, and differences in their developmental stages[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(7): 816-828.
[7] HUANG Liang,YANG Xue,HUANG Zhihua,WANG Yiwen. Brain spatio-temporal dynamics of understanding kind versus hostile intentions based on dyadic body movements[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(5): 557-570.
[8] HUANG Xiaoxiao,ZHANG Baoshan,ZHANG Yuan,MA Yuting. Effects of meta-stereotype on aggressive behavior among migrant children and the mediating effect of frustration[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(4): 484-496.
[9] LI Quan,SONG Yanan,LIAN Bin,FENG Tingyong. Mindfulness training can improve 3-and 4-year-old children’s attention and executive function[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2019, 51(3): 324-336.
[10] Mingliang ZHANG, Jiwei SI, Weixing YANG, Shufen XING, Hongxia LI, Jiajia ZHANG. Interaction effects between BDNF gene rs6265 polymorphism and parent-involved education on basic mathematical ability in primary school children[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1007-1017.
[11] Dongjie XIE, Hao LU, Yanjie SU. Pay-forward effect of resource allocation in preschoolers: Role of theory of mind and empathy[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1018-1028.
[12] Xinghua FAN, Xiaoyi FANG, Yuesheng HUANG, Fengju CHEN, Si YU. The influence mechanism of parental care on depression among left-behind rural children in China: A longitudinal study[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(9): 1029-1040.
[13] Xiangdong JIN,Guangling ZHANG,Jing CAO,Chuanhua GU,Hua WEI,Zhaohui DUAN, . Spillover effects of strong brands competition[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(6): 678-692.
[14] CHENG Yahua, WANG Jian, WU Xinchun.  The role of morphological awareness in Chinese children’s reading comprehension: The mediating effect of word reading fluency[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 413-425.
[15] ZHANG Yong, LIU Haiquan, WANG Mingxuan, QING Ping.  The impact of challenge stress and hindrance stress on employee creativity: The mediating role of self-efficacy and the moderating role of justice[J]. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 2018, 50(4): 450-461.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Acta Psychologica Sinica
Support by Beijing Magtech